The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 27 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others
Open accessAbstract
The neural processes underlying empathy are a subject of intense interest within the social neurosciences. However, very little is known about how brain empathic responses are modulated by the affective link between individuals. We show here that empathic responses are modulated by learned preferences, a result consistent with economic models of social preferences. We engaged male and female volunteers in an economic game, in which two confederates played fairly or unfairly, and then measured brain activity with functional magnetic resonance imaging while these same volunteers observed the confederates receiving pain. Both sexes exhibited empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas (fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices) towards fair players. However, these empathy-related responses were significantly reduced in males when observing an unfair person receiving pain. This effect was accompanied by increased activation in reward-related areas, correlated with an expressed desire for revenge. We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Empathic brain responses to another person’s pain are shaped by perceived fairness: participants showed pain-related empathy in fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices toward fair players, but men showed reduced empathic responses and increased reward-related activity when an unfair player received pain. The authors conclude that, at least in men, empathy is modulated by social valuation, with unfair opponents’ pain potentially linked to reward and revenge.
Key findings
- After a sequential Prisoner’s Dilemma game, both male and female subjects rated the fair player as significantly more fair, agreeable, likeable, and attractive than the unfair player (scale range 2 to 22; P < 0.001).
- Both sexes showed empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas, including bilateral anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, when observing a fair player in pain; ACC activation was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P < 0.001 uncorrected, P < 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P = 0.001 uncorrected).
- Men showed significantly enhanced bilateral fronto-insular activation when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain, whereas women showed no significant difference in empathy-related pain regions for fair versus unfair players.
- In men, but not women, observing an unfair player receiving pain increased activation in left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens and left orbito-frontal cortex; men also expressed a stronger desire for revenge than women (t(30) = 2.40, P < 0.05), and men with stronger revenge desire showed greater nucleus accumbens activation for unfair versus fair player pain.
Methods
- Subjects were 16 men and 16 women; four professional actors (two female, two male) served as confederates. Subjects played a sequential iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma game in which confederates reciprocated fairly or unfairly, inducing liking or disliking.
- In an empathy-for-pain fMRI task, subjects observed cues indicating that they, the fair player, or the unfair player would receive low or high electrical stimulation; each 12-s trial included a cue followed after 6 s by a circle indicating stimulation onset.
- fMRI data were acquired on a 1.5-T Siemens Sonata scanner and analyzed in SPM2 using an event-related model with a 2 × 3 × 2 factorial design (pain vs no pain; self, fair, unfair; male vs female subject), random-effects group analyses, conjunction/masking, and regression analyses; results are reported at P < 0.005 uncorrected in a priori regions of interest.
Limitations
- The paper states that further experiments are needed to confirm the gender specificity of the effect.
- The paper notes that the experimental design may have favoured men because the punishment modality involved physical threat rather than psychological or financial threat; alternatively, the findings could indicate a predominant role for males in maintaining justice and punishing norm violation.
- Evident from the text: the sample was small (32 subjects), several key results are reported at uncorrected thresholds within a priori regions of interest, and the gender analysis is binary and based on male/female subject groups.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 27 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In women this reduction in activity was very small, whereas in men the knowledge that an unfair player was in receipt of pain elicited no increase in empathic activity in FI.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And indeed, formal analysis revealed no significant difference for women when comparing painful trials for fair versus unfair players in empathy-related pain regions.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, men showed significantly enhanced activation in bilateral FI when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain (Supplementary Tables 8 and 11).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, we observed pain-related empathic responses in both genders in bilateral AI extending into FI and brainstem when seeing an unfamiliar but likeable person in pain (Fig. 2a, b).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Furthermore, we extended previous findings10 by showing that men, as well as women, who scored higher on standard empathy scales22 had higher empathy-related brain activity in ACC and AI/FI (Supplementary Fig. 2).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The comparison of brain activity associated with painful and non-painful trials in the ‘self’ condition for men and women revealed an expected increase in the ‘pain network’, including activity in AI and ACC (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 8
- Probably not a substantial claim. 11
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The activation in ACC was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P , 0.001 uncorrected, P , 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but was borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P 1/4 0.001 uncorrected; Supplementary Tables 4 and 5; coordinates refer to the peak of activations in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consistent with this finding, supplementary analysis showed that women but not men displayed significant activation in bilateral AI/FI and ACC in all three conditions (Supplementary Tables 7 and 10).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The perception–action model of empathy states that the observation or imagination of another person in a particular emotional state automatically activates a representation of that state in the observer1.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These results suggest that our ability to empathize relies on neuronal systems that underpin our own bodily and emotional states1,2,10,13.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Gallese, V., Keysers, C. & Rizzolatti, G. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 396–403 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Craig, A. D. Human feelings: why are some more aware than others? Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 239–241 (2004) source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the two confederates were always of the same sex, all four possible gender combinations between the sex of the subject and the sex of the confederates were used equally often throughout the study.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Empathy for pain model
