The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 27 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others
Open accessAbstract
The neural processes underlying empathy are a subject of intense interest within the social neurosciences. However, very little is known about how brain empathic responses are modulated by the affective link between individuals. We show here that empathic responses are modulated by learned preferences, a result consistent with economic models of social preferences. We engaged male and female volunteers in an economic game, in which two confederates played fairly or unfairly, and then measured brain activity with functional magnetic resonance imaging while these same volunteers observed the confederates receiving pain. Both sexes exhibited empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas (fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices) towards fair players. However, these empathy-related responses were significantly reduced in males when observing an unfair person receiving pain. This effect was accompanied by increased activation in reward-related areas, correlated with an expressed desire for revenge. We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Empathic brain responses to another person’s pain are shaped by perceived fairness: participants showed pain-related empathy in fronto-insular and anterior cingulate cortices toward fair players, but men showed reduced empathic responses and increased reward-related activity when an unfair player received pain. The authors conclude that, at least in men, empathy is modulated by social valuation, with unfair opponents’ pain potentially linked to reward and revenge.
Key findings
- After a sequential Prisoner’s Dilemma game, both male and female subjects rated the fair player as significantly more fair, agreeable, likeable, and attractive than the unfair player (scale range 2 to 22; P < 0.001).
- Both sexes showed empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas, including bilateral anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, when observing a fair player in pain; ACC activation was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P < 0.001 uncorrected, P < 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P = 0.001 uncorrected).
- Men showed significantly enhanced bilateral fronto-insular activation when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain, whereas women showed no significant difference in empathy-related pain regions for fair versus unfair players.
- In men, but not women, observing an unfair player receiving pain increased activation in left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens and left orbito-frontal cortex; men also expressed a stronger desire for revenge than women (t(30) = 2.40, P < 0.05), and men with stronger revenge desire showed greater nucleus accumbens activation for unfair versus fair player pain.
Methods
- Subjects were 16 men and 16 women; four professional actors (two female, two male) served as confederates. Subjects played a sequential iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma game in which confederates reciprocated fairly or unfairly, inducing liking or disliking.
- In an empathy-for-pain fMRI task, subjects observed cues indicating that they, the fair player, or the unfair player would receive low or high electrical stimulation; each 12-s trial included a cue followed after 6 s by a circle indicating stimulation onset.
- fMRI data were acquired on a 1.5-T Siemens Sonata scanner and analyzed in SPM2 using an event-related model with a 2 × 3 × 2 factorial design (pain vs no pain; self, fair, unfair; male vs female subject), random-effects group analyses, conjunction/masking, and regression analyses; results are reported at P < 0.005 uncorrected in a priori regions of interest.
Limitations
- The paper states that further experiments are needed to confirm the gender specificity of the effect.
- The paper notes that the experimental design may have favoured men because the punishment modality involved physical threat rather than psychological or financial threat; alternatively, the findings could indicate a predominant role for males in maintaining justice and punishing norm violation.
- Evident from the text: the sample was small (32 subjects), several key results are reported at uncorrected thresholds within a priori regions of interest, and the gender analysis is binary and based on male/female subject groups.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
20 Own result · 10 Not checked yet · 6 Own interpretation · 4 Own method · 1 Supported so far
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In women this reduction in activity was very small, whereas in men the knowledge that an unfair player was in receipt of pain elicited no increase in empathic activity in FI.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And indeed, formal analysis revealed no significant difference for women when comparing painful trials for fair versus unfair players in empathy-related pain regions.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, men showed significantly enhanced activation in bilateral FI when observing fair compared with unfair players in pain (Supplementary Tables 8 and 11).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, we observed pain-related empathic responses in both genders in bilateral AI extending into FI and brainstem when seeing an unfamiliar but likeable person in pain (Fig. 2a, b).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Furthermore, we extended previous findings10 by showing that men, as well as women, who scored higher on standard empathy scales22 had higher empathy-related brain activity in ACC and AI/FI (Supplementary Fig. 2).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The comparison of brain activity associated with painful and non-painful trials in the ‘self’ condition for men and women revealed an expected increase in the ‘pain network’, including activity in AI and ACC (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post-scan behavioural ratings confirmed that both male and female subjects rated the fair player as being significantly more fair, more agreeable, more likeable and more attractive than the unfair player (range of scale ρ2 to 22; P , 0.001; Supplementary Table S1).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 11
- It may state two separate claims as one. 8
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Recent imaging studies provide evidence for common activation elicited when experiencing disgust8, touch9 or pain10-12 in oneself, and when perceiving the same feelings in others.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Wicker, B. et al. Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40, 655–664 (2003) source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Keysers, C. et al. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 42, 335–346 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N. & Decety, J. How do we perceive the pain of others: A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage 3, 771–779 (2005) source
- Supportedcites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
