The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 27 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others
Open accessAbstract
The neural processes underlying empathy are a subject of intense interest within the social neurosciences. However, very little is known about how brain empathic responses are modulated by the affective link between individuals. We show here that empathic responses are modulated by learned preferences, a result consistent with economic models of social preferences. We engaged male and female volunteers in an economic game, in which two confederates played fairly or unfairly, and then measured brain activity with functional magnetic resonance imaging while these same volunteers observed the confederates receiving pain. Both sexes exhibited empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas (fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices) towards fair players. However, these empathy-related responses were significantly reduced in males when observing an unfair person receiving pain. This effect was accompanied by increased activation in reward-related areas, correlated with an expressed desire for revenge. We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Empathic brain responses to another person’s pain are shaped by perceived fairness: participants showed pain-related empathy in fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices toward fair players, but men showed reduced empathic responses and increased reward-related activity when an unfair player received pain. The authors conclude that, at least in men, empathy is modulated by social valuation, with unfair opponents’ pain potentially linked to reward and revenge.
Key findings
- After a sequential Prisoner’s Dilemma game, both male and female subjects rated the fair player as significantly more fair, agreeable, likeable, and attractive than the unfair player (scale range 2 to 22; P < 0.001).
- Both sexes showed empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas, including bilateral anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, when observing a fair player in pain; ACC activation was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P < 0.001 uncorrected, P < 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P = 0.001 uncorrected).
- Men showed significantly enhanced bilateral fronto-insular activation when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain, whereas women showed no significant difference in empathy-related pain regions for fair versus unfair players.
- In men, but not women, observing an unfair player receiving pain increased activation in left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens and left orbito-frontal cortex; men also expressed a stronger desire for revenge than women (t(30) = 2.40, P < 0.05), and men with stronger revenge desire showed greater nucleus accumbens activation for unfair versus fair player pain.
Methods
- Subjects were 16 men and 16 women; four professional actors (two female, two male) served as confederates. Subjects played a sequential iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma game in which confederates reciprocated fairly or unfairly, inducing liking or disliking.
- In an empathy-for-pain fMRI task, subjects observed cues indicating that they, the fair player, or the unfair player would receive low or high electrical stimulation; each 12-s trial included a cue followed after 6 s by a circle indicating stimulation onset.
- fMRI data were acquired on a 1.5-T Siemens Sonata scanner and analyzed in SPM2 using an event-related model with a 2 × 3 × 2 factorial design (pain vs no pain; self, fair, unfair; male vs female subject), random-effects group analyses, conjunction/masking, and regression analyses; results are reported at P < 0.005 uncorrected in a priori regions of interest.
Limitations
- The paper states that further experiments are needed to confirm the gender specificity of the effect.
- The paper notes that the experimental design may have favoured men because the punishment modality involved physical threat rather than psychological or financial threat; alternatively, the findings could indicate a predominant role for males in maintaining justice and punishing norm violation.
- Evident from the text: the sample was small (32 subjects), several key results are reported at uncorrected thresholds within a priori regions of interest, and the gender analysis is binary and based on male/female subject groups.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
20 Own result · 10 Not checked yet · 6 Own interpretation · 4 Own method · 1 Supported so far
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In women this reduction in activity was very small, whereas in men the knowledge that an unfair player was in receipt of pain elicited no increase in empathic activity in FI.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And indeed, formal analysis revealed no significant difference for women when comparing painful trials for fair versus unfair players in empathy-related pain regions.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, men showed significantly enhanced activation in bilateral FI when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain (Supplementary Tables 8 and 11).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, we observed pain-related empathic responses in both genders in bilateral AI extending into FI and brainstem when seeing an unfamiliar but likeable person in pain (Fig. 2a, b).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Furthermore, we extended previous findings10 by showing that men, as well as women, who scored higher on standard empathy scales22 had higher empathy-related brain activity in ACC and AI/FI (Supplementary Fig. 2).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The comparison of brain activity associated with painful and non-painful trials in the ‘self’ condition for men and women revealed an expected increase in the ‘pain network’, including activity in AI and ACC (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 11
- It may state two separate claims as one. 8
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Recent imaging studies provide evidence for common activation elicited when experiencing disgust8, touch9 or pain10-12 in oneself, and when perceiving the same feelings in others.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Wicker, B. et al. Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40, 655–664 (2003) source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Keysers, C. et al. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 42, 335–346 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N. & Decety, J. How do we perceive the pain of others: A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage 3, 771–779 (2005) source
- Supportedcites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
