The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 27 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others
Open accessAbstract
The neural processes underlying empathy are a subject of intense interest within the social neurosciences. However, very little is known about how brain empathic responses are modulated by the affective link between individuals. We show here that empathic responses are modulated by learned preferences, a result consistent with economic models of social preferences. We engaged male and female volunteers in an economic game, in which two confederates played fairly or unfairly, and then measured brain activity with functional magnetic resonance imaging while these same volunteers observed the confederates receiving pain. Both sexes exhibited empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas (fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices) towards fair players. However, these empathy-related responses were significantly reduced in males when observing an unfair person receiving pain. This effect was accompanied by increased activation in reward-related areas, correlated with an expressed desire for revenge. We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Empathic brain responses to another person’s pain are shaped by perceived fairness: participants showed pain-related empathy in fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices toward fair players, but men showed reduced empathic responses and increased reward-related activity when an unfair player received pain. The authors conclude that, at least in men, empathy is modulated by social valuation, with unfair opponents’ pain potentially linked to reward and revenge.
Key findings
- After a sequential Prisoner’s Dilemma game, both male and female subjects rated the fair player as significantly more fair, agreeable, likeable, and attractive than the unfair player (scale range 2 to 22; P < 0.001).
- Both sexes showed empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas, including bilateral anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, when observing a fair player in pain; ACC activation was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P < 0.001 uncorrected, P < 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P = 0.001 uncorrected).
- Men showed significantly enhanced bilateral fronto-insular activation when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain, whereas women showed no significant difference in empathy-related pain regions for fair versus unfair players.
- In men, but not women, observing an unfair player receiving pain increased activation in left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens and left orbito-frontal cortex; men also expressed a stronger desire for revenge than women (t(30) = 2.40, P < 0.05), and men with stronger revenge desire showed greater nucleus accumbens activation for unfair versus fair player pain.
Methods
- Subjects were 16 men and 16 women; four professional actors (two female, two male) served as confederates. Subjects played a sequential iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma game in which confederates reciprocated fairly or unfairly, inducing liking or disliking.
- In an empathy-for-pain fMRI task, subjects observed cues indicating that they, the fair player, or the unfair player would receive low or high electrical stimulation; each 12-s trial included a cue followed after 6 s by a circle indicating stimulation onset.
- fMRI data were acquired on a 1.5-T Siemens Sonata scanner and analyzed in SPM2 using an event-related model with a 2 × 3 × 2 factorial design (pain vs no pain; self, fair, unfair; male vs female subject), random-effects group analyses, conjunction/masking, and regression analyses; results are reported at P < 0.005 uncorrected in a priori regions of interest.
Limitations
- The paper states that further experiments are needed to confirm the gender specificity of the effect.
- The paper notes that the experimental design may have favoured men because the punishment modality involved physical threat rather than psychological or financial threat; alternatively, the findings could indicate a predominant role for males in maintaining justice and punishing norm violation.
- Evident from the text: the sample was small (32 subjects), several key results are reported at uncorrected thresholds within a priori regions of interest, and the gender analysis is binary and based on male/female subject groups.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 27 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In women this reduction in activity was very small, whereas in men the knowledge that an unfair player was in receipt of pain elicited no increase in empathic activity in FI.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And indeed, formal analysis revealed no significant difference for women when comparing painful trials for fair versus unfair players in empathy-related pain regions.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, men showed significantly enhanced activation in bilateral FI when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain (Supplementary Tables 8 and 11).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, we observed pain-related empathic responses in both genders in bilateral AI extending into FI and brainstem when seeing an unfamiliar but likeable person in pain (Fig. 2a, b).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Furthermore, we extended previous findings10 by showing that men, as well as women, who scored higher on standard empathy scales22 had higher empathy-related brain activity in ACC and AI/FI (Supplementary Fig. 2).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The comparison of brain activity associated with painful and non-painful trials in the ‘self’ condition for men and women revealed an expected increase in the ‘pain network’, including activity in AI and ACC (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 8
- Probably not a substantial claim. 11
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The activation in ACC was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P , 0.001 uncorrected, P , 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but was borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P 1/4 0.001 uncorrected; Supplementary Tables 4 and 5; coordinates refer to the peak of activations in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consistent with this finding, supplementary analysis showed that women but not men displayed significant activation in bilateral AI/FI and ACC in all three conditions (Supplementary Tables 7 and 10).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The perception–action model of empathy states that the observation or imagination of another person in a particular emotional state automatically activates a representation of that state in the observer1.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These results suggest that our ability to empathize relies on neuronal systems that underpin our own bodily and emotional states1,2,10,13.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Gallese, V., Keysers, C. & Rizzolatti, G. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 396–403 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Craig, A. D. Human feelings: why are some more aware than others? Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 239–241 (2004) source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the two confederates were always of the same sex, all four possible gender combinations between the sex of the subject and the sex of the confederates were used equally often throughout the study.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Empathy for pain model
