Cited by 386Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

No‐go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging

Konishi, Seiki, Nakajima, Kyoichi, Uchida, Idai, Sekihara, Kensuke, Miyashita, Yasushi·1998·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

We investigated the response inhibition function of the prefrontal cortex associated with the go/no‐go task using functional magnetic resonance imaging in five human subjects. The go/no‐go task consisted of go and no‐go trials given randomly with roughly equal probability. In go trials a green square was presented and the subjects had to respond by promptly pushing a button using their right or left thumbs, but in no‐go trials a red square was presented and subjects were instructed not to respond. When brain activity in no‐go trials is dominant over that in go trials in areas in the prefrontal cortex, this no‐go dominant brain activity would reflect the neural processes for inhibiting inherent response tendency. We used a new strategy of image data analysis by which transient brain activity in go or no‐go trials can be analysed separately, and looked for the prefrontal areas in which the brain activity in no‐go trials is dominant over that in go trials. We found the no‐go dominant foci in the posterior part of the right inferior frontal sulcus reproducibly among the subjects. This was true whether the right or left hand was used. These results suggest that this region in the prefrontal cortex is related to the neural mechanisms underlying the response inhibition function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00167.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konishi, S., Nakajima, K., Uchida, I., Sekihara, K., & Miyashita, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
Corresponding author
Konishi, Seiki
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-03
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
1209-1213
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2099625018
Cited by
386
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
response inhibition, go/no-go task, inferior frontal sulcus, prefrontal cortex, inhibitory control, hemispheric lateralization
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior, Brain, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Thumb, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review