This source is cited for the pain portion of the sentence, not for disgust or touch. The Whole Brain Contrasts section reports a common right anterior cingulate activation when participants felt a painful stimulus and when they observed another person receive one; the Summary and Conclusions reiterates that finding. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The activation in ACC was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P , 0.001 uncorrected, P , 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but was borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P 1/4 0.001 uncorrected; Supplementary Tables 4 and 5; coordinates refer to the peak of activations in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consistent with this finding, supplementary analysis showed that women but not men displayed significant activation in bilateral AI/FI and ACC in all three conditions (Supplementary Tables 7 and 10).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The perception–action model of empathy states that the observation or imagination of another person in a particular emotional state automatically activates a representation of that state in the observer1.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These results suggest that our ability to empathize relies on neuronal systems that underpin our own bodily and emotional states1,2,10,13.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Gallese, V., Keysers, C. & Rizzolatti, G. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 396–403 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Craig, A. D. Human feelings: why are some more aware than others? Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 239–241 (2004) source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the two confederates were always of the same sex, all four possible gender combinations between the sex of the subject and the sex of the confederates were used equally often throughout the study.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Empathy for pain model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These theories4,7 suggest that people value the gains of others positively if they are perceived to behave fairly, but value others' gains negatively if they behave unfairly.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Rabin, M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 83, 1281–1302 (1993)
- Not checked yetcites [7] Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114, 817–868 (1999) source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After scanning, subjects completed a standard empathy scale22 and were asked to rate the intensity of the low and high stimulation, their liking for the two confederates, and their desire for revenge on the two confederates (see Fig. 1b, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Post-scan questionnaires
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This pattern of preferences implies that people like cooperating with fair opponents but also like punishing unfair opponents.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, studies on empathy for pain have found that the activation observed in anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex (AI/FI) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) to pain in oneself is also seen when observing pain in someone else10,12.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown in Fig. 1c, cues (coloured arrows) were presented in random order indicating whether she/he (self condition), the fair player (fair condition) or the unfair player (unfair condition) would get low stimulation (no pain condition) or high stimulation (pain condition).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has been shown that people reward others for cooperative behaviour but punish violations of social fairness even at a personal cost15,16, an effect likely to be mediated by neural mechanisms that provide intrinsic motivation (that is, satisfaction) from punishing violators21.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Fehr, E. & Gachter, S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791 (2003) source
- Not checked yetcites [21] de Quervain, D. J. et al. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305, 1254–1258 (2004) source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report results at P < 0.005 uncorrected for multiple comparisons in the a priori regions of interest.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Image acquisition and analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our findings indicate that cooperation nourishes this link, but selfish behaviour that is detrimental to others effectively compromises this link (at least with males), such that empathic responses in the brain are diminished or abolished.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These findings are consistent with the different functions associated with distinct regions of the striatum: afferent projections to dorsal striatum are thought to be crucial for learning correct actions so as to maximize reward, whereas projections to ventral striatum, including nucleus accumbens, have a key function in reward prediction and pavlovian learning18-20,23,24.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Cardinal, R. N., Parkinson, J. A., Hall, J. & Everitt, B. J. Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26, 321–352 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [19] O'Doherty, J. et al. Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science 304, 452–454 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [20] Schultz, W. Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 1, 199–207 (2000) source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Dayan, P. & Balleine, B. W. Reward, motivation, and reinforcement learning. Neuron 36, 285–298 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Montague, P. R., Hyman, S. E. & Cohen, J. D. Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control. Nature 431, 760–767 (2004) source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The position (left or right) of the actor (fair or unfair) was counterbalanced across subjects.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Empathy for pain model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The modulation of empathic neural responses by the social relations between individuals is unknown.
“However, it is unclear whether or how these responses are modulated by the social relations between individuals.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms”
From Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness (2013) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While it is not clear to what extent early interoceptive signals are prone to modulation, it has been shown that all parts of insula (posterior, mid and anterior) as well as cACC may be regulated by top-down systems during processing of bottom-up interoceptive input (Atlas and Wager, 2014) and processing of top-down induced activation in the interoceptive stream (Singer et al., 2006; Rutgen et al.”
From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“That is, in male participants, ventral striatum activity increases when passively seeing partner, who has previously acted unfairly, incur pain 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“In certain conditions, ventral striatum activity appears related to seeing others receive a deserved misfortune.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“The striatum displays signals that are related to making a decision to punish someone for acting unfairly 96, 97, as well as related to observing a punishment meted out to someone who has acted unfairly 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the level of ventral striatum activation is related to male participants’ desire for revenge against the unfair partner98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“As gender differences in social emotions were observed in previous neuroscientific research (e.g.Singer et al., 2006), we decided to control for possible gender effects by restricting our sample to female participants only.”
From Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training (2014) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Self-citationAltruistic punishment in humans
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415137a · Cited by 5,616 · cited 3×
“Increased pain-related activation (asterisk indicates whole-brain corrected) for women in ACC* [9, 18, 27], left FI* [242, 15,23], right FI* [30, 18,218], left SII* [260,230, 18], right SII* [63,230, 24] and brainstem* [3,218,218]; for men in left FI* [233, 33, 3] right FI [42, 33, 3] and brainstem [3,233,230].”
