Cited by 61Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Divergent Research Methods Limit Understanding of Working Memory Training

Open access
Pergher, Valentina, Shalchy, Mahsa Alizadeh, Pahor, Anja, Van Hulle, Marc M., Jaeggi, Susanne M., Seitz, Aaron R.·2020·Journal of Cognitive Enhancement

Abstract

Working memory training has been a hot topic over the last decade. Although studies show benefits in trained and untrained tasks as a function of training, there is an ongoing debate on the efficacy of working memory training. There have been numerous meta-analyses put forth to the field, some finding overall broad transfer effects while others do not. However, discussion of this research typically overlooks specific qualities of the training and transfer tasks. As such, there has been next to no discussion in the literature on what training and transfer tasks features are likely to mediate training outcomes. To address this gap, here, we characterized the broad diversity of features employed in N-back training tasks and outcome measures in published working memory training studies. Extant meta-analyses have not taken into account the diversity of methodology at this level, primarily because there are too few studies using common methods to allow for a robust meta-analysis. We suggest that these limitations preclude strong conclusions from published data. In order to advance research on working memory training, and in particular, N-back training, more studies are needed that systematically compare training features and use common outcome measures to assess transfer effects.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This qualitative review argues that working memory training research, especially N-back training, is limited by highly divergent training protocols and transfer outcome measures. The authors conclude that current evidence cannot support strong conclusions about transfer because too few studies use common methods.

Key findings

  • Across 51 studies and 57 experiments, only 8 experiments relied on the same training method, while 49 experiments had unique training conditions.
  • The review identified 122 different transfer tasks; transfer within WM was assessed with 31 different tasks, and transfer beyond WM, especially fluid intelligence, with 27 different tasks.
  • Training features varied widely: 30 experiments used single N-back and 27 used dual N-back; 26 used auditory stimuli, 13 visual, and 18 spatial; 46 reported long ISIs (1800–2500 ms), 9 short ISIs (500–1800 ms), and 2 did not report ISI.
  • Feedback was employed in 25 experiments, while 32 either did not provide feedback or did not explicitly report it; 47 experiments used 10 or more training sessions, and 10 used fewer than 10.

Methods

  • Qualitative review of published N-back training studies identified through Google Scholar, Google, and PubMed, searching 2008–2018 with terms including “N-back training” and “updating training.”
  • Inclusion criteria required cognitive training with single or dual N-back, at least one training group, healthy adults (mean age range 19–69 years), N-back training of at least 3 sessions, and assessment of transfer to WM and/or other cognitive domains.
  • The search yielded 51 studies; 5 studies included more than one N-back training group, giving 57 experiments. The authors characterized training task features, transfer task features, and control groups.

Limitations

  • The authors state that small sample sizes for certain training features and extensive methodological variability mean they can only speculate whether these factors are meaningful mediators or moderators.
  • The authors state that extant meta-analyses cannot robustly compare methods because too few studies use common methods, and that many procedural details are not reported.
  • The text makes evident additional constraints: the review is qualitative rather than a quantitative synthesis, is limited to N-back training and healthy adults, and screened only the first 150 ranked hits per database.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41465-019-00134-7

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 42 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given

    The procedural details of each training study, including features of trained and transfer tasks that may mediate learning, have been largely ignored.

    “While these moderators are certainly relevant, the details of procedures employed in each training study, such as trained and transfer tasks features, which may mediate learning, have been largely ignored.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Across the reviewed experiments, 31 different tasks assessed aspects of working memory and short-term memory.

    “For example, across these experiments, 31 different tasks assess aspects of WM and short-term memory (STM), including N-back and other updating tasks, simple span tasks, and various complex WM tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Studies using the N-back task vary widely in methodology.

    “However, with as many studies using the N-back task, there are as many variants in methodology.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In many cases, important procedural details are not reported.

    “Note that in many cases, details of the procedures that might be important are simply not reported (see Table S1, Supplemental Material).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Six training task attributes commonly vary across N-back training implementations: N-back task type and stimulus modality, task timing, adaptive threshold, feedback, and intervention length.