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These theories4,7 suggest that people value the gains of others positively if they are perceived to behave fairly, but value others' gains negatively if they behave unfairly.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Rabin, M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 83, 1281–1302 (1993)
- Not checked yetcites [7] Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114, 817–868 (1999) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After scanning, subjects completed a standard empathy scale22 and were asked to rate the intensity of the low and high stimulation, their liking for the two confederates, and their desire for revenge on the two confederates (see Fig. 1b, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Post-scan questionnaires
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This pattern of preferences implies that people like cooperating with fair opponents but also like punishing unfair opponents.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, studies on empathy for pain have found that the activation observed in anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex (AI/FI) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) to pain in oneself is also seen when observing pain in someone else10,12.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown in Fig. 1c, cues (coloured arrows) were presented in random order indicating whether she/he (self condition), the fair player (fair condition) or the unfair player (unfair condition) would get low stimulation (no pain condition) or high stimulation (pain condition).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has been shown that people reward others for cooperative behaviour but punish violations of social fairness even at a personal cost15,16, an effect likely to be mediated by neural mechanisms that provide intrinsic motivation (that is, satisfaction) from punishing violators21.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Fehr, E. & Gachter, S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791 (2003) source
- Not checked yetcites [21] de Quervain, D. J. et al. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305, 1254–1258 (2004) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent imaging studies provide evidence for common activation elicited when experiencing disgust8, touch9 or pain10-12 in oneself, and when perceiving the same feelings in others.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Wicker, B. et al. Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40, 655–664 (2003) source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Keysers, C. et al. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 42, 335–346 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N. & Decety, J. How do we perceive the pain of others: A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage 3, 771–779 (2005) source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report results at P < 0.005 uncorrected for multiple comparisons in the a priori regions of interest.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Image acquisition and analysis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our findings indicate that cooperation nourishes this link, but selfish behaviour that is detrimental to others effectively compromises this link (at least with males), such that empathic responses in the brain are diminished or abolished.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These findings are consistent with the different functions associated with distinct regions of the striatum: afferent projections to dorsal striatum are thought to be crucial for learning correct actions so as to maximize reward, whereas projections to ventral striatum, including nucleus accumbens, have a key function in reward prediction and pavlovian learning18-20,23,24.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Cardinal, R. N., Parkinson, J. A., Hall, J. & Everitt, B. J. Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26, 321–352 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [19] O'Doherty, J. et al. Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science 304, 452–454 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [20] Schultz, W. Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 1, 199–207 (2000) source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Dayan, P. & Balleine, B. W. Reward, motivation, and reinforcement learning. Neuron 36, 285–298 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Montague, P. R., Hyman, S. E. & Cohen, J. D. Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control. Nature 431, 760–767 (2004) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The position (left or right) of the actor (fair or unfair) was counterbalanced across subjects.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Empathy for pain model
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The modulation of empathic neural responses by the social relations between individuals is unknown.
“However, it is unclear whether or how these responses are modulated by the social relations between individuals.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms”
From Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness (2013) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While it is not clear to what extent early interoceptive signals are prone to modulation, it has been shown that all parts of insula (posterior, mid and anterior) as well as cACC may be regulated by top-down systems during processing of bottom-up interoceptive input (Atlas and Wager, 2014) and processing of top-down induced activation in the interoceptive stream (Singer et al., 2006; Rutgen et al.”
From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“That is, in male participants, ventral striatum activity increases when passively seeing partner, who has previously acted unfairly, incur pain 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“In certain conditions, ventral striatum activity appears related to seeing others receive a deserved misfortune.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“The striatum displays signals that are related to making a decision to punish someone for acting unfairly 96, 97, as well as related to observing a punishment meted out to someone who has acted unfairly 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the level of ventral striatum activation is related to male participants’ desire for revenge against the unfair partner98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“As gender differences in social emotions were observed in previous neuroscientific research (e.g.Singer et al., 2006), we decided to control for possible gender effects by restricting our sample to female participants only.”
From Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training (2014) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Self-citationAltruistic punishment in humans
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415137a · Cited by 5,616 · cited 3×
“Increased pain-related activation (asterisk indicates whole-brain corrected) for women in ACC* [9, 18, 27], left FI* [242, 15,23], right FI* [30, 18,218], left SII* [260,230, 18], right SII* [63,230, 24] and brainstem* [3,218,218]; for men in left FI* [233, 33, 3] right FI [42, 33, 3] and brainstem [3,233,230].”