BackgroundTrust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,712
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
Rabin, M. (2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15 · Cited by 4,614
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126
Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093535 · Cited by 3,929
Self-citationSpatial registration and normalization of images
Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Frith, C., Poline, J.-B., Heather, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030303 · Cited by 3,744
Self-citationBehavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction
Camerer, C. F. (2003) · Cited by 3,722
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 999
Wagner, D. D., Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr074 · Cited by 107
“…examining individual differences in empathy-related constructs that have primarily examined empathic responses to another person’s physical pain (Singer et al. 2004, 2006; Lamm et al. 2007) or to perceiving basic social signals (i.e., facial displays of emotion, see Chakrabarti et al. 2006;…”
The evolution of intergroup bias: Perceptions and attitudes in rhesus macaques.
Mahajan, N., Martinez, M. A., Gutierrez, N. L., Diesendruck, G., Banaji, M. R., & Santos, L. R. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022459 · Cited by 105
Retractedvan der Meulen, M., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Crone, E. A. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159045 · Cited by 100
“Previous studies reported that neural responses to social interactions can differ for men and women [38].”
BackgroundKrach, S., Blümel, I., Marjoram, D., Lataster, T., Krabbendam, L., Weber, J., van Os, J., & Kircher, T. (2009) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-9 · Cited by 101
“Parameter estimates extracted at the local maximum activation in the ACC region [x = 8, y = 39, z = 5] neither correlated with pay-off outcomes during the human-computer nor during the human-human interaction (rhuman-computer = .07; p > .05; rhuman-human = .26; p > .05).”
BackgroundInfluentialSocial mindfulness and social hostility
Lange, P. A. M. V., & Doesum, N. J. V. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.009 · Cited by 104
How serotonin shapes moral judgment and behavior
Siegel, J. Z., & Crockett, M. J. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12229 · Cited by 103
Favouritism in the motor system: social interaction modulates action simulation
Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2010) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0478 · Cited by 104
“While it is already known that social relations modulate empathic brain responses (Singer et al .”
Anderson, D. J., & Krettenauer, T. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13073655 · Cited by 123
“Although there are some sociocultural explanations for these affective differences [68], there is also some evidence to suggest that these differences are driven in part by biological factors, such as hormones [69] or sex-based brain differences [70].”
BackgroundSocial Cognition and Interpersonal Impairments in Trauma Survivors with PTSD
Nietlisbach, G., & Maercker, A. (2009) · Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma · doi:10.1080/10926770902881489 · Cited by 97
“The discovery of mirror neurons confirmed that a translation mechanism present in the primate brain is automatically elicited when viewing others' actions ( Singer et al, 2006 ).”
BackgroundDynamic construction of the neural networks underpinning empathy for pain
Betti, V., & Aglioti, S. M. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.02.009 · Cited by 104
“This reduction is stronger significant activity of the left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens, a complex of brain region associated with reward processing (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSocial ties and coordination on negative reciprocity: The role of affect
Reuben, E., & van Winden, F. A. A. M. (2007) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.012 · Cited by 95
“Quervain et al. (2004) show that effective punishment of individuals who behave unkindly produces activity in areas of the brain associated with the processing of rewards (see also Singer et al., 2006 ).”
The effects of gratitude expression on neural activity
Kini, P., Wong, Y. J., McInnis, S., Gabana, N. T., & Brown, J. W. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.040 · Cited by 109
“A number of similar social cognitive and affective constructs have been studied, including trust and reciprocity (King-Casas et al., 2005), fairness (De Quervain et al., 2004; Sanfey et al., 2003), and empathy (Singer et al., 2004, 2006).”
BackgroundNeural correlates of economic game playing
Krüeger, F., Grafman, J. H., & McCabe, K. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0165 · Cited by 101
“In another study, Singer et al. (2004a) allowed subjects to face a series of cooperative and no-cooperative opponents in a sequential PDG.”
BackgroundEmpathetic identification and punitiveness
Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. T. (2009) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480609336495 · Cited by 97
“In this regard, Singer et al. (2006) used real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to observe the brain activity of 16 men and 16 women as they engaged in an economic game, a version of the Prisoner’s Dilemma game.”
Bellucci, G., Feng, C., Camilleri, J. A., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krüeger, F. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.06.024 · Cited by 100
“Thus, like for empathy (Singer et al., 2006; Zheng et al., 2016), reputation may modulate vAI responses to advantageous inequality and motivate people to refrain from intentionally violating a social norm.”
Neural basis of quasi-rational decision making
Lee, D. (2006) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.02.001 · Cited by 98
“Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2006, 16:1–8 namely those who behaved unfairly in an economic game, be subjected to pain [72].”
BackgroundThe power of emotional valence—from cognitive to affective processes in reading
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I. C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00192 · Cited by 107
“Similar correlations between the anterior insula and self-reported empathy have been observed for empathy of social pain (Masten et al., 2011), and for the observation of other individuals receiving pain (Singer et al., 2004, 2006).”
