The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Planck 2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents cosmological results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature and polarization anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation.Our results are in very good agreement with the 2013 analysis of the Planck nominal-mission temperature data, but with increased precision.The temperature and polarization power spectra are consistent with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter ΛCDM cosmology with a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted "base ΛCDM" in this paper).From the Planck temperature data combined with Planck lensing, for this cosmology we find a Hubble constant, H 0 = (67.8± 0.9) km s -1 Mpc -1 , a matter density parameter Ω m = 0.308 ± 0.012, and a tilted scalar spectral index with n s = 0.968 ± 0.006, consistent with the 2013 analysis.Note that in this abstract we quote 68% confidence limits on measured parameters and 95% upper limits on other parameters.We present the first results of polarization measurements with the Low Frequency Instrument at large angular scales.Combined with the Planck temperature and lensing data, these measurements give a reionization optical depth of τ = 0.066 ± 0.016, corresponding to a reionization redshift of z re = 8.8 +1.7 -1.4 .These results are consistent with those from WMAP polarization measurements cleaned for dust emission using 353-GHz polarization maps from the High Frequency Instrument.We find no evidence for any departure from base ΛCDM in the neutrino sector of the theory; for example, combining Planck observations with other astrophysical data we find N eff = 3.15 ± 0.23 for the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, consistent with the value N eff = 3.046 of the Standard Model of particle physics.The sum of neutrino masses is constrained to m ν < 0.23 eV.The spatial curvature of our Universe is found to be very close to zero, with |Ω K | < 0.005.Adding a tensor component as a single-parameter extension to base ΛCDM we find an upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r 0.002 < 0.11, consistent with the Planck 2013 results and consistent with the B-mode polarization constraints from a joint analysis of BICEP2, Keck Array, and Planck (BKP) data.Adding the BKP B-mode data to our analysis leads to a tighter constraint of r 0.002 < 0.09 and disfavours inflationary models with a V(φ) ∝ φ 2 potential.The addition of Planck polarization data leads to strong constraints on deviations from a purely adiabatic spectrum of fluctuations.We find no evidence for any contribution from isocurvature perturbations or from cosmic defects.Combining Planck data with other astrophysical data, including Type Ia supernovae, the equation of state of dark energy is constrained to w = -1.006± 0.045, consistent with the expected
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity
Starobinsky, A. A. (1980) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x · Cited by 7,677
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Self-citationBennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L., Spergel, D. N., Tucker, G. S., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377253 · Cited by 4,860
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495
Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19250.x · Cited by 2,590 · cited 5×
“XIII. shows DV/rdrag from the analysis of Anderson et al. (2014), updating the BOSS-DR9 analysis of Anderson et al. (2012) used in PCP13.”
InfluentialBaryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 galaxy sample
Percival, W. J., Reid, B. A., Eisenstein, D. J., Bahcall, N. A., Budavari, T., Frieman, J. A., Fukugita, M., Gunn, J. E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G. R., et al. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15812.x · Cited by 1,846 · cited 2×
“We have replaced the SDSS DR7 measurements of Percival et al. (2010) with the recent analysis of the SDSS Main Galaxy Sample (MGS) of Ross et al. (2015) at zeff = 0.15, and by the Anderson et al. (2014) analysis of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) “LOWZ” sample at zeff = 0.32.”
InfluentialThe Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data Set
Fixsen, D. J., Cheng, E. S., Gales, J. M., Mather, J. C., Shafer, R. A., & Wright, E. L. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/178173 · Cited by 1,780
The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z=0.15
Ross, A. J., Samushia, L., Howlett, C., Percival, W. J., Burden, A., & Manera, M. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv154 · Cited by 1,745 · cited 2×
“In this paper, we use the 6dFGS, SDSS-MGS, and BOSSLOWZ BAO measurements of DV/rdrag (Beutler et al. 2011; Ross et al. 2015; Anderson et al. 2014) and the CMASS-DR11 anisotropic BAO measurements of Anderson et al. (2014).”
