The DOI matches its Crossref record; 170 of the 170 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 77 of the 92 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The integration of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) with disease genome-wide association studies (GWASs) has proven successful in prioritizing candidate genes at disease-associated loci. QTL mapping has been focused on multi-tissue expression QTLs or plasma protein QTLs (pQTLs). We generated a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pQTL atlas by measuring 6,361 proteins in 3,506 samples. We identified 3,885 associations for 1,883 proteins, including 2,885 new pQTLs, demonstrating unique genetic regulation in CSF. We identified CSF-enriched pleiotropic regions on chromosome (chr)3q28 near OSTN and chr19q13.32 near APOE that were enriched for neuron specificity and neurological development. We integrated our associations with Alzheimer's disease (AD) through proteome-wide association study (PWAS), colocalization and Mendelian randomization and identified 38 putative causal proteins, 15 of which have drugs available. Finally, we developed a proteomics-based AD prediction model that outperforms genetics-based models. These findings will be instrumental to further understand the biology and identify causal and druggable proteins for brain and neurological traits.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The authors generated a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteogenomic atlas by measuring 6,361 proteins in 3,506 samples and identified 3,885 independent pQTL associations, including 2,885 novel to CSF. Integrating these with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) GWAS prioritized 38 putative causal proteins and produced a proteomic AD prediction model that outperformed genetics-based models.
Key findings
- In 3,506 European-ancestry individuals, 2,477 index pQTL associations were found for 1,883 proteins; conditional analysis yielded 3,885 independent associations (2,605 cis, 1,280 trans), with 2,885 novel to CSF.
- CSF pQTLs were largely tissue-specific: 1,888 (76.2%) were observed only in CSF, 1,232 of 1,821 tested failed to colocalize with plasma pQTLs, and 428 (33.6%) CSF cis-pQTLs failed to colocalize with any eQTL.
- Pleiotropic regions included chr3q28 near OSTN (208 proteins, neuron-enriched), chr6p22.2–21.32 in the HLA region (70 proteins, microglia/immune-enriched), and chr19q13.32 near APOE (335 proteins; rs429358 and rs7412 were index variants for 205 and 49 associations).
- AD integration identified 125 PWAS-significant pQTLs for 108 proteins, 17 MR-prioritized proteins, and 32 colocalized proteins; 38 proteins were significant by at least two methods, 15 had drugs available, and the proteomic risk score classified AD with testing AUC=0.902 versus genetics-based models (P<2.2×10−16).
Methods
- CSF proteomics used SOMAscan 7k/5k across eight cohorts; after QC, joint pQTL analysis included 3,506 unrelated European-ancestry individuals (1,243 cognitively normal controls, 1,021 late-onset AD cases, 1,242 with other neurodegenerative disorders).
- pQTLs were identified with PLINK2 additive linear models adjusting for age, sex, ten genetic PCs, and cohort/array; cis significance was P<5×10−8 and trans significance was P<3.45×10−11, followed by conditional analysis.
- AD integration used FUSION PWAS, TwoSampleMR Mendelian randomization, and coloc/coloc-SuSiE colocalization; a LASSO proteomic risk score was trained in n=1,325 and tested in n=567, with external Olink replication in the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (n=502).
Limitations
- The paper states that only individuals of European ancestry were included, limiting applicability to other populations; aptamer-based measurement can introduce binding artifacts and cannot determine isoform binding; AD analyses used proxy-AD cases; prioritization was limited to proteins in the panel; cell-type analyses used healthy RNA data; and MR validation is necessary.
- The paper also notes that the prediction model used individuals who were also used to identify PWAS-significant proteins, so independent cohorts are needed to validate the models.
- Evident from the text: the low colocalization overlap with brain pQTLs may be driven by small sample sizes, and the authors note that larger panels/sample sizes may make it difficult to satisfy MR assumptions.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
65 Own result · 26 Supported · 24 Own method · 16 Partly supported · 10 Own interpretation · 8 No full text of the sources · 5 No basis given · 3 Supported so far · 1 Not supported · 1 Sources not found · 1 Not checked yet · accuracy not yet measured
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“Large studies have investigated genetic association of protein levels, but they have overwhelmingly focused on plasma11–15; previous work has shown that plasma proteogenomics shares little overlap with the brain10.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Introduction
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [10] Yang, C. et al. Genomic atlas of the proteome from brain, CSF and plasma prioritizes proteins implicated in neurological disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1302–1312 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (‘Tissue-specificity investigation’; page not specified in our copy) says plasma shared more than 70% of brain pQTLs and describes plasma as informative for studying brain-related disorders. That is contrary to the claim of little overlap. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Disputed
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Importantly, we also observed an association between rs9877502 and CSF levels of phosphorylated tau (P=1×10−36), a key biomarker for AD35.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [35] Jansen, I. E. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis for Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. Acta Neuropathol. 144, 821–842 (2022). source
Table 2 in the Results lists rs9877502 at the GMNC locus as associated with CSF phosphorylated tau in the stage 3 meta-analysis (P = 9.65 × 10⁻³⁷). Rounded to one significant figure, this is P = 1 × 10⁻³⁶ as claimed. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Finally, we assessed colocalization48,49 between each of our 2,477 significant pQTL associations (cis and trans) and the AD GWAS. After exclusion of pleiotropic regions, 32 proteins had QTL that colocalized with AD risk (PP.H4>0.8, Fig. 4A, Supp. Tables S43&44).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [48] Giambartolomei, C. et al. Bayesian test for colocalisation between pairs of genetic association studies using summary statistics. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004383 (2014). source
The citation is attached to the colocalization method, not to the citing authors’ finding of 32 proteins. The source’s Discussion describes its Bayesian procedure for assessing whether two association signals colocalize, and its Results use PP4 as the posterior probability of a shared signal. The AD-risk result is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Supportedcites [49] Wallace, C. A more accurate method for colocalisation analysis allowing for multiple causal variants. PLoS Genet. 17, e1009440 (2021). source
The citation is attached to the colocalization method, not to the citing authors’ finding of 32 proteins. The source’s Introduction describes colocalisation analysis, and its Results identify PP.H4 as the posterior probability of a shared causal variant. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For each of the 208 proteins, we analyzed brain-relevant cell-type expression data34 (Supp. Table S28) to determine cell specificity and observed a significant enrichment in neurons (Fig. 3B, Supp. Fig. 13, Supp. Table S29), supporting relevance of this region for brain-related traits.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [34] Zhang, Y. et al. Purification and characterization of progenitor and mature human astrocytes reveals transcriptional and functional differences with mouse. Neuron 89, 37–53 (2016). source
The citation identifies the brain-relevant cell-type expression data used by the citing authors, not the source of their chr3q28 enrichment result. In Results (‘Transcriptomes of acutely purified human neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, microglia, and endothelial cells’), the source describes cell-type-specific expression profiles for these human brain cells and a searchable database containing them. The neuron-enrichment finding is presented as the citing authors’ own analysis. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Comparing 388 index variants with overlapping proteins on an antibody-based (Olink) platform (Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, ADC; N=502), we observed good correlation (R=0.69, P<2.2×10−16, Supp. Fig. 6, Supp. Table S5) which is consistent with protein level correlations between SOMAscan and Olink in CSF26, and support the pQTLs identified in this study”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [26] Dammer, E. B. et al. Multi-platform proteomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid and plasma reveals network biomarkers associated with proteostasis and the matrisome. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 14, 174 (2022). source
The citation is attached to the comparison with previously reported SomaScan–Olink protein correlations in CSF, not to the citing study’s 388 variants or its R=0.69 result. The cited paper’s Results (Cross-platform comparisons; page unavailable) compare proteins measured by Olink and SomaScan in CSF, and its Discussion reports good cross-platform correlation, with a median r of approximately 0.7 in CSF. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaincorrelationaln = 502 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Our findings support the nominated functional gene for ten GWAS23 loci: APOE, ACE, CR1, CTSH, EGFR, GRN, IL34, SHARPIN, TMEM106B, and TREM2.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [23] Bellenguez, C. et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat. Genet. 54, 412–436 (2022). source
The citation identifies the GWAS loci whose nominated genes the citing authors say their own findings support; it does not attribute those new findings to Bellenguez et al. The source’s GWAS meta-analysis tables identify the listed loci, including ACE and IL34, while its Gene prioritization section specifically identifies EGFR as the suggested risk gene at its locus. The cited paper therefore supports the identification for which it is cited. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Proteins with associations in this region featured known AD biomarkers, including four members of the 14-3-3 protein family and neurofilament light and heavy chains37,38.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [37] Bader, J. M. et al. Proteome profiling in cerebrospinal fluid reveals novel biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9356 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results sections on CSF proteome alterations and independent-cohort confirmation identify 14-3-3 proteins as associated with AD CSF. Our copy does not establish that four family members and neurofilament light and heavy chains were among proteins associated with the APOE region; searches for APOE and neurofilament did not find that link. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [38] Gaetani, L. et al. Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in neurological disorders. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 90, 870–881 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section on NfL in the diagnostic work-up of Alzheimer’s disease reports elevated neurofilament light in AD patients and discusses its potential as a biomarker. It does not establish neurofilament heavy chain as an AD biomarker; its discussion of heavy chain concerns ALS. The APOE-region associations are the citing authors’ findings, not a finding attributed to this review. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Additionally, the correlation between levels of mRNA and their encoded proteins is weak8,9, while proteins are typically the molecule that most-directly act on disease.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [8] Vogel, C. & Marcotte, E. M. Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 227–232 (2012). source
The section “Concentrations, production and turnover rates of mRNA and proteins at steady state” (page not provided) says corresponding mRNA and protein abundances correlate, but not strongly. It reports a typical squared Pearson correlation coefficient of about 0.40, supporting the cited clause about weak correlation. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Partly supportedcites [9] Johnson, E. C. B. et al. Large-scale deep multi-layer analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain reveals strong proteomic disease-related changes not observed at the RNA level. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 213–225 (2022). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (“Modules Not Observed in Transcriptomic Networks”; page unavailable) says that not all mRNA transcripts correlate well with protein levels. It also reports a modest correlation between RNA and protein differential expression in the studied Alzheimer’s disease brain tissues. That supports the general concern, but it does not establish that correlations between mRNA and encoded-protein levels are uniformly weak. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Trans associations were more likely to be CSF-specific than cis (655/862 trans vs 577/959 cis, P=4.19×10−13), consistent with previous work10.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [10] Yang, C. et al. Genomic atlas of the proteome from brain, CSF and plasma prioritizes proteins implicated in neurological disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1302–1312 (2021). source
The citation is offered for consistency with previous work, not as the source of the citing study’s counts or P value. In Results > Tissue-specificity investigation (page unavailable), the source reports that 77–91% of trans-pQTLs, versus 15–26% of cis-pQTLs, were tissue-specific, supporting the cited trend. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Targeting CSF proteins has proven successful at elucidating causal genes at some disease GWAS loci, including an association for the TREM2 protein at the MS4A locus potentially an Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) risk locus7,20 and an association for GRN protein levels near LRRK2 potentially relevant for Parkinson’s Disease (PD)21.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [7] Deming, Y. et al. The MS4A gene cluster is a key modulator of soluble TREM2 and Alzheimer’s disease risk. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eaau2291 (2019). source