BackgroundTrust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,712
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
Rabin, M. (2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15 · Cited by 4,614
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126
Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093535 · Cited by 3,929
Self-citationSpatial registration and normalization of images
Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Frith, C., Poline, J.-B., Heather, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030303 · Cited by 3,744
Self-citationBehavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction
Camerer, C. F. (2003) · Cited by 3,722
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 999
Neural Coding of Cooperative vs. Affective Human Interactions: 150 ms to Code the Action's Purpose
Proverbio, A. M., Riva, F., Paganelli, L., Cappa, S. F., Canessa, N., Perani, D., & Zani, A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022026 · Cited by 50
“The gender difference in the comprehension of the actions’ purpose also fits with previous evidence of a greater empathic attitude in females [12,41,74–76].”
ResultIntergroup relationships do not reduce racial bias in empathic neural responses to pain
Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Hielscher, E., Sherwell, C. S., Rens, N., & Cunnington, R. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.045 · Cited by 48
“The overall empathic response to pain can be modulated by a number of cognitive (Gu and Han, 2007; Fan and Han, 2008), affective (Singer et al., 2006; Cheng et al., 2010) and social factors (Akitsuki and Decety, 2009; Decety et al., 2010a; Hein et al., 2010; Cheon et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2012).”
BackgroundPerceived similarity and neural mirroring: Evidence from vicarious error processing
Carp, J., Halenar, M. J., Quandt, L. C., Sklar, A. L., & Compton, R. J. (2008) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910802083167 · Cited by 48
“, 2001; Sande, Goethals, & Radloff, 1988), and experience the other’s putative pain as if it were their own (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundYildirim, B. O., & Derksen, J. J. L. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.08.016 · Cited by 54
“For example, Singer et al. (2006) investigated whether perceived fairness of others modulates subsequent empathy-related neural”
BackgroundSmith, R. S., Steklis, H. D., Steklis, N. G., Weihs, K. L., & Lane, R. D. (2020) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107925 · Cited by 47
Comment: Towards a More Ecologically Valid Assessment of Empathy
Dziobek, I. (2012) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911421390 · Cited by 49
“…picture or video stimuli of others’ body parts or faces (see Fan, Duncan, de Greck, & Northoff, 2011, for a review), research involving the imagination of another person’s pain involved interactive charcteristics but lacked real-life audiovisual stimuli (for an exception, see Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundWuying, C. H. E. N., Lu, J., Liu, L., & Wenyi, L. I. N. (2014) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2014.01423 · Cited by 51
Empathic neural responses to others’ pain depend on monetary reward
Guo, X., Zheng, L., Zhang, W., Zhu, L., Li, J., Wang, Q., Dienes, Z. P., & Yang, Z. (2011) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsr034 · Cited by 46
“Recent brain imaging studies demonstrated that human empathy for pain was modulated by social factors, such as the affective link between individuals (Singer et al., 2006), the intentionality of the perceived agency who induced the pain (Decety et al.”
BackgroundOsumi, T., Nakao, T., Kasuya, Y., Shinoda, J., Yamada, J., & Ohira, H. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.05.012 · Cited by 47
Causes and Consequences of Children's Forgiveness
van der Wal, R. C., Karremans, J. C., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2016) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12216 · Cited by 49
“This may not only feel good—anticipating taking revenge activates reward areas in the brain (28)—but the tendency to retaliate after being offended may also be functional, allowing children to communicate their boundaries and possibly lower the risk of subsequent exploitation (18).”
BackgroundA neuroendocrine account of facial mimicry and its dynamic modulation
Kraaijenvanger, E. J., Hofman, D., & Bos, P. A. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.006 · Cited by 50
“neural activity in the anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex (Corradi-Dell’Acqua et al., 2013; Singer et al., 2006), can function as motivational factor driving the decision to cooperate or not.”
Singer, T., & Tusche, A. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-416008-8.00027-9 · Cited by 51
Self-citationThe Positive (and Negative) Psychology of Empathy
Grynberg, D., & Konrath, S. (2013) · Digital Access to Libraries · Cited by 45
Responsibility modulates pain-matrix activation elicited by the expressions of others in pain
Cui, F., Abdelgabar, A. R., Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.034 · Cited by 45
“…stimuli are more realistic (Gu and Han, 2007), when the observer is socially closer to the pain-taker (Cheng et al., 2010), belongs to the same group or race (Avenanti et al., 2010; Azevedo et al., 2013; Hein et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2009) or considers the pain-taker fair (Singer et al., 2006).”
InfluentialThe mirror neuron system: How cognitive functions emerge from motor organization
Fogassi, L. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.04.009 · Cited by 45
“In a second, similar experiment (Singer et al. 2006), both females and males were scanned while they observed another individual who received painful stimuli.”