Influential
Cited by
Planck 2018 results: X. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration, Akrami, Y., Arroja, F., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 · Cited by 2,442
Self-citationSimulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model
Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., Genel, S., Naiman, J., Pakmor, R., Hernquist, L., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Weinberger, R., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2656 · Cited by 2,007
In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions *
Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., Mota, D. F., Riess, A. G., & Silk, J. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d · Cited by 2,065
Self-citationAlam, S., Aubert, M., Avila, S., Balland, C., Bautista, J. E., Bershady, M. A., Bizyaev, D., Blanton, M. R., Bolton, A. S., Bovy, J., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.083533 · Cited by 1,337
UniverseMachine: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z = 0−10
Behroozi, P., Wechsler, R. H., Hearin, A. P., & Conroy, C. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1182 · Cited by 1,243
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Alarcon, A., Aleksić, J., Allam, S., Allen, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., Asorey, J., Avila, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043526 · Cited by 1,213
Self-citationDark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab3800 · Cited by 895
Self-citationFreedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Hatt, D., Hoyt, T. J., Jang, I. S., Beaton, R. L., Burns, C. R., Lee, M. G., Monson, A. J., Neeley, J. R., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f73 · Cited by 839
Bonvin, V., Courbin, F., Suyu, S. H., Marshall, P. J., Rusu, C. E., Sluse, D., Tewes, M., Wong, K. C., Collett, T., Fassnacht, C. D., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3006 · Cited by 457
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449
Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions
Pitrou, C., Coc, A., Uzan, J.-P., & Vangioni, E. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.04.005 · Cited by 440
Ade, P. A. R., Ahmed, Z., Aikin, R. W., Alexander, K. D., Barkats, D., Benton, S. J., Bischoff, C. A., Bock, J. J., Bowens-Rubin, R., Brevik, J. A., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.221301 · Cited by 431
Self-citationJoudaki, S., Blake, C., Johnson, A., Amon, A., Asgari, M., Choi, A., Erben, T., Glazebrook, K., Harnois-Déraps, J., Heymans, C., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2820 · Cited by 291
(2018) · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103503 · Cited by 233
The evidence for a spatially flat Universe
Efstathiou, G., & Gratton, S. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa093 · Cited by 203
Self-citationPerraudin, N., Defferrard, M., Kacprzak, T., & Sgier, R. (2019) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2019.03.004 · Cited by 184
The status of varying constants: a review of the physics, searches and implications
Martins, C. J. A. P. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa860e · Cited by 179
Davies, J. J., Crain, R. A., Oppenheimer, B. D., & Schaye, J. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3201 · Cited by 167
Nonlocal gravity. Conceptual aspects and cosmological predictions
Belgacem, E., Dirian, Y., Foffa, S., & Maggiore, M. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/002 · Cited by 161
A precise extragalactic test of General Relativity
Collett, T. E., Oldham, L. J., Smith, R. J., Auger, M. W., Westfall, K. B., Bacon, D., Nichol, R. C., Masters, K. L., Koyama, K., & van den Bosch, R. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2469 · Cited by 157
Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817
Pardo, K., Fishbach, M., Holz, D. E., & Spergel, D. N. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/048 · Cited by 156
The fraction of dark matter within galaxies from the IllustrisTNG simulations
Lovell, M. R., Pillepich, A., Genel, S., Nelson, D., Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Marinacci, F., Weinberger, R., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2339 · Cited by 149
Brane-world extra dimensions in light of GW170817
Visinelli, L., Bolis, N., & Vagnozzi, S. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.064039 · Cited by 139
CosmoFlow: Using Deep Learning to Learn the Universe at Scale
Mathuriya, A., Bard, D., Mendygral, P., Meadows, L., Arnemann, J., Shao, L., He, S., Karna, T., Moise, D., Pennycook, S. J., et al. (2018) · SC18: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis · doi:10.1109/sc.2018.00068 · Cited by 132
Non-Gaussian information from weak lensing data via deep learning
Gupta, A., Matilla, J. M. Z., Hsu, D., & Haiman, Z. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103515 · Cited by 128
Kim, S. Y., Peter, A. H. G., & Wittman, D. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx896 · Cited by 121
Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Ayromlou, M., Lee, W., Lehle, K., Rohr, E., & Truong, N. (2024) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348608 · Cited by 110
Cosmological dynamics of mimetic gravity
Dutta, J., Khyllep, W., Saridakis, E. N., Tamanini, N., & Vagnozzi, S. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/02/041 · Cited by 108
de la Torre, S., Jullo, E., Giocoli, C., Pezzotta, A., Bel, J., Granett, B. R., Guzzo, L., Garilli, B., Scodeggio, M., Bolzonella, M., et al. (2017) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630276 · Cited by 99