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These theories4,7 suggest that people value the gains of others positively if they are perceived to behave fairly, but value others' gains negatively if they behave unfairly.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Rabin, M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 83, 1281–1302 (1993)
- Not checked yetcites [7] Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114, 817–868 (1999) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After scanning, subjects completed a standard empathy scale22 and were asked to rate the intensity of the low and high stimulation, their liking for the two confederates, and their desire for revenge on the two confederates (see Fig. 1b, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Post-scan questionnaires
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This pattern of preferences implies that people like cooperating with fair opponents but also like punishing unfair opponents.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, studies on empathy for pain have found that the activation observed in anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex (AI/FI) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) to pain in oneself is also seen when observing pain in someone else10,12.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown in Fig. 1c, cues (coloured arrows) were presented in random order indicating whether she/he (self condition), the fair player (fair condition) or the unfair player (unfair condition) would get low stimulation (no pain condition) or high stimulation (pain condition).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has been shown that people reward others for cooperative behaviour but punish violations of social fairness even at a personal cost15,16, an effect likely to be mediated by neural mechanisms that provide intrinsic motivation (that is, satisfaction) from punishing violators21.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Fehr, E. & Gachter, S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791 (2003) source
- Not checked yetcites [21] de Quervain, D. J. et al. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305, 1254–1258 (2004) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent imaging studies provide evidence for common activation elicited when experiencing disgust8, touch9 or pain10-12 in oneself, and when perceiving the same feelings in others.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Wicker, B. et al. Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40, 655–664 (2003) source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Keysers, C. et al. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 42, 335–346 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N. & Decety, J. How do we perceive the pain of others: A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage 3, 771–779 (2005) source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report results at P < 0.005 uncorrected for multiple comparisons in the a priori regions of interest.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Image acquisition and analysis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our findings indicate that cooperation nourishes this link, but selfish behaviour that is detrimental to others effectively compromises this link (at least with males), such that empathic responses in the brain are diminished or abolished.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These findings are consistent with the different functions associated with distinct regions of the striatum: afferent projections to dorsal striatum are thought to be crucial for learning correct actions so as to maximize reward, whereas projections to ventral striatum, including nucleus accumbens, have a key function in reward prediction and pavlovian learning18-20,23,24.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Cardinal, R. N., Parkinson, J. A., Hall, J. & Everitt, B. J. Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26, 321–352 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [19] O'Doherty, J. et al. Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science 304, 452–454 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [20] Schultz, W. Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 1, 199–207 (2000) source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Dayan, P. & Balleine, B. W. Reward, motivation, and reinforcement learning. Neuron 36, 285–298 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Montague, P. R., Hyman, S. E. & Cohen, J. D. Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control. Nature 431, 760–767 (2004) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The position (left or right) of the actor (fair or unfair) was counterbalanced across subjects.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Empathy for pain model
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The modulation of empathic neural responses by the social relations between individuals is unknown.
“However, it is unclear whether or how these responses are modulated by the social relations between individuals.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms”
From Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness (2013) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While it is not clear to what extent early interoceptive signals are prone to modulation, it has been shown that all parts of insula (posterior, mid and anterior) as well as cACC may be regulated by top-down systems during processing of bottom-up interoceptive input (Atlas and Wager, 2014) and processing of top-down induced activation in the interoceptive stream (Singer et al., 2006; Rutgen et al.”
From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“That is, in male participants, ventral striatum activity increases when passively seeing partner, who has previously acted unfairly, incur pain 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“In certain conditions, ventral striatum activity appears related to seeing others receive a deserved misfortune.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“The striatum displays signals that are related to making a decision to punish someone for acting unfairly 96, 97, as well as related to observing a punishment meted out to someone who has acted unfairly 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the level of ventral striatum activation is related to male participants’ desire for revenge against the unfair partner98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“As gender differences in social emotions were observed in previous neuroscientific research (e.g.Singer et al., 2006), we decided to control for possible gender effects by restricting our sample to female participants only.”
From Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training (2014) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Self-citationAltruistic punishment in humans
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415137a · Cited by 5,616 · cited 3×
“Increased pain-related activation (asterisk indicates whole-brain corrected) for women in ACC* [9, 18, 27], left FI* [242, 15,23], right FI* [30, 18,218], left SII* [260,230, 18], right SII* [63,230, 24] and brainstem* [3,218,218]; for men in left FI* [233, 33, 3] right FI [42, 33, 3] and brainstem [3,233,230].”
BackgroundTrust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,712
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
Rabin, M. (2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15 · Cited by 4,614
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126
Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093535 · Cited by 3,929
Self-citationSpatial registration and normalization of images
Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Frith, C., Poline, J.-B., Heather, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030303 · Cited by 3,744
Self-citationBehavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction
Camerer, C. F. (2003) · Cited by 3,722
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 999
Music, empathy and cultural understanding
Clarke, E., DeNora, T., & Vuoskoski, J. K. (2015) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2015.09.001 · Cited by 359
“It is also likely that there is some degree of interaction between the two processes, as empathic mirroring responses to the pain of others can be modulated by perceptions of their social behaviour (such as whether they are perceived to be fair or unfair; [182]).”
BackgroundWild justice: the moral lives of animals
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-1420 · Cited by 324
The Blame Game: The Effect of Responsibility and Social Stigma on Empathy for Pain
Decety, J., Echols, S., & Correll, J. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21266 · Cited by 265
“, 1997), how likable the target is (i.e., Kozak, Marsh, & Wegner, 2006; Singer et al., 2006), and the group membership of the target (i.”
BackgroundDefault mode network connectivity encodes clinical pain: An arterial spin labeling study
Loggia, M. L., Kim, J., Gollub, R. L., Vangel, M. G., Kirsch, I., Kong, J., Wasan, A. D., & Napadow, V. (2012) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.07.029 · Cited by 323
The neural components of empathy: Predicting daily prosocial behavior
Morelli, S. A., Rameson, L. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss088 · Cited by 336
“For example, when we see someone accidentally cut his/her hand with a knife (Jackson et al., 2005; Singer et al., 2006; Hein et al., 2010), no additional context is required to share the target’s pain.”
An Experimental Study on Emotional Reactions Towards a Robot
Pütten, A. M. R.-V. D., Krämer, N. C., Hoffmann, L., Sobieraj, S., & Eimler, S. C. (2012) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-012-0173-8 · Cited by 308
Atkins, P. W. B., & Parker, S. K. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0490 · Cited by 344
“Furthermore, in a study of confederates playing an economic game and then receiving pain, the neural responses associated with empathy for the sufferer were modulated (in men at least) by the degree to which the sufferer was appraised as being fair in the game (Singer et al., 2006).”
Highly religious participants recruit areas of social cognition in personal prayer
Schjoedt, U., Stødkilde-Jørgensen, H., Geertz, A. W., & Roepstorff, A. (2009) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsn050 · Cited by 305
Young Children Selectively Avoid Helping People With Harmful Intentions
Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01500.x · Cited by 321
Sterzer, P., Stadler, C., Poustka, F., & Kleinschmidt, A. K. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.043 · Cited by 308
“There is increasing evidence for a crucial involvement of anterior insula in the experience of empathy (Carr et al., 2003; Jackson et al., 2005, 2006; Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Wicker et al., 2003), but little is known about the role of this structure in aggressive behaviour.”
BackgroundInfluentialHeritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game
Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710069105 · Cited by 371
“One imaging study demonstrates that people derive satisfaction from seeing cooperative norm violators being punished (17).”
BackgroundFunctional organization of the medial frontal cortex
Rushworth, M. F., Buckley, M. J., Behrens, T. E., Walton, M. E., & Bannerman, D. M. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.001 · Cited by 353
Knafo, A., Israel, S., Darvasi, A., Bachner‐Melman, R., Uzefovsky, F., Cohen, L., Feldman, E., Lerer, E., Laiba, E., Raz, Y., et al. (2007) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1601-183x.2007.00341.x · Cited by 302
“…generated by investigations from diverse disciplines including brain imaging (Fehr & Rockenbach 2004; de Quervain et al. 2004; Rilling et al. 2002; Singer et al. 2006; Stone et al. 2002), electrophysiology (Stuphorn 2006; van ’t Wout et al. 2006), pharmacology (Kosfeld et al. 2005; Zak et al.…”
BackgroundPrestimulus functional connectivity determines pain perception in humans
Ploner, M., Lee, M., Wiech, K., Bingel, U., & Tracey, I. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906186106 · Cited by 311
“005, uncorrected (note: only clusters involving five or more contiguous voxels are reported) (43, 44).”