This source is cited for the pain portion of the sentence, not for disgust or touch. The Whole Brain Contrasts section reports a common right anterior cingulate activation when participants felt a painful stimulus and when they observed another person receive one; the Summary and Conclusions reiterates that finding. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The activation in ACC was significant in women ([9, 18, 27]; P , 0.001 uncorrected, P , 0.05 whole-brain corrected) but was borderline in men ([29, 39, 27]; P 1/4 0.001 uncorrected; Supplementary Tables 4 and 5; coordinates refer to the peak of activations in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consistent with this finding, supplementary analysis showed that women but not men displayed significant activation in bilateral AI/FI and ACC in all three conditions (Supplementary Tables 7 and 10).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The perception–action model of empathy states that the observation or imagination of another person in a particular emotional state automatically activates a representation of that state in the observer1.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These results suggest that our ability to empathize relies on neuronal systems that underpin our own bodily and emotional states1,2,10,13.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Preston, S. D. & de-Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Gallese, V., Keysers, C. & Rizzolatti, G. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 396–403 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Craig, A. D. Human feelings: why are some more aware than others? Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 239–241 (2004) source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the two confederates were always of the same sex, all four possible gender combinations between the sex of the subject and the sex of the confederates were used equally often throughout the study.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Empathy for pain model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These theories4,7 suggest that people value the gains of others positively if they are perceived to behave fairly, but value others' gains negatively if they behave unfairly.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Rabin, M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 83, 1281–1302 (1993)
- Not checked yetcites [7] Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114, 817–868 (1999) source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After scanning, subjects completed a standard empathy scale22 and were asked to rate the intensity of the low and high stimulation, their liking for the two confederates, and their desire for revenge on the two confederates (see Fig. 1b, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Post-scan questionnaires
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Davis, M. A. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat. Selected Docs Psychol. 10, 85 (1980)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that in men (at least) empathic responses are shaped by valuation of other people's social behaviour, such that they empathize with fair opponents while favouring the physical punishment of unfair opponents, a finding that echoes recent evidence for altruistic punishment.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This pattern of preferences implies that people like cooperating with fair opponents but also like punishing unfair opponents.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, studies on empathy for pain have found that the activation observed in anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex (AI/FI) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) to pain in oneself is also seen when observing pain in someone else10,12.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Singer, T. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157–1162 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. & Roberts, N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270–278 (2004) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown in Fig. 1c, cues (coloured arrows) were presented in random order indicating whether she/he (self condition), the fair player (fair condition) or the unfair player (unfair condition) would get low stimulation (no pain condition) or high stimulation (pain condition).”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has been shown that people reward others for cooperative behaviour but punish violations of social fairness even at a personal cost15,16, an effect likely to be mediated by neural mechanisms that provide intrinsic motivation (that is, satisfaction) from punishing violators21.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Fehr, E. & Gachter, S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791 (2003) source
- Not checked yetcites [21] de Quervain, D. J. et al. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305, 1254–1258 (2004) source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report results at P < 0.005 uncorrected for multiple comparisons in the a priori regions of interest.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Image acquisition and analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our findings indicate that cooperation nourishes this link, but selfish behaviour that is detrimental to others effectively compromises this link (at least with males), such that empathic responses in the brain are diminished or abolished.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These findings are consistent with the different functions associated with distinct regions of the striatum: afferent projections to dorsal striatum are thought to be crucial for learning correct actions so as to maximize reward, whereas projections to ventral striatum, including nucleus accumbens, have a key function in reward prediction and pavlovian learning18-20,23,24.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Cardinal, R. N., Parkinson, J. A., Hall, J. & Everitt, B. J. Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26, 321–352 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [19] O'Doherty, J. et al. Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science 304, 452–454 (2004) source
- Not checked yetcites [20] Schultz, W. Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 1, 199–207 (2000) source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Dayan, P. & Balleine, B. W. Reward, motivation, and reinforcement learning. Neuron 36, 285–298 (2002) source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Montague, P. R., Hyman, S. E. & Cohen, J. D. Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control. Nature 431, 760–767 (2004) source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The position (left or right) of the actor (fair or unfair) was counterbalanced across subjects.”
§ Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others > METHODS > Empathy for pain model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The modulation of empathic neural responses by the social relations between individuals is unknown.
“However, it is unclear whether or how these responses are modulated by the social relations between individuals.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms”
From Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness (2013) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While it is not clear to what extent early interoceptive signals are prone to modulation, it has been shown that all parts of insula (posterior, mid and anterior) as well as cACC may be regulated by top-down systems during processing of bottom-up interoceptive input (Atlas and Wager, 2014) and processing of top-down induced activation in the interoceptive stream (Singer et al., 2006; Rutgen et al.”
