The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 59 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain-disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Most risk variants for brain disorders identified by genome-wide association studies reside in the noncoding genome, which makes deciphering biological mechanisms difficult. A commonly used tool, multimarker analysis of genomic annotation (MAGMA), addresses this issue by aggregating single nucleotide polymorphism associations to nearest genes. Here we developed a platform, Hi-C-coupled MAGMA (H-MAGMA), that advances MAGMA by incorporating chromatin interaction profiles from human brain tissue across two developmental epochs and two brain cell types. By analyzing gene regulatory relationships in the disease-relevant tissue, H-MAGMA identified neurobiologically relevant target genes. We applied H-MAGMA to five psychiatric disorders and four neurodegenerative disorders to interrogate biological pathways, developmental windows and cell types implicated for each disorder. Psychiatric-disorder risk genes tended to be expressed during mid-gestation and in excitatory neurons, whereas neurodegenerative-disorder risk genes showed increasing expression over time and more diverse cell-type specificities. H-MAGMA adds to existing analytic frameworks to help identify the neurobiological principles of brain disorders. Sey et al. report a computational tool, H-MAGMA, that extracts neurobiological insights from brain-disorder GWAS by linking risk variants to their cognate genes using chromatin interaction profiles from human brain tissue.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
68 Own result · 42 Not checked yet · 16 Own interpretation · 7 Own method · 2 Partly supported · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Notably, genes involved in vocalization were associated with ASD, diagnostic criteria of which include impairment in vocalization29.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Pathways implicated for brain disorders.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [29] Edmunds, S. R., Kover, S. T. & Stone, W. L. The relation between parent verbal responsiveness and child communication in young children with or at risk for autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Autism Rev. 12, 715–731 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction section on PVR and child communication in ASD describes reduced vocalization and communication difficulties in children with ASD. It does not address whether genes involved in vocalization are associated with ASD; searches for that association and for genetic terms yielded no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We also found a significant overlap between H-MAGMA and two widely used expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL)-based gene mapping tools, coloc9 and TWAS10.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Giambartolomei, C. et al. Bayesian test for colocalisation between pairs of genetic association studies using summary statistics. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004383 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Gusev, A. et al. Integrative approaches for large-scale transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 48, 245–252 (2016). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“72.6% of TWAS genes, Fisher’s exact test, OR=12.14, 95% CI=10.20–14.49, P=3.94x10–206”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Hi-C coupled MAGMA
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The only exception was MS, which displayed prenatal enrichment.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Psychiatric disorders exhibit neurodevelopmental origin, while degenerative disorders exhibit adult origin.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BD- and ADHD-associated genes were gradually increased during the prenatal stage with a peak at the developmental stage 6 (19–22 PCW).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Psychiatric disorders exhibit neurodevelopmental origin, while degenerative disorders exhibit adult origin.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In total, cMAGMA and H-MAGMA linked 7.4M and 3.9M SNPs to genes, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 1d).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Hi-C coupled MAGMA
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gene-level association statistics from H-MAGMA closely resembled genetic relationships among brain disorders, which enabled subsequent analyses to identify biological pathways, developmental windows, and cell types critical for each brain disorder.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Introduction
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ASD-, SCZ-, and MDD-associated genes showed remarkedly similar expression patterns with a peak at the developmental stage 5 (16–19 PCW).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Psychiatric disorders exhibit neurodevelopmental origin, while degenerative disorders exhibit adult origin.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Up to 60% of disorder risk genes were H-MAGMA selective (genes identified by H-MAGMA but not by cMAGMA), suggesting that functional genomics guided gene annotation can help identify novel genes and pathways (Extended Data Fig. 1b).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Hi-C coupled MAGMA
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“H-MAGMA selective genes were significantly enriched for heritability in all nine brain disorders, demonstrating the increase in power of H-MAGMA (Fig. 1c, Extended Data Fig. 1e, Methods).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Hi-C coupled MAGMA
boostedcorrelationaln = 9- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 40
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Second, MAGMA does not take into account tissue-specific regulatory relationships, whereas disease risk SNPs are enriched in regulatory elements of the disease-relevant tissue5,6.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [5] Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317–330 (2015). source
The Discussion reports that variants associated with complex traits are highly enriched in epigenomic annotations of trait-relevant tissues. Section 8 gives examples of disease-associated variants enriched in enhancers of relevant tissues. This supports the tissue-enrichment point to which the citation is attached; the paper is not cited here as evidence about MAGMA. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites [6] Finucane, H. K. et al. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 47, 1228–1235 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Cell-type-specific analysis of 17 traits; page unavailable) report trait-specific enrichment in relevant cell types, including immune cells for three immunological disorders. This supports the tissue-relevance point, although the analysis measures SNP-heritability enrichment in functional annotations rather than directly showing that disease-risk SNPs are enriched in regulatory elements. The paper discusses stratified LD score regression, not whether MAGMA accounts for tissue-specific regulatory relationships. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It aggregates SNP associations to gene-level associations while correcting for confounding factors such as gene length, minor allele frequency, and gene density2.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [2] de Leeuw, C. A., Mooij, J. M., Heskes, T. & Posthuma, D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004219 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Materials and Methods sections on summary SNP statistics and gene-set analysis say that MAGMA combines SNP associations into gene statistics and, in competitive gene-set analysis, corrects for gene size and gene density. The correction is described at the gene-set stage, not as part of generating gene-level associations, and our copy does not identify minor allele frequency as a correction factor. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“we additionally used an eQTL resource from the human DLPFC3, from which we found 56% of intronic SNPs and 76% of intergenic SNPs did not show any association with nearest genes (Extended Data Fig. 1a, Methods).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Hi-C coupled MAGMA
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [3] Wang, D. et al. Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain. Science 362, eaat8464 (2018). source
The QTL analysis (page not provided) describes a prefrontal-cortex eQTL resource, supporting the citation’s identification of the resource used. The 56% and 76% figures are presented as the citing authors’ own findings from using that resource, not as results attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The majority of non-coding SNPs associated with nearest genes showed additional association with distal genes, as 80% of intronic SNPs and 87% of intergenic SNPs showed associations with distal genes (Fig. 1b).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Hi-C coupled MAGMA