The Results identify a genome-wide significant association between CSF soluble TREM2 and the MS4A locus. The Discussion reports that variants at this locus are associated with Alzheimer’s disease risk and that experimentally targeting MS4A4A changes soluble TREM2 levels. This supports the example attributed to this paper; the separate GRN–LRRK2 example is assigned to another citation. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [20] Wang, L. et al. Proteo-genomics of soluble TREM2 in cerebrospinal fluid provides novel insights and identifies novel modulators for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 19, 1 (2024). source
The Results section on multi-ethnic fine mapping identifies MS4A4A and MS4A6A variants associated with CSF sTREM2 levels and reports their association with AD risk. This supports the TREM2–MS4A example for which this paper is cited; the separate GRN–LRRK2 example is attributed to another citation. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not matchedcites [21] Phillips, B. et al. Proteome wide association studies of LRRK2 variants identify novel causal and druggable proteins for Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 9, 107 (2023).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
- It may state two separate claims as one. 55
- Probably not a substantial claim. 36
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Calcineurin (PPP3R1), associated with both phosphorylated tau levels and rate of decline in AD39, is also genetically regulated by this region.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [39] Cruchaga, C. et al. SNPs associated with cerebrospinal fluid phospho-tau levels influence rate of decline in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001101 (2010). source
The Results identify a PPP3R1 variant associated with CSF phosphorylated tau levels, and the Discussion reports that the variant is also associated with faster AD progression. The citation follows the association claim; the statement that PPP3R1 is genetically regulated by “this region” is the citing authors’ separate assertion. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“We also observe apoptotic pathways, including activation of BH3-only proteins (Reactome:R-HSA-114452) and apoptosis (Reactome:R-HSA-109581, Supp. Table S36), suggesting a potential role of APOE40–42 in cell death.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [40] Zhao, J. et al. APOE4 exacerbates synapse loss and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease patient iPSC-derived cerebral organoids. Nat. Commun. 11, 5540 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Fig. 2) report increased apoptosis in APOE4 cerebral organoids, supporting a potential role for APOE4 in cell death. The paper does not report activation of BH3-only proteins or identify the specified Reactome apoptotic pathways; its pathway analysis used MetaCore. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Supportedcites [41] Wang, C. et al. Gain of toxic apolipoprotein E4 effects in human iPSC-derived neurons is ameliorated by a small-molecule structure corrector. Nat. Med. 24, 647–657 (2018). source
The citation is attached to APOE’s potential role in cell death, not to the citing authors’ observation of BH3-only pathways. In the Results section on GABAergic neuron degeneration, the source reports more apoptotic cell death in apoE4/4 than apoE3/3 neurons and concludes that apoE4 induces GABAergic neuron death in culture. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [42] Grainger, D. J., Reckless, J. & McKilligin, E. Apolipoprotein E modulates clearance of apoptotic bodies in vitro and in vivo, resulting in a systemic proinflammatory state in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 173, 6366–6375 (2004). source
The Discussion reports that apoE deficiency impairs uptake of apoptotic cells and increases their accumulation in mouse tissues, supporting the hedged suggestion that APOE has a role in cell-death-related processes. The sentence presents BH3-only protein activation as the citing authors’ own observation, not as a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“GWAS have identified over 75 loci associated with AD23, but the genes driving the associations for most of them are still unknown, and little research has been done to understand how these genes interact in specific pathways and disease mechanisms.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [23] Bellenguez, C. et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat. Genet. 54, 412–436 (2022). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that the GWAS meta-analysis identified 75 independent loci associated with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias, supporting the claim’s main point. It does not report over 75 loci, so the stated threshold is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“We note that OSTN, the gene flanking the 3’ end of this region, is highly expressed in human neurons, regulates dendritic growth in the human brain and is proposed as a candidate gene at this locus17.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [17] Hansson, O. et al. The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid. EMBO Mol. Med. 15, e16359 (2023). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (‘The GMNC‐OSTN region and CSF trans‐pQTLs’; page unavailable) says OSTN has enhanced expression in the cerebral cortex, encodes a hormone that regulates dendritic growth there, and is a possible causal gene for the region’s CSF trans-pQTLs. It does not establish that OSTN is highly expressed specifically in human neurons; cortical expression is a less specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Besides AD43, APOE has been associated with at least eighteen other diseases, including heart disease and high cholesterol44.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [43] Liu, C.-C., Kanekiyo, T., Xu, H. & Bu, G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: risk, mechanisms and therapy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 9, 106–118 (2013). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction states that ApoE4 is associated with hypercholesterolemia and coronary heart disease, supporting both examples. The paper does not state that APOE is associated with at least eighteen other diseases, so it does not support the claimed count. (LLM, conf=0.89)
- Partly supportedcites [44] Lumsden, A. L., Mulugeta, A., Zhou, A. & Hyppönen, E. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype-associated disease risks: a phenome-wide, registry-based, case–control study utilising the UK Biobank. eBioMedicine 59, 102954 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (Findings) reports APOE associations with 18 distinct diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, hypercholesterolaemia and ischaemic heart disease. It does not support the claim of at least 18 diseases besides Alzheimer’s disease; the reported total is 18 including it. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We next performed MR47 and identified 17 unique proteins as putatively causal for AD (Fig. 4A, Supp. Table S40&41, FDR-corrected P<0.05) with confirmed directionality using the Steiger test52 (Supp. Table S42).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [47] Hemani, G. et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. eLife 7, e34408 (2018). source
Citation 47 is attached to “MR,” identifying the method the citing authors used; it is not offered for their finding of 17 proteins or for the Steiger test, which has a separate citation. The source paper’s Introduction (§ Mendelian randomization; page not provided) explains MR as a method for estimating causal effects using genetic variation. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [52] Hemani, G., Tilling, K. & Davey Smith, G. Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007081 (2017). source
Citation 52 is attached to “the Steiger test,” not to the citing authors’ finding of 17 proteins. The cited paper’s Methods (“MR causal test”) describes the Steiger test as indicating the direction of a potential causal relationship and the confidence in that direction. The 17-protein result is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.92)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We performed a PWAS using FUSION45. After FDR correction and pleiotropy filtering50,51, 125 pQTL for 108 proteins were significantly associated with AD.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [45] Gusev, A. et al. Integrative approaches for large-scale transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 48, 245–252 (2016). source
Citation 45 is attached to FUSION, identifying the method used, rather than to the citing study’s PWAS results. The source paper’s Results (‘TWAS identifies novel expression-trait associations’) and Online Methods describe its association-testing approach. The 125 pQTL and 108 proteins are the citing study’s findings, not findings attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Supportedcites [50] Yang, C. et al. Mendelian randomization and genetic colocalization infer the effects of the multi-tissue proteome on 211 complex disease-related phenotypes. Genome Med. 14, 140 (2022). source
The citation is attached to pleiotropy filtering, rather than to the citing authors’ FUSION analysis or their count of AD associations. In Methods, “Instrumental variable selection for MR” (page unavailable), the source describes removing highly pleiotropic variants when selecting pQTLs. (LLM, conf=0.89)
- Supportedcites [51] Zheng, J. et al. Phenome-wide Mendelian randomization mapping the influence of the plasma proteome on complex diseases. Nat. Genet. 52, 1122–1131 (2020). source
The citation is attached to pleiotropy filtering, not to the citing authors’ FUSION PWAS or their count of 125 pQTLs. In Methods > Instrument validation (page unavailable), the source describes excluding highly pleiotropic instruments from its analyses, supporting the cited methodological point. (LLM, conf=0.89)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“We also confirmed previous evidence10,13 that cis-pQTL effect sizes correlate with proximity to the protein coding gene (Fig. 2D; Supp. Fig. 3H).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [10] Yang, C. et al. Genomic atlas of the proteome from brain, CSF and plasma prioritizes proteins implicated in neurological disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1302–1312 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on functional annotation reports that cis-pQTL association strength (−log10 P) decreased with distance from the transcription start site in all three tissues. Extended Data Fig. 10 likewise plots association significance against distance, but plots effect size (beta) against minor allele frequency instead. The copy therefore supports a proximity relationship for association significance, not specifically for effect size. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [13] Sun, B. B. et al. Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome. Nature 558, 73–79 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Genetic architecture of the plasma proteome section (page unavailable) reports that cis-pQTL association P values increased with distance from the protein-coding gene’s transcription start site. It does not report a correlation between effect sizes and distance; P values measure statistical significance, not effect size. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Proteins regulated by this region included five members of the syntaxin family involved in synapse function31 and five ephrin family members involved in neural development and memory32,33.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] Bennett, M. K., Calakos, N. & Scheller, R. H. Syntaxin: a synaptic protein implicated in docking of synaptic vesicles at presynaptic active zones. Science 257, 255–259 (1992). source
- Supportedcites [32] Dines, M. & Lamprecht, R. The role of ephs and ephrins in memory formation. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 19, pyv106 (2016). source
The cited paper supports the part of the sentence attached to this citation: ephrins are involved in neural development and memory. Its ‘Ephs and Ephrins and Neuronal Morphogenesis’ section describes ephrin-related dendritic development, and ‘Ephrins in Memory Formation’ reports evidence that ephrins are needed for memory formation. The citation is not attached to the region-specific protein count. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] Washburn, H. R., Chander, P., Srikanth, K. D. & Dalva, M. B. Transsynaptic signaling of ephs in synaptic development, plasticity, and disease. Neuroscience 508, 137–152 (2023). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“We developed a proteomic risk score91 by selecting PWAS-significant aptamers (n=456) and performing LASSO regression to select predictors of AD status (Npredictors=100) in a training dataset (n=1,325).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Identified proteins successfully predict AD status
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [91] Marigorta, U. M. et al. Transcriptional risk scores link GWAS to eQTLs and predict complications in Crohn’s disease. Nat. Genet. 49, 1517–1521 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introductory Paragraph describes a transcriptional risk score derived from gene expression for predicting Crohn’s disease outcomes, providing a precedent for a molecular risk score. It does not describe a proteomic score, PWAS-significant aptamers, LASSO selection, Alzheimer’s disease status, or the stated predictor and training-set counts; those details concern the citing authors’ study, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaincorrelationaln = 1,325- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We analyzed directionality using MR-Steiger52.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Alzheimer’s Disease Mendelian Randomization
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [52] Hemani, G., Tilling, K. & Davey Smith, G. Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007081 (2017). source
The Results section, “Using MR Steiger to infer the direction of causality,” identifies MR Steiger as a method for orienting causal direction. The Methods section, “MR causal test,” states that the Steiger test indicates the direction of the causal relationship in an MR analysis. Page numbers were not provided in the passages. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Finally, CA12 is targeted by carbonic anhydrase inhibitors like acetazolamide (DB00819), which was shown to reduce Aβ-induced mitochondrial toxicity90.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [90] Solesio, M. E. et al. Carbonic anhydrase inhibition selectively prevents amyloid β neurovascular mitochondrial toxicity. Aging Cell 17, e12787 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction identifies acetazolamide as a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, and the Discussion reports that it reversed Aβ-induced mitochondrial depolarization and H2O2 production in the study’s cell models. The passages identify other carbonic anhydrase isoforms but do not establish that acetazolamide targets CA12 specifically. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Our analyses also nominate alternative candidates at three AD risk loci. First, the association at 1q32.2 has been linked to CR153–55, but we observed a colocalized association for both CR1 and CR2 levels with AD risk (Supp. Fig. 23).”
