Cited by 333Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Larger deficits in brain networks for response inhibition than for visual selective attention in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Booth, James R., Burman, Douglas D., Meyer, Joel R., Lei, Zhang, Trommer, Barbara L., Davenport, Nicholas D., Li, Wei, Parrish, Todd B. +2 more·2005·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brain activation differences between 12 control and 12 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) children (9- to 12-year-olds) were examined on two cognitive tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). METHOD: Visual selective attention was measured with the visual search of a conjunction target (red triangle) in a field of distracters and response inhibition was measured with a go/no-go task. RESULTS: There were limited group differences in the selective attention task, with control children showing significantly greater intensity of activation in a small area of the superior parietal lobule region of interest. There were large group differences in the response inhibition task, with control children showing significantly greater intensity of activation in fronto-striatal regions of interest including the inferior, middle, superior and medial frontal gyri as well as the caudate nucleus and globus pallidus. CONCLUSION: The widespread hypoactivity for the ADHD children on the go/no-go task is consistent with the hypothesis that response inhibition is a specific deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00337.x

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Lei, Z., Trommer, B. L., Davenport, N. D., Li, W., Parrish, T. B., Gitelman, D. R., & Marsel Mesulam, M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Evanston Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Booth, James R.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-09-07
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
94-111
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2135691106
Cited by
333
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 24
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Northwestern University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, response inhibition, visual selective attention, go/no-go task, conjunction search, superior parietal lobule, frontostriatal circuits, caudate nucleus, globus pallidus, frontal cortex, children
MeSH terms
Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Task Performance and Analysis, Visual Perception, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review