Whose loss is it? Human electrophysiological correlates of non-self reward processing
Fukushima, H., & Hiraki, K. (2009) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910802625009 · Cited by 96
“Recent research in social neuroscience has shown that psychological questionnaires on social behavior are correlated with neural activity variation between individuals (see for example Fukushima & Hiraki, 2006; Gazzola et al., 2006; Singer et al., 2004, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodThe physiology of moral sentiments
Zak, P. J. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.11.009 · Cited by 97
“For example, responses to another’s pain, and to facial expressions indicating pain, locate empathy within the observer’s pain matrix: the anterior cingulate cortex, brainstem, cerebellum, and the anterior insula (Hein and Singer, 2008; Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Decety et al., 1997).”
Báez, S., Morales, J. P., Slachevsky, A., Torralva, T., Matus, C., Manes, F. F., & Ibáñez, A. M. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.007 · Cited by 94
“According with present results, contextual appraisal and target evaluation in empathy-for-pain paradigms predominantly activate the OFC, among other areas (e.g., Decety et al., 2012; Lamm et al., 2007; Singer et al., 2006).”
Suda, M., Takei, Y., Aoyama, Y., Narita, K., Sato, T., Fukuda, M., & Mikuni, M. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.036 · Cited by 98
Structural basis of empathy and the domain general region in the anterior insular cortex
Mutschler, I., Reinbold, C., Wankerl, J., Seifritz, E., & Ball, T. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00177 · Cited by 92
“observed in an fMRI study on empathy for pain that in males but not females empathetic reactions were absent for persons who were perceived as behaving unfairly (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMoral imagination: Facilitating prosocial decision-making through scene imagery and theory of mind
Gaesser, B., Keeler, K., & Young, L. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.004 · Cited by 98
“There are ample instances of our prosocial failures (Allport, 1954; Cuddy, Rock, & Norton, 2007; Latané & Darley, 1968; Harris & Fiske, 2006; Zaki, 2014), and, in some cases, even enjoyment in others’ suffering (Cikara, Bruneau, & Saxe, 2011; Cikara, Bruneau, Van Bavel, & Saxe, 2014; Singer et al., 2006).”
Yawn contagion in humans and bonobos: emotional affinity matters more than species
Palagi, E., Norscia, I., & Demuru, E. (2014) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.519 · Cited by 99
“This emotional circuitry, in its positive and negative form, has been found not only in humans (Singer et al., 2006; Pfeifer et al., 2008) but also in monkeys (Masserman, Wechkin & Terris, 1964; Palagi et al.”
Perceiving an opponent's loss: gender-related differences in the medial-frontal negativity
Fukushima, H., & Hiraki, K. (2006) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsl020 · Cited by 98
Pang, C., Li, W., Zhou, Y., Gao, T.-Y., & Han, S.-H. (2023) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsad008 · Cited by 101
“According to Steiger (2004), the general rule of thumb to use the CIs to test a statistical hypothesis (H0) is as follows: when testing a two-sided/one-sided hypothesis at the alpha level, use a 100 × (1 − α)%/100 × (1–2α)% CI.”
MethodThe influence of group membership on the neural correlates involved in empathy
Eres, R., & Molenberghs, P. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00176 · Cited by 92
Vicarious Fear Learning Depends on Empathic Appraisals and Trait Empathy
Olsson, A., McMahon, K., Papenberg, G., Zaki, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. N. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615604124 · Cited by 92
Schadenfreude: A Counternormative Observer Response to Workplace Mistreatment
Li, X., McAllister, D. J., Ilieș, R., & Gloor, J. L. P. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0134 · Cited by 99
The Positive Consequences of Pain: A Biopsychosocial Approach
Bastian, B., Jetten, J., Hornsey, M. J., & Leknes, S. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314527831 · Cited by 91
“…or gut level emotional experiences (K. D. Craig, 1968) leading to the arousal of empathy in the observer (K. D. Craig, 2009; Goubert et al., 2005; T. Singer et al., 2006) and the activation of pain-related brain regions (Jackson, Meltzoff, & Decety, 2005; Ochsner et al., 2008; Simon, Craig,…”
BackgroundFamiliarity promotes the blurring of self and other in the neural representation of threat
Beckes, L., Coan, J. A., & Hasselmo, K. (2012) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss046 · Cited by 91
“Although factors such as the perceived fairness of a target or the oddness of a target’s pain modulate the mean activity within these regions (Singer et al., 2006; Lamm et al., 2010), familiarity with the target seems to modulate the correlation between self and other in ways that are not…”
InfluentialEmpathy can increase customer equity related to pro-social brands
Lee, E. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.018 · Cited by 92
What norms trigger punishment?
Carpenter, J. P., & Matthews, P. H. (2009) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-009-9214-z · Cited by 92
“1 The notable exceptions are the neural studies of de Quervain et al. (2004) and Singer et al. (2006), which indicate that people receive pleasure from punishing norm violators but even these studies do not tell us what sorts of " misbehavior " trigger punishment.”
