Cited by 242Stress Responses and CortisolMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Hippocampal gene expression changes underlying stress sensitization and recovery

Open access
Gray, J D, Rubin, T G, Hunter, R G, McEwen, B S·2014·Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract

Chronic and acute stressors have been linked to changes in hippocampal function and anxiety-like behaviors. Both produce changes in gene expression, but the extent to which these changes endure beyond the end of stress remains poorly understood. As an essential first step to characterize abnormal patterns of gene expression after stress, this study demonstrates how chronic restraint stress (CRS) modulates gene expression in response to a novel stressor in the hippocampus of wild-type mice and the extent to which these changes last beyond the end of CRS. Male C57/bl6 mice were subjected to (1) a forced swim test (FST), (2) corticosterone (Cort) or vehicle injections, (3) CRS for 21 days and then a FST, or (4) allowed to recover 21 days after CRS and subjected to FST. Hippocampal mRNA was extracted and used to generate cDNA libraries for microarray hybridization. Naive acute stressors (FST and vehicle injection) altered similar sets of genes, but Cort treatment produced a profile that was distinct from both FST and vehicle. Exposure to a novel stress after CRS activated substantially more and different genes than naive exposure. Most genes increased by CRS were decreased after recovery but many remained altered and did not return to baseline. Pathway analysis identified significant clusters of differentially expressed genes across conditions, most notably the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of B cells (NF-κB) pathway. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) validated changes from the microarrays in known stress-induced genes and confirmed alterations in the NF-κB pathway genes, Nfkbia, RelA and Nfkb1. FST increased anxiety-like behavior in both the naive and recovery from CRS conditions, but not in mice 24h subsequent to their CRS exposure. These findings suggest that the effects of naive stress are distinct from Cort elevation, and that a history of stress exposure can permanently alter gene expression patterns in the hippocampus and the behavioral response to a novel stressor. These findings establish a baseline profile of normal recovery and adaptation to stress. Importantly, they will serve as a conceptual basis to facilitate the future study of the cellular and regional basis of gene expression changes that lead to impaired recovery from stress, such as those that occur in mood and anxiety disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mp.2013.175

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adverse experiences and environments cause problems over the life course in which there is no such thing as reversibility but rather a change in trajectory.

    “Adverse experiences and environments cause problems over the life course in which there is no such thing as “reversibility” (i.e., “rolling the clock back”) but rather a change in trajectory”

    From Neurobiological and Systemic Effects of Chronic Stress (2017) · cites this paper as [10]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gray, J. D., Rubin, T. G., Hunter, R. G., & McEwen, B. S.
Affiliations
  • Rockefeller University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Corresponding author
McEwen, B S
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2013-12-17
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
1171-1178
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W2164012002
Cited by
242
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-41256, R37MH041256, R01MH041256)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
hippocampal gene expression, chronic restraint stress, stress recovery, anxiety-like behavior, forced swim test, corticosterone, NF-κB signaling, NFKBIA, RelA, NFKB1, stress adaptation, stress sensitization, mood and anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
NF-KappaB Inhibitor alpha, Acute Disease, Animals, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Corticosterone, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychotropic Drugs, Restraint, Physical, RNA, Messenger, Stress, Psychological, Swimming, Gene Expression, I-kappa B Proteins, Transcription Factor RelA, NF-kappa B p50 Subunit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review