    “We highlight six training task attributes (types of N-back task and stimulus modality, task timing, adaptive threshold, feedback, and intervention length) that commonly vary across implementations of N-back training studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 37
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Across 57 experiments from 51 studies, more than 120 different transfer tasks were used, and transfer tasks were rarely consistent from one study to the next.

    “to the transfer tasks that are rarely consistent from one study to the next with over 120 different transfer tasks used across the 57 experiments reviewed in 51 studies”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the reviewed sample, 30 of 57 experiments used single N-back training and 27 used dual N-back training, with varying transfer outcomes.

    “In the current sample, 30 out of the 57 experiments adopted single N-back training (13 reporting transfer within WM, 11 reporting transfer beyond WM, and 6 reporting no transfer1) and 27 experiments employed dual N-back training (8 reporting transfer within WM, 9 reporting transfer beyond WM, and 10 reporting no transfer).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed set of 57 experiments is representative of published N-back working memory training studies.
    • Rests on an assumption: The transfer outcomes reported by the original studies are valid enough to be counted as evidence of transfer or no transfer.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the reviewed sample, training task modalities varied widely: 26 used auditory stimuli, 13 used visual non-spatial stimuli, and 18 used spatial stimuli, with varying transfer outcomes.

    “In our sample, we find that training task modalities vary widely, with 26 using auditory stimuli (7 reporting transfer within WM, 11 reporting transfer beyond WM, and 8 reporting no transfer), 13 using visual stimuli (non-spatial) (5 reporting transfer within WM, 6 reporting transfer beyond WM, and 2 reporting no transfer), and 18 using spatial stimuli (9 reporting transfer within WM, 3 reporting”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed set of 57 experiments is representative of published N-back working memory training studies.
    • Rests on an assumption: The transfer outcomes reported by the original studies are valid enough to be counted as evidence of transfer or no transfer.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Only 8 experiments used the same training method, while 49 experiments had unique training conditions.

    “Interestingly, only 8 experiments relied on the same training method, whereas 49 experiments had unique training conditions (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    About half of the meta-analyses in the field report evidence of transfer, while the other half do not.

    “The field has reached a point in which there is a battle of meta-analyses lingering with roughly half of them finding evidence of transfer while the others do not (see Table 1 for variety of individual studies upon which these meta-analyses are based).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For most of the 122 tasks used, no reliability measures are reported, and it is unclear whether standard or custom forms were used, making reliability information difficult to find.

    “However, for most of the 122 of tasks used, no reliability measures are reported, and it is unclear whether standard forms or custom forms of the tasks are employed, making it difficult to find information on the reliability in the extant literature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Out of 57 reviewed experiments, 25 employed some type of feedback and 32 either did not provide feedback or did not explicitly report it, with varying transfer outcomes.

    “Out of the 57 experiments reviewed, 25 experiments employed some type of feedback (11 reporting transfer to untrained WM tasks, 6 reporting transfer beyond WM, and 8 reporting no transfer) while 32 experiments either did not provide feedback or did not explicitly report the use of feedback (16 reporting transfer within WM, 9 reporting transfer beyond WM, and 7 reporting no transfer).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed set of 57 experiments is representative of published N-back working memory training studies.
    • Rests on an assumption: The transfer outcomes reported by the original studies are valid enough to be counted as evidence of transfer or no transfer.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the reviewed sample, 52 experiments included at least one control group, with 22 having only an active control, 17 having only a passive control, and 13 having both.

    “In our sample, 52 experiments included at least one control group: 22 experiments included only an active control group, 17 experiments included only a passive control group, and 13 experiments included both.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    N-back training studies, while seemingly similar, employ a wide variety of training features and assess transfer effects with a large and diverse selection of outcome measures.

    “Here we show that N-back training studies, while seemingly similar, employ a wide variety of training features, and in addition, they assess transfer effects with a large and diverse selection of outcome measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The review included 51 studies, and because 5 studies had more than one N-back training group considered separately, the total number of experiments was 57.

