The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 27 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others
Open accessAbstract
The neural processes underlying empathy are a subject of intense interest within the social neurosciences. However, very little is known about how brain empathic responses are modulated by the affective link between individuals. We show here that empathic responses are modulated by learned preferences, a result consistent with economic models of social preferences. We engaged male and female volunteers in an economic game, in which two confederates played fairly or unfairly, and then measured brain activity with functional magnetic resonance imaging while these same volunteers observed the confederates receiving pain. Both sexes exhibited empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas (fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices) towards fair players. However, these empathy-related responses were significantly reduced in males when observing an unfair person receiving pain. This effect was accompanied by increased activation in reward-related areas, correlated with an expressed desire for revenge. We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Empathic brain responses to another person’s pain are shaped by perceived fairness: participants showed pain-related empathy in fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices toward fair players, but men showed reduced empathic responses and increased reward-related activity when an unfair player received pain. The authors conclude that, at least in men, empathy is modulated by social valuation, with unfair opponents’ pain potentially linked to reward and revenge.
Key findings
- After a sequential Prisoner’s Dilemma game, both male and female subjects rated the fair player as significantly more fair, agreeable, likeable, and attractive than the unfair player (scale range 2 to 22; P < 0.001).
- Both sexes showed empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas, including bilateral anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, when observing a fair player in pain; ACC activation was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P < 0.001 uncorrected, P < 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P = 0.001 uncorrected).
- Men showed significantly enhanced bilateral fronto-insular activation when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain, whereas women showed no significant difference in empathy-related pain regions for fair versus unfair players.
- In men, but not women, observing an unfair player receiving pain increased activation in left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens and left orbito-frontal cortex; men also expressed a stronger desire for revenge than women (t(30) = 2.40, P < 0.05), and men with stronger revenge desire showed greater nucleus accumbens activation for unfair versus fair player pain.
Methods
- Subjects were 16 men and 16 women; four professional actors (two female, two male) served as confederates. Subjects played a sequential iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma game in which confederates reciprocated fairly or unfairly, inducing liking or disliking.
- In an empathy-for-pain fMRI task, subjects observed cues indicating that they, the fair player, or the unfair player would receive low or high electrical stimulation; each 12-s trial included a cue followed after 6 s by a circle indicating stimulation onset.
- fMRI data were acquired on a 1.5-T Siemens Sonata scanner and analyzed in SPM2 using an event-related model with a 2 × 3 × 2 factorial design (pain vs no pain; self, fair, unfair; male vs female subject), random-effects group analyses, conjunction/masking, and regression analyses; results are reported at P < 0.005 uncorrected in a priori regions of interest.
Limitations
- The paper states that further experiments are needed to confirm the gender specificity of the effect.
- The paper notes that the experimental design may have favoured men because the punishment modality involved physical threat rather than psychological or financial threat; alternatively, the findings could indicate a predominant role for males in maintaining justice and punishing norm violation.
- Evident from the text: the sample was small (32 subjects), several key results are reported at uncorrected thresholds within a priori regions of interest, and the gender analysis is binary and based on male/female subject groups.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
20 Own result · 10 Not checked yet · 6 Own interpretation · 4 Own method · 1 Supported so far
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In women this reduction in activity was very small, whereas in men the knowledge that an unfair player was in receipt of pain elicited no increase in empathic activity in FI.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And indeed, formal analysis revealed no significant difference for women when comparing painful trials for fair versus unfair players in empathy-related pain regions.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, men showed significantly enhanced activation in bilateral FI when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain (Supplementary Tables 8 and 11).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, we observed pain-related empathic responses in both genders in bilateral AI extending into FI and brainstem when seeing an unfamiliar but likeable person in pain (Fig. 2a, b).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Furthermore, we extended previous findings10 by showing that men, as well as women, who scored higher on standard empathy scales22 had higher empathy-related brain activity in ACC and AI/FI (Supplementary Fig. 2).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The comparison of brain activity associated with painful and non-painful trials in the ‘self’ condition for men and women revealed an expected increase in the ‘pain network’, including activity in AI and ACC (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 11
- It may state two separate claims as one. 8
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Recent imaging studies provide evidence for common activation elicited when experiencing disgust8, touch9 or pain10-12 in oneself, and when perceiving the same feelings in others.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Wicker, B. et al. Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40, 655–664 (2003) source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Keysers, C. et al. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 42, 335–346 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N. & Decety, J. How do we perceive the pain of others: A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage 3, 771–779 (2005) source
- Supportedcites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