BackgroundThe influence of prior record on moral judgment
Kliemann, D., Young, L., Scholz, J., & Saxe, R. R. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.010 · Cited by 90
“Consistent with previous studies (Berg et al., 1995; de Quervain et al., 2004; Haselhuhn & Mellers, 2005; Singer, Kiebel, Winston, Dolan, & Frith, 2004; Singer et al., 2006), the economic game provided subjects with negative (unfair) and positive (fair) personal experiences with the competitors.”
Majdandžić, J., Amashaufer, S., Hummer, A., Windischberger, C., & Lamm, C. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.003 · Cited by 90
“This set-up was motivated by previous empathy studies using a similar paradigm (Hein, Silani, Preuschoff, Batson, & Singer, 2010; Rütgen, Seidel, Riečanský, et al., 2015; Singer et al., 2006), with one stimulation train lasting 1500 ms.”
Racial bias in neural response to others' pain is reduced with other-race contact
Cao, Y., Contreras-Huerta, L. S., McFadyen, J., & Cunnington, R. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.02.010 · Cited by 90
“Other studies have similarly shown strong effects of group assignment on empathy and neuralmirroring processes when groups are defined based on competition (Hein et al., 2010; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundBruneau, E., Dufour, N. P., & Saxe, R. R. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0293 · Cited by 91
Singer, T., & Steinbeis, N. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04733.x · Cited by 86
Self-citation10,000 social brains: Sex differentiation in human brain anatomy
Kiesow, H., Dunbar, R. I. M., Kable, J. W., Kalenscher, T., Vogeley, K., Schilbach, L., Marquand, A. F., Wiecki, T. V., & Bzdok, D. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz1170 · Cited by 89
Acting together in and beyond the mirror neuron system
Kokal, I., Gazzola, V., & Keysers, C. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.010 · Cited by 93
“A similar definition is also used in domains of emotions (Jabbi et al., 2007; Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Wicker et al., 2003) and sensations (Blakemore et al., 2005; Keysers and Perrett, 2004; Keysers et al., 2004).”
MethodA review on the relationship between testosterone and life-course persistent antisocial behavior
Yildirim, B. O., & Derksen, J. J. L. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.044 · Cited by 92
“, 2005) and empathetic responding in men is strongly dependent on the individual perceived (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialMa, Y., Wang, C., & Han, S. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.003 · Cited by 91
“…in pain increased activity in the insula, inferior frontal (IF) and the secondary somatosensory cortices (SII), similar to previous findings (Han et al., 2009; Jackson et al., 2005; Saarela et al., 2007; Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Carr et al., 2003; Gu et al., 2010; ShamayTsoory et al., 2009).”
ResultPedersen, E. J., McAuliffe, W. H. B., & McCullough, M. E. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000410 · Cited by 89
Selfish or selfless? The role of empathy in economics
Kirman, A. P., & Teschl, M. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0192 · Cited by 89
Are there sex differences in ERPs related to processing empathy-evoking pictures?
Groen, Y., Wijers, A. A., Tucha, O. M., & Althaus, M. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.012 · Cited by 86
Oxytocin receptor gene and racial ingroup Bias in empathy-related brain activity
Luo, S., Li, B., Ma, Y., Zhang, W., Rao, Y., & Han, S. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.042 · Cited by 85
“, 2005) and when witnessing disliked ones receiving painful stimulation (Singer et al., 2006), reflecting modulations of human reward activity by emotional”
BackgroundVariability in empathic fear response among 11 inbred strains of mice
Keum, S., Park, J., Kim, A., Park, J., Kim, K. K., Jeong, J., & Shin, H. (2015) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12278 · Cited by 86
“…2010; Bolivar et al., 2001; Langford et al., 2006; Wiesenfeld-Hallin, 2005) and women frequently score higher on standard tests of empathy, social sensitivity and emotion recognition than men (Schulte-Ruther et al., 2008; Singer et al., 2006), we attempted to investigate the effect of sex on OFL.”
BackgroundCarré, J. M., Gilchrist, J. D., Morrissey, M. D., & McCormick, C. M. (2010) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.04.001 · Cited by 90
“Another study reported that watching individuals who had played unfairly in monetary exchange game receive painful electric shocks produced increased activation in the striatum/nucleus accumbens relative to watching individuals who had played fairly (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundCognitive rehabilitation after severe acquired brain injury: current evidence and future directions
Luca, R. D., Calabrò, R. S., & Bramanti, P. (2016) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2016.1211937 · Cited by 92
“Indeed, cognition and emotion are fundamental to the evolvement of empathy, which can be defined as a sense of similarity between the feelings one experiences and those expressed by others (refer to people’s emotional state to embodying the experience of that state) (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMasten, C. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Pfeifer, J. H., & Dapretto, M. (2010) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2010.490673 · Cited by 120
“…direct and observed fear (Whalen et al., 2001), and the dACC and anterior insula are activated by direct and observed physical pain in adults (Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Jackson, Bruney, Meltzoff, & Decety, 2005; Botvinick et al., 2005; Morrison, Lloyd, Di Pellegrino, & Roberts, 2004) and…”
McCall, C., & Singer, T. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117532 · Cited by 84
“Finally, participants completed a questionnaire in which they rated the other two players in terms of being fair, likeable, enjoyable, annoying, and attractive [2] on a Likert scale ranging from -3 to +3.”