    “In total, our research resulted in 51 studies (excluding the number of overlapping studies) (Fig. 2). Of these 51 studies, 5 studies included more than one N-back training group, which we considered separately, giving rise to a total of 57 experiments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the reviewed experiments, 12 used a threshold below 90% to advance, while 34 used a 90% correct threshold, with varying transfer outcomes.

    “Of 46 experiments, 12 adopted a threshold lower than 90% to achieve the next level (7 reporting transfer within WM, 1 reporting transfer beyond WM, and 4 reporting no transfer), while 34 adopted a threshold of 90% correct (16 reporting transfer within WM, 10 reporting transfer beyond WM, and 8 reporting no transfer).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed set of 57 experiments is representative of published N-back working memory training studies.
    • Rests on an assumption: The transfer outcomes reported by the original studies are valid enough to be counted as evidence of transfer or no transfer.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Across 57 experiments, 122 different transfer tasks were used, and the number of outcome measures per study ranged from 1 to 20.

    “Across 57 experiments, 122 different transfer tasks were employed (see Table 2), which speaks to the issue of variability in transfer tasks. The number of outcome measures per study ranged from 1 to as many as 20.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed set of 57 experiments is representative of published N-back working memory training studies.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the reviewed sample, 47 of 57 experiments used training equal to or longer than 10 sessions, and 10 used fewer than 10 sessions, with varying transfer outcomes.

    “In our sample, of the 57 experiments that measured both transfer to WM and beyond WM, 47 used training equal or longer than 10 sessions (29 reporting transfer within WM, 12 reporting transfer beyond WM, and 6 reporting no transfer), and 10 experiments used fewer than 10 sessions (5 reporting transfer within WM, 2 reporting transfer beyond WM, and 3 reporting no transfer).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed set of 57 experiments is representative of published N-back working memory training studies.
    • Rests on an assumption: The transfer outcomes reported by the original studies are valid enough to be counted as evidence of transfer or no transfer.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Transfer beyond working memory, particularly to fluid intelligence, was assessed with 27 different tasks, and 48 of 57 experiments reported assessing fluid intelligence.

    “Transfer beyond WM, in particular to fluid intelligence, was assessed with 27 different tasks. Forty-eight out of fifty-seven experiments reported assessing fluid intelligence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the reviewed experiments, 46 reported long inter-stimulus intervals (1800-2500 ms), 9 used short intervals (500-1800 ms), and 2 did not report interval information.

    “In the papers that we reviewed, we screened 57 experiments across single and dual N-back training and found 46 experiments that reported long ISIs (between 1800 and 2500 ms; 18 reporting transfer within WM, 14 reporting transfer beyond WM and 14reporting no transfer), 9 that used short ISIs (between 500 and 1800 ms; 8 reporting transfer within WM, and 1 reporting transfer beyond WM), while 2”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed set of 57 experiments is representative of published N-back working memory training studies.
    • Rests on an assumption: The transfer outcomes reported by the original studies are valid enough to be counted as evidence of transfer or no transfer.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The pattern may suggest that dual N-back training is more likely to yield transfer within and beyond working memory, while single N-back training is more likely to show transfer within working memory, but not all studies assessed both types of transfer.

    “While this may suggest that dual N-back training is more likely to yield transfer within and beyond WM, as compared with single N-back, which seems more likely to show transfer within WM, it should be noted that not all studies assessed both types of transfer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed set of 57 experiments is representative of published N-back working memory training studies.
    • Rests on an assumption: The transfer outcomes reported by the original studies are valid enough to be counted as evidence of transfer or no transfer.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Training on a specific working memory task can improve performance on untrained working memory tasks.

    “WM training on a given task can transfer to improvements in untrained working memory tasks (Blacker et al. 2017; Lilienthal et al. 2013; Chein and Morrison 2010; Borella et al. 2010)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Blacker et al. 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lilienthal et al. 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chein and Morrison 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The absence of an explanation for this variability undermines confidence in working memory training research and makes it harder to judge the effectiveness of training.