BackgroundCoercion Changes the Sense of Agency in the Human Brain
Caspar, É. A., Christensen, J. F., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067 · Cited by 294
“Such vindictive behavior is consistent with previous reports in economic games [7].”
ResultBertrand, P., Guegan, J., Robieux, L., McCall, C., & Zenasni, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00026 · Cited by 347
“Neuroimaging studies have shown that empathy-related responses were signiicantly reduced in males when observing an individual who had behaved unfairly receiving pain (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundThe role of social cognition in emotion
Olsson, A., & Ochsner, K. N. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.010 · Cited by 289
A solution to the mysteries of morality.
DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0029065 · Cited by 301
“Similarly, in modern laboratory studies, participants showed insensitivity to pain and suffering when the person was viewed as a wrongdoer (T. Singer et al., 2006).”
ResultA neurobehavioral evolutionary perspective on the mechanisms underlying empathy
Decety, J., Norman, G. J., Berntson, G. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.001 · Cited by 309
“, 2010), reduced if the person in pain has been unfair in a prior interaction (Singer et al., 2006) or are”
BackgroundHow do we empathize with someone who is not like us? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
Lamm, C., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21186 · Cited by 278
“…we assessed the neural network involved in overcoming one’s emotional response to an aversive stimulus that is neutral for the other using the contrast No pain: Dissimilar > Similar (i.e., needle injection into a dissimilar patient vs. a Q-tip touching a similar patient; note that both…”
MethodBroken hearts or broken bonds: Love and death in historical perspective.
Stroebe, M., Gergen, M., Gergen, K. J., & Stroebe, W. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.10.1205 · Cited by 291
Meyer, M. L., Masten, C. L., Ma, Y., Wang, C., Shi, Z., Eisenberger, N. I., & Han, S. (2012) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss019 · Cited by 277
“Singer et al. (2006) found that when participants played an economic game with an unfair confederate prior to scanning, male participants subsequently showed less dACC and insula in response to viewing the confederate in physical pain.”
InfluentialAzevedo, R. T., Macaluso, E., Avenanti, A., Santangelo, V., Cazzato, V., & Aglioti, S. M. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22133 · Cited by 293
“VC 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.”
BackgroundEmpathy versus Personal Distress: Recent Evidence from Social Neuroscience
Jean Decety, A., & Lamm, C. (2009) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0016 · Cited by 275
The neural and computational systems of social learning
Olsson, A., Knapska, E., & Lindström, B. (2020) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0276-4 · Cited by 285
A Key Role for Similarity in Vicarious Reward
Mobbs, D., Yu, R., Meyer, M., Passamonti, L., Seymour, B., Calder, A. J., Schweizer, S., Frith, C. D., & Dalgleish, T. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1170539 · Cited by 270
Self-citationDeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.008 · Cited by 277
“This distinction is often neglected (e.g., Singer et al., 2006).”
Backgroundde Oliveira‐Souza, R., Hare, R. D., Bramati, I. E., Garrido, G. J., Ignácio, F. A., Tovar-Moll, F. F., & Moll, J. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.054 · Cited by 269
“Bilateral insular damage would be in a strategic position to disrupt the integration of higher-order visceral and associative processes with fundamental bodily states (Singer et al., 2006).”
Neural signature of fictive learning signals in a sequential investment task
Lohrenz, T. M., McCabe, K., Camerer, C. F., & Montague, P. R. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0608842104 · Cited by 276
The role of social cognition in decision making
Frith, C. D., & Singer, T. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0156 · Cited by 361
“…empathic brain responses can be modulated by different factors such as the affective link to the other person, the perceived fairness of the other (Singer et al. 2004a, 2006), the subject’s appraisal of whether the reason the other person is suffering is justified (Lamm et al. 2007), the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationConsolation as possible expression of sympathetic concern among chimpanzees
Romero, T., Castellanos, M. A., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1006991107 · Cited by 262
“The receipt of past favors may thus enter into the decision of whether consolation will be provided, which is consistent with experimental empathy studies on humans, in which the degree of empathy with others varies with the history of positive or negative interactions (50, 51).”