From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“That is, in male participants, ventral striatum activity increases when passively seeing partner, who has previously acted unfairly, incur pain 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“In certain conditions, ventral striatum activity appears related to seeing others receive a deserved misfortune.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“The striatum displays signals that are related to making a decision to punish someone for acting unfairly 96, 97, as well as related to observing a punishment meted out to someone who has acted unfairly 98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the level of ventral striatum activation is related to male participants’ desire for revenge against the unfair partner98.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“As gender differences in social emotions were observed in previous neuroscientific research (e.g.Singer et al., 2006), we decided to control for possible gender effects by restricting our sample to female participants only.”
From Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training (2014) · cites this paper as Singer et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Self-citationAltruistic punishment in humans
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415137a · Cited by 5,616 · cited 3×
“Increased pain-related activation (asterisk indicates whole-brain corrected) for women in ACC* [9, 18, 27], left FI* [242, 15,23], right FI* [30, 18,218], left SII* [260,230, 18], right SII* [63,230, 24] and brainstem* [3,218,218]; for men in left FI* [233, 33, 3] right FI [42, 33, 3] and brainstem [3,233,230].”
BackgroundTrust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,712
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
Rabin, M. (2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15 · Cited by 4,614
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126
Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093535 · Cited by 3,929
Self-citationSpatial registration and normalization of images
Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Frith, C., Poline, J.-B., Heather, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030303 · Cited by 3,744
Self-citationBehavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction
Camerer, C. F. (2003) · Cited by 3,722
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 999
Sex-Linked Neuroanatomical Basis of Human Altruistic Cooperativeness
Yamasue, H., Abe, O., Suga, M., Yamada, H., Rogers, M. A., Aoki, S., Kato, N., & Kasai, K. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm254 · Cited by 68
“Furthermore, a few studies have suggested sex differences in these activations (Leibenluft et al. 2004; Azim et al. 2005; Platek et al. 2005; Singer et al. 2006).”
BackgroundMultiple-Brain Connectivity During Third Party Punishment: an EEG Hyperscanning Study
Ciaramidaro, A., Toppi, J., Casper, C., Freitag, C. M., Siniatchkin, M., & Astolfi, L. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24416-w · Cited by 71
Reward-related neural responses are dependent on the beneficiary
Braams, B. R., Güroğlu, B., de Water, E., Meuwese, R., Koolschijn, P. C., Peper, J. S., & Crone, E. A. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst077 · Cited by 75
The Interaction Between Pain and Social Behavior in Humans and Rodents
Martin, L. J., Tuttle, A. H., & Mogil, J. S. (2014) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2014_287 · Cited by 70
“For example, although both men and women exhibited empathy-related cortical activation after seeing study confederates in pain, only in men were those activations reduced if the confederates had played unfairly in an economic game played prior to pain testing (Singer et al. 2006).”
BackgroundSacheli, L. M., Candidi, M., Pavone, E. F., Tidoni, E., & Aglioti, S. M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050223 · Cited by 67
“Based on previous findings indicating that the impact of an unfair partner’s behaviour is stronger in men compared to women [46], only male participants were selected.”
BackgroundThe role of self-evaluation and envy in schadenfreude
DIJK, W. W. V., Ouwerkerk, J. W., Smith, R. H., & Cikara, M. (2015) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1111600 · Cited by 87
“Singer et al. (2006) found that for male participants, seeing the pain of a cooperative confederate activated neural networks associated with first-hand experience of pain.”
BackgroundHearing others’ pain: neural activity related to empathy
Lang, S., Yu, T., Markl, A., Müller, F., & Kotchoubey, B. (2011) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-011-0035-0 · Cited by 67
“…of empathy for pain—in particular, when our attention is directed to the somatosensory aspects of the pain experience (Avenanti, Bueti, Galati, & Aglioti, 2005; Avenanti, Minio-Paluello, Bufalari, & Aglioti, 2006; Gu & Han, 2007; Lamm, Nusbaum, Meltzoff, & Decety, 2007b; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundResultNeural responses to perceiving suffering in humans and animals
Franklin, R. G., Nelson, A. J., Baker, M. K., Beeney, J. E., Vescio, T. K., Lenz-Watson, A., & Adams, R. B. (2013) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2013.763852 · Cited by 65
Zak, P. J. (2010) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.09.004 · Cited by 69
“This idea is of ancient origin, but is most clearly articulated in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments.”
