Cited by 349Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchStress Responses and CortisolNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Endogenous cannabinoid signaling is essential for stress adaptation

Open access
Hill, Matthew N., McLaughlin, Ryan J., Bingham, Brenda, Shrestha, Lalita, Lee, Tiffany T. Y., Gray, J. Megan, Hillard, Cecilia J., Gorzalka, Boris B. +1 more·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Secretion of glucocorticoid hormones during stress produces an array of physiological changes that are adaptive and beneficial in the short term. In the face of repeated stress exposure, however, habituation of the glucocorticoid response is essential as prolonged glucocorticoid secretion can produce deleterious effects on metabolic, immune, cardiovascular, and neurobiological function. Endocannabinoid signaling responds to and regulates the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis that governs the secretion of glucocorticoids; however, the role this system plays in adaptation of the neuroendocrine response to repeated stress is not well characterized. Herein, we demonstrate a divergent regulation of the two endocannabinoid ligands, N-arachidonylethanolamine (anandamide; AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), following repeated stress such that AEA content is persistently decreased throughout the corticolimbic stress circuit, whereas 2-AG is exclusively elevated within the amygdala in a stress-dependent manner. Pharmacological studies demonstrate that this divergent regulation of AEA and 2-AG contribute to distinct forms of HPA axis habituation. Inhibition of AEA hydrolysis prevented the development of basal hypersecretion of corticosterone following repeated stress. In contrast, systemic or intra-amygdalar administration of a CB(1) receptor antagonist before the final stress exposure prevented the repeated stress-induced decline in corticosterone responses. The present findings demonstrate an important role for endocannabinoid signaling in the process of stress HPA habituation, and suggest that AEA and 2-AG modulate different components of the adrenocortical response to repeated stressor exposure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0914661107

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies in animals and humans point to a major role of EC signaling in both the periphery and central nervous system in controlling adaptive processes to aversive situations and regulating and limiting stress reactions.

    “Despite the abovementioned diversity in central and peripheral functions, recent studies in animals [9] and humans [10] point to a major role of EC signaling in both the periphery [10] and central nervous system [11] in controlling adaptive processes to aversive situations and regulating and limiting stress reactions.”
  • Gene deletion or pharmacological inhibition of FAAH prevents stress-induced reductions in AEA and associated increases in BLA dendritic hypertrophy and anxiety-like behavior.

    “Gene deletion or pharmacological inhibition of FAAH prevents stress-induced reductions in AEA and associated increases in BLA dendritic hypertrophy and anxiety-like behavior.”
  • Genetic loss or repeated, pre-stress pharmacological inhibition of FAAH prevents stress-induced reductions in AEA and increases in HPA activity and anxiety-like behavior.

    “whereas genetic loss or repeated, pre-stress pharmacological inhibition (JNJ5003) of FAAH prevents stress-induced reductions in AEA and increases in HPA activity and anxiety-like behavior [68,73,74]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, M. N., McLaughlin, R. J., Bingham, B., Shrestha, L., Lee, T. T. Y., Gray, J. M., Hillard, C. J., Gorzalka, B. B., & Viau, V.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Rockefeller University (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Viau, Victor
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-05-03
Volume
107
Issue
20
Pages
9406-9411
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2048249572
Cited by
349
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
FWCI
18.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Michael Smith Health Research BC
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA009155, R21DA022439)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
endocannabinoid signaling, repeated stress, anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, corticosterone, CB1 receptor, amygdala, stress adaptation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Arachidonic Acids, Benzamides, Carbamates, Corticosterone, Male, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Stress, Physiological, Signal Transduction, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1, Rats, Polyunsaturated Alkamides, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review