BackgroundOrganizational Neuroscience: Taking Organizational Theory Inside the Neural Black Box
Becker, W. J., Cropanzano, R., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311398955 · Cited by 278
“Other studies have shown that observing another party being treated unfairly triggers feelings of empathy (e.g., Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundSocial modulation of peripersonal space boundaries
Teneggi, C., Canzoneri, E., di Pellegrino, G., & Serino, A. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.043 · Cited by 257
Gonzalez-Liencres, C., Shamay‐Tsoory, S., & Brüne, M. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.05.001 · Cited by 290
The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum
Bhanji, J. P., & Delgado, M. R. (2014) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1266 · Cited by 256
Cheng, Y., Chen, C., Lin, C., Chou, K., & Jean Decety, A. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.047 · Cited by 255
“…is usually stronger than that between the Self and the Stranger, this may also contribute to the differential empathic responses to the Loved-one and Stranger, as shown in one fMRI study that documented that affective relationship modulated the activity in the anterior insula (Singer et al., 2006).”
Singer, T., Snozzi, R., Bird, G., Petrovic, P., Silani, G., Heinrichs, M., & Dolan, R. J. (2008) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0014195 · Cited by 248
“…of the analyses focusing on brain activation elicited when participants either received nociceptive stimulation (self condition) or vicariously experienced their partner’s pain (other condition) largely replicated previous results obtained with a similar paradigm (e.g., Singer et al., 2004, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationThe role of shared neural activations, mirror neurons, and morality in empathy – A critical comment
Lamm, C., & Majdandžić, J. (2015) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.008 · Cited by 252
“…vs. cooperative relationship with her, also seem sufficient to cause an almost complete blockage of empathic responses and can even cause anti-social responses such as counter-empathy and Schadenfreude (Decety et al., 2010; Singer et al., 2006; Takahashi et al., 2009; Yamada et al., 2011).”
Agent-Specific Responses in the Cingulate Cortex During Economic Exchanges
Tomlin, D., Kayali, M. A., King‐Casas, B., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1125596 · Cited by 252
The anatomy of empathy: Vicarious experience and disorders of social cognition
Lockwood, P. L. (2016) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.05.048 · Cited by 274
Neurobiology of empathy and callousness: Implications for the development of antisocial behavior
Shirtcliff, E. A., Vitacco, M. J., Graf, A., Gostisha, A. J., Merz, J., & Zahn‐Waxler, C. (2009) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.862 · Cited by 259
“The neurobiology involved in empathy and callousness is different in males and females, with empathy-related neurocircuitry being generally more active in females (Hein & Singer, 2008; Schulte-Ruther, Markowitsch, Shah, Fink, & Piefke, 2008; Singer et al., 2006).”
An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences.
Wondra, J. D., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039252 · Cited by 275
“If your goal is for the target to suffer, as with a desire to punish someone who has acted unfairly (Singer et al., 2006), then you should appraise whatever contributes to the other person's wellbeing as goal-obstructive and whatever detracts from the other person's wellbeing as goalcongruent.”
BackgroundThe trans-species concept of self and the subcortical cortical midline system.
Northoff, G., & Panksepp, J. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.007 · Cited by 240
The Neural Circuitry of a Broken Promise
Baumgärtner, T., Fischbacher, U., Feierabend, A., Lutz, K., & Fehr, E. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.017 · Cited by 244
Lutz, A., McFarlin, D. R., Perlman, D. M., Salomons, T. V., & Davidson, R. J. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.030 · Cited by 233
“, 2009; Moayedi and Weissman-Fogel, 2009), empathy for pain (Singer et al., 2006), lack of perceived controllability (Salomons et al.”
The Need for a Cognitive Neuroscience of Naturalistic Social Cognition
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04601.x · Cited by 251
Gender difference in empathy for pain: An electrophysiological investigation
Han, S., Fan, Y., & Mao, L. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.062 · Cited by 231
Lieberman, M. D. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001005 · Cited by 231
The neurobiology of social decision-making
Rilling, J. K., King‐Casas, B., & Sanfey, A. G. (2008) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.06.003 · Cited by 239
To Detect and Correct: Norm Violations and Their Enforcement
Montague, P. R., & Lohrenz, T. M. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.020 · Cited by 230
“…underpinnings of fairness instincts, altruism, and the many other social sentiments that fall into this category (Rilling et al., 2002; Sanfey et al., 2003; de Quervain et al., 2004; King-Casas et al., 2005; Delgado et al., 2005; Singer et al., 2006; Spitzer et al., 2007 [this issue of Neuron]).”