InfluentialNeural systems for guilt from actions affecting self versus others
Morey, R. A., McCarthy, G., Selgrade, E. S., Seth, S., Nasser, J. D., & LaBar, K. S. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.069 · Cited by 67
“Substantial evidence shows that when reasoning about others, women are more inclined to empathize than men (Toussaint and Webb, 2005), with a corresponding gender difference in neural activation (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMathews, B., & Collin‐Vézina, D. (2016) · Journal of Public Health Policy · doi:10.1057/jphp.2016.21 · Cited by 66
Common and distinct neural mechanisms associated with the conscious experience of vicarious pain
Grice-Jackson, T., Critchley, H., Banissy, M. J., & Ward, J. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.015 · Cited by 68
“…(Yang et al. 2009). fMRI studies have not consistently revealed a greater activity in pain-related regions in females when watching others in pain (Lamm et al. 2011), but there is evidence that females modulate their vicarious pain less than men according to social context (Singer et al. 2006).”
Models, Mechanisms and Moderators Dissociating Empathy and Theory of Mind
Kanske, P., Böckler, A., & Singer, T. (2015) · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2015_412 · Cited by 64
“…behavior-based and neural activation differences, showing for instance that empathy in women is less susceptible to previous unfairness of the observed other (Singer et al. 2006) and that emotion recognition activates mirror regions to a stronger degree in women (Schulte-Ruther et al. 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGames people play—toward an enactive view of cooperation in social neuroscience
Engemann, D. A., Bzdok, D., Eickhoff, S. B., Vogeley, K. T., & Schilbach, L. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00148 · Cited by 68
“, 2004) are acknowledged to be related to the intrinsically hedonic value of mutual cooperation, while the orbitofrontal cortex has been linked with the desire for revenge toward unfair partners (Singer et al., 2006; for an overview see Fehr and Camerer, 2007).”
BackgroundDistinct Brain Areas involved in Anger versus Punishment during Social Interactions
Klimecki, O., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28863-3 · Cited by 67
Gergen, K. J. (2010) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354310370906 · Cited by 69
“…and social decision making (Lee, 2008), romantic love (Bartels & Zeki, 2006; Fisher, Aron, & Brown, 2005), empathy (Lamm, Batson, & Decety, 2007; Singer et al., 2006), envy (Shamay-Tsoory, Tibi-Elhanany, & Aharon-Peretz, 2007), moral decision making (Casebeer, 2003), aesthetic judgment (Kirk,…”
Harnessing the Power of Reputation: Strengths and Limits for Promoting Cooperative Behaviors
Barclay, P. (2012) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491201000509 · Cited by 67
“Studies using brain-scanning technology suggest that people experience pleasure when non-cooperators receive punishment (de Quervain et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundKarjalainen, T., Karlsson, H. K., Lahnakoski, J. M., Glerean, E., Nuutila, P., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Hari, R., Sams, M. E., & Nummenmaa, L. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx129 · Cited by 62
“…(Lahnakoski et al. 2012), revealing bilateral activation clusters in regions including anterior insulae and S2 that are related to both fi rst-hand and vicarious experiences of pain (Singer et al. 2004, 2006; Jackson et al. 2005, 2006; Hein et al. 2010; Lamm et al. 2011; Morelli et al. 2014).”
Grodal, T., & Kramer, M. (2014) · Recherches sémiotiques · doi:10.7202/1025921ar · Cited by 63
“In a renowned experiment conducted by the German neuroscientist Tania Singer and her research team (Singer et al. 2006), subjects were privy to the alleged fictional corporal punishment of individuals who had either played fairly in a game or had cheated.”
BackgroundOverlapping and distinct representations of advantageous and disadvantageous inequality
Yu, R., Calder, A. J., & Mobbs, D. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22402 · Cited by 65
Mirroring, Mindreading, and Simulation
Goldman, A. I. (2008) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-479-7_14 · Cited by 63
Smith, J. (2015) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0771-8 · Cited by 71
Sora, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.814565 · Cited by 62
“Neurophysiological studies indicate that when people see or even imagine the pain of others, the brain activity is the same as if they were experiencing the observed pain themselves (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundGoals, Methods, and Progress in Neuroeconomics
Camerer, C. F. (2013) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-082012-123040 · Cited by 61
“…et al. 2002, 2004); during third-party punishment with money or symbolic points (De Quervain et al. 2004), especially for male punishment observers (Singer et al. 2006); in charitable donations (Moll et al. 2006, Harbaugh et al. 2007, Zaki et al. 2013); in the rejection of ultimatum offers based…”
BackgroundAziz‐Zadeh, L., Sheng, T., Liew, S., & Damásio, H. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr139 · Cited by 63
“This ‘‘pain matrix’’ includes the insula, the anterior and middle cingulate gyrus, the somatosensory cortices (SI and SII), and perhaps premotor areas as well (Singer et al. 2004, 2006; Jackson et al. 2006; Bufalari et al. 2007; Valeriani et al. 2008).”
BackgroundHermeneutics of personality description.