BackgroundGao, X., Pan, W., Li, C., Weng, L., Yao, M., & Chen, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00650 · Cited by 44
“Usually, empathy refers to the capacity to understand and share the emotional and affective states of another person in relation to oneself (Decety and Jackson, 2004; Singer et al., 2006; Hein and Singer, 2008; Guo et al., 2012, 2013).”
BackgroundVerplaetse, J., Schrijver, J. D., Vanneste, S., & Braeckman, J. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6287-2 · Cited by 49
“, 2006), and activity in reward-related brain regions is evoked by interpersonal reciprocal exchanges (de Quervain et al., 2004; Rilling et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006)”
BackgroundNeuroeconomics: a view from neuroscience.
Montague, P. R. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 44
Pinker, S. A. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/478309a · Cited by 45
Not Only the Miserable Receive Help: Empathy Promotes Prosocial Behaviour Toward the Happy
Telle, N.-T., & Pfister, H.-R. (2012) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-012-9157-y · Cited by 48
“Rather, elicited feelings of empathy might vary in strength and duration, depending on the appraisal and integration of information perceived during social interaction (Hein and Singer 2008; Singer et al. 2006).”
BackgroundEnfacing others but only if they are nice to you
Bufalari, I., Lenggenhager, B., Porciello, G., Holmes, B. S., & Aglioti, S. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00102 · Cited by 49
Forking Cinematic Paths to the Self: Neurocinematically Informed Model of Empathy in Motion Pictures
Raz, G., & Hendler, T. (2014) · Projections · doi:10.3167/proj.2014.080206 · Cited by 44
From actions to empathy and morality – A neural perspective
Molnar-Szakacs, I. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.019 · Cited by 45
“In an elegant demonstration of the interplay of emotional and cognitive empathy, Singer et al. (2006), had participants in a neuroimaging study observe others receiving painful stimulation, and found empathy-related brain activation within the fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices – a…”
BackgroundInfluentialWagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2006) · Cited by 44
Increased Insular Connectivity and Enhanced Empathic Ability Associated with Dance/Music Training
Li, G., He, H., Xin, L., Lirong, Z., Yao, Y., Guofeng, Y., Lu, J., Shulin, Z., Lei, Y., Luo, C., et al. (2019) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2019/9693109 · Cited by 51
“The robust evidence has indicated the empathy-related activations in salience and sensorimotor functional regions, including AI, ACC, and primary sensorimotor cortex [30, 72].”
BackgroundGender differences in cortical morphological networks
Nebli, A., & Rekik, I. (2019) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-019-00123-6 · Cited by 44
Concern for Others Leads to Vicarious Optimism
Kappes, A., Faber, N. S., Kahane, G., Savulescu, J., & Crockett, M. J. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617737129 · Cited by 45
“We further predicted that increasing concern for others would increase vicarious optimism just as it increases vicarious emotional responses to negative outcomes for others (Hein et al., 2010; Mathur, Richeson, Paice, Muzyka, & Chiao, 2014; Singer et al., 2006).”
Embodied self-other overlap in romantic love: a review and integrative perspective
Quintard, V., Jouffe, S., Hommel, B., & Bouquet, C. A. (2020) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01301-8 · Cited by 49
“Embodied approach to self‑other overlap and romantic love Theories of embodiment postulate that representational codes that are specific to the body, including sensorimotor, somatosensory, and visceral codes, play an important role in human cognition and may even account for language comprehension and abstract, concep…”
BackgroundInfluentialEmpathy and Morality: Integrating Social and Neuroscience Approaches
Jean Decety, A., & Batson, C. D. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6287-2_5 · Cited by 42
Müller‐Pinzler, L., Rademacher, L., Paulus, F. M., & Krach, S. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv130 · Cited by 46
“The social relation to the target person thereby is an important modulator of such vicarious responses to the emotional events in the environment (Singer et al. , 2006; Cheng et al. , 2010).”
The neurobiology of collective action
Zak, P. J., & Barraza, J. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00211 · Cited by 46
“(2006). Tend and befriend: biobehavioral bases of affiliation under”
BackgroundWalking a fine line: is it possible to remain an empathic physician and have a hardened heart?
Newton, B. W. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00233 · Cited by 44
Postural correlates with painful situations
Lelard, T., Montalan, B., Morel, M. F., Krystkowiak, P. C., Ahmaidi, S., Godefroy, O., & Mouras, H. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00004 · Cited by 43
“The instruction to adopt another person’s perspective modulates pain rating according to the affective link between the observer and the individual experiencing the outcome (Singer et al., 2006; Penner et al., 2008).”