This source is cited for the pain portion of the sentence, not for disgust or touch. The Whole Brain Contrasts section reports a common right anterior cingulate activation when participants felt a painful stimulus and when they observed another person receive one; the Summary and Conclusions reiterates that finding. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The activation in ACC was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P , 0.001 uncorrected, P , 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but was borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P 1/4 0.001 uncorrected; Supplementary Tables 4 and 5; coordinates refer to the peak of activations in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consistent with this finding, supplementary analysis showed that women but not men displayed significant activation in bilateral AI/FI and ACC in all three conditions (Supplementary Tables 7 and 10).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The perception–action model of empathy states that the observation or imagination of another person in a particular emotional state automatically activates a representation of that state in the observer1.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These results suggest that our ability to empathize relies on neuronal systems that underpin our own bodily and emotional states1,2,10,13.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Gallese, V., Keysers, C. & Rizzolatti, G. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 396–403 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Craig, A. D. Human feelings: why are some more aware than others? Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 239–241 (2004) source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the two confederates were always of the same sex, all four possible gender combinations between the sex of the subject and the sex of the confederates were used equally often throughout the study.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Empathy for pain model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These theories4,7 suggest that people value the gains of others positively if they are perceived to behave fairly, but value others' gains negatively if they behave unfairly.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Rabin, M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 83, 1281–1302 (1993)
- Not checked yetcites [7] Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114, 817–868 (1999) source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After scanning, subjects completed a standard empathy scale22 and were asked to rate the intensity of the low and high stimulation, their liking for the two confederates, and their desire for revenge on the two confederates (see Fig. 1b, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Post-scan questionnaires
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This pattern of preferences implies that people like cooperating with fair opponents but also like punishing unfair opponents.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, studies on empathy for pain have found that the activation observed in anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex (AI/FI) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) to pain in oneself is also seen when observing pain in someone else10,12.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown in Fig. 1c, cues (coloured arrows) were presented in random order indicating whether she/he (self condition), the fair player (fair condition) or the unfair player (unfair condition) would get low stimulation (no pain condition) or high stimulation (pain condition).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has been shown that people reward others for cooperative behaviour but punish violations of social fairness even at a personal cost15,16, an effect likely to be mediated by neural mechanisms that provide intrinsic motivation (that is, satisfaction) from punishing violators21.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Fehr, E. & Gachter, S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791 (2003) source
- Not checked yetcites [21] de Quervain, D. J. et al. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305, 1254–1258 (2004) source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report results at P < 0.005 uncorrected for multiple comparisons in the a priori regions of interest.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Image acquisition and analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our findings indicate that cooperation nourishes this link, but selfish behaviour that is detrimental to others effectively compromises this link (at least with males), such that empathic responses in the brain are diminished or abolished.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These findings are consistent with the different functions associated with distinct regions of the striatum: afferent projections to dorsal striatum are thought to be crucial for learning correct actions so as to maximize reward, whereas projections to ventral striatum, including nucleus accumbens, have a key function in reward prediction and pavlovian learning18-20,23,24.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Cardinal, R. N., Parkinson, J. A., Hall, J. & Everitt, B. J. Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26, 321–352 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [19] O'Doherty, J. et al. Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science 304, 452–454 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [20] Schultz, W. Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 1, 199–207 (2000) source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Dayan, P. & Balleine, B. W. Reward, motivation, and reinforcement learning. Neuron 36, 285–298 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Montague, P. R., Hyman, S. E. & Cohen, J. D. Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control. Nature 431, 760–767 (2004) source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The position (left or right) of the actor (fair or unfair) was counterbalanced across subjects.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Empathy for pain model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The modulation of empathic neural responses by the social relations between individuals is unknown.
“However, it is unclear whether or how these responses are modulated by the social relations between individuals.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms”
From Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness (2013) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While it is not clear to what extent early interoceptive signals are prone to modulation, it has been shown that all parts of insula (posterior, mid and anterior) as well as cACC may be regulated by top-down systems during processing of bottom-up interoceptive input (Atlas and Wager, 2014) and processing of top-down induced activation in the interoceptive stream (Singer et al., 2006; Rutgen et al.”
From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“That is, in male participants, ventral striatum activity increases when passively seeing partner, who has previously acted unfairly, incur pain 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“In certain conditions, ventral striatum activity appears related to seeing others receive a deserved misfortune.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“The striatum displays signals that are related to making a decision to punish someone for acting unfairly 96, 97, as well as related to observing a punishment meted out to someone who has acted unfairly 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the level of ventral striatum activation is related to male participants’ desire for revenge against the unfair partner98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“As gender differences in social emotions were observed in previous neuroscientific research (e.g.Singer et al., 2006), we decided to control for possible gender effects by restricting our sample to female participants only.”
From Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training (2014) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Self-citationAltruistic punishment in humans
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415137a · Cited by 5,616 · cited 3×
“Increased pain-related activation (asterisk indicates whole-brain corrected) for women in ACC* [9, 18, 27], left FI* [242, 15,23], right FI* [30, 18,218], left SII* [260,230, 18], right SII* [63,230, 24] and brainstem* [3,218,218]; for men in left FI* [233, 33, 3] right FI [42, 33, 3] and brainstem [3,233,230].”