New constraints on time-dependent variations of fundamental constants using Planck data
Hart, L., & Chluba, J. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2783 · Cited by 96
Self-citationGoldstein, D. A., Nugent, P. E., Kasen, D. N., & Collett, T. E. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa975 · Cited by 96
Constraints on ΛCDM extensions from the SPT-3G 2018 EE and TE power spectra
Balkenhol, L., Dutcher, D., Ade, P. A. R., Ahmed, Z., Anderes, E., Anderson, A. J., Archipley, M., Avva, J. S., Aylor, K., Barry, P. S., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.083509 · Cited by 84
Self-citationObservational constraints on generalized Proca theories
De Felice, A., Heisenberg, L., & Tsujikawa, S. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.123540 · Cited by 82
Exploring the Tension between Current Cosmic Microwave Background and Cosmic Shear Data
Di Valentino, E., & Bridle, S. (2018) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym10110585 · Cited by 80
Brehmer, J., Mishra-Sharma, S., Hermans, J., Louppe, G., & Cranmer, K. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c41 · Cited by 80
Massive Warm/Hot Galaxy Coronae. II. Isentropic Model
Faerman, Y., Sternberg, A., & McKee, C. F. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7ffc · Cited by 71
Bernal, J. L., Smith, T. L., Boddy, K. K., & Kamionkowski, M. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.123515 · Cited by 69
Full-shape galaxy power spectra and the curvature tension
Glanville, A., Howlett, C., & Davis, T. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2891 · Cited by 69
Weak gravity conjecture, multiple point principle and the standard model landscape
Hamada, Y., & Shiu, G. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)043 · Cited by 63
KiDS+2dFLenS+GAMA: testing the cosmological model with the EG statistic
Amon, A., Blake, C., Heymans, C., Leonard, C. D., Asgari, M., Bilicki, M., Choi, A., Erben, T., Glazebrook, K., Harnois-Déraps, J., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1624 · Cited by 62
Coskun, A., Zarepour, A., & Zarrabi, A. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24076275 · Cited by 61
Measuring the Growth Rate of Structure with Type IA Supernovae from LSST
Howlett, C., Robotham, A. S. G., Lagos, C. D. P., & Kim, A. G. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa88c8 · Cited by 59
Zhu, K., Lu, S., Cappellari, M., Li, R., Mao, S., & Gao, L. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1299 · Cited by 54
Finding Horndeski theories with Einstein gravity limits
McManus, R., Lombriser, L., & Peñarrubia, J. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/11/006 · Cited by 57
Translation and rotation equivariant normalizing flow (TRENF) for optimal cosmological analysis
Dai, B., & Seljak, U. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2010 · Cited by 48
Probing gravity with a joint analysis of galaxy and CMB lensing and SDSS spectroscopy
Singh, S., Alam, S., Mandelbaum, R., Seljak, U., Rodriguez-Torres, S., & Ho, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.08915 · Cited by 48
Probing gravity with a joint analysis of galaxy and CMB lensing and SDSS spectroscopy
Singh, S., Alam, S., Mandelbaum, R., Seljak, U., Rodriguez-Torres, S., & Ho, S. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2681 · Cited by 48
Tensions between direct measurements of the lens power spectrum from Planck data
Motloch, P., & Hu, W. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103536 · Cited by 46
On the dissection of degenerate cosmologies with machine learning
Merten, J., Giocoli, C., Baldi, M., Meneghetti, M., Peel, A., Lalande, F., Starck, J.-L., & Pettorino, V. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz972 · Cited by 45
Introduction to big bang nucleosynthesis and modern cosmology
Mathews, G. J., Kusakabe, M., & Kajino, T. (2017) · International Journal of Modern Physics E · doi:10.1142/s0218301317410014 · Cited by 39
The PAU Survey: Photometric redshifts using transfer learning from simulations
Eriksen, M., Alarcon, A., Cabayol, L., Carretero, J., Casas, R., Castander, F. J., De Vicente, J., Fernandez, E., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2265 · Cited by 39
Strong gravitational lensing’s ‘external shear’ is not shear
Etherington, A., Nightingale, J. W., Massey, R., Tam, S.-I., Cao, X., Niemiec, A., He, Q., Robertson, A., Li, R., Amvrosiadis, A., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1375 · Cited by 39
Self-citationA model of interacting dark fluids tested with supernovae and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations data
Bégué, D., Stahl, C., & Xue, S.-S. (2019) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.01.001 · Cited by 37
Shirasaki, M., Moriwaki, K., Oogi, T., Yoshida, N., Ikeda, S., & Nishimichi, T. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab982 · Cited by 38
Abdalla, E., Abellán, G. F., Aboubrahim, A., Agnello, A., Akarsu, Ö., Akrami, Y., Alestas, G., Aloni, D., Amendola, L., Anchordoqui, L. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 · Cited by 37
Self-citationRadio relics in massive galaxy cluster mergers in the TNG-Cluster simulation
Lee, W., Pillepich, A., ZuHone, J., Nelson, D., Jee, M. J., Nagai, D., & Finner, K. (2024) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348194 · Cited by 37
Hart, L., & Chluba, J. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2777 · Cited by 36
Self-citationSimulation-based inference of dynamical galaxy cluster masses with 3D convolutional neural networks
Kodi Ramanah, D., Wojtak, R., & Arendse, N. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3922 · Cited by 31
What is flat ΛCDM, and may we choose it?