    “The lack of explanation regarding this variability not only casts a shadow on WM training research but also poses a significant hurdle when evaluating the effectiveness of WM training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dual N-back tasks produce longer reaction times and more errors than single N-back tasks.

    “For example, Jaeggi et al. (2003) showed that single and dual N-back tasks differ at the behavioral level with longer reaction times and more errors on dual N-back tasks compared with single N-back.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jaeggi et al. (2003) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Single and dual N-back tasks do not differ at the neural level; prefrontal activation increases with higher load regardless of task type.

    “On the other hand, no differentiation between single and dual N-back tasks was observed at the neural level: prefrontal activation increased with higher load irrespective of task type.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jaeggi et al. (2003) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The N-back task is a common working memory measure; it is an updating task requiring storage, maintenance, and manipulation, and it predicts individual differences in higher cognitive functions.

    “One of the most common measures of WM is the N-back task, an updating task that requires multiple processes (storage, maintenance, and manipulation of information) and is predictive of inter-individual differences in higher cognitive functions (Jaeggi et al. 2010a, b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jaeggi et al. 2010a, b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Working memory training can also transfer to tasks in other cognitive domains, such as fluid intelligence.

    “as well as tasks pertaining to other cognitive domains such as fluid intelligence (Jaeggi et al. 2008; Heinzel et al. 2017; Chein and Morrison 2010; Borella et al. 2010)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Jaeggi et al. 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Heinzel et al. 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chein and Morrison 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There is a long-running debate about whether training can improve basic cognitive functions.

    “A longstanding debate has regarded the extent to which training can improve our basic cognitive functions (Katz et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Katz et al. 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Even though the single versus dual N-back comparison is the most powered available, differences between study methodologies largely prevent strong meta-analytic conclusions.

    “Even though the single vs dual N-back dichotomy is the most powered of available comparisons, the differences between study methodologies, as described below, largely preclude strong meta-analytic conclusions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed set of 57 experiments is representative of published N-back working memory training studies.
    • Rests on an assumption: The transfer outcomes reported by the original studies are valid enough to be counted as evidence of transfer or no transfer.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Although reports on N-back training are increasing, the mechanisms of transfer and the factors that might affect them remain unclear.

    “Although reports on N-back training are steadily increasing, the mechanisms of transfer and the factors that might impact them are still unclear.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Au et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Soveri et al. 2017a, b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Melby-Lervåg and Hulme 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Performance on N-back tasks correlates only weakly with performance on complex span tasks, so updating and span tasks should be considered separately.

    “Performance on N-back tasks only correlates weakly with performance on complex span tasks (Redick and Lindsey 2013) therefore it makes sense to consider updating and span tasks separately.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Redick and Lindsey 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although matrix reasoning was the most common fluid intelligence test, using only one type of test is not enough to estimate fluid intelligence at the latent level.

    “While matrix reasoning was the most common type of test used to assess fluid intelligence, which allows for a certain level of comparison across experiments, using just one type of test is not sufficient to estimate fluid intelligence at the latent level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Categorizing working memory tasks only by type and domain does not capture the full range of cognitive demands and may hide improvements in a subgroup of tasks.

    “While some distinctions have been made in terms of task type (untrained N-back vs. WM tasks in Soveri et al. 2017a, b) and task domain (verbal vs. visuospatial WM in Melby-Lervåg and Hulme 2013; Melby-Lervåg et al. 2016; Schwaighofer et al. 2015), such categorization does not capture the full range of cognitive demands imposed by different WM tasks and may even mask improvements in a subgroup of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Soveri et al. 2017a, b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Melby-Lervåg and Hulme 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Melby-Lervåg et al. 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Evidence on whether adaptivity improves working memory training gains is mixed: one study found greater gains for adaptive training, while others found no effect.

    “Moreover, Holmes et al. (2009) showed that WM training gains were significantly greater for an adaptive training group compared with a non-adaptive training group, although others have failed to observe any effects of adaptivity on learning outcome (von Bastian and Eschen 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Holmes et al. (2009) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites von Bastian and Eschen 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The working memory training literature is mixed about what control conditions are used and how much control type alters transfer magnitude.