- Also stated in: § Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease · hedged
“At the 7q22.1 AD locus, the nominated genes were ZCWPW1 and NYAP1. Our analyses indicate that PILRA is a functional gene in this locus, identifying a negative association between PILRA levels and AD risk (Supp. Fig. 23).”
- Also stated in: § Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease · plain
“At the 16p11.2, KAT8 locus, we nominate PRSS8 as the candidate gene.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [53] Fonseca, M. I. et al. Analysis of the putative role of CR1 in Alzheimer’s disease: genetic association, expression and function. PLoS ONE 11, e0149792 (2016). source
The Introduction identifies CR1 variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease, including the GWAS-identified rs6656401 variant. This supports the specific statement to which this source is cited: that the association has been linked to CR1. The alternative-candidate nominations are presented as the citing authors’ own analyses, not as findings attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [54] Kucukkilic, E. et al. Complement receptor 1 gene (CR1) intragenic duplication and risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Genet. 137, 305–314 (2018). source
The citation is attached to the statement that the AD association at 1q32.2 has been linked to CR1, not to the citing authors’ nomination of alternative candidates. The source’s Results section ('Relationship of CR1-B with flanking SNV alleles'; page unavailable) reports that the CR1-B allele is linked to the AD risk haplotype and could explain the association at nearby SNPs. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [55] Brouwers, N. et al. Alzheimer risk associated with a copy number variation in the complement receptor 1 increasing C3b/C4b binding sites. Mol. Psychiatry 17, 223–233 (2012). source
The citation is attached to the statement that the AD-risk association at 1q32.2 has been linked to CR1, not to the citing authors’ nominations of alternative candidates. The Results section (“CR1 SNP association in Flanders–Belgian cohort”) reports significant associations between SNPs across the CR1 locus and AD risk. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Partly supportedcites [58] Rathore, N. et al. Paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor α G78R variant alters ligand binding and confers protection to Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007427 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section identifies a PILRA variant associated with protection from Alzheimer’s disease, supporting PILRA as a candidate at one AD risk locus. It calls that locus 7q21, not 7q22.1, and does not support the claim’s CR2 or PRSS8 candidates. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Supportedcites [59] Schwartzentruber, J. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis, fine-mapping and integrative prioritization implicate new Alzheimer’s disease risk genes. Nat. Genet. 53, 392–402 (2021). source
The citation in the printed sentence is attached to the prior link between the 1q32.2 AD risk association and CR1, not to the citing authors’ nomination of alternative candidates. In Results > Integrative gene prioritization (page unavailable), the source reports that CR1 was top-ranked at its AD risk locus. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease · hedged
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Mutations in CLN5 contribute to a form of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis78, while CLN5-deficient neurons showed impaired lysosomal activity and movement78.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [78] Basak, I., Hansen, R. A., Ward, M. E. & Hughes, S. M. Deficiency of the lysosomal protein CLN5 alters lysosomal function and movement. Biomolecules 11, 1412 (2021). source
The Introduction states that CLN5 mutations cause a variant late-infantile form of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. The Discussion reports that CLN5-deficient human neurons had defects in lysosomal enzyme activity and movement. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“CASQ1 is a ligand for calcium (DB11093) and studies suggest that targeting calcium receptors may be beneficial in AD88.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [88] Ge, M. et al. Role of calcium homeostasis in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 18, 487–498 (2022). source
The Introduction states that studies of therapies targeting calcium-associated receptors have reversed AD-related pathological changes and describes drug development based on calcium homeostasis as feasible. The AD88 citation is attached to that therapeutic claim; the CASQ1 statement carries a separate identifier. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.92)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“CLN5 is processed through the ER and Golgi before being transported through the early endosome to lysosomes79, supporting enrichment for endosome proteins (Fig. 4F).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [79] Basak, I. et al. A lysosomal enigma CLN5 and its significance in understanding neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 4735–4763 (2021). source
In the “CLN5 localisation and trafficking” section, the Fig. 2 caption states that CLN5 is processed in the ER, transported to the Golgi, and then passes through the early endosome to lysosomes. The statement about enrichment for endosome proteins is the citing authors’ interpretation, not a separate finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Captopril (DB01197), an ACE inhibitor, showed a neuroprotective effect in an AD mouse model89.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [89] AbdAlla, S., Langer, A., Fu, X. & Quitterer, U. ACE inhibition with captopril retards the development of signs of neurodegeneration in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 16917–16942 (2013). source
Section 2.10 reports that captopril slowed the development of signs of neuronal degeneration in the Tg2576 mouse model of AD. The Conclusions likewise report retarded Aβ plaque accumulation and signs of neuronal regeneration after treatment with the ACE inhibitor captopril. Page numbers are not provided in the supplied copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Increased CTSH mRNA levels were observed in AD, while microglia with CTSH knockouts showed increased Aβ phagocytosis75.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [75] Li, Y. et al. Functional genomics identify causal variant underlying the protective CTSH locus for Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychopharmacology 48, 1555–1566 (2023). source
The section ‘Increased CTSH mRNA expression in brain tissues of AD patients and AD mouse models’ reports significantly higher CTSH mRNA in several brain regions of AD patients than in controls. The CTSH-knockout section reports higher fluorescent Aβ42 uptake in knockout human microglial cells than in wild-type cells and interprets this as increased phagocytic ability. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“FCGR3B is targeted by cetuximab (DrugBank accession number DB00002), a chemotherapy agent. Cetuximab is associated with decreased risk of AD85 (Supp. Table S47).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [85] Akushevich, I., Yashkin, A. P., Kravchenko, J. & Kertai, M. D. Chemotherapy and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in colorectal cancer survivors: evidence from the medicare system. JCO Oncol. Pract. 17, e1649–e1659 (2021). source
The Discussion reports that cetuximab was associated with the lowest risk of Alzheimer’s disease in this study of colorectal cancer survivors. The citation is attached to the sentence about AD risk; the preceding FCGR3B targeting statement carries a DrugBank identifier and is not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Glutamic acid (DB00142) targets SLC25A18, a glutamate transporter86 and is involved in excitatory signaling in neurons87.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [86] Fiermonte, G. et al. Identification of the mitochondrial glutamate transporter: bacterial expression, reconstitution, functional characterization, and tissue distribution of two human isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 19289–19294 (2002). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies GC1 and GC2 as mitochondrial glutamate carriers, and the substrate-specificity results show that both transport L-glutamate. Our copy does not explicitly identify either isoform as SLC25A18, so it does not fully establish the named target. The neuronal-signaling clause has a separate citation (87) and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Supportedcites [87] Wang, R. & Reddy, P. H. Role of glutamate and NMDA receptors in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 57, 1041–1048 (2017). source
The citation to this paper is attached to the excitatory-signaling clause, not the preceding SLC25A18 transporter claim. In “Glutamate and glutamatergic signaling,” the paper describes glutamate as the most abundant excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian CNS and discusses its role in synaptic signaling. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In AD, many genetic loci have been identified, but for some the functional gene is not clear23,59.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [23] Bellenguez, C. et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat. Genet. 54, 412–436 (2022). source
The Main section says that many putative AD-associated loci and genes have been reported. The Gene prioritization section says that, for five loci, there was insufficient molecular evidence to prioritize a gene beyond the nearest one, supporting the claim that the functional gene is unclear for some loci. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Supportedcites [59] Schwartzentruber, J. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis, fine-mapping and integrative prioritization implicate new Alzheimer’s disease risk genes. Nat. Genet. 53, 392–402 (2021). source
The Results section reports 37 Alzheimer’s disease risk loci and says the authors analyzed them to identify causal genes and variants. The colocalization results note that multiple genes can be implicated at an individual locus, requiring further evidence to prioritize the relevant gene. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“CST8 is part of a protein family that inhibits the activity of cathepsins77, offering a potential mechanism for its inverse AD association.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [77] Haves-Zburof, D. et al. Cathepsins and their endogenous inhibitors cystatins: expression and modulation in multiple sclerosis. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 15, 2421–2429 (2011). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction identifies cystatins B and C as inhibitors of cathepsins, and the Results section on glucocorticoid treatment describes cystatin C as a protease inhibitor. The paper does not identify CST8 as a member of that family or examine its activity; the proposed inverse AD association is the citing authors’ interpretation, not the part directly attached to this citation. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“supporting a strong immunological role in AD93–95 including TREM27,96, CD33, and IL34.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [93] Jones, L. et al. Genetic evidence implicates the immune system and cholesterol metabolism in the aetiology of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE 5, e13950 (2010). source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says the data suggest that genetic variation in the innate immune system is among the primary causes of late-onset AD. That supports the strong immunological role to which this citation is attached; the citing sentence gives TREM2 separate citations. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [94] Yokoyama, J. S. et al. Association between genetic traits for immune-mediated diseases and Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 73, 691–697 (2016). source
The Discussion reports genetic overlap between Alzheimer disease and immune-mediated diseases and concludes that immune- and inflammation-associated genes likely influence AD pathogenesis and progression. The Conclusions likewise say the findings are consistent with inflammation influencing AD pathogenesis. This supports the broad immunological role attached to this citation; the paper is not cited specifically for enrichment of prioritized proteins. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Supportedcites [95] Haage, V. & De Jager, P. L. Neuroimmune contributions to Alzheimer’s disease: a focus on human data. Mol. Psychiatry 27, 3164–3181 (2022). source