BackgroundPunishment and spite, the dark side of cooperation
Jensen, K. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0146 · Cited by 219
Mapping the brain's metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason
Lakoff, G. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958 · Cited by 335
“Enjoy these: (Boroditsky, 2000; Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Aziz-Zadeh et al., 2006; Gibbs, 2006; Wilson and Gibbs, 2007; Casasanto, 2008; Boulenger et al., 2009; IJzerman and Semin, 2009; Schubert and Koole, 2009; Landau et al., 2010; Sapolsky, 2010; Desai et al., 2011; Lee and Schwarz, 2011, 2012;…”
The Anatomy of Suffering: Understanding the Relationship between Nociceptive and Empathic Pain
Zaki, J., Wager, T. D., Singer, T., Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.02.003 · Cited by 220
Self-citationFairness and Cooperation Are Rewarding: Evidence from Social Cognitive Neuroscience
TABIBNIA, G., & LIEBERMAN, M. D. (2007) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1412.001 · Cited by 211
Association between interoception and empathy: Evidence from heartbeat-evoked brain potential
Fukushima, H., Terasawa, Y., & Umeda, S. (2011) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.015 · Cited by 209
“This measure has been shown to positively correlate with the magnitude of neural activity related to empathy, for instance, that of insula activity during pain observation (Singer et al., 2006; Singer, et al., 2004).”
ResultChiu, P. H., Kayali, M. A., Kishida, K. T., Tomlin, D., Klinger, L. G., Klinger, M. R., & Montague, P. R. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.020 · Cited by 209
“In recent years,mathematically portrayed economic exchange games have added a new approach to assessing a subject’s model of their partner and themselves during an active interpersonal exchange (Delgado et al., 2005; King-Casas et al., 2005; Rilling et al., 2002, 2004; Sanfey et al., 2003; Singer et al., 2006).”
Social exclusion and punishment of excluders: Neural correlates and developmental trajectories
Gunther Moor, B., Güroğlu, B., Op de Macks, Z. A., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Van der Molen, M. W., & Crone, E. A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.028 · Cited by 207
“Previous studies have shown that people tend to punish social norm violations (Singer et al., 2006) and are less willing to cooperate with people who have previously rejected them (Hillebrandt et al.”
Social context and perceived agency affects empathy for pain: An event-related fMRI investigation
Akitsuki, Y., & Decety, J. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.091 · Cited by 219
“…attention (Gu and Han, 2007), cognitive appraisal (Lamm et al., 2007a), medical expertise (Cheng et al., 2007), and likeability of the person in pain (Singer et al., 2006) are significant factors that influence the participants' pain ratings as well as the neural response to the pain of others.”
BackgroundAbsence of Embodied Empathy During Pain Observation in Asperger Syndrome
Minio-Paluello, I., Baron‐Cohen, S., Avenanti, A., Walsh, V., & Aglioti, S. M. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.08.006 · Cited by 204
A new perspective on the anterior cingulate cortex and affective pain
Xiao, X., & Zhang, Y.-Q. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.022 · Cited by 197
“illustrated that bilateral anterior insular cortex is significantly correlated with empathy for pain, but not sensory-component of pain (Singer et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006; Singer et al., 2008).”
Yamada, M., & Decety, J. (2009) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.01.028 · Cited by 199
“Compared to male participants, females often perform better in emotional tasks (e.g., [22]), and show more empathic brain responses to others’ emotions [4] and pain [5,19], even toward dislikable targets [ 27 ].”
BackgroundThe neurobiology of punishment
Seymour, B., Singer, T., & Dolan, R. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2119 · Cited by 240
Self-citationThe Role of Empathy and Compassion in Conflict Resolution
Klimecki, O. (2019) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073919838609 · Cited by 243
“…activations in brain areas relevant for reward processing when participants witness the pain or misfortunes of outgroup members or people from other races (Avenanti, Sirigu, & Aglioti, 2010; Cikara, Botvinick, & Fiske, 2011; Hein et al., 2010; Singer et al., 2006; Xu, Zuo, Wang, & Han, 2009).”
BackgroundWhen do people cooperate? The neuroeconomics of prosocial decision making
Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., & Emonds, G. (2012) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.009 · Cited by 223
“Singer et al. (2006) investigated the empathic neural response of men and women under fMRI.”
BackgroundMechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes
Brosnan, S. F., Talbot, C. F., AHLGREN, M., Lambeth, S. P., & Schapiro, S. J. (2010) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.019 · Cited by 197
“Human males are also hypothesized to be more involved in decisions regarding justice than females (e.g. Singer et al. 2006), which could also be true in other primates, including chimpanzees.”
