Cited by 177Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsElectrochemical sensors and biosensors

Nanoscale laminin coating modulates cortical scarring response around implanted silicon microelectrode arrays

Open access
He, Wei, McConnell, George C, Bellamkonda, Ravi V·2006·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Neural electrodes could significantly enhance the quality of life for patients with sensory and/or motor deficits as well as improve our understanding of brain functions. However, long-term electrical connectivity between neural tissue and recording sites is compromised by the development of astroglial scar around the recording probes. In this study we investigate the effect of a nanoscale laminin (LN) coating on Si-based neural probes on chronic cortical tissue reaction in a rat model. Tissue reaction was evaluated after 1 day, 1 week, and 4 weeks post-implant for coated and uncoated probes using immunohistochemical techniques to evaluate activated microglia/macrophages (ED-1), astrocytes (GFAP) and neurons (NeuN). The coating did not have an observable effect on neuronal density or proximity to the electrode surface. However, the response of microglia/macrophages and astrocytes was altered by the coating. One day post-implant, we observed an approximately 60% increase in ED-1 expression near LN-coated probe sites compared with control uncoated probe sites. Four weeks post-implant, we observed an approximately 20% reduction in ED-1 expression along with an approximately 50% reduction in GFAP expression at coated relative to uncoated probe sites. These results suggest that LN has a stimulatory effect on early microglia activation, accelerating the phagocytic function of these cells. This hypothesis is further supported by the increased mRNA expression of several pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1 and IL-6) in cultured microglia on LN-bound Si substrates. LN immunostaining of coated probes immediately after insertion and retrieval demonstrates that the coating integrity is not compromised by the shear force during insertion. We speculate, based on these encouraging results, that LN coating of Si neural probes could potentially improve chronic neural recordings through dispersion of the astroglial scar.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/3/4/009

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a follow-up study, the nanoscale coating in vivo following implantation in rat brains showed a positive impact on reducing gliosis at the 4 week time point, but no apparent effect on the neuronal density local to the implant.

    “In a follow-up study, He and colleagues evaluated the nanoscale coating in vivo following implantation in rat brains, where it showed a positive impact on reducing gliosis at the 4 week time point, but no apparent effect on the neuronal density local to the implant.75”

    From Regenerative Electrode Interfaces for Neural Prostheses. (2016) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, W., McConnell, G. C., & Bellamkonda, R. V.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2006-11-15
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
316-326
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2022850908
Cited by
177
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Emory University
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC006849, R01 DC 06849)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS45072, R01NS045072)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Keywords
laminin coating, neural implants, glial scar, microglial activation, astrocytes, chronic neural recording, inflammatory cytokines, ED1, glial fibrillary acidic protein, TNF-α, interleukin-1, interleukin-6, coating integrity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Cerebral Cortex, Cicatrix, Electrodes, Implanted, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Gliosis, Immunohistochemistry, Interleukin-1, Laminin, Male, Microelectrodes, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Neuroglia, Neurons, Polyethyleneimine, Silicon, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Interleukin-6, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, DNA Primers, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Nanotechnology, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review