The citation is attached to the claim of a strong immunological role in AD, not to the citing authors’ protein-prioritization result. In “Recent studies renewing interest in the immunological contribution to AD,” the review reports enrichment of immune-response genes among AD susceptibility loci and identifies myeloid-cell genes including CD33 and TREM2. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [7] Deming, Y. et al. The MS4A gene cluster is a key modulator of soluble TREM2 and Alzheimer’s disease risk. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eaau2291 (2019). source
In the citing sentence, this citation is attached to TREM2, not to the enrichment analysis, CD33, or IL34. The source’s Introduction (page not available) describes TREM2 as essential to immune responses in microglia and reports TREM2 variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease risk, supporting its inclusion as an example of an immunological role in AD. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [96] Jin, S. C. et al. Coding variants in TREM2 increase risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 5838–5846 (2014). source
The citation is attached to TREM2, not to CD33, IL34, or the citing authors’ protein-enrichment result. The paper’s Discussion identifies TREM2 as primarily expressed on brain microglia and involved in inflammatory regulation; its Abstract reports an association between TREM2 variants and AD risk. (LLM, conf=0.93)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Evidence suggests that candidate proteins can be identified for many neurological traits, even with smaller sample sizes10,13”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [10] Yang, C. et al. Genomic atlas of the proteome from brain, CSF and plasma prioritizes proteins implicated in neurological disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1302–1312 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Mendelian randomization and drug repositioning; page unavailable) report identifying proteins implicated in several neurological traits, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS and stroke. The paper does not establish the claim that candidate proteins can be identified even with smaller sample sizes; Results (Replication and meta-analyses; page unavailable) instead report substantially more pQTL signals after increasing sample size. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [13] Sun, B. B. et al. Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome. Nature 558, 73–79 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘trans pQTLs identify pathways to disease’ section links plasma proteins to disease-associated genetic variants, supporting the general idea that candidate proteins can be identified for disease traits. The passages do not establish this for many neurological traits or show that it works with smaller sample sizes; the Methods describe an analysis of 3,301 participants, not a smaller-sample comparison. (LLM, conf=0.82)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“ITAM- and ITIM-containing proteins regulate processes including microglial phagocytosis and apoptosis74, suggesting convergent AD-relevant pathways mediated through microglial surface receptors.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [74] Linnartz, B., Wang, Y. & Neumann, H. Microglial immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation and inhibition motif signaling in neuroinflammation. Int. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2010, 587463 (2010). source
Section 2 describes ITAM-associated microglial receptors increasing phagocytosis and ITIM-bearing receptors counter-regulating that signaling. Section 5 says Siglecs participate in the induction of apoptosis, while the paper discusses these receptor pathways in relation to Alzheimer’s disease. The citation supports the attributed processes; the proposed convergence is the citing authors’ inference. (LLM, conf=0.87)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Immune-relevant proteins included TREM2, which regulates microglial response to neurodegeneration68.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [68] Deczkowska, A. et al. Disease-associated microglia: a universal immune sensor of neurodegeneration. Cell 173, 1073–1081 (2018). source
The Introduction (page not supplied) states that TREM2 signaling is required for the transition to stage 2 disease-associated microglia and calls TREM2 a key player in inducing that phenotype. This supports the claim that TREM2 regulates the microglial response to neurodegeneration. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“TREM2 complexes with DAP12, which modulates activation of microglia through its immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM)69.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [69] Konishi, H. & Kiyama, H. Microglial TREM2/DAP12 signaling: a double-edged sword in neural diseases. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12, 206 (2018). source
The TREM2/DAP12 complex section states that TREM2 binds DAP12 and that phosphorylation of DAP12’s ITAM initiates downstream signaling. It also explains that the complex can either activate or inhibit cellular activation, consistent with ‘modulates.’ No page number is provided in the supplied passages. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“We also identified two lysosomal proteins, GRN and TMEM106B80,81, that are associated with frontotemporal dementia (FTD)82,83 but were also identified in the latest AD risk GWAS23.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [80] Paushter, D. H., Du, H., Feng, T. & Hu, F. The lysosomal function of progranulin, a guardian against neurodegeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 136, 1–17 (2018). source
The Introduction identifies GRN mutations as a cause of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), and the section “TMEM106B is a risk factor for FTLD with GRN mutations” describes TMEM106B’s FTLD association and the proteins’ roles in lysosomal biology. The citing sentence assigns the latest AD risk GWAS finding to a separate citation (23), not to this review. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [81] Feng, T. et al. Loss of TMEM106B and PGRN leads to severe lysosomal abnormalities and neurodegeneration in mice. EMBO Rep. 21, e50219 (2020). source
The Discussion ('The role of TMEM106B in FTLD') describes PGRN and TMEM106B as acting in the lysosome and links GRN and TMEM106B to frontotemporal lobar degeneration. In the citing sentence, this source is cited for the proteins’ identification; the AD risk GWAS statement has a separate citation. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [82] Van Deerlin, V. M. et al. Common variants at 7p21 are associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions. Nat. Genet. 42, 234–239 (2010). source
The Abstract identifies GRN mutations as a cause of FTLD-TDP and reports TMEM106B as a genetic risk factor for FTLD-TDP. This supports the frontotemporal-dementia association attributed to this source; the separate claim about an AD risk GWAS has a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [83] Baker, M. et al. Mutations in progranulin cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature 442, 916–919 (2006). source
- Supportedcites [23] Bellenguez, C. et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat. Genet. 54, 412–436 (2022). source
The GWAS meta-analysis names GRN and TMEM106B among the loci identified in the AD-risk analysis. The ‘Genetic overlap with other neurodegenerative diseases’ section also identifies both as loci associated with types of frontotemporal dementia; the Discussion links both to endosome/lysosome function. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, we note that SOMAscan-based measurements correlate well with complementary approaches26,97.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [26] Dammer, E. B. et al. Multi-platform proteomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid and plasma reveals network biomarkers associated with proteostasis and the matrisome. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 14, 174 (2022). source
The Results (Cross-platform comparisons; page not specified) report good agreement between SomaScan and the complementary Olink and mass-spectrometry platforms for proteins measured in CSF and plasma. Median within-subject correlations across platforms were approximately 0.7 in CSF and 0.6 in plasma. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites [97] Timsina, J. et al. Comparative analysis of Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers measurement by multiplex SOMAscan platform and immunoassay-based approach. J. Alzheimers Dis. 89, 193–207 (2022). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (“Correlation between SOMAscan and immunoassay measurements”) reports strong correlations for three CSF biomarkers and a weaker but significant correlation for sTREM2. SNAP-25 showed no significant correlation, so the unqualified claim that SOMAscan-based measurements correlate well with complementary approaches overstates these findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This dataset represents an expansion of previous CSF pQTL work10,16–19 in both sample size (n=3,506) and number of proteins (n=6,361).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [10] Yang, C. et al. Genomic atlas of the proteome from brain, CSF and plasma prioritizes proteins implicated in neurological disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1302–1312 (2021). source
The Results section (“Discovery of multi-tissue pQTLs”) identifies this as prior CSF pQTL work and reports that 835 CSF samples and 713 proteins were included after quality control. Both are fewer than the citing document’s stated 3,506 samples and 6,361 proteins; those larger figures describe the citing document’s dataset, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [16] Sasayama, D. et al. Genome-wide quantitative trait loci mapping of the human cerebrospinal fluid proteome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 44–51 (2017). source
The citation identifies this paper as previous CSF pQTL work, not as the source of the new dataset’s figures. The Abstract reports a CSF pQTL study of 133 subjects and 1,126 proteins, both smaller than the citing dataset’s 3,506 subjects and 6,361 proteins. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Supportedcites [17] Hansson, O. et al. The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid. EMBO Mol. Med. 15, e16359 (2023). source
The Discussion identifies this as a previous CSF pQTL study comprising 1,591 individuals and 398 proteins. Those figures are below the citing dataset’s stated 3,506 samples and 6,361 proteins, so the paper supports its use as an example of earlier, smaller CSF pQTL work; it does not itself report the newer dataset’s figures. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [18] Kaiser, S. et al. A proteogenomic view of Parkinson’s disease causality and heterogeneity. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 9, 24 (2023). source
The citation identifies this paper as previous CSF pQTL work, not as the source of the citing authors’ dataset counts. The Introduction (Fig. 1; page unavailable) reports a CSF pQTL analysis of 804 participants and proteomic measurement of 4,135 unique proteins—both below the citing dataset’s stated figures of 3,506 and 6,361. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [19] Kauwe, J. S. K. et al. Genome-wide association study of CSF levels of 59 Alzheimer’s disease candidate proteins: significant associations with proteins involved in amyloid processing and inflammation. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004758 (2014). source
The Methods (Subjects) report 266 Knight ADRC and 308 ADNI samples, and Methods (Statistical analysis) describe genome-wide association tests for 59 CSF protein phenotypes. This identifies the cited paper as earlier CSF pQTL work with a smaller sample and fewer proteins. The figures 3,506 and 6,361 describe the citing paper’s new dataset, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plainn = 3,506- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of all proteins prioritized by PWAS, COLOC and MR, eight (all cis) were significant in all three and 38 (24 cis, 13 trans, and one cis and trans) were significant through two methods (Figs. 4A–D; Supp. Table S45).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We identified 3,885 associations for 1,883 proteins, including 2,885 novel pQTLs, demonstrating unique genetic regulation in CSF.”
