Cited by 37Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Seroprevalence of heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) in feline and canine hosts from central and northern Portugal

Vieira, L., Silvestre-Ferreira, A.C., Fontes-Sousa, A.P., Balreira, A.C., Morchón, R., Carretón, E., Vilhena, H., Simón, F. +1 more·2015·Journal of Helminthology

Abstract

Dirofilaria immitis is endemic in Portugal. Several studies have reported the presence of canine heartworm disease, although no previous studies on feline infections have been published. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of D. immitis in cats and dogs from central and northern Portugal. Blood samples from 434 cats were tested for circulating anti-D. immitis and anti-Wolbachia antibodies. Furthermore, 386 dogs were tested for circulating D. immitis antigens. Overall feline seroprevalence was 15%, while canine prevalence was 2.1%. The highest feline seroprevalences of 18.7% and 17.6% were found in Aveiro and Viseu, respectively, while the highest canine prevalences of 8.8% and 6.8% were found in Coimbra and Aveiro, respectively. Cats and dogs showing respiratory signs presented higher prevalences of 24.4% and 17%, respectively, while 50% of cats with gastrointestinal signs were seropositive. The present study confirms the seropositivity of D. immitis in the feline population in central and northern Portugal, and suggests the importance of including heartworm disease in the list of differential diagnoses of cats and dogs showing clinical signs compatible with the disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022149x14000352

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vieira, L., Silvestre-Ferreira, A. C., Fontes-Sousa, A. P., Balreira, A. C., Morchón, R., Carretón, E., Vilhena, H., Simón, F., & Montoya-Alonso, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
  • Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
  • Escola Universitária Vasco da Gama (PT)
Corresponding author
Montoya-Alonso, J.A.
Venue
Journal of Helminthology
Published
2014-05-14
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
625-629
ISSN
  • 0022-149X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2697
OpenAlex
W2136167095
Cited by
37
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Helminthology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, heartworm disease, seroprevalence, feline heartworm infection, canine heartworm disease, circulating antigens, cats, dogs, respiratory signs, gastrointestinal signs, differential diagnosis, Portugal
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Helminth, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Male, Portugal, Prevalence, Seroepidemiologic Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review