InfluentialSelf-citationActing on social exclusion: neural correlates of punishment and forgiveness of excluders
Will, G., Crone, E. A., & Güroğlu, B. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsu045 · Cited by 85
“, 2012) or administration of electric shocks to norm-violators (Singer et al., 2006; Hein et al., 2010).”
BackgroundThe Social Context Network Model in Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases
Báez, S., García, A. M., & Ibáñez, A. M. (2016) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2016_443 · Cited by 84
Moral judgment modulates neural responses to the perception of other’s pain: an ERP study
Cui, F., Ma, N., & Luo, Y.-J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20851 · Cited by 82
Is Neuroaccounting Waiting in the Wings? An Essay
Birnberg, J. G., & Ganguly, A. R. (2011) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.11.004 · Cited by 84
A common neural code for social and monetary rewards in the human striatum
Wake, S., & Izuma, K. (2017) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsx092 · Cited by 96
“…or behavior, such as mutually cooperating with other individuals (Rilling et al., 2002, 2004), punishing unfair behavior (De Quervain et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006), giving charitable donations (Moll et al., 2006; Harbaugh et al., 2007) and receiving a good reputation from others (Izuma et…”
BackgroundSocial Preferences and the Brain
Fehr, E. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374176-9.00015-4 · Cited by 84
Yamamoto, S., & Takimoto, A. (2012) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0160-0 · Cited by 81
“However, considering the observed empathy–fairness intervention in neural activities, which is found in men who did not feel empathy for the unfair person in pain (Singer et al., 2006), it is plausible that empathy is not always a mere automatic consequence of the passive observation of emotional cues in others, but r…”
BackgroundInfluentialMoral Values Are Associated with Individual Differences in Regional Brain Volume
Lewis, G. J., Kanai, R., Bates, T. C., & Rees, G. E. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00239 · Cited by 85
“Some relevant brain regions, such as the ACC (with prior links to fairness; e.g., Singer et al., 2006), did not show significant associations to any of the traits examined in this study.”
Schadenfreude deconstructed and reconstructed: A tripartite motivational model
Wang, S., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Rochat, P. (2018) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.09.002 · Cited by 88
Empathy dysfunction in children and adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders
de Wied, M. A., Wied, C. C. G., & Boxtel, A. V. (2009) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.10.016 · Cited by 98
“A recent brain-imaging study conducted by Singer and colleagues (Singer et al., 2006) reveal the neural correlates of such counter-empathic reactions.”
BackgroundWhen Giving Is Good: Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Activation for Others' Intentions
Cooper, J. C., Kreps, T. A., Wiebe, T., Pirkl, T., & Knutson, B. D. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.030 · Cited by 81
“Individuals watching others receive electric shocks, for example, had reduced activation in pain-sensitive regions such as the insula and ACC if those others had played unfairly in a prior economic game (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundCoutinho, J. F. P., Oliveira‐Silva, P., & Decety, J. (2014) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000021 · Cited by 99
Oxytocin, sexually dimorphic features of the social brain, and autism
Yamasue, H., Kuwabara, H., Kawakubo, Y., & Kasai, K. (2009) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2009.01944.x · Cited by 78
The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour
(2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490118 · Cited by 79
Is the Extrastriate Body Area (EBA) Sensitive to the Perception of Pain in Others?
Lamm, C., & Jean Decety, A. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn006 · Cited by 77
Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Analysis of Invariance and Gender Differences in Spanish Youths
Tello, F. P. H., Egido, B. D., Ortíz, M. Á. C., & Gándara, M. V. D. B. (2012) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-012-0327-9 · Cited by 77
“This suggests that women recruit areas containing mirror neurons to a higher degree than men, and therefore, that empathic response of women could be more automatic and less shaped by people’s social behavior [34].”
BackgroundLubell, M. N., & Lippert, L. (2011) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852310388367 · Cited by 76
“Stakeholder interaction allows cross-interest learning and empathy, which are linked to cooperation (Batson et al., 1995; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundDeontic Justice and Organizational Neuroscience
Cropanzano, R., Massaro, S., & Becker, W. J. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3056-3 · Cited by 80
“Singer et al. (2006) found that subjects showed activation in fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices toward fair players who were allegedly being hurt.”