Gergen, K. J., Hepburn, A., & Fisher, D. C. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1261 · Cited by 69
Koski, S. E., & Sterck, E. H. M. (2009) · European Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17405620902986991 · Cited by 64
“For example, knowledge of the cause of the emotion and moral evaluation of another’s behaviour can increase or decrease the empathy (Lamm, Batson, & Decety, 2007; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundWhat Are They Up To? The Role of Sensory Evidence and Prior Knowledge in Action Understanding
Chambon, V., Domenech, P., Pacherie, É., Koechlin, É., Baraduc, P., & Farrer, C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017133 · Cited by 68
“The structure of social interaction meets indeed particular, often irrepressible, expectations, such as those provided by reputational knowledge [9,10,37].”
BackgroundKuehn, E., Trampel, R., Mueller, K., Turner, R., & Schütz‐Bosbach, S. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22031 · Cited by 59
Genes for susceptibility to violence lurk in the brain
Viding, E. M., & Frith, U. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601350103 · Cited by 60
Thoma, P., Winter, N., Juckel, G., & Roser, P. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.08.042 · Cited by 70
“about the perceived fairness of an individual (Singer et al., 2006) or the successful outcome of a painful treatment (Lamm et al.”
Proverbio, A. M., Riva, F., & Zani, A. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.015 · Cited by 59
Larson, M. J., Fair, J. E., Good, D. A., & Baldwin, S. A. (2009) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00949.x · Cited by 62
“, 2004) and when evaluating the perceived ‘fairness’ of others’ actions (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundNeural responses to advantageous and disadvantageous inequity
Fließbach, K., Phillipps, C. B., Trautner, P., Schnabel, M., Elger, C. E., Falk, A., & Weber, B. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00165 · Cited by 63
“Previous studies on ultimatum bargaining suggest that these activations can be interpreted in terms of registering both norm and status concern/self-interest violations (Sanfey et al., 2003; Knoch et al., 2006; Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundEffects of age-related differences in empathy on social economic decision-making
Beadle, J. N., Paradiso, S., Kovach, C. K., Polgreen, L. A., Denburg, N. L., & Tranel, D. (2012) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610211002547 · Cited by 60
“insula) when seeing an “unfair” player in pain in comparison to a “fair” player (Singer et al., 2006), suggesting that perception of fairness may affect the degree of empathy experienced towards others.”
InfluentialGeniole, S. N., MacDonell, E. T., & McCormick, C. M. (2016) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.04.006 · Cited by 62
“Neuroimaging studies of economic exchange games showa relationship between costly punishment of unfair behavior and neural structures associated with reward processing such as the dorsal and ventral striatum (De Quervain et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006; Crockett et al., 2013).”
Neuronal correlates of strategic cooperation in monkeys
Ong, W. S., Madlon‐Kay, S., & Platt, M. L. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00746-9 · Cited by 61
“…has been more closely linked with tracking the rewards 8 and emotional experiences of others 46 to support psychological processes including empathy 46 and social learning, in both monkeys and humans 8,47 Nevertheless, our observation that some neurons in ACCg encode strategic social information…”
Pleasing frowns, disappointing smiles: An ERP investigation of counterempathy.
Yamada, M., Lamm, C., & Decety, J. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0023854 · Cited by 60
Environmental morale and motivation
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490118.017 · Cited by 62
Goal-directed, habitual and Pavlovian prosocial behavior
GÄTMsiarz, F., & Crockett, M. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00135 · Cited by 70
“…medial prefrontal cortex and temporo-parietal junction, also play a vital role in prosocial behaviors—although traditionally they are not considered to be a part of the RLDM neural circuitry (Singer et al., 2006; Hare et al., 2010; Morishima et al., 2012; Waytz et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2014).”
BackgroundHow we empathize with others: A neurobiological perspective
Jankowiak-Siuda, K., Rymarczyk, K., & Grabowska, A. (2011) · Medical Science Monitor · doi:10.12659/msm.881324 · Cited by 59
“sity of the desire for revenge, admitted in a questionnaire filled after the experiment [25].”
BackgroundThe social and personality neuroscience of empathy for pain and touch
Bufalari, I., & Ionta, S. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00393 · Cited by 62
Przyrembel, M., Smallwood, J., Pauen, M., & Singer, T. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00190 · Cited by 68
“For example, even though “the meeting of minds” (Amodio and Frith, 2006) certainly has hedonic qualities and may “feel good” (see Schilbach et al., 2010a), the ventral striatum or other reward-related brain areas cannot be seen as specific neural correlates of the secondperson perspective or of mutual social interacti…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDecision-making: from neuroscience to neuroeconomics—an overview
Serra, D. (2021) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-021-09830-3 · Cited by 63
Five‐year‐olds punish antisocial adults
Kenward, B., & Östh, T. (2014) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21568 · Cited by 61
Empathic neural reactivity to noxious stimuli delivered to body parts and non‐corporeal objects
Costantini, M., Galati, G., Romani, G. L., & Aglioti, S. M. (2008) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06406.x · Cited by 60
Understanding Others' Regret: A fMRI Study
Canessa, N., Motterlini, M., Dio, C. D., Perani, D., Scifo, P., Cappa, S. F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007402 · Cited by 58
“In line with these studies [5,7] (see also [16,17] and [6] for a”
ResultWhen you dislike patients, pain is taken less seriously
Ruddere, L. D., Goubert, L., Prkachin, K., Stevens, M., Ryckeghem, D. M. L. V., & Crombez, G. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.028 · Cited by 57
“in someone else - is less pronounced when observers dislike the observed person in pain [33].”
