Cited by 496Vitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

A new recommended dietary allowance of vitamin C for healthy young women

Open access
Levine, Mark, Wang, Yaohui, Padayatty, Sebastian J., Morrow, Jason·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The recently released Recommended Dietary Allowance of vitamin C for women, 75 mg daily, was based on data for men. We now report results of a depletion-repletion study with healthy young women hospitalized for 186 +/- 28 days, using vitamin C doses of 30-2,500 mg daily. The relationship between dose and steady-state plasma concentration was sigmoidal. Only doses above 100 mg were beyond the linear portion of the curve. Plasma and circulating cells saturated at 400 mg daily, with urinary elimination of higher doses. Biomarkers of endogenous oxidant stress, plasma and urine F(2)-isoprostanes, and urine levels of a major metabolite of F(2)-isoprostanes were unchanged by vitamin C at all doses, suggesting this vitamin does not alter endogenous lipid peroxidation in healthy young women. By using Food and Nutrition Board guidelines, the data indicate that the Recommended Dietary Allowance for young women should be increased to 90 mg daily.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.171318198

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [1]Food and Nutrition Board and Panel on Dietary Antioxidants and Related Compounds. Vitamin C. 2000;5:95–185. [Google Scholar]
  2. [4]Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung (German Society of Nutrition); Österreichische Gesellschaft für Ernährung (Austrian Society of Nutrition); Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ernährungsforschung (Swiss Society of Nutrition) & Schweizerische Vereinigung für Ernährung (Swiss Unit of Nutrition) Referenzwerte für die Nahrstoffzefuhr (Recommended Values for Nutritional Intake) (Umschau, Frankfurt), pp. 137–144. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  3. [5]Health and Nutrition Information Society. Recommended Dietary Allowances (Dietary Reference Intakes) Tokyo: Daiichi Shuppan; 2000. pp. 112–127. [Google Scholar]
  4. [6]Birlouez-Aragon L, Fieux B, Potier de Courcy G, Hercberg C. Apports Nutritionnels Conseillés pour la Population Française. 3rd Ed. London: Editions TEC and Doc; 2000. pp. 215–230. [Google Scholar]
  5. [9]Washko P W, Rotrosen D, Levine M. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:18996–19002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [10]Bergsten P, Amitai G, Kehrl J, Dhariwal K R, Klein H G, Levine M. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:2584–2587. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [27]Rumsey S C, Levine M. J Nutr Biochem. 1998;9:116–130. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levine, M., Wang, Y., Padayatty, S. J., & Morrow, J.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-08-14
Volume
98
Issue
17
Pages
9842-9846
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2070532527
Cited by
496
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 25
FWCI
19.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DK 48831, DK 26657, GM 15431, CA 77839)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA77839, P01CA077839)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 15431, P50GM015431, P01GM015431)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Z01DK054506, DK-26657, DK 48831, P30DK026657, R01DK048831)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
vitamin C, RDA, young women, dose-response relationship, steady-state plasma concentration, urinary excretion, F2-isoprostanes, lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress
MeSH terms
Adult, Ascorbic Acid, Biological Availability, Canada, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Nutritional Requirements, Sex Characteristics, United States, Lipid Peroxidation, Dinoprost, Oxidative Stress, Nutrition Policy, F2-Isoprostanes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review