Anselmi, S., Carney, M. F., Giblin, J. T., Kumar, S., Mertens, J. B., O'Dwyer, M., Starkman, G. D., & Tian, C. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/02/049 · Cited by 29
Cosmological perturbation theory in generalized Einstein-Aether models
Battye, R. A., Pace, F., & Trinh, D. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.064041 · Cited by 29
Self-citationBaryon acoustic oscillations reconstruction using convolutional neural networks
Mao, T.-X., Wang, J., Li, B., Cai, Y.-C., Falck, B., Neyrinck, M., & Szalay, A. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3741 · Cited by 29
Park, S. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.044006 · Cited by 27
Neural physical engines for inferring the halo mass distribution function
Charnock, T., Lavaux, G., Wandelt, B. D., Sarma Boruah, S., Jasche, J., & Hudson, M. J. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa682 · Cited by 26
Bernardini, M., Feldmann, R., Anglés-Alcázar, D., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J., Mayer, L., & Stadel, J. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3088 · Cited by 26
Electron-positron annihilation freeze-out in the early universe
Thomas, L. C., Dezen, T., Grohs, E. B., & Kishimoto, C. T. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.063507 · Cited by 24
Parametrizing theories of gravity on large and small scales in cosmology
Clifton, T., & Sanghai, V. A. A. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.01157 · Cited by 21
Parametrizing Theories of Gravity on Large and Small Scales in Cosmology
Clifton, T., & Sanghai, V. A. A. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.011301 · Cited by 21
Estimating the Milky Way's Mass via Hierarchical Bayes: A Blind Test on MUGS2 Simulated Galaxies
Eadie, G., Keller, B., & Harris, W. E. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadb95 · Cited by 20
Cañameras, R., Schuldt, S., Shu, Y., Suyu, S. H., Taubenberger, S., Andika, I. T., Bag, S., Inoue, K. T., Jaelani, A. T., Leal-Taixé, L., et al. (2024) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347072 · Cited by 19
Euclid : A complete Einstein ring in NGC 6505
O’Riordan, C. M., Oldham, L. J., Nersesian, A., Li, T., Collett, T. E., Sluse, D., Altieri, B., Clément, B., Vasan, K. G. C., Rhoades, S., et al. (2025) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453014 · Cited by 17
Self-citationMICROSCOPE’s view at gravitation
Bergé, J. (2023) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/acd203 · Cited by 12
O’Donnell, J. H., Jeltema, T. E., Roberts, M. G., Nightingale, J., Flowers, A., & Aldas, D. (2026) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/hfgd-245k · Cited by 5
Cosmological implications of the Gaia Milky Way declining rotation curve
Coquery, E., & Blanchard, A. (2025) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556337 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., Bartolo, N., Battaner, E., Battye, R., Benabed, K., Benoît, A., Benoit-Lévy, A., Bernard, J.-P., Bersanelli, M., Bielewicz, P., Bock, J. J., Bonaldi, A., Bonavera, L., Bond, J. R., Borrill, J., Bouchet, F. R., Boulanger, F., Bucher, M., Burigana, C., Butler, R. C., Calabrese, E., Cardoso, J.-F., Catalano, A., Challinor, A., Chamballu, A., Chary, R.