- Also stated in: § Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics · plain
“In total, we identified 3,885 conditionally independent associations (see Supplementary Notes, Supp. Table S8).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Abstract
plaincorrelationaln = 3,506- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These associations were consistent between controls and AD cases, suggesting APOE has an important role regardless of disease status (see Supplementary Notes).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 648 that overlap, 78.9% (511) colocalize with a neurologically-relevant tissue and 50.8% (329) are unique to neurological tissues.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We identified 3,885 associations for 1,883 proteins, including 2,885 novel pQTLs, demonstrating unique genetic regulation in CSF.”
- Also stated in: § Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics · plain
“When analyzing conditional associations 2,885 were novel to CSF, of which 2,007 were CSF-specific and 878 were novel.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Abstract
plainn = 3,506- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, we observed 303 pathways enriched for these proteins. The most-significant were almost exclusively neuronal and cell surface pathways (Fig. 3C, Supp. Fig. 12, Supp. Table S30), including neuron projection development (GO:0031175), cell junction (GO:0030054), axon development (GO:0061564), and SNAP receptor activity (GO:0048812).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We observed an overrepresentation in microglia/macrophages (P=1.38×10−4, Fig. 4E, Supp. Fig. 13, Supp. Table S29), astrocytes (P=0.012), and neurodegenerative pathways, including late-onset AD and brain atrophy.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In CSF, the APOE region at chr19q13.32 was associated with the largest number of proteins, with eleven unique index variants in three LD blocks (R2>0.5, Supp. Fig. 15) associated with the levels of 335 proteins (Fig. 3I, Supp. Table S27), of which four (three aptamers tagging APOE and APOC2) are in cis.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The same region in plasma contained 1,756 associations11, significantly more than CSF (9.71% of all plasma associations vs 6.50% of all CSF associations; P=3.10×10−7).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [11] Ferkingstad, E. et al. Large-scale integration of the plasma proteome with genetics and disease. Nat. Genet. 53, 1712–1721 (2021). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We identified 1,861 index CSF pQTL (75.1% of all, 866 cis, 995 trans) that failed to colocalize with any pQTL across tissues (CSF-specific, 1,280) or were associated with newly-measured proteins (true novel, 581).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among these we observed inverse associations (higher protein, decreased risk) for ACE, TREM2, and GRN, while CTSH, SHARPIN, and CR1 were associated with increased risk.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Novel proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We identified 32 cis associations for 23 unique proteins and 129 trans associations for 47 unique proteins.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pathway analysis identified 86 enriched pathways using the 70 proteins (Fig. 3G, Supp. Fig. 14, Supp. Table S32). These were highly immune-specific, including regulation of immune response (GO:0050776), leukocyte mediated immunity (GO:0002443), and antigen processing and presentation (KEGG:hsa04612).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We observed colocalization (PP.H4≥0.8) for 16.8% (72/428) of associations in plasma and 6.7% (35/520) in brain (Fig. 2G).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We integrated our associations with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) through PWAS, colocalization and Mendelian Randomization and identified 38 putative causal proteins, 15 of which have drugs available.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Abstract
hedgedconditionaln = 3,506- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Only one pQTL was observed in this region in plasma11, suggesting this is a CSF-specific pQTL hotspot.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [11] Ferkingstad, E. et al. Large-scale integration of the plasma proteome with genetics and disease. Nat. Genet. 53, 1712–1721 (2021). source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most proteins (n=1,025, 54.4%) had a single association, but we observed up to 16 independent cis associations for two proteins (SIRPB1 & GSTM1).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“QTLs were enriched for protein-altering variants (PAVs, see Supplementary Notes, Supp. Fig. 9B, Supp. Table S12, P<0.001, Fold change=9.78), a trend that persisted after removing potential binding artifacts (P < 0.001, FC = 6.39), indicating that pQTL are enriched for coding variants in comparison with non-pQTL variants.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Unique genetic architecture of CSF proteomics
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interestingly, although we observed an enrichment of proteins with APOE-region associations in neurons (Fig. 3J, Supp. Fig. 13, Supp. Table S29), APOE is mainly expressed in astrocytes (Supp. Table S28).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The chr3q28 region is intergenic, located between GMNC and OSTN, and consists of twelve index variants corresponding to one LD block (R2>0.5, Supp. Fig. 12I) associated with 208 unique proteins (Fig. 3A, Supp. Table S27), all of them trans.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Pleiotropic regions regulate neurological pathways
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The performance of the model was consistent across ages and APOE genotypes (Supp. Fig. 25, Supp. Table S50) and the independent Stanford dataset (ProtRS AUC=0.932, Supp. Fig. 26), which only included 65% of the proteins.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Identified proteins successfully predict AD status
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We integrated our pQTL with AD GWAS and prioritized 38 proteins, 24 of which were not nominated by previous studies.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We confirmed many of our findings using a complementary proteomic platform, highlighting the robustness of our findings across cohorts and measurement techniques.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The model accurately classified participants in both the training (AUC=0.949; Supp. Fig. 25, Supp. Table S49) and testing datasets (AUC=0.902, Fig. 4G).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Identified proteins successfully predict AD status
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The model performed better than a PRS with covariates or a model incorporating APOE genotype with covariates (P<2.2×10−16, Supp. Table S50).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Identified proteins successfully predict AD status
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also highlighted a lysosomal role, with GRN and TMEM106B among others implicated in endosome-lysosome fusion.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In total, 5,750 proteins had genes that were included in the cell-type expression data.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Cell-type Specificity Analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This includes an instance where aptamers do not correlate with the expected genotype (see Supplementary Notes, Supp. Figs. 27&28).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Filtering for cryptic relatedness through identity by descent (IBD) was performed using PLINK1.998 including variants with MAF≥0.15 or HWE P≥0.001 and R2 of 0.2 (Supplementary Figure 2B). Pairs with PI_HAT≥0.25 were considered related and one sample from each pair was removed to minimize samples lost (n=230).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Genomic Data QC
plainn = 230- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The binding characteristics of each aptamer are not available, so we cannot determine which isoform the aptamers are binding to.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“protein measurement using aptamers can introduce binding artifacts that affect the pQTL associations.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“CSF is neurologically relevant as the fluid that surrounds the brain and spinal cord, while many CSF proteins are derived from the central nervous system92.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [92] Regeniter, A. et al. A modern approach to CSF analysis: pathophysiology, clinical application, proof of concept and laboratory reporting. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 111, 313–318 (2009). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All datasets were merged and variants with genotyping rate ≥90%, minor allele count (MAC) ≥10, and HWE P≥1×10−6 were kept.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Genomic Data QC
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We extracted the instrument variants then harmonized the two datasets to ensure matching effect alleles.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Alzheimer’s Disease Mendelian Randomization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In total 1,450 proteomic PCs were necessary to account for that variance, so a study-wide significant p-value of 5x10−8/1450 (approximately P<3.45x10−11) was used to define trans-pQTL.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > pQTL Identification
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using PLINK1.998 to account for population stratification.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Genomic Data QC
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our cell-type analyses were derived from healthy individuals and RNA levels, which may correlate poorly with proteins.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For all enrichment analyses, an FDR-corrected p-value threshold of 0.05 was used.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Pathway Enrichment Analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We performed clumping on all variants that reached genome-wide significance (P<5×10−8) in cis for each aptamer, using the predefined default clumping thresholds.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Alzheimer’s Disease Mendelian Randomization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Before imputation, high-quality directly sequenced variants were filtered based on the following criteria: (1) genotyping rate ≥98% per SNP or individual; (2) MAF≥0.01; and (3) Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) P≥1×10−6.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Genomic Data QC
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the prioritization was limited to proteins in the panel, excluding genes from many AD-associated regions and limiting the search space for those where a protein is included.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analyses were corrected for age, sex, and population structure (gPC 1-4).”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > External Replication (Olink)
plainn = 502- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quality control was also performed on the PPMI SOMAscan 5k data.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Proteomic Data Processing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“We performed multiple test correction using Benjamini-Hochberg112 false discovery rate, with an adjusted p-value threshold of 0.05.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Alzheimer’s Disease Mendelian Randomization
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [112] Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 57, 289–300 (1995). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To account for pleiotropy in the analysis, we first removed all variants for each aptamer including any variant in a pleiotropic region (as identified above) that regulated two or more proteins – so only variants associated with a single protein were included.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Alzheimer’s Disease Mendelian Randomization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For each aptamer, age, self-reported sex, ten genetic principal components, and cohortArray variables (for example ADNI_OmniEx) were included as covariates in an additive linear model.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > pQTL Identification
plainn = 3,506- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To account for sample size differences across the cohorts, only aptamers present in the largest dataset (that consisting of ADNI, DIAN, Knight-ADRC (Oct 2021), FACE, and Barcelona-1, Naptamers=7,008) were kept for analysis.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Proteomic Data Processing
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“and this dataset has been applied to identify proteogenomic links between the LRRK2 locus and Parkinson’s disease21.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [21] Phillips, B. et al. Proteome wide association studies of LRRK2 variants identify novel causal and druggable proteins for Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 9, 107 (2023).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We then determined the aptamers that overlapped between at least two of PWAS, COLOC, and MR and performed pathway and cell-type analyses as described below.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Alzheimer’s Disease Mendelian Randomization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that the individuals used in the prediction models were also used when identifying the PWAS-significant proteins, so further analysis is needed in independent cohorts to validate the models.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Results > Identified proteins successfully predict AD status
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ambiguous SNPs were removed from the analyses to avoid false-positive results due to genotyping array strand differences.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Genomic Data QC
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“while we attempted to control for horizontal pleiotropy in our MR analyses by utilizing only cis -pQTL and removing any variants associated with multiple proteins, we are limited to the proteins in the panel.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further quality control was performed on the normalized proteomics data provided by Somalogic, according to an in-house protocol, for samples from all cohorts except PPMI.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Cohorts > Proteomic Data Processing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ability to extract CSF from living individuals and its shared biology with the brain highlights its relevance for the study of neurological disorders and diseases.”
