Cited by 122Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The neural underpinnings of cognitive flexibility and their disruption in psychotic illness

Open access
Waltz, James A.·2017·Neuroscience

Abstract

Schizophrenia (SZ) has long been associated with a variety of cognitive deficits, including reduced cognitive flexibility. More recent findings, however, point to tremendous inter-individual variability among patients on measures of cognitive flexibility/set-shifting. With an eye toward shedding light on potential sources of variability in set-shifting abilities among SZ patients, I examine the neural substrates of underlying probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) - a paradigmatic measure of cognitive flexibility - as well as neuromodulatory influences upon these systems. Finally, I report on behavioral and neuroimaging studies of PRL in SZ patients, discussing the potentially influences of illness profile and antipsychotic medications on cognitive flexibility in SZ.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.06.005

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deficits in the ability to flexibly update behaviour are manifest in a wide range of neurological and psychiatric disorders, including autism, obsessive-compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder and schizophrenia.

    “Deficits in the ability to flexibly update behaviour are manifest in a wide range of neurological and psychiatric disorders, including autism, obsessive–compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder and schizophrenia [23–30]”

    From Linking haploinsufficiency of the autism- and schizophrenia-associated gene Cyfip1 with striatal-limbic-cortical network dysfunction and cognitive inflexibility (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction describes cognitive-flexibility deficits in schizophrenia, and the General Conclusions describe excessive rigidity in obsessive–compulsive disorder and atypical switching in major depressive disorder. Our copy does not address autism, so it does not support that example in the cited sentence (searched: autism). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Our results are in keeping with deficits in the ability to flexibly update behaviour observed in neurological and psychiatric disorders such as Parkinson's Disease, schizophrenia and autism.

    “Moreover, our results are in keeping with deficits in the ability to flexibly update behaviour observed in neurological and psychiatric disorders such as Parkinson’s Disease, schizophrenia and autism [23–31].”

    From Linking haploinsufficiency of the autism- and schizophrenia-associated gene Cyfip1 with striatal-limbic-cortical network dysfunction and cognitive inflexibility (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The General Conclusions (page unavailable) describe excessive rigidity in Parkinson’s disease and altered cognitive flexibility in subgroups of people with schizophrenia. The passages do not address autism, so this source supports only part of the cited list. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Frontostriatal circuitry appears linked with variability of cognitive flexibility performance in schizophrenia, as in the general population.

    “Just as in the general population, frontostriatal circuitry appears to be linked with variability of cognitive flexibility performance in schizophrenia96.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waltz, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Waltz, James A.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
345
Pages
203-217
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2411740764
Cited by
122
References
159
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (K12 RR023250, R01 MH094460, R01 MH080066)
  • NIDA-IRP
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
cognitive flexibility, schizophrenia, probabilistic reversal learning, set-shifting, interindividual variability, neural correlates, neuromodulation, antipsychotic drugs, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Neural Pathways, Psychotic Disorders, Reversal Learning, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review