BackgroundMentalizing and the Role of the Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus in Sharing Others' Embarrassment
Paulus, F. M., Müller‐Pinzler, L., Jansen, A., Gazzola, V., & Krach, S. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu011 · Cited by 57
“This dissociation is supported by previous studies on vicarious physical pain, which demonstrated that the affective responses within the AI and ACC are modulated by perceivers’ evaluations of the social setting (Singer et al. 2006; Cheng et al. 2007; Lamm et al. 2007).”
ResultWhat can we learn about emotion by studying psychopathy?
Marsh, A. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00181 · Cited by 66
“There is limited evidence that failure to exhibit empathic responses to others’ pain is related to lower self-reported empathic concern or aggressive or antisocial behavior (Singer et al., 2004, 2006).”
BackgroundMathews, B., Yang, C., Lehman, E. B., Mincemoyer, C. C., Verdiglione, N., & Levi, B. H. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177777 · Cited by 59
The psychophysiological measurement of empathy
Neumann, D. L., & Westbury, H. R. (2011) · Griffith Research Online · Cited by 58
Foundations of Neuroeconomics: From Philosophy to Practice
Clithero, J. A., Tankersley, D., & Huettel, S. A. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060298 · Cited by 58
Acting Oneself as Another: An Actor’s Empathy for her Character
Gallagher, S., & Gallagher, J. (2019) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-018-9624-7 · Cited by 56
Bernhardt, B. C., Klimecki, O., Leiberg, S., & Singer, T. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht072 · Cited by 62
“On the other hand, we did not address the modulation of empathy by contextual factors, such as perceived fairness (Singer et al. 2006), appraisal (Lamm, Batson et al. 2007; Lamm, Nusbaum et al. 2007; Hein and Singer 2008; Engen and Singer 2012), or perceived group membership (Hein et al. 2010).”
InfluentialSelf-citationThrough your eyes: incongruence of gaze and action increases spontaneous perspective taking
Furlanetto, T., Cavallo, A., Manera, V., Tversky, B., & Becchio, C. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00455 · Cited by 56
López, M. J. R., Padrón, I., de Vega, M., & Ferstl, E. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00060 · Cited by 57
In Others' Shoes: Do Individual Differences in Empathy and Theory of Mind Shape Social Preferences?
Artinger, F. M., Exadaktylos, F., Koppel, H., & Sääksvuori, L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092844 · Cited by 64
“Neuroscientific evidence also points in this direction: Empathy-related brain activity is observed in participants when another person who had previously acted in a fair manner receive a painful stimulus [26].”
BackgroundDiotaiuti, P., Valente, G., Mancone, S., Grambone, A., & Chirico, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773363 · Cited by 55
Medir a empatia: Adaptação portuguesa do Índice de Reactividade Interpessoal
Limpo, T., Alves, R. A., & Castro, S. L. (2013) · Laboratório de Psicologia · doi:10.14417/lp.640 · Cited by 55
The effects of prior pain experience on neural correlates of empathy for pain: An fMRI study
Preis, M. A., Schmidt‐Samoa, C., Dechent, P., & Kröner‐Herwig, B. (2012) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.11.014 · Cited by 56
“Previous research has generated results suggesting that empathic responses are modulated by situational characteristics like the affective link between individuals [50], social relationship [56], or being simultaneously in pain [9].”
BackgroundMurata, A., Saito, H., Schug, J. R., Ogawa, K., & Kameda, T. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153128 · Cited by 55
Will, G., Crone, E. A., van Lier, P. A. C., & Güroğlu, B. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.05.004 · Cited by 58
The two faces of revenge: moral responsibility and the culture of honor
Sommers, T. (2008) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-008-9112-3 · Cited by 55
Empathy from the Perspective of Social Neuroscience
Klimecki, O., & Singer, T. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511843716.029 · Cited by 60
Self-citationPulcu, E., Zahn, R., & Elliott, R. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00310 · Cited by 61
Evolutionary models of in-group favoritism
Masuda, N., & Fu, F. (2015) · F1000Prime Reports · doi:10.12703/p7-27 · Cited by 59
Embodied Perspective on Emotion-Cognition Interactions
Winkielman, P., Niedenthal, P. M., & Oberman, L. M. (2008) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-479-7_11 · Cited by 55
de Gelder, B. (2016) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374346.001.0001 · Cited by 53
Exploring the neural basis of fairness: A model of neuro-organizational justice
Beugré, C. D. (2009) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.06.005 · Cited by 55
Neuroethics and National Security
Canli, T., Brandon, S. E., Casebeer, W. D., Crowley, P. J., DuRousseau, D., Greely, H. T., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (2007) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265160701290249 · Cited by 51
“2004b ; Singer et al. 2006 ), consumer preferences ( McClure et al.”