§ Proteogenomic analysis of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies neurologically relevant regulation and implicates causal proteins for Alzheimer’s disease > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Proteins often directly contribute to disease because of their active participation in biological processes.
The paper relies on this without support.
The genes driving the associations for most Alzheimer's disease GWAS loci are still unknown.
“GWAS have identified over 75 loci associated with AD23, but the genes driving the associations for most of them are still unknown, and little research has been done to understand how these genes interact in specific pathways and disease mechanisms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Little research has been done to understand how Alzheimer's disease GWAS genes interact in specific pathways and disease mechanisms.
“GWAS have identified over 75 loci associated with AD23, but the genes driving the associations for most of them are still unknown, and little research has been done to understand how these genes interact in specific pathways and disease mechanisms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Proteins often directly contribute to disease because of their active participation in biological processes.
“Proteins, due to their active participation in biological processes, often directly contribute to disease.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Little is understood about the genetic underpinnings regulating protein levels across tissues, especially in the context of neurological traits.
“However, little is understood about the genetic underpinnings regulating protein levels across tissues, especially in the context of neurological traits.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“There is limited pQTL information in nonplasma contexts, with no studies analyzing more than 1000 samples outside of plasma until recent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) efforts (12, 13).”
From Low overlap of plasma and CSF protein quantitative trait loci affects protein discovery for neurological disease (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“although we previously detected limited disease-specific pQTL effects (12).”
From Low overlap of plasma and CSF protein quantitative trait loci affects protein discovery for neurological disease (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
clusterProfiler: an R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters
Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y., & He, Q.-Y. (2012) · OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2011.0118 · Cited by 36,259
Self-citationMcKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939 · Cited by 27,915
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i01 · Cited by 19,927
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps
Barrett, J. C., Fry, B., Maller, J., & Daly, M. J. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457 · Cited by 14,563
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J.-C., & Müller, M. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-77 · Cited by 13,697
Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets
Chang, C. C., Chow, C. C., Tellier, L. C., Vattikuti, S., Purcell, S. M., & Lee, J. J. (2015) · Gigascience · doi:10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8 · Cited by 12,709
The Human Genome Browser at UCSC
Kent, W. J., Sugnet, C. W., Furey, T. S., Roskin, K. M., Pringle, T. H., Zahler, A. M., & Haussler, A. D. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229102 · Cited by 10,400
DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018
Wishart, D. S., Feunang, Y. D., Guo, A. C., Lo, E. J., Marcu, A., Grant, J. R., Sajed, T., Johnson, D., Li, C., Sayeeda, Z., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1037 · Cited by 8,404
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Heneka, M. T., Gauthier, S. G., Chandekar, S. A., Hahn-Pedersen, J. H., Bentsen, M. A., & Zetterberg, H. (2025) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-025-02939-9 · Cited by 97
Apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer’s disease trajectories and the next-generation clinical care pathway
Narasimhan, S., Holtzman, D. M., Apostolova, L. G., Cruchaga, C., Masters, C. L., Hardy, J., Villemagne, V. L., Bell, J. S., Cho, M., & Hampel, H. J. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01669-5 · Cited by 70
Self-citationAli, M., Timsina, J., Western, D., Liu, M., Beric, A., Budde, J., Do, A., Heo, G., Wang, L., Gentsch, J., et al. (2025) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2025.02.014 · Cited by 61
Self-citationThe Bis(monoacylglycero)-phosphate Hypothesis: From Lysosomal Function to Therapeutic Avenues
Medoh, U. N., & Abu-Remaileh, M. (2024) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-092823-113814 · Cited by 62
Promises and Challenges of populational Proteomics in Health and Disease
Sun, B. B., Suhre, K., & Gibson, B. W. (2024) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100786 · Cited by 60
Dammer, E. B., Shantaraman, A., Ping, L., Duong, D. M., Gerasimov, E. S., Ravindran, S. P., Guðmundsdóttir, V., Frick, E. A., Gómez, G., Walker, K. A., et al. (2024) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adn3504 · Cited by 63
Self-citationVance, J. M., Farrer, L. A., Huang, Y., Cruchaga, C., Hyman, B. T., Pericak‐Vance, M. A., Goate, A. M., Greicius, M. D., Griswold, A. J., Haines, J. L., et al. (2024) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.26864 · Cited by 52
Self-citationWang, C., Yang, C., Western, D., Ali, M., Wang, Y., Phuah, C., Budde, J., Wang, L., Gorijala, P., Timsina, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01973-7 · Cited by 53
Self-citationDisruption of the cerebrospinal fluid–plasma protein balance in cognitive impairment and aging
Farinas, A., Rutledge, J., Bot, V. A., Western, D., Ying, K., Lawrence, K. A., Oh, H. S., Yoon, S., Ding, D. Y., Tsai, A. P., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03831-3 · Cited by 52
Self-citationFrick, E. A., Emilsson, V., Jónmundsson, Þ., Steindorsdottir, A. E., Johnson, E. C. B., Puerta, R., Dammer, E. B., Shantaraman, A., Cano, A. C., Boada, M., et al. (2024) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-024-00693-1 · Cited by 47
Self-citationIbáñez, L., Liu, M., Beric, A., Timsina, J., Kohlfeld, P., Bergmann, K., Lowery, J., Sykora, N., Montejo, B. S., Brock, W., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14413 · Cited by 42
Self-citationYarbro, J. M., Shrestha, H. K., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Zaman, M., Chu, M., Wang, X., Yu, G., & Peng, J. (2025) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-025-00874-5 · Cited by 43
Fernández, M. V., Liu, M., Beric, A., Johnson, M., Cetin, A., Patel, M. R., Budde, J., Kohlfeld, P., Bergmann, K., Lowery, J., et al. (2024) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03485-9 · Cited by 41
Self-citationShue, F., White, L. J., Hendrix, R. D., Ulrich, J. D., Henson, R. L., Knight, W., Martens, Y. A., Wang, N., Roy, B., Starling, S. C., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adk3674 · Cited by 33
Self-citationIL6 genetic perturbation mimicking IL-6 inhibition is associated with lower cardiometabolic risk
Zhang, L., Omarov, M., Xu, L., deGoma, E. M., Natarajan, P., & Georgakis, M. K. (2025) · Nature Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1038/s44161-025-00700-7 · Cited by 32
Cerebrospinal fluid proteomics identification of biomarkers for amyloid and tau PET stages
Wang, Z., Chen, Y., Gong, K., Zhao, B., Ning, Y., Chen, M., Li, Y., Ali, M., Timsina, J., Liu, M., et al. (2025) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102031 · Cited by 23
Self-citationChemparathy, A., Guen, Y. L., Zeng, Y., Gorzynski, J. E., Jensen, T. D., Yang, C., Kasireddy, N. M., Talozzi, L., Belloy, M. E., Stewart, I., et al. (2024) · Neurology Genetics · doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000200124 · Cited by 19
Self-citationWang, S., Xi, J., Zhang, M., & Wang, J. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.139394 · Cited by 20
Bumber, J. R., Rački, V., Mežnarić, S., Pelčić, G., & Mršić‐Pelčić, J. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14176047 · Cited by 19
Plasma proteomic associations with Alzheimer’s disease endophenotypes
Afshar, S., Dammer, E. B., Bian, S., Bennett, D. A., Mohs, R. C., Beauregard, D., Dwyer, J. R., Hales, C. M., Goldstein, F. C., Parker, M. W., et al. (2025) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-025-00965-4 · Cited by 23
Self-citationPuerta, R., Cano, A. C., García‐González, P., García‐Gutiérrez, F., Capdevila, M., de Rojas, I., Olivé, C., Blázquez-Folch, J., Sotolongo‐Grau, Ó., Miguel, A., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26010286 · Cited by 17
Self-citationZhan, H., Cammann, D., Cummings, J. L., Dong, X., & Chen, J. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-06317-5 · Cited by 17
Circadian protein expression patterns in healthy young adults
Specht, A., Kolosov, G., Cederberg, K. L. J., Bueno, F. F., Arrona‐Palacios, A., Pardilla‐Delgado, E., Herrera, N. R., Zitting, K., Kramer, A., Zeitzer, J. M., et al. (2023) · Sleep Health · doi:10.1016/j.sleh.2023.10.005 · Cited by 15
Beydoun, M. A., Beydoun, H. A., Li, Z., Hu, Y., Hooten, N. N., Ding, J., Hossain, S. A., Vieytes, C. A. M., Launer, L. J., Evans, M. K., et al. (2024) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-024-01413-8 · Cited by 15