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genes associated with degenerative disorders except MS constantly and gradually increased during both prenatal and postnatal stages, suggesting that these genes may become more susceptible upon aging.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Psychiatric disorders exhibit neurodevelopmental origin, while degenerative disorders exhibit adult origin.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genes associated with psychiatric disorders were highly expressed during prenatal stages, while genes associated with degenerative disorders were highly expressed postnatally (Fig. 2b–c, see Supplementary Data 3 for statistics).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Psychiatric disorders exhibit neurodevelopmental origin, while degenerative disorders exhibit adult origin.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that only 20% of intronic SNPs and 5% of intergenic SNPs interact with nearest genes based on Hi-C (Fig. 1b, Extended Data Fig. 1a, Methods).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Hi-C coupled MAGMA
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This distinction between psychiatric and degenerative disorders was less clear in cMAGMA: ASD- and BD-associated genes were postnatally enriched, AD-associated genes did not display postnatal enrichment, and ALS-associated genes were prenatally enriched (Extended Data Fig. 3, Supplementary Data 3).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Psychiatric disorders exhibit neurodevelopmental origin, while degenerative disorders exhibit adult origin.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Consistent with the previous findings6, psychiatric disorders showed strong enrichment in brain tissues, while degenerative disorders lacked brain-specific enrichment (Extended Data Fig. 2).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Psychiatric disorders exhibit neurodevelopmental origin, while degenerative disorders exhibit adult origin.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Finucane, H. K. et al. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 47, 1228–1235 (2015). source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“H-MAGMA detected a much larger number of genes to be associated with SCZ, which explained a significant proportion of heritability (4.7% of SNPs explained 38.93% of heritability, Enrichment = 8.23, Enrichment P= 7.17x10–53, Methods).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Hi-C coupled MAGMA
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, while the majority of brain disorders displayed enrichment in glutamatergic signaling, ASD, SCZ, and ALS displayed enrichment in GABAergic signaling.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Pathways implicated for brain disorders.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In support of this finding, multiple aspects of glial development were also associated with brain disorders, with stronger enrichment in degenerative disorders (Table 1).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Pathways implicated for brain disorders.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Not surprisingly, neurotransmitter and synaptic pathways were implicated in multiple brain disorders, supporting decades of studies highlighting the importance of synaptic function in psychiatric disorders19.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Pathways implicated for brain disorders.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Zoghbi, H. Y. & Bear, M. F. Synaptic dysfunction in neurodevelopmental disorders associated with autism and intellectual disabilities. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a009886 (2012). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, all brain disorders showed postsynaptic associations, while a selected set of disorders (ADHD, SCZ, MDD, and MS) also exhibited presynaptic associations.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Pathways implicated for brain disorders.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neuronal differentiation and neuronal apoptotic pathways were also enriched in all brain disorders.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Pathways implicated for brain disorders.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additional interesting findings include amyloid beta enrichment for AD and PD, and tau enrichment for MS and PD (Table 1), supporting amyloid beta and tau pathology in degenerative disorders26,27.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Pathways implicated for brain disorders.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Iqbal, K., Liu, F. & Gong, C.-X. Tau and neurodegenerative disease: the story so far. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 12, 15–27 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [27] Haass, C. & Selkoe, D. J. Soluble protein oligomers in neurodegeneration: lessons from the Alzheimer’s amyloid β-peptide. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 101–112 (2007). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While cMAGMA gave a similar result to H-MAGMA, there were important discrepancies, which include astrocytic expression of ASD-associated genes, lack of astrocytic expression of PD- and ALS-associated genes, and lack of endothelial expression of MS-associated genes (Extended Data Fig. 4).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Cell-type specificity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This selective enrichment in excitatory neurons prevailed across development, as adult neuronal expression profiles for psychiatric disorder-associated genes also indicated excitatory neuronal enrichment (Extended Data Fig. 4b).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Cell-type specificity
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cell-type specific H-MAGMA recapitulated biological processes, cell-type specificities, and developmental trajectories of brain homogenate H-MAGMA.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Cell-type specific gene mapping
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ASD- and BD-associated genes were neither differentially regulated in psychiatric disorders nor enriched for any disease-associated co-expression modules (Extended Data Fig. 6).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Functional impact of genetic risk factors in transcriptomic signatures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, we observed excitatory neuronal expression of psychiatric disorder risk genes, microglial expression of AD- and MS-associated genes, and astrocytic expression of PD- and ALS-associated genes (Fig. 3a).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Cell-type specific gene mapping
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, psychiatric disorder-associated genes showed prenatal enrichment with a peak during mid-gestation, while degenerative disorder-associated genes were postnatally enriched with a gradual increase in expression across a lifespan (Fig. 3b–c).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Cell-type specific gene mapping
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that AD- and PD-associated genes were expressed in mature astrocytes, while ALS-associated genes were highly expressed in fetal astrocytes.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Cell-type specific gene mapping
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One striking difference between psychiatric and degenerative disorders was that psychiatric disorder-associated genes coalesced in neurons, while degenerative disorder-associated genes were highly expressed in glia (microglia for AD and MS, astrocytes for ALS and PD, Extended Data Fig. 4a).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Cell-type specificity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Gene-level overlaps recapitulated the previously reported genetic architecture of brain disorders25: psychiatric disorders exhibited strong overlaps in their ranked gene lists, whereas degenerative disorders did not display significant overlaps (Extended Data Fig. 7a).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Shared genetic architecture among brain disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] The Brainstorm Consortium et al. Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science 360, eaap8757 (2018). source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that AD-associated genes were significantly enriched for DEGs in microglia and oligodendrocytes, but not in neurons (Fig. 4a).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Functional impact of genetic risk factors in transcriptomic signatures
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pleiotropic genes were involved in gene regulation, synaptic function, and neuronal and dendritic development (Fig. 5b).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Biological pathways underlying pleiotropy