-R., Chiang, H. C., Chluba, J., Christensen, P. R., Church, S., Clements, D. L., Colombi, S., Colombo, L. P. L., Combet, C., Coulais, A., Crill, B. P., Curto, A., Cuttaia, F., Danese, L., Davies, R. D., Davis, R. J., de Bernardis, P., de Rosa, A., de Zotti, G., Delabrouille, J., Désert, F.-X., Di Valentino, E., Dickinson, C., Diego, J. M., Dolag, K., Dole, H., Donzelli, S., Doré, O., Douspis, M., Ducout, A., Dunkley, J., Dupac, X., Efstathiou, G., Elsner, F., Enßlin, T. A., Eriksen, H. K., Farhang, M., Fergusson, J., Finelli, F., Forni, O., Frailis, M., Fraisse, A. A., Franceschi, E., Frejsel, A., Galeotta, S., Galli, S., Ganga, K., Gauthier, C., Gerbino, M., Ghosh, T., Giard, M., Giraud-Héraud, Y., Giusarma, E., Gjerløw, E., González-Nuevo, J., Górski, K. M., Gratton, S., Gregorio, A., Gruppuso, A., Gudmundsson, J. E., Hamann, J., Hansen, F. K., Hanson, D., Harrison, D. L., Helou, G., Henrot-Versillé, S., Hernández-Monteagudo, C., Herranz, D., Hildebrandt, S. R., Hivon, E., Hobson, M., Holmes, W. A., Hornstrup, A., Hovest, W., Huang, Z., Huffenberger, K. M., Hurier, G., Jaffe, A. H., Jaffe, T. R., Jones, W. C., Juvela, M., Keihänen, E., Keskitalo, R., Kisner, T. S., Kneissl, R., Knoche, J., Knox, L., Kunz, M., Kurki-Suonio, H., Lagache, G., Lähteenmäki, A., Lamarre, J.-M., Lasenby, A., Lattanzi, M., Lawrence, C. R., Leahy, J. P., Leonardi, R., Lesgourgues, J., Levrier, F., Lewis, A., Liguori, M., Lilje, P. B., Linden-Vørnle, M., López-Caniego, M., Lubin, P. M., Macías-Pérez, J. F., Maggio, G., Maino, D., Mandolesi, N., Mangilli, A., Marchini, A., Maris, M., Martin, P. G., Martinelli, M., Martínez-González, E., Masi, S., Matarrese, S., McGehee, P., Meinhold, P. R., Melchiorri, A., Melin, J.-B., Mendes, L., Mennella, A., Migliaccio, M., Millea, M., Mitra, S., Miville-Deschênes, M.-A., Moneti, A., Montier, L., Morgante, G., Mortlock, D., Moss, A., Munshi, D., Murphy, J. A., Naselsky, P., Nati, F., Natoli, P., Netterfield, C. B., Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U., Noviello, F., Novikov, D., Novikov, I., Oxborrow, C. A., Paci, F., Pagano, L., Pajot, F., Paladini, R., Paoletti, D., Partridge, B., Pasian, F., Patanchon, G., Pearson, T. J., Perdereau, O., Perotto, L., Perrotta, F., Pettorino, V., Piacentini, F., Piat, M., Pierpaoli, E., Pietrobon, D., Plaszczynski, S., Pointecouteau, E., Polenta, G., Popa, L., Pratt, G. W., Prézeau, G., Prunet, S., Puget, J.-L., Rachen, J. P., Reach, W. T., Rebolo, R., Reinecke, M., Remazeilles, M., Renault, C., Renzi, A., Ristorcelli, I., Rocha, G., Rosset, C., Rossetti, M., Roudier, G., Rouillé d’Orfeuil, B., Rowan-Robinson, M., Rubiño-Martín, J. A., Rusholme, B., Said, N., Salvatelli, V., Salvati, L., Sandri, M., Santos, D., Savelainen, M., Savini, G., Scott, D., Seiffert, M. D., Serra, P., Shellard, E. P. S., Spencer, L. D., Spinelli, M., Stolyarov, V., Stompor, R., Sudiwala, R., Sunyaev, R., Sutton, D., Suur-Uski, A.-S., Sygnet, J.-F., Tauber, J. A., Terenzi, L., Toffolatti, L., Tomasi, M., Tristram, M., Trombetti, T., Tucci, M., Tuovinen, J., Türler, M., Umana, G., Valenziano, L., Valiviita, J., Van Tent, F., Vielva, P., Villa, F., Wade, L. A., Wandelt, B. D., Wehus, I. K., White, M., White, S. D. M., Wilkinson, A., Yvon, D., Zacchei, A., & Zonca, A.
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2016-09-20
- Volume
- 594
- Pages
- A13
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W4292875581
- Cited by
- 10,583
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 811.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.