Cited by 144Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceMemory and Neural MechanismsSleep and Wakefulness Research

Evolution of consciousness: Phylogeny, ontogeny, and emergence from general anesthesia

Open access
Mashour, George A., Alkire, Michael T.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Are animals conscious? If so, when did consciousness evolve? We address these long-standing and essential questions using a modern neuroscientific approach that draws on diverse fields such as consciousness studies, evolutionary neurobiology, animal psychology, and anesthesiology. We propose that the stepwise emergence from general anesthesia can serve as a reproducible model to study the evolution of consciousness across various species and use current data from anesthesiology to shed light on the phylogeny of consciousness. Ultimately, we conclude that the neurobiological structure of the vertebrate central nervous system is evolutionarily ancient and highly conserved across species and that the basic neurophysiologic mechanisms supporting consciousness in humans are found at the earliest points of vertebrate brain evolution. Thus, in agreement with Darwin’s insight and the recent “Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness in Non-Human Animals,” a review of modern scientific data suggests that the differences between species in terms of the ability to experience the world is one of degree and not kind.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1301188110

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Arguments for the subcortical basis of subjective experience in humans provide important convergent evidence for the role of a PI in subjective experience.

    “arguments for the subcortical basis of subjective experience in humans [16,40–43] provide important convergent evidence for the role of a PI in subjective experience [9,16].”

    From Phenomenal interface theory: a model for basal consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mashour, G. A., & Alkire, M. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-06-10
Volume
110
Issue
supplement_2
Pages
10357-10364
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2168918152
Cited by
144
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM098578)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
evolution of consciousness, emergence from general anesthesia, animal consciousness, vertebrate brain evolution, central nervous system evolution, anesthesiology
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, General, Animals, Consciousness, Biological Evolution, Humans, Models, Biological, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review