Cited by 35Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Increased training complexity reduces the effectiveness of brief working memory training: evidence from short-term single and dual n-back training interventions

Küper, Kristina, Karbach, Julia·2016·Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

N-back training has recently come under intense scientific scrutiny due to reports of training-related improvements in general fluid intelligence. As of yet, relatively little is known about the effects of short-term n-back training interventions, however. In a pretest-training-posttest design, we compared brief dual and single n-back training regimen in terms of training gains and transfer effects relative to a passive control group. Transfer effects indicated that, in the short-term, single n-back training may be the more effective training task: At the short training duration we employed, neither training group showed far transfer to specific task switch costs, Stroop inhibition costs or matrix reasoning indexing fluid intelligence. Yet, both types of training resulted in a reduction of general task switch costs indicating improved cognitive control during the sustained maintenance of competing task sets. Single but not dual n-back training additionally yielded near transfer to an untrained working memory updating task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20445911.2015.1118106

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Küper, K., & Karbach, J.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Küper, Kristina
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Published
2015-12-07
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
199-208
ISSN
  • 2044-5911 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-592X
OpenAlex
W2273757702
Cited by
33
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Saarland University (Start-up grant)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory training, training complexity, fluid intelligence, transfer effects, switch costs, matrix reasoning, cognitive control, working memory updating, training duration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review