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Consistent with the previous finding3,11, we detected a substantial overlap.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Wang, D. et al. Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain. Science 362, eaat8464 (2018). source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Gusev, A. et al. Transcriptome-wide association study of schizophrenia and chromatin activity yields mechanistic disease insights. Nat. Genet. 50, 538–548 (2018). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“SNPs mapped to proximal genes may also have distal associations, while SNPs mapped to distal genes do not have any association with proximal genes.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Extended Data
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since psychiatric disorder-associated genes showed neurodevelopmental and neuronal enrichment, we used fetal brain and neuronal H-MAGMA results.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Identification of pleiotropic genes
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the end, we obtained 1,841 genes that are shared in more than four disorders, and defined them as pleiotropic genes.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Identification of pleiotropic genes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Psychiatric disorders show strong genetic relationships both at the level of genetic correlations (bottom left, rg) and gene-level overlaps (top right, RRHO).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Extended Data
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Multi-marker Analysis of GenoMic Annotation (MAGMA) was initially developed to extract biological insights from GWAS by linking risk variants to their cognate genes2.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] de Leeuw, C. A., Mooij, J. M., Heskes, T. & Posthuma, D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004219 (2015). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“MAGMA assigns SNPs to the nearest genes, which has two major pitfalls. First, it is becoming increasingly recognized that non-coding SNPs can regulate distal genes via long range (>10 kb) regulatory interactions, whereby distal enhancers are brought into contact with the gene promoter3,4.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Wang, D. et al. Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain. Science 362, eaat8464 (2018). source
- Not checked yetcites [4] Won, H. et al. Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain. Nature 538, 523–527 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By comparing H-MAGMA with cMAGMA, we found that non-coding SNPs often interact with distal genes, necessitating the use of functional genomic evidence in assigning SNPs to cognate genes.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Introduction
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Most risk variants for brain disorders identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) reside in non-coding genome, which makes deciphering biological mechanisms difficult.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“the majority of common risk variants reside in non-coding regions of the genome1.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Edwards, S. L., Beesley, J., French, J. D. & Dunning, A. M. Beyond GWASs: illuminating the dark road from association to function. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93, 779–797 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“H-MAGMA advances conventional MAGMA (hereafter referred to as cMAGMA) by incorporating relevant functional genomics evidence and allowing developmental stage and cell-type specific gene mapping.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While traditional Hi-C guided gene mapping restricts its analysis to genome-wide significant (GWS) loci7, H-MAGMA can leverage signals from sub-threshold loci that explain a significant proportion of heritability8.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Watanabe, K., Taskesen, E., van Bochoven, A. & Posthuma, D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat. Commun. 8, 1826 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [8] Shi, H., Kichaev, G. & Pasaniuc, B. Contrasting the genetic architecture of 30 complex traits from summary association data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99, 139–153 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This result is consistent with a strong neurodevelopmental predisposition for psychiatric disorders, in contrast with degenerative disorders which have a postnatal origin.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Psychiatric disorders exhibit neurodevelopmental origin, while degenerative disorders exhibit adult origin.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Developmental stages 5 and 6 represent mid-gestation, the period during which upper layer neurons are generated and neuronal differentiation including axonogenesis and dendritic arborization takes place12,13.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Psychiatric disorders exhibit neurodevelopmental origin, while degenerative disorders exhibit adult origin.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Kang, H. J. et al. Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature 478, 483–489 (2011). source
- Not checked yetcites [13] De La Torre-Ubieta, L., Won, H., Stein, J. L. L. & Geschwind, D. H. H. Advancing the understanding of autism disease mechanisms through genetics. Nat. Med. 22, 345–361 (2016). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results collectively highlight synaptic dysfunction in brain disorders, albeit we could detect distinctions among disorders based on neurotransmitters and pre/post synaptic associations.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Pathways implicated for brain disorders.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, ASD postmortem brains exhibit cell-type specific gene expression signatures such as upregulation of glial genes and downregulation of neuronal genes30.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Cell-type specificity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [30] Parikshak, N. N. et al. Genome-wide changes in lncRNA, splicing, and regional gene expression patterns in autism. Nature 540, 423–427 (2016). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Microglia are increasingly recognized as a central cell type contributing to the etiology of AD32.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Cell-type specificity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Hansen, D. V., Hanson, J. E. & Sheng, M. Microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cell Biol. 217, 459–472 (2018). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Common variation in SCZ maps onto specific groups of cells including pyramidal neurons and medium spiny neurons31.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Cell-type specificity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Skene, N. G. et al. Genetic identification of brain cell types underlying schizophrenia. Nat. Genet. 50, 825–833 (2018). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Cross-disorder GWAS of eight psychiatric disorders recently identified more than a hundred GWS loci increasing risk for multiple disorders, further providing evidence of widespread pleiotropy among psychiatric disorders14.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Biological pathways underlying pleiotropy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders. Cell 179, 1469–1482.e11 (2019). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared with cMAGMA, H-MAGMA (1) links non-coding SNPs to their target genes based on functional genomic evidence, and (2) adds relevant cellular context to gene mapping by using chromatin interaction data from disease-relevant tissue and cell types.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Second, it has been recently shown that the variants associated with chromatin accessibility capture stimulus-sensitive signals and explain a significant proportion of heritability, even more so than eQTLs47,48.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Alasoo, K. et al. Shared genetic effects on chromatin and gene expression indicate a role for enhancer priming in immune response. Nat. Genet. 50, 424–431 (2018). source