BackgroundTrust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,712
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
Rabin, M. (2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15 · Cited by 4,614
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126
Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093535 · Cited by 3,929
Self-citationSpatial registration and normalization of images
Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Frith, C., Poline, J.-B., Heather, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030303 · Cited by 3,744
Self-citationBehavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction
Camerer, C. F. (2003) · Cited by 3,722
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 999
Neural mechanisms of social decision-making in the primate amygdala
Chang, S. W. C., Fagan, N. A., Toda, K., Utevsky, A. V., Pearson, J. M., & Platt, M. L. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1514761112 · Cited by 157
“5A), we focus on the 30-min time window beginning 5 min into the completion of each injection hereafter [first 30 min: BLA, F(1,24) = 4.”
InfluentialCrockett, M. J., Clark, L., Lieberman, M. D., Tabibnia, G., & Robbins, T. W. (2010) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0019861 · Cited by 159
“, 2006); and a spiteful, emotion-driven system including the mPFC, insula and striatum, which represent the immediately reinforcing aspects of sanctioning norm violators (de Quervain et al., 2004; Koenigs & Tranel, 2007; Sanfey et al., 2003; Singer et al., 2006; Tabibnia et al., 2008).”
BackgroundMonetary sacrifice among strangers is mediated by endogenous oxytocin release after physical contact
MORHENN, V, PARK, J., PIPER, E., & ZAK, P. (2008) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.04.004 · Cited by 158
“Keywords: Cooperation; Altruism; Sacrifice; Trust; Touch”
BackgroundTheir pain, our pleasure: stereotype content and schadenfreude
Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12179 · Cited by 183
Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate‐based meta‐analysis
Bellucci, G., Chernyak, S. V., Goodyear, K., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krueger, F. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23451 · Cited by 160
“For instance, this region is more engaged in prosocial individuals when they defect, whereas pro-self individuals engage the AI more when they reciprocate [King-Casas et al., 2008; Singer et al., 2006].”
BackgroundThe Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D. (2009) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8029.003.0086 · Cited by 164
Investigations on empathy towards humans and robots using fMRI
Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A. M., Schulte, F. P., Eimler, S. C., Sobieraj, S., Hoffmann, L., Maderwald, S., Brand, M., & Krämer, N. C. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.004 · Cited by 148
Perspective taking is associated with specific facial responses during empathy for pain
Lamm, C., Porges, E. C., Cacioppo, J. T., & Jean Decety, A. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.066 · Cited by 159
Cortisol increase in empathic stress is modulated by emotional closeness and observation modality
Engert, V., Plessow, F., Miller, R. E., Kirschbaum, C., & Singer, T. (2014) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.04.005 · Cited by 176
“Alongside other characteristics of the observer-target relationship such as the affective link (Singer et al., 2006), familiarity was repeatedly shown to modulate the amount of empathy in a given situation (Cialdini et al., 1997; de Vignemont and Singer, 2006; Hein and Singer, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBrain Structural and Functional Damage Network Localization of Suicide
Zhang, X., Xu, R., Ma, H., Qian, Y., & Zhu, J. (2024) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.01.003 · Cited by 160
Language in dialogue: when confederates might be hazardous to your data
Kuhlen, A. K., & Brennan, S. E. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0341-8 · Cited by 172
Racism and the Empathy for Pain on Our Skin
Forgiarini, M., Gallucci, M., & Maravita, A. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00108 · Cited by 157
“, 2009), by social relationship with the target (Singer et al., 2006), by familiarity for the target (Cialdini et al.”
BackgroundAlexithymia and emotional empathy following traumatic brain injury
Williams, C., & Wood, R. L. (2009) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390902976940 · Cited by 167
What Is It like to Feel Another's Pain?
de Vignemont, F., & Jacob, P. (2012) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/664742 · Cited by 159
The Direct-Perception Model of Empathy: a Critique
Jacob, P. (2011) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-011-0065-0 · Cited by 151
“... interpretation of this finding as showing the existence of “a common mechanism for understanding the emotion in others and feeling the same emotions in ourselves.” Now, advocates of the direct-perception modelofempathymight argue thatthisfinding isevidenceinfavor of the second-personal interactionist view of socia…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialJack, A. I., Friedman, J. P., Boyatzis, R. E., & Taylor, S. N. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149989 · Cited by 166
“However, prior work has shown a that males have a stronger tendency towards mentalizing, and females towards empathic concern [26, 106].”