BackgroundReduced empathic responses for sexually objectified women: An fMRI investigation
Cogoni, C., Carnaghi, A., & Silani, G. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.020 · Cited by 58
Hansen, E. M., Eklund, J. H., Hallén, A., Bjurhager, C. S., Norrström, E., Viman, A., & Stocks, E. L. (2018) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.2018.1495170 · Cited by 72
“Previous neurological studies have shown a link between self-oriented and other-oriented feelings (e.g., Decety & Gr ezes, 2006; Jackson, Meltzoff, & Decety, 2005; Singer et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2006; for reviews, see Gallese, 2003 and Preston & deWaal, 2002).”
BackgroundResultCromwell, H. C., Abe, N., Barrett, K. C., Caldwell‐Harris, C. L., Gendolla, G. H. E., Koncz, R., & Sachdev, P. S. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.032 · Cited by 57
Masten, C. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Pfeifer, J. H., & Dapretto, M. (2013) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12056 · Cited by 57
Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining
Weiland, S., Hewig, J. S., Hecht, H., Mussel, P., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2012) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2012.674056 · Cited by 54
“…2008) on the ultimatum and dictator games, we did not use a “one-shot” paradigm but a repeatedgame paradigm where the same proposer repeatedly interacted with the same responder (for examples, see Civai, Corradi-Dell’Acqua, Gamer, & Rumiati, 2010; Polezzi et al., 2008; Smith & Silberberg, 2010).”
“So You Wanna Be a Pop Star?”: Schadenfreude Following Another's Misfortune on TV
DIJK, W. W. V., Ouwerkerk, J. W., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., & Wesseling, Y. M. (2012) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2012.656006 · Cited by 52
“The notion that schadenfreude is evoked when someone gets his or her comeuppance is clearly demonstrated by the theoretical and empirical work of Feather (eg, Feather, 1994 , 1999 , 2006 ; Feather & Sherman, 2002 ) and received further support from other studies (eg, Singer et al, 2006 ; Van Dijk, Goslinga, & Ouwerker…”
ResultNeural responses to unfairness and fairness depend on self-contribution to the income
Guo, X., Zheng, L., Cheng, X. M., Chen, M., Zhu, L., Li, J., Chen, L., & Yang, Z. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst131 · Cited by 54
“Accompanied by AI activity, ACC also showed increased activations during unfair offers with the increment of self-contribution, indicating the involvement of AI/ACC network in norm violations (Singer et al., 2006; Güroğlu et al., 2010, 2011).”
BackgroundA Matter of Trust: From Social Preferences to the Strategic Adherence to Social Norms
Krueger, J. I., Massey, A. L., & DiDonato, T. E. (2008) · Negotiation and Conflict Management Research · doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2007.00003.x · Cited by 52
Olsson, A., Kopsida, E., Sorjonen, K., & Savic, I. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0039765 · Cited by 51
Xiang, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, S., Zhang, X., & Cui, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00507 · Cited by 54
“…feelings when they experience different emotions or sensations such as happiness, sadness, pain, touch, or tickling (Gallese, 2003). de Vignemont and Singer (2006) defined the four essential elements of empathy: (1) an affective state (2) that mirrors (3) and is induced by observing or imagining…”
BackgroundInfluentialBoadi, E. A., He, Z., Bosompem, J., Say, J., & Boadi, E. K. (2019) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244019825920 · Cited by 52
Empathy or schadenfreude? Exploring observers’ differential responses to abusive supervision
Chen, C., Qin, X., Yam, K. C., & Wang, H. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-020-09721-4 · Cited by 52
Mancini, A., Betti, V., Panasiti, M. S., Pavone, E. F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026008 · Cited by 50
“Interestingly, there is evidence that fairness-directed conducts, such as mutual cooperation with a human partner [24], donating to a charity [25,26], altruistic punishment and revenge [27,28] are related to neural activation of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system.”
BackgroundGodinho, F. L. F., Faillenot, I., Perchet, C., Frot, M., Magnin, M., & Garcı́a-Larrea, L. (2011) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00039.x · Cited by 62
Grynberg, D., & López‐Pérez, B. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194248 · Cited by 58
“, unfair behaviors in a monetary game) have been shown 151 to reduce empathic responses from other players [42], supporting the main role of 152 approach/avoidance behaviors to promote social relationships.”