- Not checked yetcites [48] Gate, R. E. et al. Genetic determinants of co-accessible chromatin regions in activated T cells across humans. Nat. Genet. 50, 1140–1150 (2018). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(3) data collection and analysis were not performed blind to the conditions of the experiments.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > GWAS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since we used publicly available GWAS summary statistics, (1) no data points were excluded from analysis”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > GWAS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(2) no statistical methods were used to pre-determine the sample size”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > GWAS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Similar cell-type specificity was reported by the interactome study, demonstrating the robustness of the result using an orthogonal approach49.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Mohammadi, S., Davila-Velderrain, J. & Kellis, M. Reconstruction of cell-type-specific interactomes at single-cell resolution. Cell Syst. 9, 559–568.e4 (2019). source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pleiotropic genes were associated with neuronal development and synaptic plasticity, suggesting that inappropriate neuronal activity and regulation may act as key components in the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We generated an input file for cMAGMA that is comparable to H-MAGMA. We used the same gene model (Gencode v26) and a SNP list used for H-MAGMA, and allowed a window of 35kb upstream and 10kb downstream of each gene as previously described16,52.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Gene annotation for conventional MAGMA (cMAGMA)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Network Pathway Analysis Subgroup of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Psychiatric genome-wide association study analyses implicate neuronal, immune and histone pathways. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 199–209 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [52] Pardiñas, A. F. et al. Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nat. Genet. 50, 381–389 (2018). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Differentially expressed genes (DEG) in postmortem brains with psychiatric disorders were obtained from Gandal et al., 201840 (FDR<0.05).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Gene-set analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Gandal, M. J. et al. Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science 362, eaat8127 (2018). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To ensure that developmental expression trajectories are not dictated by the developmental stage from which Hi-C data was obtained, we used union disorder risk genes.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Developmental and Cellular Expression Profiles
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Cell-type specific DEG in AD postmortem brains was obtained from Mathys et al., 201924.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Gene-set analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Mathys, H. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 570, 332–337 (2019). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We restricted our H-MAGMA results to those derived from the adult brain so that we can match the developmental period (adult) and brain region (DLPFC) with the eQTL database.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Comparison between H-MAGMA and eQTL-based gene mapping algorithms
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In comparing H-MAGMA outputs (common variation) with the gene lists that harbor protein disrupting variation (rare variation), we used a generalized linear model controlling for the exome length (controlling for rare variation) and the number of SNPs mapped to each gene (controlling for common variation).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Gene-set analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Protein-disrupting variation in brain disorders is dependent on the exon but not on gene length.
In the paper
“In comparing H-MAGMA outputs with DEG, we used the gene-set analysis embedded in MAGMA, which utilizes the whole gene-level association statistics while controlling for covariates such as gene size and LD2.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Gene-set analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] de Leeuw, C. A., Mooij, J. M., Heskes, T. & Posthuma, D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004219 (2015). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To further verify the developmental trajectories in a cell-type specific fashion, we used neuronal Hi-C for psychiatric disorders and astrocytic Hi-C for degenerative disorders.”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Developmental and Cellular Expression Profiles
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Schizophrenia risk genes with elevated burden of rare variation were obtained from Singh et al., 201666 (110 genes with FDR<0.3).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Gene-set analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] Singh, T. et al. Rare loss-of-function variants in SETD1A are associated with schizophrenia and developmental disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 571–577 (2016). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Protein-disrupting variation in brain disorders is dependent on the exon but not on gene length.
“We took this alternative approach than using MAGMA gene-set analysis because protein disrupting variation in brain disorders was detected by exome-sequencing and is dependent on the exon, but not gene length.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Non-coding genes have much lower expression values than protein-coding genes, which can dilute signals.
“We restricted our analysis only on protein-coding genes, because (1) the majority of genes detected in the spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas12, single cell expression datasets60–62, and gene ontologies were protein-coding genes, and (2) non-coding genes have much lower expression values compared with protein-coding genes, which can dilute the signals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The majority of genes detected in the spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas, single-cell expression datasets, and gene ontologies are protein-coding genes.
“We restricted our analysis only on protein-coding genes, because (1) the majority of genes detected in the spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas12, single cell expression datasets60–62, and gene ontologies were protein-coding genes, and (2) non-coding genes have much lower expression values compared with protein-coding genes, which can dilute the signals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The complexity of linkage disequilibrium in the MHC region can override the overall pattern.
“We also excluded genes within the MHC region due to the complexity of LD, which can override the overall pattern.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Given that genetic correlation between SCZ and BD is remarkably high (rg = 0.67)46,53,54, these findings suggest cellular substrates for molecular convergence (Ex7 and In6 are shared between two disorders) and divergence (Ex1 is BD-specific, while Ex2 is SCZ-specific) among two highly genetically correlated disorders.”
From Neuronal and glial 3D chromatin architecture informs the cellular etiology of brain disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [46]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In contrast to AD in which multiple glial cells are implicated, previous work has indicated neurons as the central cell-type harboring genetic risk for the majority of psychiatric disorders3,22,46,58–61.”
From Neuronal and glial 3D chromatin architecture informs the cellular etiology of brain disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [46]
In the citing paper
“TADA genes were defined as a set of 113 ASD genes that were associated with ASD at an FDR < 0.05.”
From A phenotypic spectrum of autism is attributable to the combined effects of rare variants, polygenic risk and sex (2022) · cites this paper as [65]
In the citing paper
“This analysis identified 181 AD risk genes (FDR < 0.05) based upon their potential regulation by associated non-coding variants (“Methods”, Supplementary Data 6), many of which included well-known AD risk genes47.”
From Neuronal and glial 3D chromatin architecture informs the cellular etiology of brain disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [46]
In the citing paper
“In our previous study, we found that genes associated with psychiatric disorders display substantial molecular convergence within neurons, which was in stark contrast to neurodegenerative disorders like AD46.”
From Neuronal and glial 3D chromatin architecture informs the cellular etiology of brain disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Biological pathways underlying pleiotropy
“we next examined genes shared in multiple psychiatric disorders (n≥4) to identify common molecular mechanisms of psychiatric disorders”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Biological pathways underlying pleiotropy
“In total, we found 1,841 genes (hereby referred to as pleiotropic genes) that are shared in more than four psychiatric disorders”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Result > Psychiatric disorders exhibit neurodevelopmental origin, while degenerative disorders exhibit adult origin.