BackgroundFranzen, N., Hagenhoff, M., Baer, N., Schmidt, A., Mier, D. U., Sammer, G., Gallhofer, B., Kirsch, P., & Lis, S. (2010) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.11.012 · Cited by 149
“, 2004), as well as the extent of empathy experiencedwith another subject (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundThe Sight of Others' Pain Modulates Motor Processing in Human Cingulate Cortex
Morrison, I., Peelen, M. V., & Downing, P. E. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl129 · Cited by 151
“…between neurophysiological measures and various subjective measures encompassing empathy- and pain-related emotional and sensory indices (Singer et al. 2004, 2006; Avenanti et al. 2005, 2006; Jackson et al. 2005, 2006; Morrison et al. forthcoming), but so far, no study has linked neural…”
BackgroundKiyonari, T., & Barclay, P. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0011381 · Cited by 157
Recovery at Work: Understanding the Restorative Side of "Depleting" Client Interactions
Lilius, J. M. (2012) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0458 · Cited by 159
“On the other hand, of course, when relational quality is high, empathic concern will be more naturally felt (Bartal, 1976; Singer et al., 2006), and, thus, such interactions will be marked by what Ashforth and Humphrey describe as “instances whereby one spontaneously and genuinely experiences the…”
BackgroundNot so innocent: Does seeing one's own capability for wrongdoing predict forgiveness?
Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Zell, A. L., Kraft, A. J., & Witvliet, C. V. O. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.495 · Cited by 146
Fact vs fiction—how paratextual information shapes our reading processes
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I. C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss098 · Cited by 146
“The ventral striatum is known to be involved in the processing of reward and positive affect (Elliot et al., 2000; Roy et al., 2012), learning (Willems et al., 2010) and social cognition (Singer et al., 2006; Tricomi et al., 2010).”
Grabowska, A. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.23953 · Cited by 151
“Research carried out by Singer et al. (2006) is one of the best known examples of this.”
BackgroundSex and gender differences in the development of empathy
Rochat, M. J. (2022) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.25009 · Cited by 169
“The physical pain of cheaters activates both pain matrix and reward- related areas in the observer's brain (Singer et al., 2006), while early traumatic social experience virtually blocks both emotion recognition and automatic facial mimicry of a perceived emotion (Ardizzi et al., 2013, 2015).”
BackgroundEmpathy and contextual social cognition
Melloni, M., López, V., & Ibáñez, A. M. (2013) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0205-3 · Cited by 147
“The consideration of fairness for others in pain also modulates the pain matrix (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundNeural correlates of body dissatisfaction in anorexia nervosa
Friederich, H., Brooks, S. J., Uher, R., Campbell, I. C., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S., Herzog, W., & Treasure, J. L. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.036 · Cited by 157
Motivated empathy: a social neuroscience perspective
Weisz, E., & Zaki, J. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.05.005 · Cited by 153
Currie, G. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199656615.001.0001 · Cited by 148
Ochsner, K. N., Zaki, J., Hanelin, J., Ludlow, D. H., Knierim, K. E., Ramachandran, T., Glover, G. H., & Mackey, S. (2008) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsn006 · Cited by 145
“Others have suggested that beyond the use of shared representations, additional higher-level inferential processes may be necessary for complete empathic understanding and social cognition more generally (Decety and Jackson, 2004; Beer and Ochsner, 2006; Mitchell, 2006; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundResultNeural Basis of Preference for Human Social Hierarchy versus Egalitarianism
Chiao, J. Y., Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., & Lipke, T. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04508.x · Cited by 141
Emotional contagion for pain is intact in autism spectrum disorders
Hadjikhani, N. K., Zürcher, N. R., Rogier, O., Hippolyte, L., Lemonnier, É., Ruest, T., Ward, N., Lassalle, A., Gillberg, N., Billstedt, E., et al. (2014) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2013.113 · Cited by 152
Impact of Aging on Empathy: Review of Psychological and Neural Mechanisms
Beadle, J. N., & de la Vega, C. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00331 · Cited by 140
“Key brain regions thought to be involved in emotional empathy include the anterior cingulate and insula, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and amygdala (13, 69, 70).”
BackgroundMethodEmpathy, gender, and prosocial behavior
Kamas, L., & Preston, A. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2020.101654 · Cited by 139
Social learning through prediction error in the brain
Joiner, J. A., Piva, M., Turrin, C., & Chang, S. W. C. (2017) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-017-0009-2 · Cited by 147
Conceptualising spirituality for medical research and health service provision
King, M., & Koenig, H. G. (2009) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-116 · Cited by 139
“We also know something of the brain function underlying the emotions joy, ecstasy, rage or fear[24,42,43], all of which may be part of ecstatic experience.”
Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira‐Souza, R., Bramati, I. E., Krüeger, F., Tura, B. R., Cavanagh, A. L., & Grafman, J. H. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.026 · Cited by 142
Building trust: Heart rate synchrony and arousal during joint action increased by public goods game
Mitkidis, P., McGraw, J. J., Roepstorff, A., & Wallot, S. (2015) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.033 · Cited by 144
Deontological and altruistic guilt: evidence for distinct neurobiological substrates
Basile, B., Mancini, F., Macaluso, E., Caltagirone, C., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Bozzali, M. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21009 · Cited by 133
The Emotional Cost of Humanity
Cameron, C. D., Harris, L. T., & Payne, B. K. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615604453 · Cited by 148
Correlations in Social Neuroscience Aren't Voodoo: Commentary on Vul et al. (2009)
Lieberman, M. D., Berkman, E. T., & Wager, T. D. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01128.x · Cited by 135
“In Study 31 (Singer et al., 2006), four nonindependent correlations that are described in the text were not included, though they were listed numerically in the supplementary materials (as indicated in the main text).”
