Cited by 291Memory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and CortisolMemory Processes and Influences

The hippocampus mediates glucocorticoid-induced impairment of spatial memory retrieval: Dependence on the basolateral amygdala

Open access
Roozendaal, Benno, Griffith, Qyana K., Buranday, Jason, de Quervain, Dominique J.-F., McGaugh, James L.·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that stress-activated glucocorticoid hormones induce temporary memory retrieval impairment. The present study examined whether adrenal steroid receptors in the hippocampus mediate such glucocorticoid effects on spatial memory retrieval. The specific glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonist 11β, 17β-dihydroxy-6,21-dimethyl-17α-pregna-4,6-trien-20yn-3-one (RU 28362; 5 or 15 ng) infused into the hippocampus of male Sprague–Dawley rats 60 min before water-maze retention testing, 24 h after training, dose-dependently impaired probe-trial retention performance, as assessed both by time spent in the training quadrant and initial latency to cross the platform location. The GR agonist did not affect circulating corticosterone levels immediately after the probe trial, indicating that RU 28362 infusions did not influence retention by altering glucocorticoid feedback mechanisms. As infusions of the GR agonist into the hippocampus 60 min before training did not influence water-maze acquisition or immediate recall, the findings indicated that the GR agonist-induced retention impairment was induced selectively by an influence on information retrieval. In contrast, pretest infusions of the GR agonist administered into the basolateral complex of the amygdala (BLA; 2 or 6 ng) did not alter retention performance in the water maze. However, N -methyl- d -aspartate-induced lesions of the BLA, made 1 week before training, blocked the memory retrieval impairment induced by intrahippocampal infusions of RU 28362 given 60 min before the retention test. These findings indicate that the effects of glucocorticoids on retrieval of long-term spatial memory depend on the hippocampus and, additionally, that neuronal input from the BLA is critical in enabling hippocampal glucocorticoid effects on memory retrieval.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0337480100

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The great enhancement and durability of memory for the details of arousing experiences is produced in part by the rapid induction of neuroplasticity in the hippocampus in phase 1, mediated by arousal-related afferents, including the amygdala, hypothalamus, ventral tegmental area, and locus coeruleus.

    “We hypothesize that the great enhancement and durability of memory for the details of arousing experiences is produced in part by the rapid induction of neuroplasticity in the hippocampus in phase 1 (Figure 3), mediated by arousal-related afferents, including the amygdala (Abe [18]; Roozendaal et al. [315]; Abe et al. [316]; Richter-Levin [20]; McGaugh [88]; Akirav and Richter-Levin [22]),”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roozendaal, B., Griffith, Q. K., Buranday, J., de Quervain, D. J.-F., & McGaugh, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory and Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3800; and Division of Psychiatry Research, University of Zürich, Lenggstrasse 31, 8029 Zürich, Switzerland Europe
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-01-21
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
1328-1333
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1971207561
Cited by
291
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (58420)
  • National Institutes of Health (MH12526)
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH012526, MH12526, R56MH012526)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-55246-03, R25GM055246)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
glucocorticoids, hippocampus, basolateral amygdala, spatial memory retrieval, glucocorticoid receptor, RU 28362, NMDA lesions, water maze, stress, corticosterone, long-term memory
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Amygdala, Androstanols, Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Glucocorticoids, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, N-Methylaspartate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review