“BD- and ADHD-associated genes were gradually increased during the prenatal stage with a peak at the developmental stage 6 (19–22 PCW).”
§ A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles > Methods > Developmental and Cellular Expression Profiles
“stage 6, 19 PCW ≤ Age < 24 PCW”
Citations
Cites
Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13595 · Cited by 7,577
Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes
Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, Kundaje, A., Meuleman, W., Ernst, J., Bilenky, M., Yen, A., Heravi-Moussavi, A., Kheradpour, P., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14248 · Cited by 6,368
Soluble protein oligomers in neurodegeneration: lessons from the Alzheimer's amyloid β-peptide
Haass, C., & Selkoe, D. J. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2101 · Cited by 4,744
Giambartolomei, C., Vukcevic, D., Schadt, E. E., Franke, L., Hingorani, A. D., Wallace, C., & Plagnol, V. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004383 · Cited by 4,261
An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits
ReproGen Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B., Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 3, Finucane, H. K., Anttila, V., Gusev, A., Day, F. R., Loh, P.-R., Duncan, L., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3406 · Cited by 4,255
Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA
Watanabe, K., Taskesen, E., van Bochoven, A., & Posthuma, D. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5 · Cited by 4,083
MAGMA: Generalized Gene-Set Analysis of GWAS Data
de Leeuw, C. A., Mooij, J. M., Heskes, T., & Posthuma, D. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219 · Cited by 3,653
eQTLGen, Wray, N. R., 23andMe, the Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Ripke, S., Mattheisen, M., Trzaskowski, M., Byrne, E. M., Abdellaoui, A., Adams, M. J., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0090-3 · Cited by 3,005
Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics
ReproGen Consortium, Finucane, H. K., Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, The RACI Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B., Gusev, A., Trynka, G., Reshef, Y., Loh, P.-R., Anttila, V., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3404 · Cited by 2,604
Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease
Mathys, H., Davila-Velderrain, J., Peng, Z., Gao, F., Mohammadi, S., Young, J. Z., Menon, M., He, L., Abdurrob, F., Jiang, X., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1195-2 · Cited by 2,568
Howard, D. M., Adams, M. J., Clarke, T.-K., Hafferty, J. D., Gibson, J., Shirali, M., Coleman, J. R. I., Hagenaars, S. P., Ward, J., Wigmore, E. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0326-7 · Cited by 2,565
Integrative approaches for large-scale transcriptome-wide association studies
Gusev, A., Ko, A., Shi, H., Bhatia, G., Chung, W., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Jansen, R., de Geus, E. J. C., Boomsma, D. I., Wright, F. A., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3506 · Cited by 2,479
Nalls, M. A., Blauwendraat, C., Vallerga, C. L., Heilbron, K., Bandres-Ciga, S., Chang, D., Tan, M., Kia, D. A., Noyce, A. J., Xue, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30320-5 · Cited by 2,454
Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder
Autism Spectrum Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Grove, J., BUPGEN, Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 23andMe Research Team, Ripke, S., Als, T. D., Mattheisen, M., Walters, R. K., Won, H., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0344-8 · Cited by 2,421
Self-citationSatterstrom, F. K., Kosmicki, J. A., Wang, J., Breen, M. S., De Rubeis, S., An, J.-Y., Peng, M., Collins, R., Grove, J., Klei, L., et al. (2018) · doi:10.1101/484113 · Cited by 2,323
Satterstrom, F. K., Kosmicki, J. A., Wang, J., Breen, M. S., De Rubeis, S., An, J.-Y., Peng, M., Collins, R., Grove, J., Klei, L., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.036 · Cited by 2,321
Zhang, Y., Sloan, S. A., Clarke, L. E., Caneda, C., Plaza, C. A., Blumenthal, P. D., Vogel, H., Steinberg, G. K., Edwards, M. S. B., Li, G., et al. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.013 · Cited by 2,295
Jansen, I. E., Savage, J. E., Watanabe, K., Bryois, J., Williams, D. M., Steinberg, S., Sealock, J., Karlsson, I. K., Hägg, S., Athanasiu, L., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0311-9 · Cited by 2,277
ADHD Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC), Demontis, D., Early Lifecourse & Genetic Epidemiology (EAGLE) Consortium, 23andMe Research Team, Walters, R. K., Martin, J., Mattheisen, M., Als, T. D., Agerbo, E., Baldursson, G., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0269-7 · Cited by 2,203
Self-citationSpatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain
Kang, H. J., Kawasawa, Y. I., Cheng, F., Zhu, Y., Xu, X., Li, M., Sousa, A. M. M., Pletikos, M., Meyer, K. A., Sedmak, G., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10523 · Cited by 2,084
Microglia in Alzheimer’s disease
Hansen, D. V., Hanson, J. E., & Sheng, M. (2018) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201709069 · Cited by 1,935
Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain
The Brainstorm Consortium, Anttila, V., Bulik-Sullivan, B., Finucane, H. K., Walters, R. K., Bras, J., Duncan, L., Escott-Price, V., Falcone, G. J., Gormley, P., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap8757 · Cited by 1,924
Transcriptomic Analysis of Autistic Brain Reveals Convergent Molecular Pathology
Voineagu, I., Wang, X., Johnston, P., Lowe, J. K., Tian, Y., Horvath, S., Mill, J., Cantor, R. M., Blencowe, B. J., & Geschwind, D. H. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10110 · Cited by 1,874
Multiple Sclerosis: An Immune or Neurodegenerative Disorder?