The multiple facets of empathy: a survey of theory and evidence
Leiberg, S., & Anders, S. (2006) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56023-6 · Cited by 134
“A very recent fMRI study (Singer et al., 2006) employing the Prisoner’s Dilemma paradigm has shown that the brain activity of male subjects during observing an opponent in pain was modulated by the perceived fairness of the opponent.”
BackgroundThe past, present and future of social neuroscience: A European perspective
Singer, T. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.109 · Cited by 141
“…or psychological traits such as alexithymia (Bird et al., 2010; Silani et al., 2008), expertise (Cheng et al., 2007), the perception of fairness (Singer et al., 2006), group membership of the other (Avenanti et al., 2010; Hein et al., 2010), contextual appraisal of the situation (Lamm et al.,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe evolutionary psychology of leadership
van Vugt, M., & Ronay, R. (2013) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386613493635 · Cited by 133
“For instance, fMRI research shows that there is activation in the reward areas of the brain when bystanders witness leaders being punished when they behave unfairly (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundThe envious brain: The neural basis of social comparison
Dvash, J., Gilam, G., Ben‐Ze'ev, A., Hendler, T., & Shamay‐Tsoory, S. G. (2010) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20972 · Cited by 132
Self‐other resonance, its control and prosocial inclinations: Brain–behavior relationships
Christov‐Moore, L., & Iacoboni, M. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23119 · Cited by 136
“…shared neural representations for the perception and experience of disgust [Jabbi et al., 2007; Wicker et al., 2003], somatosensation [Bufalari et al., 2007; Masten et al., 2011; Singer et al., 2006], emotion [Carr et al., 2003; Pfeifer et al., 2008], and motor behavior [Keysers and Fadiga, 2008].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe anterior cingulate cortex: an integrative hub for human socially-driven interactions
Lavín, C., Melis, C., Mikulan, E., Gelormini‐Lezama, C., Huepe, D., & Ibáñez, A. M. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00064 · Cited by 145
“For instance, observing a prosocial subject receiving pain stimulation triggers empathy responses reflected in increased bilateral activity of the AI and the ACC, compared to observing an antisocial subject (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundAn insular view of the social decision-making network
Rogers-Carter, M. M., & Christianson, J. P. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.005 · Cited by 121
“NAc encodes reward value and decision-making, and, as noted, both IC and NAc are implicated in rodent and human social behaviors (Lamm & Singer, 2010; Trezza et al., 2011; Singer et al., 2006; Lichtenberg et al., 2018).”
BackgroundEmotional contagion and prosocial behavior in rodents
Keysers, C., Knapska, E., Moita, M. A. P., & Gazzola, V. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.05.005 · Cited by 130
“This is reminiscent of findings in humans that men and women show similar levels of elevated activity in pain-related regions for fair demonstrators receiving shocks, but only women do for unfair demonstrators [68].”
Gender differences in neural mechanisms underlying moral sensitivity
Harenski, C. L., Antonenko, O., Shane, M. S., & Kiehl, K. A. (2008) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsn026 · Cited by 132
“Recent studies investigating the neural correlates of empathy have implicated two primary regions; the anterior insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (Botvinick et al., 2005; Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Jackson et al., 2005, 2006; Saarela et al., 2007; Lamm et al., 2007).”
BackgroundCarruthers, P. (2015) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.009 · Cited by 133
In Search of Informed Discretion: An Experimental Investigation of Fairness and Trust Reciprocity
Maas, V. S., van Rinsum, M., & Towry, K. L. (2011) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-10205 · Cited by 124
“Recent research in neuroeconomics has also found that such perceived unfairness has neural correlates in pain-related brain areas (Sanfey et al. 2003; Singer et al. 2006) and that the opportunity to punish a norm-violator activates reward-related areas of the brain (De Quervain et al. 2004).”
