CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4,737Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressHead and Neck Cancer StudiesLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Vitamin E and Beta Carotene on the Incidence of Lung Cancer and Other Cancers in Male Smokers

Open access
The Alpha-Tocopherol Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group·1994·New England Journal of Medicine
DOI 10.1056/nejm199404143301501
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence indicates that diets high in carotenoid-rich fruits and vegetables, as well as high serum levels of vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) and beta carotene, are associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled primary-prevention trial to determine whether daily supplementation with alpha-tocopherol, beta carotene, or both would reduce the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers. A total of 29,133 male smokers 50 to 69 years of age from southwestern Finland were randomly assigned to one of four regimens: alpha-tocopherol (50 mg per day) alone, beta carotene (20 mg per day) alone, both alpha-tocopherol and beta carotene, or placebo. Follow-up continued for five to eight years. RESULTS: Among the 876 new cases of lung cancer diagnosed during the trial, no reduction in incidence was observed among the men who received alpha-tocopherol (change in incidence as compared with those who did not, -2 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -14 to 12 percent). Unexpectedly, we observed a higher incidence of lung cancer among the men who received beta carotene than among those who did not (change in incidence, 18 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 3 to 36 percent). We found no evidence of an interaction between alpha-tocopherol and beta carotene with respect to the incidence of lung cancer. Fewer cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed among those who received alpha-tocopherol than among those who did not. Beta carotene had little or no effect on the incidence of cancer other than lung cancer. Alpha-tocopherol had no apparent effect on total mortality, although more deaths from hemorrhagic stroke were observed among the men who received this supplement than among those who did not. Total mortality was 8 percent higher (95 percent confidence interval, 1 to 16 percent) among the participants who received beta carotene than among those who did not, primarily because there were more deaths from lung cancer and ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: We found no reduction in the incidence of lung cancer among male smokers after five to eight years of dietary supplementation with alpha-tocopherol or beta carotene. In fact, this trial raises the possibility that these supplements may actually have harmful as well as beneficial effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199404143301501

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. National Research Council. Diet, nutrition, and cancer. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1982.
  2. Bostik RM, 1993, Cancer Res, 53, 4230
  3. Gaziano JM, 1990, Circulation, 82, III
  4. Buring JE, 1992, J Myocard Ischemia, 4, 27

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
The Alpha-Tocopherol Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group
Corresponding author
The Alpha-Tocopherol Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Published
1994-04-14
Volume
330
Issue
15
Pages
1029-1035
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
DOI
10.1056/nejm199404143301501
OpenAlex
W1525444530
Cited by
4,737
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 135 · 2013: 120 · 2012: 160
FWCI
154.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01cn045165-030)
  • National Cancer Institute (N01 CN 45165)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
vitamin E, alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene, lung cancer, cancer prevention, smokers, dietary supplementation, prostate cancer, hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause mortality, ischemic heart disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Carotenoids, Cause of Death, Double-Blind Method, Finland, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Smoking, Vitamin E, Incidence, beta Carotene

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review