BackgroundOne cranium, two brains not yet introduced: Distinct but complementary views of the social brain
Prounis, G. S., & Ophir, A. G. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.011 · Cited by 46
“NINscope: a versatile miniscope for multi-region circuit investigations. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/685909 de Vignemont F, and Singer T (2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialPredicting Empathy From Resting State Brain Connectivity: A Multivariate Approach
Christov‐Moore, L., Reggente, N., Douglas, P. K., Feusner, J. D., & Iacoboni, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2020.00003 · Cited by 42
“Females also show greater vicarious somatosensory responses to the sight or knowledge of another person in pain or distress (Singer et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2009; Groen et al., 2013; Christov-Moore et al., 2014; Christov-Moore and Iacoboni, 2019), and exhibit greater facial mimicry when viewing emotional facial expr…”
BackgroundInfluentialImpression Formation: A Focus on Others’ Intents
Ames, D. L., Fiske, S. T., & Todorov, A. T. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342161.013.0028 · Cited by 43
Interpersonal Forgiveness and Psychological Well-being in Late Childhood
van der Wal, Karremans, J. C., & Cillessen (2015) · Merrill-palmer Quarterly · doi:10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.62.1.0001 · Cited by 46
Could empathy for animals have been an adaptation in the evolution of Homo sapiens?
Bradshaw, J., & Paul, E. (2010) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s096272860000230x · Cited by 42
“…both in location and likely evolutionary age (with emotional empathy having earlier developmental and phylogenetic origins than cognitive empathy; Singer et al 2006) suggests that at least two separate adaptive processes are likely to have operated within the evolutionary history of human…”
BackgroundLearning affective values for faces is expressed in amygdala and fusiform gyrus
Petrović, P., Kalisch, R., Pessiglione, M., Singer, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2008) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsn002 · Cited by 45
“Learning affective values for faces is expressed in amygdala and fusiform gyrus”
Self-citationInductive modeling using causal studies in neuroeconomics: brains on drugs
Vercoe, M., & Zak, P. J. (2010) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/13501781003756675 · Cited by 40
“Brain imaging studies locate the empathic response in reaction to the perceived pain in another in the observer’s pain matrix, with especially strong activation in the anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula (Decety et al. 1997; Singer et al. 2004, 2006; Hein and Singer 2008).”
BackgroundSomatosensory activity modulation during observation of other's pain and touch
Martínez-Jauand, M., González‐Roldán, A. M., Muñoz, M. Á., Sitges, C., Cifré, I., & Montoya, P. (2012) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.055 · Cited by 44
Keep Away from Danger: Dangerous Objects in Dynamic and Static Situations
Anelli, F., Nicoletti, R., Bolzani, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00344 · Cited by 40
“…studies suggested that the magnitude of these empathic brain responses can be modulated by different factors, such as the perceived fairness of the other (Singer et al., 2004a, 2006) and the intensity of the inflicted pain (Avenanti et al., 2006; for a review, see de Vignemont and Singer, 2006).”
Qi, Y., Wu, H., Raiha, S., & Liu, X. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.028 · Cited by 40
“Initially, they would complete a revised trust game to induce affective preferences (social liking vs. social disliking) in the other two students, named A and B (Singer et al., 2006).”
The Neural Basis of and a Common Neural Circuitry in Different Types of Pro-social Behavior
Luo, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00859 · Cited by 50
“In accordance with these studies, advances in neuroscience enable us to gain new insights into the neural basis of empathy (Eisenberg, 2000; Hoffman, 2001; Preston and de Waal, 2002; de Vignemont and Singer, 2006; Batson, 2009).”
ResultWhen Punishment Doesn’t Pay: Cold Glow and Decisions to Punish
Ouss, A., & Peysakhovich, A. (2015) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/684229 · Cited by 37
“2004), and reward activity is not visible when cooperative players are punished (Singer et al. 2006).”
Unzipping empathy in psychopathy: Empathy and facial affect processing in psychopaths
Rijnders, R. J. P., Terburg, D., Bos, P. A., Kempes, M. M., & van Honk, J. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.020 · Cited by 39
“…there is a relative dearth of knowledge about gender differences in empathy processing, there are some indications that compared to women, men who participated in research in which an economic game was played, showed less empathy toward unfair opponents receiving pain stimuli (Singer et al., 2006).”