BackgroundPreschool children and chimpanzees incur costs to watch punishment of antisocial others
Mendes, N., Steinbeis, N., Guerra, N. B., Call, J., & Singer, T. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0264-5 · Cited by 74
Self-citationFernandez-Quintanilla, C. (2020) · Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics · doi:10.1177/0963947020927134 · Cited by 99
“Target perception and evaluation, including (un)fairness perception and blame allocation, are relevant aspects that fall within the contextual appraisal of a situation (Cuff et al., 2016; Singer and Lamm, 2009; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInteraction of empathy and culture: a review
Jami, P. Y., Walker, D. I., & Mansouri, B. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04422-6 · Cited by 83
“…Stürmer et al., 2006 ; Tarrant et al., 2009 ), historic differences in power and status (Mathur et al., 2010 ), fairness received from the observee (Singer et al., 2006 ), perception of the target’s moral characteristics (Cui et al., 2016 ; Delgado et al., 2005 ), direct or indirect interaction…”
Differences in self- and other-induced Mu suppression are correlated with empathic abilities
Woodruff, C. C., Martin, T., & Bilyk, N. (2011) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.046 · Cited by 79
How social neuroscience can inform theories of social comparison
Swencionis, J. K., & Fiske, S. T. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.009 · Cited by 74
“In a study more squarely focused on warmth comparisons, Singer et al. (2006) had participants react to others' painful experiences after observing their economic-game behavior.”
BackgroundRoesler, C. (2012) · Journal of Analytical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01963.x · Cited by 77
“This explains why we can get infected by other people’s emotions (Singer et al. 2006).”
BackgroundCrisp, R. (2008) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-008-9114-x · Cited by 78
Vachon‐Presseau, É., Roy, M., Martel, M. O., Albouy, G., Chen, J.-I., Budell, L., Sullivan, M. J. L., Jackson, P. L., & Rainville, P. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.030 · Cited by 75
“…empathy (Jackson et al., 2005; Singer et al., 2004), expertise (Cheng et al., 2007; Decety et al., 2010), the affective link between individuals (Singer et al., 2006), perceived group membership (Hein et al., 2010) and racial bias (Avenanti et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2009) have been shown to…”
BackgroundIntegration of Error Agency and Representation of Others' Pain in the Anterior Insula
Koban, L., Corradi‐Dell’Acqua, C., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00324 · Cited by 72
“For example, activation to observed pain is more pronounced for close others and same-group members (Avenanti, Sirigu, & Aglioti, 2010; Cheng, Chen, Lin, Chou, & Decety, 2010; Decety, Echols, & Correll, 2010; Xu, Zuo, Wang, & Han, 2009; Singer et al., 2006), suggesting that interpersonal relationships can moderate the…”
BackgroundUniversal moral grammar: a critical appraisal
Emmanuel Dupoux, A., & Jacob, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.001 · Cited by 78
Repression in Residential Youth Care: A Scoping Review
de Valk, S., Kuiper, C. H. Z., van der Helm, P. G., Maas, A. J. J., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2016) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-016-0029-9 · Cited by 80
“The males even activated a region of the brain that is involved in processing reward; they literally appeared to enjoy seeing the ‘‘bad guy’’ punished (Keysers 2011; Singer et al. 2006).”
BackgroundSinger, T. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374176-9.00017-8 · Cited by 85
“…of empathic brain responses obtained while subjects were observing other people suffering ! be it their loved ones or people the subjects liked (Singer et al., 2004, 2006) ! have revealed individual differences in activity in empathy-related painsensitive areas (ACC and AI) and that these…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSynchronous with Your Feelings: Sensorimotor γ Band and Empathy for Pain
Betti, V., Zappasodi, F., Rossini, P. M., Aglioti, S. M., & Tecchio, F. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2759-09.2009 · Cited by 72
“These studies provided important clues on some of the possible variables that modulate empathy for pain (Singer et al., 2006; Avenanti et al., 2006; Cheng et al., 2007; Valeriani et al., 2008) and on whether this process impinges upon the affective (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004), the…”
BackgroundBruneau, E., Jacoby, N., & Saxe, R. R. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.034 · Cited by 76
“When empathy is reduced by making the target 13 less sympathetic (e.g. a cheater), there is no reduction in amygdala activity when the 14 target receives a painful electric shock (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundWhen decisions of others matter to me: an electrophysiological analysis
Marco‐Pallarés, J., Krämer, U. M., Strehl, S., Schröder, A., & Münte, T. F. (2010) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-11-86 · Cited by 75
“displays were presented, either [25][5] or [5][25].”
BackgroundInfluentialLeft hemisphere dominance in reading the sensory qualities of others’ pain?
Minio-Paluello, I., Avenanti, A., & Aglioti, S. M. (2006) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910601035954 · Cited by 71
Increasing generosity by disrupting prefrontal cortex
Christov‐Moore, L., Sugiyama, T., Grigaityte, K., & Iacoboni, M. (2016) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2016.1154105 · Cited by 68
“…2012; Hogeveen, Inzlicht, & Obhi, 2014; Lamm, Nusbaum, Meltzoff, & Decety, 2007; Liebe & Tutic, 2010; Loggia, Mogil, & Bushnell, 2008; Losin et al., 2015; Reynolds Losin, Iacoboni, & Dapretto, 2014; Reynolds Losin, Iacoboni, Martin, Cross, & Dapretto, 2012; Singer et al., 2006; Zaki et al., 2012).”