BackgroundNeural markers of a greater female responsiveness to social stimuli
Proverbio, A. M., Zani, A., & Adorni, R. (2008) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-56 · Cited by 126
Paulus, M., Kühn‐Popp, N., Licata, M., Sodian, B., & Meinhardt, J. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.041 · Cited by 139
“Social neuroscience has recently experienced a growing interest in the neural correlates of prosocial and moral behavior (e.g., de Greck et al., 2012; Decety et al., 2011; Güroğlu et al., 2011; Hsu et al., 2008; Mathur et al., 2010; Rameson et al., 2011; Shen and Han, 2012; Singer et al., 2006; Sommer et al., 2010; Yo…”
BackgroundThe emergence of human prosociality: aligning with others through feelings, concerns, and norms
Jensen, K., Vaish, A., & Schmidt, M. F. H. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00822 · Cited by 145
“Punishers often feel angry at being cheated (e.g., Pillutla and Murnighan, 1996; Ben-Shakhar et al., 2007) and people (men, at least) will show neurological signatures of pleasure when seeing someone who cheated them apparently receive a painful stimulus (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundPerspective taking modulates event-related potentials to perceived pain
Li, W., & Han, S. (2009) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.021 · Cited by 126
Cognitive, affective, and conative theory of mind (ToM) in children with traumatic brain injury
Dennis, M., Simić, N., Bigler, E. D., Abildskov, T. J., Agostino, A., Taylor, H. G., Rubin, K. H., Vannatta, K. A., Gerhardt, C. A., Stancin, T., et al. (2012) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.006 · Cited by 139
Perception of suffering and compassion experience: Brain gender disparities
Mercadillo, R. E., Díaz, J. L., Pasaye, E. H., & Barrios, F. A. (2011) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.019 · Cited by 126
“It has also been reported that women are more empathic in conflict-resolution situations, and that men manifest a lower activation of brain areas related to empathy when they observe a painful stimulus received by a person known to be unfair (de Wied, Branje, & Meeus, 2007; Singer et al., 2006).”
Extension 3.0: Managing Agricultural Knowledge Systems in the Network Age
Lubell, M. N., Niles, M. T., & Hoffman, M. (2014) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.933496 · Cited by 145
“In the case of conflict, network theory suggests the importance of building ‘‘bridging’’ social capital among members of different groups (Adler and Kwon 2002) in order to facilitate better understanding of diverse viewpoints and empathy (Singer et al. 2006).”
Organization of felt and seen pain responses in anterior cingulate cortex
Morrison, I., & Downing, P. E. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.079 · Cited by 126
“…studies have shown activation of medial prefrontal areas in response to pain observation, including the anterior cingulate (ACC), supplementary motor area (SMA) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA) (Morrison et al., 2004, Singer et al., 2004, 2006; Jackson et al., 2005; Lamm et al., 2007).”
BackgroundAdenzato, M., Brambilla, M., Manenti, R., Lucia, L. D., Trojano, L., Garofalo, S., Enrici, I., & Cotelli, M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep41219 · Cited by 132
To empathise or not to empathise? Empathy and its limits in design
Heylighen, A., & Dong, A. (2019) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.007 · Cited by 121
A volumetric comparison of the insular cortex and its subregions in primates
Bauernfeind, A. L., de Sousa, A. A., Avasthi, T., Dobson, S. D., Raghanti, M. A., Lewandowski, A. H., Zilles, K., Semendeferi, K., Allman, J. M., Craig, A. D. (., et al. (2013) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.12.003 · Cited by 134
“…of complex social interactions that have been amplified in the human lineage, such as increased empathy, cooperation, understanding of other individual’s mental states, and language (Singer et al., 2004, 2006, 2009; Rilling et al., 2008; Ackermann and Riecker, 2010; Rilling and Sanfey, 2011).”
Trust and social reciprocity in adolescence – A matter of perspective‐taking
Fett, A.-K. J., Shergill, S. S., Gromann, P. M., Dumontheil, I., Blakemore, S., Yakub, F., & Krabbendam, L. (2013) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.11.011 · Cited by 128
“In our study, the only gender difference we found was more malevolent reciprocity of male participants towards an unfair interaction partner, which could reflect a greater inclination of males to punish unfair behaviour (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundAre Gender Differences in Empathy Due to Differences in Emotional Reactivity?
Rueckert, L. M., Branch, B., & Doan, T. (2011) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2011.26088 · Cited by 119
“The gender difference in empathy toward friends and enemies found in the present study appears to be at odds with results reported by Singer et al. (2006). Using fMRI, they found that women and men showed an equally strong empathic response in pain-related areas of the brain when they saw a “fair” confederate receive…”
ResultEmotional and cognitive aspects of empathy and their relation to social cognition—an fMRI-study
Krämer, U. M., Mohammadi, B., Doñamayor, N., Samii, A., & Münte, T. F. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.043 · Cited by 120
Combs, D. J. Y., Powell, C. A. J., Schurtz, D. R., & Smith, R. H. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.009 · Cited by 120
“…schadenfreude is more likely to arise when people deserve their misfortunes (Feather, 2008; Feather & Naim, 2005; Feather & Sherman, 2002; Portmann, 2000; Singer et al., 2006; van Dijk et al., 2005) and when misfortunes happen to people who are disliked (Hareli & Weiner, 2002; Heider, 1958).”