ResultHolle, H., Banissy, M. J., Wright, T., Bowling, N. C., & Ward, J. (2011) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.12.002 · Cited by 39
“…of the brain respond to the sight of painful medical procedures performed on others depend on the observers knowledge and experience about the procedure (Lamm, Batson, & Decety, 2007) and, in the case of punishment, whether the person experiencing pain is judged to deserve it (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundA neural signature of the creation of social evaluation
Osinsky, R., Mussel, P., Öhrlein, L., & Hewig, J. S. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst051 · Cited by 41
Empathy for others’ suffering and its mediators in mental health professionals
Santamaría‐García, H. A., Báez, S., García, A. M., Flichtentrei, D., Prats, M., Mastandueno, R., Sigman, M., Matallana, D., Cetkovich, M., & Ibáñez, A. M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06775-y · Cited by 40
Riva, F., Tschernegg, M., Chiesa, P. A., Wagner, I. C., Kronbichler, M., Lamm, C., & Silani, G. (2018) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.12.028 · Cited by 39
Pattern of social cognition deficits in individuals with borderline personality disorder
Anupama, V. V., Bhola, P., Thirthalli, J., & Mehta, U. M. (2018) · Asian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2018.03.010 · Cited by 45
Norms and the Flexibility of Moral Action
FeldmanHall, O., Son, J.-Y., & Heffner, J. (2018) · Personality Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/pen.2018.13 · Cited by 39
Causes and consequences of coalitional cognition
Cikara, M. (2021) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.04.002 · Cited by 42
Trautmann-Lengsfeld, S. A., & Herrmann, C. S. (2012) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2012.742927 · Cited by 43
What is neuroethics? Empirical and theoretical neuroethics
Northoff, G. (2009) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e32832e088b · Cited by 39
“Empathy describes the ability to share another person’s cognitive and emotional inner life (see [25,26, 27,28,29,30, 31 ]).”
BackgroundToward an understanding of the cerebral substrates of woman's orgasm
Bianchi-Demicheli, F., & Ortigue, S. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.04.016 · Cited by 41
“For instance, the involvement of the insula and the cingulate cortex in human empathy (e.g., Carr et al., 2003; Singer et al., 2004, 2006) may suggest that women having an orgasm imagine how the other perceives the situation and feels as a result.”
BackgroundDistinct effects of self-construal priming on empathic neural responses in Chinese and Westerners
Jiang, C., Varnum, M. E. W., Hou, Y., & Han, S. (2013) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2013.867899 · Cited by 39
“…by a host of factors such as top–down attention to painful cues (Gu & Han, 2007), personal experiences (Cheng et al., 2007), affective connection (Singer et al., 2006), morality salience (Luo et al., in press), socioeconomic status (Ma, Wang, & Han, 2011), and intergroup experiences (Xu et al.,…”
BackgroundThe Social Neuroscience of Interpersonal Emotions
Müller‐Pinzler, L., Krach, S., Krämer, U. M., & Paulus, F. M. (2016) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2016_437 · Cited by 40
“For example, Singer et al. (2006) could show how important the valuation of the social target is as a modulatory factor by manipulating the perceived fairness of the social target during prior interaction.”
BackgroundHouser, D. E., & Xiao, E. (2010) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2010.07.008 · Cited by 36
Leng, Y., & Zhou, X. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.033 · Cited by 38
“, 2004), and the perceived fairness of the other person (Singer et al., 2006).”
Fauchon, C., Faillenot, I., Perrin, A., Borg, C., Pichot, V., Chouchou, F., Garcı́a-Larrea, L., & Peyron, R. (2017) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13701 · Cited by 38
“…experiments are modulated by the context (Gu & Han, 2007; Fan & Han, 2008), as well as by personal experiences (Cheng et al., 2007; Decety et al., 2010), and affective links with the person who suffers, including perceived fairness or group affiliation (Singer et al., 2006; Han et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodQiao, E., Corradi‐Dell’Acqua, C., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.027 · Cited by 39
“However, previous studies report mixed results: unfairness-induced anger made individuals less sensitive to others’ pain (Singer et al., 2006), whereas exposure to negative words enhanced individuals’ sensitivity (Yamada and Decety, 2009), and exposure to negative facial expressions led to no effect (impacting only ne…”
ResultThe emerging neuroscience of social punishment: Meta-analytic evidence
Bellucci, G., Camilleri, J. A., Iyengar, V., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krüeger, F. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.04.011 · Cited by 40
“The caudate may reflect a desire to seek revenge for the suffered norm violation (Singer et al., 2006) or integrate behaviorally-relevant information for belief updating about the character of those who show norm-deviant behaviors, as this region is activated during interactions with unfair or immoral others (Harle et…”
BackgroundAffective Response to a Loved One's Pain: Insula Activity as a Function of Individual Differences
Mazzola, V., Latorre, V., Petito, A., Gentili, N., Fazio, L., Popolizio, T., Blasi, G., Arciero, G., & Bondolfi, G. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015268 · Cited by 41
“Neuroimaging studies have provided evidence for the direct involvement of the insular cortex in the so-called ‘‘pain matrix’’ during empathy for pain [45–53].”
