Cited by 424Vitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 155 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Targeting cancer vulnerabilities with high-dose vitamin C

Open access
Ngo, Bryan, Van Riper, Justin M., Cantley, Lewis C., Yun, Jihye·2019·Nature Reviews Cancer

Abstract

Over the past century, the notion that vitamin C can be used to treat cancer has generated much controversy. However, new knowledge regarding the pharmacokinetic properties of vitamin C and recent high-profile preclinical studies have revived interest in the utilization of high-dose vitamin C for cancer treatment. Studies have shown that pharmacological vitamin C targets many of the mechanisms that cancer cells utilize for their survival and growth. In this Opinion article, we discuss how vitamin C can target three vulnerabilities many cancer cells share: redox imbalance, epigenetic reprogramming and oxygen-sensing regulation. Although the mechanisms and predictive biomarkers that we discuss need to be validated in well-controlled clinical trials, these new discoveries regarding the anticancer properties of vitamin C are promising to help identify patient populations that may benefit the most from high-dose vitamin C therapy, developing effective combination strategies and improving the overall design of future vitamin C clinical trials for various types of cancer. This Opinion discusses three different mechanisms by which high-dose vitamin C can be selectively toxic to cancer cells. These findings from preclinical studies will be beneficial for the design of clinical trials testing high-dose vitamin C as an anticancer therapy.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This Opinion article argues that high-dose intravenous vitamin C can target three shared cancer vulnerabilities—redox imbalance, epigenetic reprogramming, and oxygen-sensing regulation—and proposes predictive biomarkers and combination strategies. It synthesizes preclinical and early clinical evidence, concluding that efficacy still requires validation in well-controlled trials.

Key findings

  • Pharmacological ascorbate can selectively kill some cancer cells through pro-oxidant mechanisms: increased labile iron and/or GLUT1-mediated dehydroascorbic acid (DHA) uptake deplete antioxidants, raise ROS, inhibit GAPDH, and cause an “energy crisis.” KRAS or BRAF mutant colorectal cancer cells are selectively killed, and daily intraperitoneal ascorbate (4 g kg−1) inhibited tumour growth in Apc−/−;KrasG12D/+ mice but not Apc−/− mice.
  • Ascorbate acts as a cofactor for α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases: it activates TETs to promote DNA demethylation (for example, TET2 restoration in leukaemia models and increased 5hmC in melanoma/bladder cancer) and enhances HIF hydroxylases (PHD/FIH) to inhibit HIF1α. VHL-deficient renal cancer cells die upon vitamin C in normoxia, and high-dose ascorbate reduced HIF1α, VEGF, and microvessel density in Gulo−/− mouse tumours.
  • Route of administration is critical: millimolar cytotoxic concentrations are achievable only intravenously, not orally. Early oral randomized controlled trials failed, whereas intravenous trials achieved peak plasma concentrations of 6 mM, and a phase I study with 100 g intravenous vitamin C reached 25–30 mM with ~10 mM sustained for at least 4 hours. Proposed putative biomarkers include mutations in KRAS, BRAF, TET2, IDH1 and/or IDH2, VHL, SH or FDH (as stated).
  • Clinical studies to date indicate intravenous high-dose ascorbate is well tolerated with minimal toxicity, improves quality of life, and may act synergistically with radiation and standard chemotherapies, but efficacy remains undetermined because many studies were not large-scale randomized controlled trials.

Methods

  • Design: Opinion article/narrative review; no new primary experiments are reported.
  • Evidence base: synthesizes in vitro cell culture, genetically engineered mouse models (including Gulo−/− mice), xenografts, human observational/retrospective studies, and phase I/II clinical trials and case reports.
  • Main analysis: conceptual synthesis of vitamin C pharmacokinetics, redox biology, epigenetic regulation, and HIF1 signalling; proposes mechanisms, predictive biomarkers, and combination strategies.

Limitations

  • Stated: the mechanisms and predictive biomarkers discussed need to be validated in well-controlled clinical trials; many clinical studies were not large-scale randomized controlled trials, so efficacy remains to be determined.
  • Stated: for HIF1, all studies prove association but not causality; the exact amount of DHA generated from ascorbate is difficult to quantify because of its instability; and in vitro H2O2 generation may be an artefact because most labile Fe2+ is sequestered by transferrin in vivo.
  • Evident: as an Opinion/narrative review, it is not systematic and reports no new primary data; conclusions depend on the cited preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41568-019-0135-7

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

103 Not checked yet · 25 Own interpretation · 12 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Own method

Verify all 153 references — free account

Show all 88 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 51
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 4
54 of 54
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Past clinical trials of ascorbate in cancer were poorly designed and hindered research into its efficacy.

    “Poorly designed clinical trials in the past have stunted critical research on therapeutic efficacy of ascorbate as a cancer treatment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ascorbate therapy has a low financial cost.

    “Given its low toxicity and low financial cost, ascorbate could become an important weapon in our arsenal against cancer, either acting as a single agent with predictive biomarkers or used in combination as an adjuvant therapy.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 147 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 424

Metadata

Authors
Ngo, B., Van Riper, J. M., Cantley, L. C., & Yun, J.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Cantley, Lewis C.
  • Yun, Jihye
Venue
Nature Reviews Cancer
Published
2019-04-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
271-282
ISSN
  • 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1768
OpenAlex
W2938641131
Cited by
423
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 8
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Agios Pharmaceuticals
  • National Institutes of Health (5k22ca216036-02)
  • National Cancer Institute (F99CA234950, U54CA210184, K22 CA216036, R21CA258134, R35CA197588)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
high-dose vitamin C, vitamin C, cancer therapy, redox imbalance, epigenetic reprogramming, oxygen sensing, cancer cell vulnerability, predictive biomarkers, combination therapy, clinical trial design
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Ascorbic Acid, Humans, Neoplasms, Oxidation-Reduction, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review