BackgroundShanton, K. L., & Goldman, A. I. (2010) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.33 · Cited by 136
Social neuroscience evidence for dehumanised perception
Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2009) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280902954988 · Cited by 148
“Research has demonstrated that the insula is more active when participants witness a close other experience a negative event, specifically a mild shock (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundBeeney, J. E., Franklin, R. G., Levy, K. N., & Adams, R. B. (2011) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2011.557245 · Cited by 119
“Consistent with our first hypothesis, we found that when participants watched a friend be rejected their brain activation showed striking overlap with regions activated previously for the actual experience of social rejection, as well as for actual and empathic experiences of physical pain (Eisenberger et al, 2003 ; S…”
BackgroundResultRacial Bias in Neural Empathic Responses to Pain
Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Baker, K. S., Reynolds, K. J., Batalha, L., & Cunnington, R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084001 · Cited by 116
“Furthermore, recent imaging studies have found that social and contextual factors can also regulate empathic neural responses to others’ pain [10,11,24–28], including race of the target person [29–34].”
BackgroundNeuroeconomic Approaches to Mental Disorders
Kishida, K. T., King‐Casas, B., & Montague, P. R. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.021 · Cited by 124
Seeing the pain of others while being in pain: A laser-evoked potentials study
Valeriani, M., Betti, V., Pera, D. L., Armas, L. D., Miliucci, R., Restuccia, D., Avenanti, A., & Aglioti, S. M. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.056 · Cited by 123
“Relevant to this issue is an fMRI study demonstrating that empathic responses to the pain of others’ are dramatically lower for unfair than fair individuals (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundThe narcissistic self and its psychological and neural correlates: an exploratory fMRI study
Fan, Y., Wonneberger, C., Enzi, B., de Greck, M., Ulrich, C., Tempelmann, C., Bogerts, B., Doering, S., & Northoff, G. (2010) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329171000228x · Cited by 122
“The right anterior insula has indeed been typically associated with empathy (Singer et al. 2004, 2006 ; Singer & Lamm, 2009; Lamm & Singer, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEmpathic responses to others’ gains and losses: An electrophysiological investigation
Ma, Q., Shen, Q., Xu, Q., Li, D., Shu, L., & Weber, B. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.045 · Cited by 120
“The nucleus accumbens was activated instead of empathy-related region like the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) or anterior insula (AI) when seeing the betrayers suffering from pain (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMinimally Acceptable Altruism and the Ultimatum Game
Rotemberg, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2006.06.008 · Cited by 115
Intergroup Schadenfreude: motivating participation in collective violence
Cikara, M. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.007 · Cited by 115
“, [52,53]).”
Rütgen, M., Seidel, E., ansky, I. R., & Lamm, C. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3936-14.2015 · Cited by 115
Pain perception in the self and observation of others: An ERP investigation
Meng, J., Jackson, T., Chen, H., Hu, L., Yang, Z., Su, Y., & Huang, X. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.024 · Cited by 114
“…" (e.g., Avenanti et al., 2010; Botvinick et al., 2005; Cheng et al., 2007; Gu and Han, 2007; Jackson et al., 2005; Lamm et al., 2010), overlapping cortical structures that include affective areas (e.g., Lamm et al., 2007; Singer et al., 2004, 2006) and sensory areas (e.g., Avenanti et al., 2006).”
Empathic neural responses to others' pain are modulated by emotional contexts
Han, S., Fan, Y., Xu, X., Qin, J., Wu, B., Wang, X., Aglioti, S. M., & Mao, L. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20742 · Cited by 113
“…(BOLD) signal recorded using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) [Jackson et al., 2005, 2006; Morrison et al., 2004; Saarela et al., 2007; Singer et al., 2004, 2006], the amplitudes of event-related potentials (ERPs) [Fan and Han, 2008; Han et al., 2008], the nonphase-locked…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFilippi, M., Riccitelli, G. C., Falini, A., Salle, F. D., Vuilleumier, P. O., Comı, G., & Rocca, M. A. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010847 · Cited by 128
“Moreover, empathic responses can be modulated by the subjective attitude held toward suffering individuals [7], as well as by personal experience [8].”
BackgroundNeuroscientific approaches and applications within anthropology
Rilling, J. K. (2008) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20947 · Cited by 115
“…studies have shown that brain reward regions, including the caudate nucleus and related structures in the ventral striatum, are activated when subjects successfully punish others who have previously treated them unfairly in a trust game or a PD game (de Quervain et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundBruneau, E., Pluta, A., & Saxe, R. R. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.008 · Cited by 121
“…a loved one leads to more activity in insula and cingulate regions (Cheng, Chen, Lin, Chou, & Decety, 2010; Singer et al., 2004), while pain experienced by a disliked individual or group leads to less activity in these regions (Hein, Silani, Preuschoff, Batson, & Singer, 2010; Singer et al., 2006).”