BackgroundRelativism, Religion, and Relational Being
Gergen, K. J. (2007) · Common Knowledge · doi:10.1215/0961754x-2007-011 · Cited by 38
Projecting my envy onto you: Neurocognitive mechanisms of an offline emotional egocentricity bias
Steinbeis, N., & Singer, T. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.007 · Cited by 40
“Whereas previous studies have shown particularly the ventral striatum to be sensitive to such individual differences in Schadenfreude (Singer et al., 2006; Takahashi et al., 2009), no such association was found in the present study.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationGordon, D. S., Madden, J. R., & Lea, S. E. G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110045 · Cited by 45
“That perceived likeability and dominance remained even when the interaction was unsuccessful suggests that such ratings are not due to a halo effect of seeing an antisocial individual punished [51,52] or due to the punisher being the recipient of indirect or strong reciprocity for carrying out a public function.”
BackgroundEmpathy from a police work perspective
Inzunza, M. (2014) · Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention · doi:10.1080/14043858.2014.987518 · Cited by 37
“Discussions about acting differently depending on the perception of the target are relevant in policing, as there are some experimental indications that men react differently—essentially with reduced empathy—when observing a target categorized as ‘acting unfair’ (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundThe neural correlates of justified and unjustified killing: an fMRI study
Molenberghs, P., Ogilvie, C., Louis, W. R., Decety, J., Bagnall, J., & Bain, P. G. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv027 · Cited by 39
Weighing the stigma of weight: An fMRI study of neural reactivity to the pain of obese individuals
Azevedo, R. T., Macaluso, E., Viola, V., Sani, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.041 · Cited by 38
“Activity in these regions was found to be reduced also for the pain of perceived unfair (Singer et al., 2006), rival (Hein et al., 2010) and stigmatized (Decety et al., 2010) individuals, indicating people are less ready to share the experienceswith scarcely significant or disregarded individuals.”
BackgroundInfluentialExploring the Facets of Empathy and Pain in Clinical Practice: A Review
Roche, J., & Harmon, D. C. (2017) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/papr.12563 · Cited by 37
Social Preferences and the Brain
Fehr, E., & Krajbich, I. M. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-416008-8.00011-5 · Cited by 44
Damage to the insula is associated with abnormal interpersonal trust
Belfi, A. M., Koscik, T. R., & Tranel, D. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.003 · Cited by 35
“, 2008) to social emotions (Singer et al., 2006) to judgments of trustworthiness (King-Casas et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialSex difference in trait empathy is encoded in the human anterior insula
Wu, X. X., Lu, X., Zhang, H., Bi, Y., Gu, R., Kong, Y., & Hu, L. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac398 · Cited by 38
“2009), even though those in pain or distress are hostile (Fukushima and Hiraki 2006) or disgraceful (Singer et al. 2006).”
BackgroundBeing Moved by the Self and Others: Influence of Empathy on Self-Motion Perception
Lopez, C., Falconer, C. J., & Mast, F. W. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048293 · Cited by 39
“This is in line with the view that the mirror neuron system’s tendency to simulate another person’s actions and feelings is modulated by several cognitive, social and emotional factors (see [22,29,54,55]).”
BackgroundResultThe gender you are and the gender you like: sexual preference and empathic neural responses.
Perry, D., Walder, K., Hendler, T., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. (2013) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.040 · Cited by 27
Comprehending Body Language and Mimics: An ERP and Neuroimaging Study on Italian Actors and Viewers
Proverbio, A. M., Calbi, M., Manfredi, M., & Zani, A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091294 · Cited by 37
“These localizations agree with a large body of literature that indicates the primary involvements of the prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices, the hippocampus [38] and the cingulate cortex [23] in emotional processing and the subjective evaluation of events and their significance [39–41].”
ResultCognitive neuroscience: The case for design rather than default
Morcom, A. M., & Fletcher, P. C. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.018 · Cited by 37
“For example, studies have explored the neural correlates of cognitive control andmonitoring, of complex processing concerned with social cognition, of future-planning, and, indeed, remembering the past (see for example Gilbert et al., 2006; Otten, 2006; Singer et al., 2006; Velanova et al., 2003).”
BackgroundWagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007) · Cited by 36
Direct Perception and Simulation: Stein’s Account of Empathy
Dullstein, M. (2013) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-013-0139-2 · Cited by 35
Neural correlate of autistic-like traits and a common allele in the oxytocin receptor gene
Saito, Y., Suga, M., Tochigi, M., Abe, O., Yahata, N., Kawakubo, Y., Liu, X., Kawamura, Y., Sasaki, T., Kasai, K., et al. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst136 · Cited by 36
“The factors were named ‘prosociality’, ‘communication’, ‘details/patterns’ and ‘imagination’ in reference to previous literature (Austin, 2005; Hurst et al., 2007; Hoekstra et al., 2008; Stewart and Austin, 2009; Kloosterman et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMasten, C. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Pfeifer, J. H., Colich, N. L., & Dapretto, M. (2013) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12056 · Cited by 41
“, 2001), and the dACC and anterior insula are activated by direct and observed physical pain in adults (Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson, Bruney, Meltzoff, & Decety, 2005; Morrison, Lloyd, Di Pellegrino, & Roberts, 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006) and children (Decety, Michalska, & Akitsuki, 2008).”
