Cited by 111Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 170 of the 170 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 77 of the 92 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Western, Daniel, Timsina, Jigyasha, Wang, Lihua, Wang, Ciyang, Yang, Chengran, Phillips, Bridget, Wang, Yueyao, Liu, Menghan, Ali, Muhammad, Beric, Aleksandra, Gorijala, Priyanka, Kohlfeld, Pat, Budde, John, Levey, Allan I., Morris, John C., Perrin, Richard J., Ruiz, Agustin, Marquié, Marta, Boada, Mercè, de Rojas, Itziar, Rutledge, Jarod, Oh, Hamilton, Wilson, Edward N., Le Guen, Yann, Reus, Lianne M., Tijms, Betty, Visser, Pieter Jelle, van der Lee, Sven J., Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L., Teunissen, Charlotte E., del Campo Milan, Marta, Alvarez, Ignacio, Aguilar, Miquel, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN), the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), Greicius, Michael D., Pastor, Pau, Pulford, David J., Ibanez, Laura, Wyss-Coray, Tony, Sung, Yun Ju, Cruchaga, Carlos·2024·Nature Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The integration of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) with disease genome-wide association studies (GWASs) has proven successful in prioritizing candidate genes at disease-associated loci. QTL mapping has been focused on multi-tissue expression QTLs or plasma protein QTLs (pQTLs). We generated a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pQTL atlas by measuring 6,361 proteins in 3,506 samples. We identified 3,885 associations for 1,883 proteins, including 2,885 new pQTLs, demonstrating unique genetic regulation in CSF. We identified CSF-enriched pleiotropic regions on chromosome (chr)3q28 near OSTN and chr19q13.32 near APOE that were enriched for neuron specificity and neurological development. We integrated our associations with Alzheimer's disease (AD) through proteome-wide association study (PWAS), colocalization and Mendelian randomization and identified 38 putative causal proteins, 15 of which have drugs available. Finally, we developed a proteomics-based AD prediction model that outperforms genetics-based models. These findings will be instrumental to further understand the biology and identify causal and druggable proteins for brain and neurological traits.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The authors generated a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteogenomic atlas by measuring 6,361 proteins in 3,506 samples and identified 3,885 independent pQTL associations, including 2,885 novel to CSF. Integrating these with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) GWAS prioritized 38 putative causal proteins and produced a proteomic AD prediction model that outperformed genetics-based models.

Key findings

  • In 3,506 European-ancestry individuals, 2,477 index pQTL associations were found for 1,883 proteins; conditional analysis yielded 3,885 independent associations (2,605 cis, 1,280 trans), with 2,885 novel to CSF.
  • CSF pQTLs were largely tissue-specific: 1,888 (76.2%) were observed only in CSF, 1,232 of 1,821 tested failed to colocalize with plasma pQTLs, and 428 (33.6%) CSF cis-pQTLs failed to colocalize with any eQTL.
  • Pleiotropic regions included chr3q28 near OSTN (208 proteins, neuron-enriched), chr6p22.2–21.32 in the HLA region (70 proteins, microglia/immune-enriched), and chr19q13.32 near APOE (335 proteins; rs429358 and rs7412 were index variants for 205 and 49 associations).
  • AD integration identified 125 PWAS-significant pQTLs for 108 proteins, 17 MR-prioritized proteins, and 32 colocalized proteins; 38 proteins were significant by at least two methods, 15 had drugs available, and the proteomic risk score classified AD with testing AUC=0.902 versus genetics-based models (P<2.2×10−16).

Methods

  • CSF proteomics used SOMAscan 7k/5k across eight cohorts; after QC, joint pQTL analysis included 3,506 unrelated European-ancestry individuals (1,243 cognitively normal controls, 1,021 late-onset AD cases, 1,242 with other neurodegenerative disorders).
  • pQTLs were identified with PLINK2 additive linear models adjusting for age, sex, ten genetic PCs, and cohort/array; cis significance was P<5×10−8 and trans significance was P<3.45×10−11, followed by conditional analysis.
  • AD integration used FUSION PWAS, TwoSampleMR Mendelian randomization, and coloc/coloc-SuSiE colocalization; a LASSO proteomic risk score was trained in n=1,325 and tested in n=567, with external Olink replication in the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (n=502).

Limitations

  • The paper states that only individuals of European ancestry were included, limiting applicability to other populations; aptamer-based measurement can introduce binding artifacts and cannot determine isoform binding; AD analyses used proxy-AD cases; prioritization was limited to proteins in the panel; cell-type analyses used healthy RNA data; and MR validation is necessary.
  • The paper also notes that the prediction model used individuals who were also used to identify PWAS-significant proteins, so independent cohorts are needed to validate the models.
  • Evident from the text: the low colocalization overlap with brain pQTLs may be driven by small sample sizes, and the authors note that larger panels/sample sizes may make it difficult to satisfy MR assumptions.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-024-01972-8

Cites

170 of 170 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

65 Own result · 26 Supported · 24 Own method · 16 Partly supported · 10 Own interpretation · 8 No full text of the sources · 5 No basis given · 3 Supported so far · 1 Not supported · 1 Sources not found · 1 Not checked yet · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 76 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 55
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 36
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
84 of 84
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The genes driving the associations for most Alzheimer's disease GWAS loci are still unknown.

    “GWAS have identified over 75 loci associated with AD23, but the genes driving the associations for most of them are still unknown, and little research has been done to understand how these genes interact in specific pathways and disease mechanisms.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Little research has been done to understand how Alzheimer's disease GWAS genes interact in specific pathways and disease mechanisms.

    “GWAS have identified over 75 loci associated with AD23, but the genes driving the associations for most of them are still unknown, and little research has been done to understand how these genes interact in specific pathways and disease mechanisms.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Proteins often directly contribute to disease because of their active participation in biological processes.

    “Proteins, due to their active participation in biological processes, often directly contribute to disease.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Little is understood about the genetic underpinnings regulating protein levels across tissues, especially in the context of neurological traits.

    “However, little is understood about the genetic underpinnings regulating protein levels across tissues, especially in the context of neurological traits.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 170 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Western, D., Timsina, J., Wang, L., Wang, C., Yang, C., Phillips, B., Wang, Y., Liu, M., Ali, M., Beric, A., Gorijala, P., Kohlfeld, P., Budde, J., Levey, A. I., Morris, J. C., Perrin, R. J., Ruiz, A., Marquié, M., Boada, M., de Rojas, I., Rutledge, J., Oh, H., Wilson, E. N., Le Guen, Y., Reus, L. M., Tijms, B., Visser, P. J., van der Lee, S. J., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Teunissen, C. E., del Campo Milan, M., Alvarez, I., Aguilar, M., Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN), (ADNI), T. A. D. N. I., Greicius, M. D., Pastor, P., Pulford, D. J., Ibanez, L., Wyss-Coray, T., Sung, Y. J., & Cruchaga, C.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University Hospital Mútua de Terrassa (ES)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Cruchaga, Carlos
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2024-11-11
Volume
56
Issue
12
Pages
2672-2684
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W4404224780
Cited by
111
References
170
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 24
FWCI
28.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01AG044546, P01AG003991, RF1AG053303, RF1AG058501, U01AG058922)
  • Alzheimer's Association (ZEN-22-848604)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
cerebrospinal fluid, proteome-wide association study, Alzheimer's disease, causal proteins, pleiotropy, apolipoprotein E, Mendelian randomization, colocalization, disease prediction model, druggable targets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-01, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-01 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review