Espinosa, M. P., & KovářÃk, J. (2015) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00088 · Cited by 130
Hunter, T., Siess, F., & Colloca, L. (2013) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00436.x · Cited by 110
“Moreover, empathy may be modulated by the interpersonal context in which individuals are engaged (Lanzetta and Englis, 1989; Singer et al., 2006) and so the lack of interaction with the demonstrator in the video replay group may have also influenced the relationship between empathy and placebo…”
BackgroundIbáñez, A., Hurtado, E., Lobos, A., Escobar, J., Trujillo, N., Baez, S., Huepe, D., Manes, F., & Decety, J. (2011) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.014 · Cited by 110
The Moral brain: a multidisciplinary perspective
Decety, J., & Wheatley, T. (2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.192126 · Cited by 110
Empathy in Human–Robot Interaction: Designing for Social Robots
Park, S. H., & Whang, M. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19031889 · Cited by 111
“As reviewed (see Figure 1), the empathic event may influence the likelihood of empathizing [69] and the power of empathic responses [20].”
BackgroundJankowski, K. F., & Takahashi, H. (2014) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.12182 · Cited by 115
“Both male and female participants recruited empathy-related AI/FO and ACC activity when they observed fair players in pain, which was positively correlated with self-reported empathy.(129) However, male participants recruited reduced empathy-related AI/FO activity and increased rewardrelated VS activity when they obse…”
ResultDevelopmental consequences and biological significance of mother–infant bonding
Mogi, K., Nagasawa, M., & Kikusui, T. (2010) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.08.024 · Cited by 108
Wang, C., Wu, B., Liu, Y. T., Wu, X., & Han, S. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv005 · Cited by 112
Braams, B. R., Peters, S., Peper, J. S., Güroğlu, B., & Crone, E. A. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.020 · Cited by 102
“cover story with an unfair ultimatum game offer allowed us to create an antagonist as the third player (Braams et al., 2013; Sanfey et al., 2003; Singer et al., 2006).”
The neural basis of unconditional love
Beauregard, M., Courtemanche, J., Paquette, V., & St-Pierre, É. L. (2009) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.11.003 · Cited by 106
“It has also been demonstrated that the anterior insula plays a crucial role for empathic experience related to pain (Singer et al., 2004, 2006).”
BackgroundChimpanzees empathize with group mates and humans, but not with baboons or unfamiliar chimpanzees
Campbell, M., & de Waal, F. Β. Μ. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0013 · Cited by 106
“Outgroup chimpanzees possibly elicited a hostile response, which interfered with empathybased engagement [49], whereas the gelada baboons were viewed as a socially meaningless stimulus.”
BackgroundSchaefer, M., Heinze, H., & Rotte, M. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.112 · Cited by 106
“…others in pain and may be linked to activation in insula and sensorimotor areas (Avenanti et al., 2009; Betti et al., 2009; Cheng et al., 2008; Singer et al., 2004, 2006), whereas cognitive empathy (PT) might be involved when watching others being nonpainfully touched, associated with…”
BackgroundCheetham, M. (2009) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.029.2009 · Cited by 108
“, 1987; Davis, 1996; Preston and de Waal, 2002; Decety and Jackson, 2004), even to the extent that not only the direct observation of another person’s pain (Jackson et al., 2006; Singer et al., 2006) but also the perception of a signal that pain is being experienced is suffi cient to induce empathy-related brain activ…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Neuroscience of Compassion and Empathy and Their Link to Prosocial Motivation and Behavior
Chierchia, G., & Singer, T. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805308-9.00020-8 · Cited by 108
Self-citationCulture shapes empathic responses to physical and social pain.
Atkins, D., Üskül, A. K., & Cooper, N. R. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000162 · Cited by 118
Yun, J. H., Lee, E., & Kim, D. H. (2021) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21445 · Cited by 112
Cooper, J. C., Dunne, S., Furey, T., & O'Doherty, J. P. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00114 · Cited by 101
“role in the response to othersʼ outcomes (Cooper, Kreps, Wiebe, Pirkl, & Knutson, 2010; Mobbs et al., 2009; Singer et al., 2006; Delgado, Frank, & Phelps, 2005), and varia-”
Self-citationDistinct neural networks underlying empathy for pleasant and unpleasant touch
Lamm, C., Silani, G., & Singer, T. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.01.021 · Cited by 109
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Wellcome Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Singer, Tania
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 439
- Issue
- 7075
- Pages
- 466-469
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC2636868
- OpenAlex
- W2098425678
- Semantic Scholar
- a9adbab6dae28c23a205786c725a988649d155ef
- Cited by
- 1,726
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 100
- FWCI
- 139.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (078865)
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- empathy, perceived fairness, social preferences, schadenfreude, altruistic punishment, revenge, sex differences, anterior cingulate cortex, reward processing, economic games, corporal punishment
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Empathy, Female, Game Theory, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Pain, Photic Stimulation, Punishment, Reward, Sex Characteristics, Social Justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review