Trapp, B. D., & Nave, K.-A. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094313 · Cited by 1,724
The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006
Hinrichs, A. S. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj144 · Cited by 1,646
GERAD1 Consortium, Pardiñas, A. F., CRESTAR Consortium, Holmans, P., Pocklington, A. J., Escott-Price, V., Ripke, S., Carrera, N., Legge, S. E., Bishop, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2 · Cited by 1,552
Self-citationGenome-wide association study identifies 30 loci associated with bipolar disorder
eQTLGen Consortium, Stahl, E. A., BIOS Consortium, the Bipolar Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Breen, G., Forstner, A. J., McQuillin, A., Ripke, S., Trubetskoy, V., Mattheisen, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0397-8 · Cited by 1,519
The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters
Sanyal, A., Lajoie, B. R., Jain, G., & Dekker, J. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11279 · Cited by 1,489
Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders
Study, D. D. D. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21062 · Cited by 1,480
A survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level
Darmanis, S., Sloan, S. A., Zhang, Y., Enge, M., Caneda, C., Shuer, L. M., Hayden Gephart, M. G., Barres, B. A., & Quake, S. R. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1507125112 · Cited by 1,401
Analysis of immune-related loci identifies 48 new susceptibility variants for multiple sclerosis
International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium (IMSGC) (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2770 · Cited by 1,386
Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders
Lee, P. H., Anttila, V., Won, H., Feng, Y.-C. A., Rosenthal, J., Zhu, Z., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Nivard, M. G., Grotzinger, A. D., Posthuma, D., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.020 · Cited by 1,381
Self-citationTranscriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder
Gandal, M. J., Zhang, P., Hadjimichael, E., Walker, R. L., Chen, C., Liu, S., Won, H., van Bakel, H., Varghese, M., Wang, Y., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8127 · Cited by 1,247
Self-citationNormal aging induces A1-like astrocyte reactivity
Clarke, L. E., Liddelow, S. A., Chakraborty, C., Münch, A. E., Heiman, M., & Barres, B. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1800165115 · Cited by 1,237
A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells
Jin, F., Li, Y., Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Ye, Z., Lee, A. Y., Yen, C.-A., Schmitt, A. D., Espinoza, C. A., & Ren, B. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12644 · Cited by 1,208
Wild-Type Nonneuronal Cells Extend Survival of SOD1 Mutant Motor Neurons in ALS Mice
Clement, A. M., Nguyen, M. D., Roberts, E. A., Garcia, M. L., Boillée, S., Rule, M., McMahon, A. P., Doucette, W. T., Siwek, D. F., Ferrante, R. J., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1086071 · Cited by 1,131
Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain
Wang, D., Liu, S., Warrell, J., Won, H., Shi, X., Navarro, F. C. P., Clarke, D., Gu, M., Emani, P., Yang, Y. T., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8464 · Cited by 965
Self-citationSpatiotemporal gene expression trajectories reveal developmental hierarchies of the human cortex
Nowakowski, T. J., Bhaduri, A., Pollen, A. A., Alvarado, B., Mostajo-Radji, M. A., Di Lullo, E., Haeussler, M., Sandoval-Espinosa, C., Liu, S. J., Velmeshev, D., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap8809 · Cited by 964
Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain
Lake, B. B., Ai, R., Kaeser, G. E., Salathia, N. S., Yung, Y. C., Liu, R., Wildberg, A., Gao, D., Fung, H.-L., Chen, S., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1204 · Cited by 957
Advancing the understanding of autism disease mechanisms through genetics
de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Won, H., Stein, J. L., & Geschwind, D. H. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4071 · Cited by 827
Self-citationTau and neurodegenerative disease: the story so far
Iqbal, K., Liu, F., & Gong, C.-X. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.225 · Cited by 806
Zoghbi, H. Y., & Bear, M. F. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a009886 · Cited by 797
Beyond GWASs: Illuminating the Dark Road from Association to Function
Edwards, S. L., Beesley, J., French, J. D., & Dunning, A. M. (2013) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.012 · Cited by 784
Psychiatric genome-wide association study analyses implicate neuronal, immune and histone pathways
The Network and Pathway Analysis Subgroup of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3922 · Cited by 755
Postnatal neurodevelopmental disorders: meeting at the synapse?
Zoghbi, H. Y. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089071 · Cited by 691
Genome-wide changes in lncRNA, splicing, and regional gene expression patterns in autism
Parikshak, N. N., Swarup, V., Belgard, T. G., Irimia, M., Ramaswami, G., Gandal, M. J., Hartl, C., Leppa, V., Ubieta, L. D. L. T., Huang, J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20612 · Cited by 685
Genetic identification of brain cell types underlying schizophrenia
Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Skene, N. G., Bryois, J., Bakken, T. E., Breen, G., Crowley, J. J., Gaspar, H. A., Giusti-Rodriguez, P., Hodge, R. D., Miller, J. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0129-5 · Cited by 651
Genetic variability in the regulation of gene expression in ten regions of the human brain
UK Brain Expression Consortium, Ramasamy, A., North American Brain Expression Consortium, Trabzuni, D., Guelfi, S., Varghese, V., Smith, C., Walker, R., De, T., Coin, L., et al. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3801 · Cited by 644
Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain
Won, H., de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Stein, J. L., Parikshak, N. N., Huang, J., Opland, C. K., Gandal, M. J., Sutton, G. J., Hormozdiari, F., Lu, D., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19847 · Cited by 584
Self-citationThe neuropathology of autism: defects of neurogenesis and neuronal migration, and dysplastic changes
Wegiel, J., Kuchna, I., Nowicki, K., Imaki, H., Wegiel, J., Marchi, E., Ma, S. Y., Chauhan, A., Chauhan, V., Bobrowicz, T. W., et al. (2010) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0655-4 · Cited by 577