Plasma proteomic analysis identifies proteins and pathways related to Alzheimer's risk
Huang, Y.-N., Liu, S., Park, T., Chaudhuri, S., Kuchenbecker, L. A., Carrasquillo, M. M., Ertekin‐Taner, N., Bice, P. J., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70579 · Cited by 13
Self-citationCruchaga, C., Ali, M., Shen, Y., Do, A. N., Wang, L., Western, D., Liu, M., Beric, A., Budde, J., Gentsch, J., et al. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3631708/v1 · Cited by 14
Self-citationStroke Genetics, Genomics, and Precision Medicine
Debette, S., & Paré, G. (2024) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.123.044212 · Cited by 11
Duggan, M. R., Yang, S., Gómez, G., Cui, Y., Capuano, A. W., Chen, J., Yang, Z., Wen, J., Erus, G., Drouin, S. M., et al. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adt7176 · Cited by 12
Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, X., Mao, Z., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2024) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.16257 · Cited by 10
Gupta, A. K., Martin, W., Pieper, A. A., Wang, Y., Saykin, A. J., & Cheng, F. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70452 · Cited by 12
Self-citationYang, C., Gorijala, P., Timsina, J., Wang, L., Liu, M., Wang, C., Brock, W., Wang, Y., Urano, F., Sung, Y. J., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62463-w · Cited by 14
Self-citationDammer, E. B., Shantaraman, A., Ping, L., Duong, D. M., Gerasimov, E. S., Ravindran, S. P., Guðmundsdóttir, V., Frick, E. A., Gómez, G., Walker, K. A., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.10.29.23297651 · Cited by 10
Self-citationRehman, H., Ang, T. F. A., Tao, Q., Au, R., Farrer, L. A., Qiu, W. Q., Zhang, X., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70066 · Cited by 9
Niu, P., Zhang, R., Zhang, C., Li, S., & Li, Y. (2024) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/cns.14817 · Cited by 10
Caro, I., Western, D., Namba, S., Sun, N., Kawaguchi, S., He, Y., Fujita, M., Roshchupkin, G. V., D’Aoust, T., Duperron, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-025-01006-w · Cited by 22
Self-citationYadav, A., Ouyang, X., Barkley, M., Watson, J. C., Madhamanchi, K., Kramer, J., Zhang, J., & Melkani, G. C. (2026) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/acel.70439 · Cited by 9
Imaging-based organ-specific aging clock predicts human diseases and mortality
Ren, P., Su, W., You, J., Liang, Y., Gong, W., Zhang, W., Zhou, Z., Dai, F., Hou, X., Liu, W., et al. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02488-7 · Cited by 8
Proteomic signatures of the APOE ε4 and APOE ε2 genetic variants and Alzheimer’s disease
Lu, L., Binette, A. P., Hristovska, I., Janelidze, S., Smets, B., Cumplido-Mayoral, I., Vasanthakumar, A., Milkovich, B., An, L., Ossenkoppele, R., et al. (2026) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-026-01123-0 · Cited by 10
Bradley, J. L., Pottier, C. P., da Fonseca, E. L., Kurup, J. T., Western, D., Wang, C., Neupane, A., Ray, N. R., Jean‐Francois, M. N., Ali, M., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70377 · Cited by 9
Self-citationWojtas, A., Rathore, S., Dammer, E. B., Yu, L., Seifar, F., Gadhavi, J. D., Shantaraman, A., Duong, D. M., Wu, F., Liu, Y., et al. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.1101/2025.10.08.25337413 · Cited by 9
Self-citationA genetic and proteomic comparison of key AD biomarkers across tissues
Marsh, T. W., Western, D., Timsina, J., Gorijala, P., Yang, C., Pastor, P., Liu, M., Morris, J. C., Bateman, R. J., Schindler, S. E., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14139 · Cited by 6
Self-citationMs4a4a deficiency ameliorates plaque pathology in a mouse model of amyloid accumulation
Danhash, E., Verbeck, A. C., Western, D., Díaz‐Pacheco, A. S., Galasso, G., You, S., Huang, G., Starr, E., Miller, N., Nadarajah, C. J., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70580 · Cited by 6
Self-citationfSuSiE enables fine-mapping of QTLs from genome-scale molecular profilesPreprint
Denault, W. R. P., Sun, H. H., Carbonetto, P. S., Liu, A., Jager, P. L. D., Bennett, D., Wang, G., & Stephens, M. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.17.670732 · Cited by 8
Cook, N., Yang, C., Zeng, Y., Sivasankaran, S. K., Song, S., Talozzi, L., Western, D., Yang, C., Liu, Y., Guen, Y. L., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.10.31.25339089 · Cited by 10
Self-citationAzmal, M., Paul, J. K., Talukder, O. F., Haque, A. S. N. B., & Ghosh, A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-17343-0 · Cited by 6
Single-nucleus atlas of cell-type specific genetic regulation in the human brain
Zeng, B., Yang, H., Prashant, N. M., Venkatesh, S., Mathur, D. D., Auluck, P. K., Bennett, D. A., Marenco, S., Haroutunian, V. H., Hong, A., et al. (2026) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-026-02733-5 · Cited by 7
Debette, S., Caro, I., Western, D., Namba, S., Sun, N., Kawaguchi, S., He, Y., Fujita, M., Roshchupkin, G., D'Aoust, T., et al. (2024) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4535534/v1 · Cited by 5
Self-citationMaterial-based neuroimaging and biomarker detection for central nervous system disorder
Yu, L., Zhu, Y., Zheng, X., Huang, R., Song, S., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Chen, B., & Zhu, R. (2025) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102615 · Cited by 5
Sex-aware causal inference assessment of the immune system in complex neurodegenerative diseases
Lona‐Durazo, F., Ross, B., Pilon, M., Greicius, M. D., Dubé, M., Belloy, M. E., McLaughlin, R. L., & Taliun, S. A. G. (2025) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaf474 · Cited by 5
Self-citationOMG! A proteomic determinant of neurodegenerative resiliency
Duggan, M. R., Oh, H. S., Frank, P., Gómez, G., Zweibaum, D. A., Cui, Y., Chen, J., Surapaneni, A., Blew, C., Dark, H. E., et al. (2026) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-025-00921-1 · Cited by 4
Self-citationWang, Y., Wu, T. Z., Gogineni, A., Tsai, M., Kielpinski, L. J., Mahajan, A., Pandey, S., Schachner, L. F., Tran, J. C., Wu, C., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.08.23.609240 · Cited by 4
Self-citationYu, K., Jiang, R., Zhou, D., & Zhao, Z. (2025) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.1177/13872877251344572 · Cited by 3
Liu, R., Zhu, Z., Zhu, Y., Lin, X., Li, H., Wang, T., Zheng, J., Li, M., Zhao, Z., Xu, Y. H., et al. (2025) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-025-01794-4 · Cited by 3
Afxenti, S., Bourdakou, M. M., Loizidou, E. M., Zachariou, M., Lambrianides, A., Pantzaris, M., & Spyrou, G. M. (2025) · Expert Review of Proteomics · doi:10.1080/14789450.2025.2584129 · Cited by 3
Understanding Neurodegenerative Diseases From the −Omics Perspective: Lessons Learnt
Ibáñez, L., Pottier, C. P., Beric, A., Western, D., Ali, M., & Cruchaga, C. (2026) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.78170 · Cited by 6
Self-citationSerum proteomics reveals APOE dependent and independent protein signatures in Alzheimer’s disease
Frick, E. A., Emilsson, V., Jonmundsson, T., Steindorsdottir, A. E., Johnson, E. C. B., Puerta, R., Dammer, E. B., Shantaraman, A., Cano, A., Boada, M., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.08.23298251 · Cited by 3
Self-citationXi, J., He, K., Hou, L., Smets, B., Miller, S., Saad, Z. S., Whelan, C. D., Ruiz, A., Puerta, R., Cano, A. C., et al. (2026) · npj Dementia · doi:10.1038/s44400-025-00053-9 · Cited by 4
Self-citationCerebral glucose uptake and cognitive functions: A phenome-wide Mendelian randomization study
Ueda, M., Suzuki, T., Yoshimizu, T., Konuma, T., Maekawa, M., Sasase, T., Initiative, A. D. N., & Nishiu, J. (2026) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.1177/13872877261418310 · Cited by 2
Walker, K. A., Blew, C., Duggan, M. R., Joynes, C., Gómez, G., Drouin, S. M., Cordon, J., Chen, J., Zhang, J., File, B., et al. (2026) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adx4852 · Cited by 2
Self-citationManimaran, A., Balamurugan, K. S., Hashim, M. I., Hashim, F., Rasool, H. A., & Hashim, D. J. (2024) · Asian Conference on Communication and Networks (ASIANComNet) · doi:10.1109/asiancomnet63184.2024.10811082 · Cited by 2
Elenbaas, J. S., Lee, P. C., Patel, V., & Stitziel, N. O. (2025) · The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-061724-080905 · Cited by 3
Timsina, J., Jiang, C., McCartney, D. L., Tao, F., Dalmasso, M. C., Najar, J., Anastasi, F., Ohlei, O., Puerta, R., Yang, C., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71682-8 · Cited by 5
Self-citationCruchaga, C., Bradley, J. L., Western, D., Wang, C., da Fonseca, E. L., Neupane, A., Kurup, J. T., Ray, N. R., Jean‐Francois, M. N., Gorijala, P., et al. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4480585/v1 · Cited by 2
Self-citationSong, S., Do, A. N., Wang, L., Heo, G., Kwon, J., Western, D., Yang, S. J., Timsina, J., Liu, M., Budde, J., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.10.29.25339064 · Cited by 2
Self-citationWestern, D., Yang, C., Timsina, J., Liu, M., Wang, C., Campbell, M. C., Kotzbauer, P., Perlmutter, J. S., Schindler, S. E., Morris, J. C., et al. (2026) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adz2016 · Cited by 1
Self-citationZeng, Y., Cook, N., Yang, C., Sivasankaran, S. K., Fujita, M., Gardell, Z. A., Guen, Y. L., Shigemizu, D., Ozaki, K., Morizono, T., et al. (2026) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.71552 · Cited by 2