BackgroundInferior frontal gyrus activity triggers anterior insula response to emotional facial expressions.
Jabbi, M., & Keysers, C. (2008) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0014194 · Cited by 190
Activation in the VTA and nucleus accumbens increases in anticipation of both gains and losses
Carter, R. (2009) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.08.021.2009 · Cited by 202
“, 2002), altruistic punishment (Singer et al., 2006), and rewards for a favored charity (Moll et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialVicarious motor activation during action perception: beyond correlational evidence
Avenanti, A., Candidi, M., & Urgesi, C. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00185 · Cited by 198
“…(Keysers et al., 2004; Blakemore et al., 2005; Bufalari et al., 2007; Ebisch et al., 2008; Schaefer et al., 2009; Gazzola et al., 2012) or pain (Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Avenanti et al., 2005, 2009a; Valeriani et al., 2008; Lamm et al., 2011; Voisin et al., 2011) vicariously activates those…”
BackgroundExperience modulates vicarious freezing in rats: a model for empathy
Atsak, P., Orre, M., Bakker, P., Cerliani, L., Roozendaal, B., Gazzola, V., Moita, M., & Keysers, C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021855 · Cited by 193
“While this conclusion may seem trivial, it actually brakes new grounds in the context of empathy research: most current models of empathy for pain or distress in human neuroscience used prerecorded stimuli [2,4,9,10,11,72,73,74] or used live interactions but prevented participants from viewing the reactions of their p…”
Loggia, M. L., Mogil, J. S., & Bushnell, C. M. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.017 · Cited by 193
“Several fMRI studies (Singer et al., 2004; Morrison et al., 2004; Jackson et al., 2005; Botvinick et al., 2005; Singer et al., 2006; Saarela et al., 2007) have demonstrated that exposure to somebody in pain elicits increased activity ublished by Elsevier B.V.”
BackgroundCanetto, S. S., & Chen, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.042 · Cited by 194
The role of prediction in social neuroscience
Brown, E. C., & Brüne, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00147 · Cited by 190
“Neural responses induced by empathy for others’ pain have also been shown to be modulated by perceived fairness (Singer et al., 2006), group membership (Forgiarini et al., 2011), emotional closeness (Beeney et al., 2011), emotional context (Han et al., 2009), self-relatedness (Perry et al., 2010),…”
BackgroundOrganizational justice: The dynamics of fairness in the workplace.
Greenberg, J. (2010) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/12171-008 · Cited by 212
The interplay of cognition and cooperation
Brosnan, S. F., Salwiczek, L. H., & Bshary, R. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0154 · Cited by 198
Engen, H. G., & Singer, T. (2012) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.003 · Cited by 198
“gender [20]) and individual differences in self-reported state and trait empathy [9 ].”
Self-citationZaki, J., Ochsner, K. N., Hanelin, J., Wager, T. D., & Mackey, S. (2007) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910701401973 · Cited by 193
“Prior work has shown that social context can importantly alter our reactions to the suffering of others (de Quervain etal., 2004; Lanzetta & Englis, 1989; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialNeurocognitive Basis of Racial Ingroup Bias in Empathy
Han, S. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.013 · Cited by 182
“For example, after witnessing a partner behave either fairly or unfairly, individuals showed decreased AI activity to perceived pain in those who played unfairly compared with those who played fairly because they did not like those who played unfairly [23].”
The evolution of leader–follower reciprocity: the theory of service-for-prestige
Price, M. E., & van Vugt, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00363 · Cited by 205
“Studies have also begun to indicate the general brain regions involved with the punishment of non-cooperators in dyadic trust game contexts (de Quervain et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundYour flaws are my pain: linking empathy to vicarious embarrassment
Krach, S., Cohrs, J. C., de Echeverría Loebell, N. C., Kircher, T., Sommer, J., Jansen, A., & Paulus, F. M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018675 · Cited by 179
“Recent fMRI studies could show that the neural response to another person’s physical pain was modulated by the observer’s appraisals due to prior interactions with a protagonist [31] or own professional experience [32].”
Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability
Petrovic, P., & Castellanos, F. X. (2016) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00070 · Cited by 179
Does It Look Painful or Disgusting? Ask Your Parietal and Cingulate Cortex
Benuzzi, F., Lui, F., Duzzi, D., Nichelli, P., & Porro, C. A. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4012-07.2008 · Cited by 186
“, 2007), as well as in other paradigms of pain empathy (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe mentalizing network orchestrates the impact of parochial altruism on social norm enforcement
Baumgärtner, T., Götte, L., Gügler, R., & Fehr, E. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21298 · Cited by 191
“…of goaldirected actions [Fliessbach et al., 2007; Kawagoe et al., 1998; O’Doherty et al., 2004; Schultz and Romo, 1988]) in combination with behavioral and questionnaire measures suggests that people derive satisfaction from punishing norm violators [de Quervain et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006].”