PARALS Registry, van Rheenen, W., SLALOM Group, SLAP Registry, NNIPPS Study Group, Shatunov, A., Dekker, A. M., McLaughlin, R. L., Diekstra, F. P., Pulit, S. L., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3622 · Cited by 577
Conserved epigenomic signals in mice and humans reveal immune basis of Alzheimer's disease
Gjoneska, E., Pfenning, A. R., Mathys, H., Quon, G., Kundaje, A., Tsai, L.-H., & Kellis, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14252 · Cited by 576
The serotonin system in autism spectrum disorder: From biomarker to animal models
Muller, C. L., Anacker, A. M. J., & Veenstra-VanderWeele, J. (2016) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.11.010 · Cited by 531
Gusev, A., Mancuso, N., Won, H., Kousi, M., Finucane, H. K., Reshef, Y., Song, L., Safi, A., Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, McCarroll, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0092-1 · Cited by 491
Self-citationPlaisier, S. B., Taschereau, R., Wong, J. A., & Graeber, T. G. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq636 · Cited by 468
Segrè, A. V., DIAGRAM Consortium, MAGIC investigators, Groop, L., Mootha, V. K., Daly, M. J., & Altshuler, D. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001058 · Cited by 463
Enhancer-promoter interactions are encoded by complex genomic signatures on looping chromatin
Whalen, S., Truty, R. M., & Pollard, K. S. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3539 · Cited by 456
Study, S. S., Singh, T., Study, I., Study, D., UK10 K Consortium, Kurki, M. I., Curtis, D., Purcell, S. M., Crooks, L., McRae, J., et al. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4267 · Cited by 452
Glia: Initiators and progressors of pathology in Parkinson's disease
Halliday, G. M., & Stevens, C. H. (2011) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.23455 · Cited by 436
Contrasting the Genetic Architecture of 30 Complex Traits from Summary Association Data
Shi, H., Kichaev, G., & Pasaniuc, B. (2016) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.05.013 · Cited by 387
Gene Ontology Analysis of GWA Study Data Sets Provides Insights into the Biology of Bipolar Disorder
Holmans, P., Green, E. K., Pahwa, J. S., Ferreira, M. A. R., Purcell, S. M., Sklar, P., Owen, M. J., O'Donovan, M. C., & Craddock, N. (2009) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.05.011 · Cited by 378
Developmental timing and critical windows for the treatment of psychiatric disorders
Marín, O. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4225 · Cited by 374
Role of the Blood–Brain Barrier in Multiple Sclerosis
Ortiz, G. G., Pacheco-Moisés, F. P., Macías-Islas, M. Á., Flores-Alvarado, L. J., Mireles-Ramírez, M. A., González-Renovato, E. D., Hernández-Navarro, V. E., Sánchez-López, A. L., & Alatorre-Jiménez, M. A. (2014) · Archives of Medical Research · doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2014.11.013 · Cited by 373
Large-scale imputation of epigenomic datasets for systematic annotation of diverse human tissues
Ernst, J., & Kellis, M. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3157 · Cited by 357
The Dynamic Landscape of Open Chromatin during Human Cortical Neurogenesis
de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Stein, J. L., Won, H., Opland, C. K., Liang, D., Lu, D., & Geschwind, D. H. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.014 · Cited by 353
Self-citationHIPSCI Consortium, Alasoo, K., Rodrigues, J., Mukhopadhyay, S., Knights, A. J., Mann, A. L., Kundu, K., Hale, C., Dougan, G., & Gaffney, D. J. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0046-7 · Cited by 338
Microglia and Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis
Streit, W. J. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.20093 · Cited by 335
The identity and function of microglia in neurodegeneration
Song, W. M., & Colonna, M. (2018) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-018-0212-1 · Cited by 308
Genome-wide association study identifies 30 Loci Associated with Bipolar DisorderPreprint
Stahl, E. A., Breen, G. D., Forstner, A. J., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/173062 · Cited by 255
Brambilla, R. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-019-01980-7 · Cited by 246
INRICH: interval-based enrichment analysis for genome-wide association studies
Lee, P. H., O'Dushlaine, C., Thomas, B., & Purcell, S. M. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts191 · Cited by 238
Schork, A. J., Won, H., Appadurai, V., Nudel, R., Gandal, M., Delaneau, O., Revsbech Christiansen, M., Hougaard, D. M., Bækved-Hansen, M., Bybjerg-Grauholm, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0320-0 · Cited by 223
Self-citationNeuron-specific signatures in the chromosomal connectome associated with schizophrenia risk
Rajarajan, P., Borrman, T., Liao, W., Schrode, N., Flaherty, E., Casiño, C., Powell, S., Yashaswini, C., LaMarca, E. A., Kassim, B., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat4311 · Cited by 219
Self-citationAutism spectrum disorder causes, mechanisms, and treatments: focus on neuronal synapses
Won, H., Mah, W., & Kim, E. (2013) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2013.00019 · Cited by 217
Self-citationGenetic determinants of co-accessible chromatin regions in activated T cells across humans
Gate, R. E., Cheng, C. S., Aiden, A. P., Siba, A., Tabaka, M., Lituiev, D., Machol, I., Gordon, M. G., Subramaniam, M., Shamim, M., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0156-2 · Cited by 181
Novel multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci implicated in epigenetic regulation
Andlauer, T. F. M., Buck, D., Antony, G., Bayas, A., Bechmann, L., Berthele, A., Chan, A., Gasperi, C., Gold, R., Graetz, C., et al. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501678 · Cited by 178
Exploring the Wnt signaling pathway in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
Hoseth, E. Z., Krull, F., Dieset, I., Mørch, R. H., Hope, S., Gardsjord, E. S., Steen, N. E., Melle, I. S., Brattbakk, H.-R., Steen, V. M., et al. (2018) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0102-1 · Cited by 145
Nalls, M., Blauwendraat, C., Vallerga, C., et al. (2018) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/388165 · Cited by 145
Neurodevelopmental Perspectives on Wnt Signaling in Psychiatry
Mulligan, K. A., & Cheyette, B. N. R. (2016) · Complex Psychiatry · doi:10.1159/000453266 · Cited by 103