    “However, literature on WM training is mixed both in regard to what control conditions are employed, some using active controls and others passive controls, and also the extent to which the control type seems to alter the magnitude of observed transfer (Au et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Au et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The diversity of transfer tasks across studies raises serious questions about whether the same underlying cognitive outcomes are measured and limits interpretation of the literature.

    “Overall, this diversity of transfer tasks measured across studies raises serious issues of the extent to which the same underlying cognitive outcomes are assessed across studies and thus, limits the interpretation of the extant literature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reviewed set of 57 experiments is representative of published N-back working memory training studies.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The type of control group plays a significant role in whether transfer is observed, and its impact relates to similarity between N-back training and control interventions, participant engagement, motivation, and expectations.

    “It has also been argued that the type of control group plays a significant role in whether transfer is observed. The impact of control groups is related to the degree of similarity between the N-back training and the control interventions, and/or to the differential participant engagement and motivation, and/or participant expectations (Green et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Green et al. 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Several factors lead to the diversity of methods in the field, and this diversity limits progress.

    “We suggest that there are several factors that are leading to this diversity of methods, which we argue limit progress in the field.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The conceptual understanding of working memory or fluid intelligence as domain-general processes leads researchers to overlook the importance of domain and task specificity.

    “First, there is the conceptual understanding of WM or fluid intelligence as domain-general processes. This view presumably leads researchers to overlook the importance of domain and task specificity, assuming that it does not matter how a specific exercise or test on WM is given (type, modality, etc.), as all approaches would impact the same cognitive process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is evidence that longer training produces more learning, reflected in more pronounced changes in brain regions involved in working memory, and that training duration affects results, though the appropriate amount is not well established.

    “There is evidence that longer training leads to more learning in terms of more pronounced changes in brain regions involved in WM function (Dahlin et al. 2008; Lövdén et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dahlin et al. 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lövdén et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Large test batteries can cause participant fatigue and reduced engagement, and can create multiple comparison problems.

    “Using large test batteries can give rise to participant fatigue and decreased participant engagement (Ackerman and Kanfer 2009), and it can also lead to issues with multiple comparison.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ackerman and Kanfer 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The diversity of transfer tests and batteries across studies is challenging because outcome measures vary in similarity to the trained task and their reliability and validity are often unclear.

    “Overall, the diversity of transfer tests and batteries used across studies poses a challenge as these outcome measures vary in their degree of similarity with the trained task, and furthermore, their reliability and their validity in measuring the factor of interest are often unclear.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because certain training task features had small sample sizes and the literature shows extensive variability, the authors can only speculate whether these factors are meaningful mediators and moderators.

    “Given the small sample size of certain training task features and the extensive variability of methods in the literature, we can only speculate whether these factors are meaningful mediators and moderators.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Feedback is important for learning, especially in complex cognitive tasks and for monitoring goal progress, and it can facilitate learning.

    “Feedback plays an important role in the process of learning, particularly in complex cognitive tasks and in monitoring goal progress (West et al. 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites West et al. 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most N-back training studies use adaptive training by adjusting difficulty based on individual performance, and adapting difficulty is engaging for participants.

    “Most N-back training studies utilize adaptive training by adjusting the level of task difficulty based on individual performance, and it has been shown that adapting the difficulty level of the task is engaging for the participant (Jaeggi et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jaeggi et al. 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Active control conditions differ in their cognitive and perceptual demands, in their similarity to the experimental condition, and likely in the expectations they induce about training-related improvement, which makes it difficult to compare results across studies.

    “These active control conditions differ in their cognitive and perceptual demands and similarity to the experimental condition, as well as most likely in the induced expectations about performance improvement due to training, again making it difficult to compare results across studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Inter-stimulus intervals can affect the time available to process each stimulus and to use strategies such as rehearsal or grouping and comparison, and these strategies can change performance and likely affect learning outcomes.