BackgroundThe effect of altruistic tendency on fairness in third-party punishment
Lu, S., Tan, P., Cheng, Y., Chen, J., & Qu, C. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00820 · Cited by 48
“In one functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study (Singer et al., 2006), male volunteers who observed an unfair confederate receiving pain showed lower empathy-related activation, accompanied by reward-related activation that might represent the desire for revenge.”
BackgroundStallen, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2013) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858412469728 · Cited by 57
Psychopathy versus sociopathy: Why the distinction has become crucial
Pemment, J. (2013) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2013.07.001 · Cited by 51
“Singer et al. (2006), using functionalmagnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), found that the activity in theACC decreaseswhen people believe that the punishment another person receives is considered fair; this was particularly true of the male participants.”
BackgroundMethodEmotion in Stories: Facial EMG Evidence for Both Mental Simulation and Moral Evaluation
Hart, B. ‘., Struiksma, M. E., Boxtel, A. V., & Berkum, J. J. A. V. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00613 · Cited by 51
“While it is well-established that Schadenfreude does in fact occur in such cases (e.g., Feather and Nairn, 2005; Singer et al., 2006; Leach and Spears, 2009 ) and that this can also influence facial muscle activity recorded using EMG (Cikara and Fiske, 2012), to our knowledge no research has been…”
Wilkowski, B. M., Hartung, C. M., Crowe, S. E., & Chai, C. A. (2012) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.06.001 · Cited by 54
“Follow-up research by Singer et al. (2006) also indicates a clear gender difference in this pattern.”
BackgroundA Three-Person Model of Empathy
Breithaupt, F. A. (2012) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911421375 · Cited by 49
“As mentioned, these secondary mechanisms may include, but are not limited to, narrative thinking (Breithaupt, 2011; Keen, 2007; Voss, 2004), fairness perception (Singer et al., 2006), causal fault attribution, past experiences, and temporal development (Saarela et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialMapping Social Interactions: The Science of Proxemics
McCall, C. (2015) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2015_431 · Cited by 47
Disgust: Sensory affect or primary emotional system?
Toronchuk, J. A., & Ellis, G. (2007) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930701298515 · Cited by 48
“A recent follow-up study showed that the AI activity in response to pain in another person was modulated by the perceived fairness of that person (Singer et al, 2006 ).”
BackgroundEmpathy: Necessary for effective pain management?
Tait, R. C. (2008) · Current Pain and Headache Reports · doi:10.1007/s11916-008-0021-6 · Cited by 50
Puts, D. A., Bailey, D. H., & Reno, P. L. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych113 · Cited by 50
“When a defector in an economic game was punished, empathy-related brain responses were reduced, and reward-related brain responses were increased, in men but not women (Singer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundExposure to violence reduces empathetic responses to other’s pain
Guo, X., Zheng, L., Wang, H., Zhu, L., Li, J., Wang, Q., Dienes, Z., & Yang, Z. (2013) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.04.005 · Cited by 45
“On the other hand, other studies revealed the modulation of contextual factors on empathy for other’s pain, such as the affective link between individuals (Singer et al., 2006), the intentionality of the perceived agency who induced the pain (Akitsuki & Decety, 2009; Decety et al.”
Venuti, P., Caria, A., Esposito, G., De Pisapia, N., Bornstein, M. H., & de Falco, S. (2012) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.06.011 · Cited by 48
“The anterior insular region has also been found to activate during awareness (Singer et al., 2004, Singer et al., 2006) or viewing (Jackson et al., 2006; Lamm et al., 2007; Morrison et al., 2004) of another individual’s pain.”
BackgroundHein, G., & Singer, T. (2010) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/12061-006 · Cited by 50
“Activation in this network was also observed when participants saw an unknown but likeable person suffering pain (Singer et al., 2006) or watched videos showing body”
BackgroundSelf-citationCan emotions influence level-1 visual perspective taking?
Bukowski, H., & Samson, D. (2015) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2015.1043879 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Wellcome Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Singer, Tania
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 439
- Issue
- 7075
- Pages
- 466-469
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC2636868
- OpenAlex
- W2098425678
- Semantic Scholar
- a9adbab6dae28c23a205786c725a988649d155ef
- Cited by
- 1,726
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 100
- FWCI
- 139.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (078865)
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- empathy, perceived fairness, social preferences, schadenfreude, altruistic punishment, revenge, sex differences, anterior cingulate cortex, reward processing, economic games, corporal punishment
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Empathy, Female, Game Theory, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Pain, Photic Stimulation, Punishment, Reward, Sex Characteristics, Social Justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review