Gerring, Z. F., Gamazon, E. R., & Derks, E. M. (2019) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008245 · Cited by 94
Edmunds, S. R., Kover, S. T., & Stone, W. L. (2019) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2100 · Cited by 93
Scaini, G., Fries, G. R., Valvassori, S. S., Zeni, C., Zunta‐Soares, G. B., Berk, M., Soares, J. C., & Quevedo, J. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2017.83 · Cited by 88
Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cerebral cortical development
Chenn, A. (2008) · Organogenesis · doi:10.4161/org.4.2.5852 · Cited by 77
Genetic identification Of brain cell types underlying schizophreniaPreprint
Skene, N., Bryois, J., Bakken, T. E., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/145466 · Cited by 73
Reconstruction of Cell-type-Specific Interactomes at Single-Cell Resolution
Mohammadi, S., Davila-Velderrain, J., & Kellis, M. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.10.007 · Cited by 73
Synapse Assembly and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Washbourne, P. (2014) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2014.163 · Cited by 72
Gusev, A., Mancuso, N., Finucane, H. K., Reshef, Y., Song, L., Safi, A., Oh, E. C. T., McCarroll, S. A., Neale, B. M., Ophoff, R. A., et al. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/067355 · Cited by 66
Pearl, J. R., Colantuoni, C., Bergey, D. E., Funk, C. C., Shannon, P. T., Basu, B., Casella, A. M., Oshone, R. T., Hood, L., Price, N. D., et al. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.01.002 · Cited by 60
Pedroso, I., Lourdusamy, A., Rietschel, M., Nöthen, M. M., Cichon, S., McGuffin, P., Al-Chalabi, A., Barnes, M. R., & Breen, G. (2012) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.12.031 · Cited by 59
Lee, P. H., Anttila, V., Won, H., Feng, Y. A., Rosenthal, J., Zhu, Z., Tucker–Drob, E. M., Nivard, M. G., Grotzinger, A. D., Posthuma, D., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/528117 · Cited by 51
Self-citationCholinergic Circuits and Signaling in the Pathophysiology of Schizophrenia
Berman, J. A., Talmage, D. A., & Role, L. W. (2007) · International Review of Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7742(06)78007-2 · Cited by 47
Dushlaine, C. O., Rossin, L., Ph, L., Duncan, L. E., Parikshak, N., Newhouse, S., Ripke, S., Neale, B. M., Purcell, S., Danielle Posthuma, B., et al. (2015) · Cited by 43
Repurposing dopaminergic drugs for MS — the evidence mounts
Marino, F., & Cosentino, M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.33 · Cited by 38
Mah, W., & Won, H. (2020) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2019.03.007 · Cited by 38
Self-citationDeutsch, S. I., Urbano, M. R., Burket, J. A., Herndon, A. L., & Winebarger, E. E. (2011) · Clinical Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1097/wnf.0b013e31823a1247 · Cited by 22
Gerring, Z. F., Gamazon, E. R., & Derks, E. M. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/591693 · Cited by 10
Most regulatory interactions are not in linkage disequilibriumPreprint
Whalen, S., & Pollard, K. S. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/272245 · Cited by 8
The Network and Pathway Analysis Subgroup of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn0615-926c · Cited by 8
Single-cell interactomes of the human brain reveal cell-type specific convergence of brain disordersPreprint
Mohammadi, S., Dávila-Velderrain, J., & Kellis, M. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/586859 · Cited by 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stroke genetics informs drug discovery and risk prediction across ancestries
Mishra, A., Malik, R., Hachiya, T., Jürgenson, T., Namba, S., Posner, D. C., Kamanu, F., Koido, M., Grand, Q. L., Shi, M., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05165-3 · Cited by 623
Garvin, M. R., Alvarez, C., Miller, J. I., Prates, E. T., Walker, A. M., Amos, B. K., Mast, A. E., Justice, A. C., Aronow, B. J., & Jacobson, D. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.59177 · Cited by 372
Corces, M. R., Shcherbina, A., Kundu, S., Gloudemans, M. J., Frésard, L., Granja, J. M., Louie, B. H., Eulalio, T., Shams, S., Bagdatli, S. T., et al. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00721-x · Cited by 358
A large-scale genome-wide association study meta-analysis of cannabis use disorder
Johnson, E. C., Demontis, D., Thorgeirsson, T. E., Walters, R. K., Polimanti, R. A., Hatoum, A. S., Sanchez‐Roige, S., Paul, S. E., Wendt, F. R., Clarke, T.-K., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30339-4 · Cited by 334
Karlsson Linnér, R., Mallard, T. T., Barr, P. B., Sanchez-Roige, S., Madole, J. W., Driver, M. N., Poore, H. E., de Vlaming, R., Grotzinger, A. D., Tielbeek, J. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00908-3 · Cited by 317
“Because of the strong polygenic signal identified in the GWAS of EXT, four different gene-based analyses identified an abundance of implicated genes ( > 3,000): (1) functional annotation of the 579 SNPs to their nearest gene with FUMA 26 , which suggested 587 genes; (2) MAGMA gene-based association analysis 27 , which…”
MethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Sey, N. Y. A., Hu, B., Mah, W., Fauni, H., McAfee, J. C., Rajarajan, P., Brennand, K. J., Akbarian, S., & Won, H.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Corresponding author
- Won, Hyejung
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2020-03-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 583-593
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- PMC
- PMC7131892
- OpenAlex
- W3009063121
- Semantic Scholar
- f35ffcf138c22bfc43a0a99a2bb24338a41bf44b
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 36
- FWCI
- 26.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (5T32NS007431)
- UNC | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Helen Lyng White Fellowship)
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (R56MH101454, R0MH106056, R00MH113823, DP2MH122403)
- Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD Young Investigator)
- Simons Foundation (605259)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- magma, brain disorders, risk genes, chromatin interactions, Hi-C, non-coding variants, mental illness, neurodegenerative diseases, gene regulatory relationships, developmental timing, excitatory neurons, brain cell types, gene expression, genome-wide association study
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Diseases, Chromatin, Humans, Risk Factors, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review