    “Inter-stimulus intervals (ISI) can have an important impact on the time available to process each stimulus and to engage in strategies such as rehearsal or grouping and comparison. The use of these strategies can modify performance levels, give rise to very different experiences during training, and thus likely impact learning outcomes (Laine et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Laine et al. 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

42 of 42
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The reviewed set of 57 experiments is representative of published N-back working memory training studies.

    “In the current sample, 30 out of the 57 experiments adopted single N-back training”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The transfer outcomes reported by the original studies are valid enough to be counted as evidence of transfer or no transfer.

    “13 reporting transfer within WM, 11 reporting transfer beyond WM, and 6 reporting no transfer”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All tests used to investigate cognitive constructs are only partially correlated with the underlying construct.

    “Although there is still an ongoing debate about the relationship between specificity of cognitive functions and domain-general processes, emphasis should be given to the fact that all the tests used to investigate these constructs are only partially correlated with the underlying construct.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    If performance on two tasks is correlated but the tasks do not rely on the exact same mechanisms, then a change in one may not predict a change in the other.

    “For example, if performance on two tasks is correlated, but they do not rely upon the exact same mechanisms, then a change in one may not predict a change in the other.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In another meta-analysis of N-back training studies, only 37% reported using N-back tasks as an outcome measure.

    “In another meta-analysis of N-back training studies, only 37% of N-back training studies reported using N-back tasks as an outcome measure19”

    From Near transfer to an unrelated N-back task mediates the effect of N-back working memory training on matrix reasoning (2022) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction and Transfer Task Features sections say that N-back tasks were among the outcome measures used in the reviewed training studies. They do not report that 37% used N-back outcome tasks. The paper also describes itself as a qualitative review, not a meta-analysis. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Transfer to untrained N-back tasks is often not reported, so information about what participants learned is often missing.

    “Transfer to untrained N-back tasks is often not reported therefore information is often missing about what participants learned, and thus, the extent of learning on measures of transfer remains unknown.”

    From Near transfer to an unrelated N-back task mediates the effect of N-back working memory training on matrix reasoning (2022) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Training Task Features section says that important procedural details are often unreported, and the Discussion and Future Directions section says the mechanisms and extent of transfer after N-back training remain unclear. The paper also notes that not all studies assessed both types of transfer, but the passages do not establish that transfer to specifically untrained N-back tasks is often unreported or that this omission is why information about participants’ learning is missing. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Two different counts of fluid-intelligence transfer tasks

    Minor

    The introduction counts 29 tasks assessing aspects of fluid intelligence, but the transfer-task section counts 27.

  • Dual N-back transfer comparison reverses the reported proportions

    Minor

    The reported counts give dual N-back a lower proportion of experiments reporting transfer beyond WM (9/27) than single N-back (11/30). They also give dual N-back a lower proportion reporting transfer within WM (8/27 versus 13/30), contrary to the stated comparative suggestion.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Marček, V. (2015). Effectiveness of n-back cognitive training: quantitative and qualitative aspects (Doctoral dissertation, Masarykova univerzita, Fakulta sociálních studií).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pergher, V., Shalchy, M. A., Pahor, A., Van Hulle, M. M., Jaeggi, S. M., & Seitz, A. R.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Pergher, Valentina
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
Published
2019-05-09
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
100-120
ISSN
  • 2509-3290 (ISSN-L)
  • 2509-3304
OpenAlex
W2943834229
Cited by
56
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Enhancement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIMH R01 (MH111742)
  • NIH/NIA 1K02 (AG054665)
  • the Belgian Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (G088314N)
  • Financing program (PFV/10/008)
  • interdisciplinary research project (IDO/12/007)
  • industrial research fund project (IOF/HB/12/021)
  • special research fund project Ku Leuven (C24/18/098)
  • Belgian Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders (G0A0914N, G0A4118N)
  • Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme – Belgian Science Policy (IUAP P7/11)
  • Flemish Regional Ministry of Education (GOA 10/019)
  • Hercules Foundation (AKUL 043)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
working memory training, transfer effects, outcome measures, methodological heterogeneity, meta-analysis limitations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review