BackgroundMethodThe pleasure of revenge: retaliatory aggression arises from a neural imbalance toward reward
Chester, D. S., & DeWall, C. N. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv082 · Cited by 189
Michalska, K. J., Kinzler, K. D., & Decety, J. (2012) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2012.08.001 · Cited by 179
Social Cognition through the Lens of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience
Arioli, M., Crespi, C., & Canessa, N. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/4283427 · Cited by 215
“In keeping with the notion of “mirroring,” these results suggest that the observation, or even the mere awareness [116, 117], of another person in a particular emotional state may automatically activate the neural representation of the same state in the observer.”
BackgroundResultDialogue: Life and Death of the Organization
Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M., & Barrett, F. J. (2004) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781848608122.n2 · Cited by 175
Action, agency and responsibility
Frith, C. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.007 · Cited by 188
Self-citationWhat motivates repayment? Neural correlates of reciprocity in the Trust Game
van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Westenberg, P. M., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2009) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsp009 · Cited by 175
“Together, these findings support the hypothesis that the insula is most active when a personal norm is violated (which can be a reciprocate norm for prosocial individuals or a defect norm for proself individuals) (Singer et al., 2006; Montague and Lohrenz, 2007).”
ResultStietz, J., Jauk, E., Krach, S., & Kanske, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00126 · Cited by 204
“At a most basic level, women score higher on selfreport measures of empathy than men, which may be due to gender-role stereotypes (77) as gender differences are not clearly present in neural empathy responses [but seem to depend largely on context effects, (78)].”
BackgroundActivation of Anterior Insula during Self-Reflection
Modinos, G., Ormel, J., & Aleman, A. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004618 · Cited by 172
The neural correlates of the affective response to unreciprocated cooperation
Rilling, J. K., Goldsmith, D. R., Glenn, A. L., Jairam, M. R., Elfenbein, H. A., Dagenais, J. E., Murdock, C. D., & Pagnoni, G. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.033 · Cited by 175
Perceiving Pain in Others: Automatic and Controlled Mechanisms
Craig, K. D., Versloot, J., Goubert, L., Vervoort, T., & Crombez, G. (2009) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.008 · Cited by 183
The neuroscience of empathy and compassion in pro-social behavior
Stevens, F. L., & Taber, K. H. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107925 · Cited by 198
Tit-for-tat: The neural basis of reactive aggression
Krämer, U. M., Jansma, H., Tempelmann, C., & Münte, T. F. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.029 · Cited by 170
“This was indicated by striatal activation during the punishment of a defector (de Quervain et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundUnfair? It depends: Neural correlates of fairness in social context
Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2010) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsq013 · Cited by 174
Moral emotions: A review and research agenda for management scholarship
Greenbaum, R. L., Bonner, J., Gray, T. W., & Mawritz, M. B. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2367 · Cited by 176
The Cognitive Bases of Anthropomorphism: From Relatedness to Empathy
Airenti, G. (2015) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-014-0263-x · Cited by 181
Does online technology make us more or less sociable? A preliminary review and call for research
Waytz, A., & Gray, K. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617746509 · Cited by 157
“…this study does not assess participants’ own empathy—or their baseline use of online technology—it also provides the possibility for a negative relationship between online technology and sociability, given the relationship between empathy and trust (Batson & Moran, 1999; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundThe neuroscience of in-group bias
Molenberghs, P. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.002 · Cited by 174
Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species
Chiao, J. Y. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.006 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Wellcome Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Singer, Tania
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 439
- Issue
- 7075
- Pages
- 466-469
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC2636868
- OpenAlex
- W2098425678
- Semantic Scholar
- a9adbab6dae28c23a205786c725a988649d155ef
- Cited by
- 1,726
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 100
- FWCI
- 139.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (078865)
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- empathy, perceived fairness, social preferences, schadenfreude, altruistic punishment, revenge, sex differences, anterior cingulate cortex, reward processing, economic games, corporal punishment
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Empathy, Female, Game Theory, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Pain, Photic Stimulation, Punishment, Reward, Sex Characteristics, Social Justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review