Measuring empathic responses in animals
Edgar, J. L., Nicol, C. J., Clark, C. C. A., & Paul, E. S. (2012) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.006 · Cited by 80
Toward a conceptualization of ethnocultural empathy.
Rasoal, C., Eklund, J. H., & Hansen, E. M. (2011) · Journal of Social Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0099278 · Cited by 74
“There are still numerous definitions and operationalizations of the concept of empathy in use (e.g., Eisenberg & Lennon, 1983; Hoffman, 1977; Rappaport & Chinsky, 1972; Rogers, 1975; Singer et al., 2006; Truax, 1972; Walton, 1933).”
BackgroundRules of social exchange: Game theory, individual differences and psychopathology
Wischniewski, J., Windmann, S., Juckel, G., & Brüne, M. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.008 · Cited by 74
“In fact, most people tend to feel uncomfortable when witnessing somebody being cheated upon by another person and experience satisfaction from observing or administering punishment to norm-violators (de Quervain et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006).”
Woltin, K., Corneille, O., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Förster, J. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.006 · Cited by 75
“…individual differences in empathic tendencies (Baron-Cohen & Wheelwright, 2004; Pulos, Elison, & Lennon, 2004) and shows covariation with activity in the anterior cingulate and the anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex (i.e., regions activated when observing pain in others; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundSocial hierarchy modulates neural responses of empathy for pain
Feng, C., Li, Z., Xue, F., Wang, L., Tian, T., & Luo, Y. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv135 · Cited by 68
Xu, E., Huang, X., Jia, R. T., Xu, J., Liu, W., Graham, L., & Snape, E. (2020) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2019.1349 · Cited by 69
“Indeed, recent neuropsychological research has demonstrated that the neural activation associated with schadenfreude in response to a rival ’ s misfortune is related to the endorsement of harming behavior (e.g., Singer et al. 2006, Takahashi et al. 2009, Cikara et al. 2011).”
The S cience of Interpersonal Trust
Borum, R. (2010) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 69
Wöllner, C. (2012) · Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0027392 · Cited by 73
The Neural Bases of Social Intention Understanding: The Role of Interaction Goals
Canessa, N., Alemanno, F., Riva, F., Zani, A., Proverbio, A. M., Mannara, N., Perani, D., & Cappa, S. F. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042347 · Cited by 69
“Moreover, a relationship has been reported between such differences and the presence of higher empathic aptitude in females than males [31,32].”
BackgroundSelective reduction of Von Economo neuron number in agenesis of the corpus callosum
Kaufman, J. A., Paul, L. K., Manaye, K. F., Granstedt, A. E., Hof, P. R., Hakeem, A. Y., & Allman, J. M. (2008) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-008-0434-7 · Cited by 69
“In human fMRI experiments, ACC and FI are both activated by paradigms evoking social emotions such as empathy [47], guilt [46], unfairness [ 48 ], humor [60], embarrassing situations or violations of social norms [4], and romantic love [3, 23].”
BackgroundReduced self-referential neural response during intergroup competition predicts competitor harm
Cikara, M., Jenkins, A. C., Dufour, N., & Saxe, R. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.080 · Cited by 67
“, ventral striatum) respond when a competitor receives a painful electric shock (Singer et al., 2006), or when an envied target experiences misfortunes (Takahashi et al.”
What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art
Sherman, A., & Morrissey, C. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00411 · Cited by 85
“In 12Additionally, Singer et al. (2006) demonstrated that the proposed neural networks subserving empathy indeed represent “true” empathizing with another person, rather than just imagining one’s own emotional experience.”
BackgroundHormonal and Genetic Influences on Processing Reward and Social Information
Caldú, X., & Dreher, J. (2007) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1412.007 · Cited by 71
Montalan, B., Lelard, T., Godefroy, O., & Mouras, H. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00389 · Cited by 68
“For example, affective links (e.g., Singer et al., 2006), perceived similarities (e.g., Perry et al., 2010), and social memberships (e.g., Xu et al., 2009) are likely to modulate the level of empathy experienced by the observer toward agent’s pain.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Wellcome Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Singer, Tania
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 439
- Issue
- 7075
- Pages
- 466-469
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC2636868
- OpenAlex
- W2098425678
- Semantic Scholar
- a9adbab6dae28c23a205786c725a988649d155ef
- Cited by
- 1,726
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 100
- FWCI
- 139.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (078865)
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- empathy, perceived fairness, social preferences, schadenfreude, altruistic punishment, revenge, sex differences, anterior cingulate cortex, reward processing, economic games, corporal punishment
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Empathy, Female, Game Theory, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Pain, Photic Stimulation, Punishment, Reward, Sex Characteristics, Social Justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review