Dispositional Vengeance and Anger on Schadenfreude
Sawada, M., & Hayama, D. (2012) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/16.07.21.pr0.111.4.322-334 · Cited by 35
With love, from me to you: Embedding social interactions in affective neuroscience
Gilam, G., & Hendler, T. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.027 · Cited by 39
Understanding actors and object-goals in the human brain
Ramsey, R., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.124 · Cited by 35
“, 2005), whilst knowledge about the ‘fairness’ of other people modulates empathy-related brain responses (Singer et al., 2006).”
Jarheads, Girly Men, and the Pleasures of Violence
Pelias, R. J. (2007) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800407304413 · Cited by 35
Sogabe, S., Yagasaki, Y., Onozawa, K., & Kawakami, Y. (2013) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-65 · Cited by 35
“According to human brain imaging analyses, the strength of conscious pain, which is related to psychological condition, reflects activities of the PFC [45].”
Charitable giving and cognitive ability
James, R. N. (2010) · International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.402 · Cited by 31
Leaving a bad taste in your mouth but not in my insula
Hagen, E. V. D., Beaver, J. D., Ewbank, M., Keane, J., Passamonti, L., Lawrence, A. D., & Calder, A. J. (2009) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsp018 · Cited by 34
Perception of Pain in Others: Implication for Caregivers
Coll, M., Grégoire, M., Latimer, M. A., Eugène, F., & Jackson, P. L. (2011) · Pain Management · doi:10.2217/pmt.11.21 · Cited by 40
Coster, L. D., Verschuère, B., Goubert, L., Manos Tsakiris, A., & Braß, M. (2013) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0168-4 · Cited by 35
“Several studies have indicated that this sharing of representations when observing someone else in pain can be influenced by a wide range of cognitive mechanisms, and is thus modulated by top-down processing (e.g., Cheng et al., 2007; Decety, Echols, & Correll, 2010; de Vignemont & Singer, 2006; Hein & Singer, 2008; L…”
BackgroundLópez‐Solà, M., Koban, L., Krishnan, A., & Wager, T. D. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.012 · Cited by 37
“…showing that both pain conditions robustly engaged overlapping aIns and dACC regions (Cheng et al., 2010; Cui et al., 2015; de Vignemont and Singer, 2006; Gu et al., 2012; Jackson et al., 2006; Jackson et al., 2005; Krishnan et al., 2016; Lamm et al., 2007, 2011; Lamm and Singer, 2010;…”
InfluentialImmersive Journalism and Virtual Reality
Soler-Adillón, J., & Sora, C. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96253-5_4 · Cited by 34
Pain Mirrors: Neural Correlates of Observing Self or Others’ Facial Expressions of Pain
Benuzzi, F., Lui, F., Ardizzi, M., Ambrosecchia, M., Ballotta, D., Righi, S., Pagnoni, G., Gallese, V., & Porro, C. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01825 · Cited by 38
Perceived trustworthiness shapes neural empathic responses toward others' pain
Sessa, P., & Meconi, F. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.028 · Cited by 39
Gender and Conditional Support for Torture in the War on Terror
Haider‐Markel, D. P., & Vieux, A. (2008) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x08000019 · Cited by 34
“10 DONALD P. HAIDER-MARKEL AND ANDREA VIEUX similar neural spikes in activity (Singer et al. 2006).”
BackgroundPeng, X., Li, Y., Wang, P., Mo, L., & Chen, Q. (2015) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2014.999162 · Cited by 38
“Similarly, previous studies about fairnessmodulated empathy found that people got pleasure from seeing other’s suffering and experienced less pain-related empathy if the target person behaved unfairly in economic games (e.g., Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialBenbasat, I., Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P. A., & Qiu, L. (2010) · International Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 34
Sex differences in the neural bases of social appraisals
Veroude, K., Jolles, J., Croiset, G., & Krabbendam, L. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst015 · Cited by 34
Wealth, consumption and happiness
Ahuvia, A. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490118.009 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Wellcome Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Singer, Tania
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 439
- Issue
- 7075
- Pages
- 466-469
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC2636868
- OpenAlex
- W2098425678
- Semantic Scholar
- a9adbab6dae28c23a205786c725a988649d155ef
- Cited by
- 1,726
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 100
- FWCI
- 139.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (078865)
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- empathy, perceived fairness, social preferences, schadenfreude, altruistic punishment, revenge, sex differences, anterior cingulate cortex, reward processing, economic games, corporal punishment
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Empathy, Female, Game Theory, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Pain, Photic Stimulation, Punishment, Reward, Sex Characteristics, Social Justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review