Cited by 220COVID-19 and Mental HealthStudent Stress and CopingMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mental health prevalence and predictors among university students in nine countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-national study

Open access

Abstract

The student population has been highly vulnerable to the risk of mental health deterioration during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to reveal the prevalence and predictors of mental health among students in Poland, Slovenia, Czechia, Ukraine, Russia, Germany, Turkey, Israel, and Colombia in a socioeconomic context during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted among 2349 students (69% women) from May-July 2020. Data were collected by means of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Gender Inequality Index (GII), Standard & Poor's Global Ratings, the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT), and a sociodemographic survey. Descriptive statistics and Bayesian multilevel skew-normal regression analyses were conducted. The prevalence of high stress, depression, and generalized anxiety symptoms in the total sample was 61.30%, 40.3%, and 30%, respectively. The multilevel Bayesian model showed that female sex was a credible predictor of PSS-10, GAD-7, and PHQ-8 scores. In addition, place of residence (town) and educational level (first-cycle studies) were risk factors for the PHQ-8. This study showed that mental health issues are alarming in the student population. Regular psychological support should be provided to students by universities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-97697-3

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Maps present the following data in nine countries (Poland, Slovenia, Czechia, Ukraine, Russia, Germany, Turkey, Israel, and Colombia): (a) credit rating (indicated by the size of the dot) and the stringency level of restrictions (highlighted in color); (b) gender Inequality Index (GII) (size) and the stringency level (color). The map was developed in Tableau 2021.1.
Figure 1 Maps present the following data in nine countries (Poland, Slovenia, Czechia, Ukraine, Russia, Germany, Turkey, Israel, and Colombia): (a) credit rating (indicated by the size of the dot) and the stringency level of restrictions (highlighted in color); (b) gender Inequality Index (GII) (size) and the stringency level (color). The map was developed in Tableau 2021.1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Distribution of anxiety (GAD-7), perceived stress (PSS-10), and depression (PHQ-8) parameters within each surveyed country presented by violin and box plots. COL = Colombia, CZ = Czechia, GER = Germany, ISR = Israel, PL = Poland, RU = Russia, SL = Slovenia, TR = Turkey, UKR = Ukraine.
Figure 2 Distribution of anxiety (GAD-7), perceived stress (PSS-10), and depression (PHQ-8) parameters within each surveyed country presented by violin and box plots. COL = Colombia, CZ = Czechia, GER = Germany, ISR = Israel, PL = Poland, RU = Russia, SL = Slovenia, TR = Turkey, UKR = Ukraine.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Posterior means of predicted marginal means (points) with 95% credible intervals (vertical lines) from the Bayesian skew-normal multilevel model for generalized anxiety (GAD-7) scores. Boxplots and violin plots show the distribution of the data.
Figure 3 Posterior means of predicted marginal means (points) with 95% credible intervals (vertical lines) from the Bayesian skew-normal multilevel model for generalized anxiety (GAD-7) scores. Boxplots and violin plots show the distribution of the data.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Posterior means of predicted marginal means (points) with 95% credible intervals (vertical lines) from the Bayesian skew-normal multilevel model for perceived stress (PSS-10) scores. Boxplots and violin plots show the distribution of the data.
Figure 4 Posterior means of predicted marginal means (points) with 95% credible intervals (vertical lines) from the Bayesian skew-normal multilevel model for perceived stress (PSS-10) scores. Boxplots and violin plots show the distribution of the data.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Posterior means of predicted marginal means (points) with 95% credible intervals (vertical lines) from the Bayesian skew-normal multilevel model for depression (PHQ-8) scores. Boxplots and violin plots show the distribution of the data.
Figure 5 Posterior means of predicted marginal means (points) with 95% credible intervals (vertical lines) from the Bayesian skew-normal multilevel model for depression (PHQ-8) scores. Boxplots and violin plots show the distribution of the data.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hale, T., Petherick, A., Phillips, T. & Webster, S. Variation in government responses to COVID-19. Blavatnik School Gov. Work. Pap. 31, 2020–2111 (2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Ochnik, D., Rogowska, A. M., Kuśnierz, C., Jakubiak, M., Schütz, A., Held, M. J., Arzenšek, A., Benatov, J., Berger, R., Korchagina, E. V., Pavlova, I., Blažková, I., Aslan, I., Çınar, O., & Cuero-Acosta, Y. A.
Affiliations
  • Akademia Śląska (PL)
  • University of Opole (PL)
  • Opole University of Technology (PL)
  • Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (PL)
  • University of Bamberg (DE)
  • University of Primorska (SI)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (RU)
  • Mendel University in Brno (CZ)
  • Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University (TR)
Corresponding author
Held, Marco J.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-09-20
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
18644-18644
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198966822
Cited by
220
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 6
FWCI
29.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
student mental health, COVID-19 pandemic, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, perceived stress, university students, cross-national comparison, gender differences, socioeconomic factors, psychological support, risk factors
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Anxiety Disorders, Bayes Theorem, Depression, Female, Geography, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Regression Analysis, Stress, Psychological, Students, Universities, Prevalence, Multilevel Analysis, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review