Self-citationGc inhibition preserves insulin sensitivity and reduces body weight without loss of muscle mass
Gill, R., & Kuo, T. (2025) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.195341 · Cited by 2
Proteome-wide association study identifies novel Alzheimer's disease-associated proteins
Sun, L., Wei, G., Ji, F., Ding, Y., Fan, J., Xu, Y., He, C., Zhou, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, Z., et al. (2025) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.1177/13872877251409352 · Cited by 1
Liu, J., Chen, Z., Yang, Q., Lin, H., Wang, S., Li, M., Wang, T., Zhao, Z., Xu, M., Chen, Y., et al. (2026) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-026-01379-y · Cited by 2
Self-citationGenetic evidence supports therapeutic modulation of progranulin levels in Alzheimer’s Disease
Robins, C., Eicher, J. D., Liu, J., Lo, Y., Richardson, T. G., Western, D., Davitte, J., Cruchaga, C., Initiative, A. D. N., Kumar, U., et al. (2026) · Molecular Neurodegeneration Advances · doi:10.1186/s44477-025-00011-y · Cited by 1
Self-citationMechanisms to medicines: navigating drug repurposing strategies in Alzheimer’s disease
Khan, S. A., Raza, K., Tiwari, P., El‐Tanani, M., Rabbani, S. A., & Parvez, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1676065 · Cited by 1
Kushnir, C. N., Taylor‐Bateman, V., Davies, N. M., & Anderson, E. L. (2026) · Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2026.101185 · Cited by 1
Sia, J., Lee, B., & Oon, H. H. B. (2026) · Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology · doi:10.1007/s12016-026-09152-8 · Cited by 1
Proteogenomics in human populations
Zhai, R., Mälarstig, A., & Shen, X. (2026) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-026-00998-4 · Cited by 1
Gene-environment interactions contribute to blood pressure variation across global populations
Goda, K., Arango, N. K., Tiezzi, F., Mackay, T. F. C., & Morgante, F. (2026) · Human Genetics and Genomics Advances · doi:10.1016/j.xhgg.2026.100656 · Cited by 2
Cruchaga, C., Yang, C., Gorijala, P., Timsina, J., Wang, L., Liu, M., Wang, C., Brock, W., Wang, Y., & Sung, Y. J. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3617016/v1 · Cited by 1
Self-citationShen, J., Huang, Y., Wu, M., Yan, M., Sun, J., Chen, H., Xu, X., Song, P., Yao, P., Xu, Q., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.01.14.25320538 · Cited by 1
Kinreich, S., Bingly, A., & Pandey, G. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.05.09.653177 · Cited by 1
Golebiewski, A. K., Stolze, L. K., Vazquez, V. D., Yazdi, A. M., Careaga, C. M., & Romanoski, C. E. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.07.29.667484 · Cited by 1
Sex-specific disease association and genetic architecture of retinal vascular traitsPreprint
Böttger, L., Bontempi, D., Trofimova, O., Beyeler, M. J., Bors, S., Iuliani, I., Quintas, I., Presby, D. M., & Bergmann, S. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.07.16.665150 · Cited by 1
CSF proteogenomics implicates novel proteins and humoral immunity in Alzheimer’s disease riskPreprint
Wingo, A. P., Liu, Y., Mei, Z. L., Wang, M., Vattathil, S., Gerasimov, E. S., Shantaraman, A., Wu, F., Duong, D. M., Fox, E. J., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.09.21.25336297 · Cited by 2
Self-citationCSF turnover reshapes biomarker interpretation in neurodegeneration studiesPreprint
García‐González, P., Puerta, R., Dehairs, J., Yang, C., Wang, C., Timsina, J., de Rojas, I., Olivé, C., Valenzuela, A., Bayón-Buján, P., et al. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.02.02.26345363 · Cited by 3
Self-citationHuman IL-34 Deficiency Primes Microglia Toward Alzheimer’s Disease-Associated StatesPreprint
Hernández-Rasco, F., Ruiz, R. R., de Rojas, I., Puerta, R., Garcia-Mayor, C., Espinosa‐Oliva, A. M., García‐Revilla, J., Bayón-Buján, P., Rivera-Ramos, A., Oualit, F. R., et al. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.02.21.26346696 · Cited by 2
Self-citationUnraveling Alzheimer's disease heterogeneity:
Vromen, E. M. (2024) · doi:10.5463/thesis.937
Wang, L., Tanner, K., Andersen, S. L., Cosentino, S., Moghaddam, V. A., Daw, E. W., Anema, J. A., Lin, S. J., Sandeep, A., Province, M. A., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.07.08.663708
Self-citationKushnir, C. N., Taylor‐Bateman, V., Davies, N. M., & Anderson, E. L. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.08.01.25332834
Sex-specific disease association and genetic architecture of retinal vascular traitsPreprint
Bergmann, S., Böttger, L., Bontempi, D., Trofimova, O., Beyeler, M. J., Bors, S., Iuliani, I., Quintas, I., & Presby, D. M. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7472272/v1
Wittenberg, G. M., Elwood, F., Houghton, A., Mansi, T., Smets, B., & Lovestone, S. (2025) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100417 · Cited by 1
Insights into Renal Protein Handling Through GWAS of the Human Urine ProteomePreprint
Haug, S., Borisov, O., Lehner, N., Schoberth, M., Menneking, I., Xu, K. H., Khan, A., Scherer, N., Monteiro-Martins, S., Uluvar, B., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2025.12.08.25341835 · Cited by 1
Zhou, H., Dong, S., Pan, A., Xu, H., Tang, X., Wang, X., Xie, L., & Li, Y. (2025) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2025.124906
APOE, Biomarkers, and Proteogenomics in Alzheimer’s Disease
Pereira, J. D., Tosatti, J. A. G., & Gomes, K. B. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52641-1_66-1
Omer, A., Jagtap, S., Morrison, E., Carito, L. M., Prinzen, A. L., McDonough, S. I., & Andreone, B. J. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.28.701050
The Genetics of TDP-43 Type C Neurodegeneration
Nassan, M. M., Ayala, I. A., Sloan, J., Bonfitto, A., Stark, B., Song, S., Naymik, M., Geula, C., Gefen, T. D., Barbieri, E., et al. (2026) · Neurology Genetics · doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000200369 · Cited by 3
Effects of BACE2 polymorphisms on verbal memory in the general population
Garvert, L., Killer, S., Kirchner, K., Völzke, H., Völker, U., Grabe, H. J., & der Auwera, S. V. (2026) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s00406-026-02208-y
Coral, R.-P., Khandaker, G. M., Sanderson, E. C. M., Lau, J. Y. F., & Carvalho, L. A. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.04.08.26350416
Integrative multi-omics implicates a CTSB/ITIH-ECM axis in autism spectrum disorder
Wang, G., Zhu, G., Hongyan, L., Wu, L., Zhang, Z., Pang, P., Si, S., & Yang, G. (2026) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2026.107402 · Cited by 1
Guen, Y. L., Park, J. Y., Peña‐Tauber, A., & Greicius, M. D. (2026) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.71688
Self-citationAPOE, Biomarkers, and Proteogenomics in Alzheimer’s Disease
Pereira, J. D., Tosatti, J. A. G., & Gomes, K. B. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96089-5_66
Lobo, S., Griem, L., Shell, M. S., & Shea, J. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2531932123 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Western, D., Timsina, J., Wang, L., Wang, C., Yang, C., Phillips, B., Wang, Y., Liu, M., Ali, M., Beric, A., Gorijala, P., Kohlfeld, P., Budde, J., Levey, A. I., Morris, J. C., Perrin, R. J., Ruiz, A., Marquié, M., Boada, M., de Rojas, I., Rutledge, J., Oh, H., Wilson, E. N., Le Guen, Y., Reus, L. M., Tijms, B., Visser, P. J., van der Lee, S. J., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Teunissen, C. E., del Campo Milan, M., Alvarez, I., Aguilar, M., Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN), (ADNI), T. A. D. N. I., Greicius, M. D., Pastor, P., Pulford, D. J., Ibanez, L., Wyss-Coray, T., Sung, Y. J., & Cruchaga, C.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
- Stanford University (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- University Hospital Mútua de Terrassa (ES)
- GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cruchaga, Carlos
- ORCID
- Western, Daniel
- Timsina, Jigyasha
- Wang, Lihua
- Wang, Ciyang
- Yang, Chengran
- Phillips, Bridget
- Wang, Yueyao
- Liu, Menghan
- Ali, Muhammad
- Beric, Aleksandra
- Gorijala, Priyanka
- Kohlfeld, Pat
- Budde, John
- Levey, Allan I.
- Morris, John C.
- Perrin, Richard J.
- Ruiz, Agustin
- Marquié, Marta
- Rutledge, Jarod
- Oh, Hamilton
- Wilson, Edward N.
- Le Guen, Yann
- Reus, Lianne M.
- Tijms, Betty
- Visser, Pieter Jelle
- van der Lee, Sven J.
- Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L.
- Teunissen, Charlotte E.
- del Campo Milan, Marta
- Alvarez, Ignacio
- Greicius, Michael D.
- Pastor, Pau
- Pulford, David J.
- Wyss-Coray, Tony
- Sung, Yun Ju
- Cruchaga, Carlos
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2024-11-11
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2672-2684
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- PMC
- PMC11831731
- OpenAlex
- W4404224780
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 170
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 24
- FWCI
- 28.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01AG044546, P01AG003991, RF1AG053303, RF1AG058501, U01AG058922)
- Alzheimer's Association (ZEN-22-848604)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- cerebrospinal fluid, proteome-wide association study, Alzheimer's disease, causal proteins, pleiotropy, apolipoprotein E, Mendelian randomization, colocalization, disease prediction model, druggable targets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-01, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-01 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review