Cited by 876CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringVirus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 40 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Therapeutic genome editing by combined viral and non-viral delivery of CRISPR system components in vivo

Open access

Abstract

The combination of Cas9, guide RNA and repair template DNA can induce precise gene editing and the correction of genetic diseases in adult mammals. However, clinical implementation of this technology requires safe and effective delivery of all of these components into the nuclei of the target tissue. Here, we combine lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery of Cas9 mRNA with adeno-associated viruses encoding a sgRNA and a repair template to induce repair of a disease gene in adult animals. We applied our delivery strategy to a mouse model of human hereditary tyrosinemia and show that the treatment generated fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (Fah)-positive hepatocytes by correcting the causative Fah-splicing mutation. Treatment rescued disease symptoms such as weight loss and liver damage. The efficiency of correction was >6% of hepatocytes after a single application, suggesting potential utility of Cas9-based therapeutic genome editing for a range of diseases.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study combined lipid nanoparticle delivery of Cas9 mRNA with AAV-delivered sgRNA and an HDR template to correct the Fah mutation in a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia type I. A single treatment corrected >6% of hepatocytes, restored Fah splicing, and rescued weight loss and liver damage.

Key findings

  • In Fahmut/mut mice, combined nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR treatment yielded 6.2% ± 1.0% Fah-positive hepatocytes by immunohistochemistry after a single application (n = 4 mice), with correction correlating with nano.Cas9 and AAV-HDR dose.
  • Treated mice had 9.5% restored FAH mRNA without selection, 24.1% average indels at the sgRNA target region, and 0.81% ± 0.08% corrected “G-CC” sequence in total liver DNA by deep sequencing.
  • Treatment completely prevented body weight loss after NTBC withdrawal, all nano.Cas9 + AAV-HDR mice survived 30 days, and serum AST, ALT, and bilirubin indicated substantially reduced liver damage compared with controls.
  • Off-target editing was low at assayed sites: <0.3% indels at three top predicted off-target sites, and in vivo OT1/GOT sites were not substantially higher than background (P > 0.05); transient mRNA Cas9 also reduced off-target editing versus long-term lentiviral Cas9 in cells.

Methods

  • Fahmut/mut mice (8–10 weeks old, male and female) were injected via tail vein with AAV2/8-HDR (6 × 10^11 or 1.2 × 10^12 genome copies) and nano.Cas9 (1 or 2 mg/kg); in the efficacy experiment, AAV-HDR was given at day −14, nano.Cas9 at day −7, and NTBC water was withdrawn at day 0.
  • Cas9 mRNA was chemically modified and formulated with C12-200, cholesterol, C14PEG2000, DOPE, and arachidonic acid in lipid nanoparticles; AAV-HDR encoded U6-sgRNA and a 1.7-kb HDR template designed to correct the mutant “A” to wild-type “G” and introduce a “CC” PAM motif.
  • Analyses included liver immunohistochemistry, serum biomarkers, qRT-PCR, Sanger sequencing, Illumina deep sequencing, GUIDE-Seq in Hepa1-6 cells, and statistics by Student’s t-tests and one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test.

Limitations

  • Stated: non-viral delivery of DNA into the nucleus in vivo with high efficiency and low toxicity remains difficult, and further improvement of HDR efficacy may require optimizing HDR template design and inhibiting the NHEJ pathway.
  • Stated: the stringent “G-CC” pattern counting may underestimate HDR events, and an alternative explanation for the observed data is partial gene conversion; off-target analysis was limited to predicted and assayed sites.
  • Evident from the text: efficacy was shown only in the Fahmut/mut mouse model, with small group sizes (n = 3–4 mice) and 30-day follow-up, so long-term durability, AAV immunogenicity, and human translation are not established.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.3471

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 40 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 28
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
40 of 40
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clinical implementation of CRISPR genome editing requires safe and effective delivery of all components into the nuclei of the target tissue.

    “However, clinical implementation of this technology requires safe and effective delivery of all of these components into the nuclei of the target tissue.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Improvements to CRISPR delivery methods and HDR efficiency are required for therapeutic application of genome editing for disease gene correction.

    “However, improvements to CRISPR delivery methods and HDR efficiency are required for therapeutic application of genome editing for disease gene correction.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–874 of 874

Metadata

Authors
Yin, H., Song, C.-Q., Dorkin, J. R., Zhu, L. J., Li, Y., Wu, Q., Park, A., Yang, J., Suresh, S., Bizhanova, A., Gupta, A., Bolukbasi, M. F., Walsh, S., Bogorad, R. L., Gao, G., Weng, Z., Dong, Y., Koteliansky, V., Wolfe, S. A., Langer, R., Xue, W., & Anderson, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
  • Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Xue, Wen
  • Anderson, Daniel G
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2016-02-01
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
328-333
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2260024370
Cited by
876
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 46
FWCI
67.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f32eb017625-01)
  • National Eye Institute (P30EY012196)
  • National Cancer Institute (5‑U54‑CA151884‑04, U54CA151884, R00CA169512, P30CA014051, P30-CA-14051)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (1F32EB017625, F32 EB017625)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
therapeutic genome editing, CRISPR/Cas9, lipid nanoparticle delivery, adeno-associated virus vectors, hereditary tyrosinemia, fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Lipids, Mutation, Viruses, Genome, Human, RNA Editing, Gene Transfer Techniques, Tyrosinemias, Mice, Nanoparticles, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review