The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,100 of 12,257
Arts Equity: A Praxis-Oriented Tale
Kraehe, A. M. (2017) · Studies in Art Education · doi:10.1080/00393541.2017.1368293 · Cited by 30
Introduction: The Growing Importance of Traditional Forest-Related Knowledge
Trosper, R. L., & Parrotta, J. A. (2011) · World forests · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2144-9_1 · Cited by 30
Listening to People: Using Social Psychology to Spotlight an Overlooked Virtue
Notess, S. (2019) · Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0031819118000529 · Cited by 29
Radical unknowability: an essay on solidarities and multiform urban life
Simone, A., & Broto, V. C. (2022) · City · doi:10.1080/13604813.2022.2124693 · Cited by 29
Race-evasive frames in physics and physics education: Results from an interview study
Robertson, A. D., Vélez, V. N., Hairston, W. T., & Bonilla‐Silva, E. (2023) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.19.010115 · Cited by 30
Allen, N. D. C. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04249-5 · Cited by 29
Incredible Women: Legal Systems Abuse, Coercive Control, and the Credibility of Victim-Survivors
Reeves, E., Fitz‐Gibbon, K., Meyer, S., & Walklate, S. (2023) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778012231220370 · Cited by 39
Boublil, É. (2024) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/s10746-024-09736-3 · Cited by 29
Who speaks through the machine? Generative AI as discourse and implications for management
Agbon, G. (2024) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102761 · Cited by 30
Embracing dissensus in lived experience research: the power of conflicting experiential knowledge
Speyer, H., & Ustrup, M. (2025) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(25)00003-3 · Cited by 29
The ultimate power play in research - partnering with patients, partnering with power
Richards, D. P., Bowden, J., Gee, P. O., Haagaard, A., Kothari, A. R., McKinnon, A., Primeau, C. A., Tricco, A. C., Wang, E., Woolley, K. L., et al. (2025) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-025-00745-9 · Cited by 29
Studying politics in the age of academic humility
Ackerly, B. A. (2013) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2012.760312 · Cited by 29
Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Redlining
Doan, M. D. (2017) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2017.1293120 · Cited by 29
New Trouble For Deliberative Democracy
Talisse, R. B. (2017) · Les ateliers de l éthique · doi:10.7202/1042280ar · Cited by 29
Piron, F. (2018) · Sociologie et sociétés · doi:10.7202/1042805ar · Cited by 29
Implicit attitudes and the ability argument
Buckwalter, W. (2018) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-018-1159-7 · Cited by 32
What is Collaborative, Interdisciplinary Reasoning? The Heart of Interdisciplinary Team Research
Laursen, B. K. (2018) · Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/4010 · Cited by 29
The cat on a hot tin roof? Critical considerations in multilingual language assessments
Mdlalo, T., Flack, P. S., & Joubert, R. (2019) · South African Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.4102/sajcd.v66i1.610 · Cited by 29
Stewart, H. (2019) · South Central Review · doi:10.1353/scr.2019.0014 · Cited by 29
Interactions between persons—Knowledge, decision making, and the co‐production of practice
Loughlin, M., Buetow, S., Cournoyea, M., Copeland, S. M., Chin-Yee, B. H., & Fulford, K. W. M. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13297 · Cited by 29
Moes, F., Houwaart, E. S., Delnoij, D. M. J., & Horstman, K. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112674 · Cited by 29
Words Matter: Meaning and Power
McConnell‐Ginet, S. (2020) · Cited by 29
Bogaert, B. (2020) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106558 · Cited by 29
The Institution of Gender-Based Asylum and Epistemic Injustice: A Structural Limit
Sertler, E. (2018) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2018.3.5775 · Cited by 32
Patients’ experiences and wellbeing after injury: A focus group study
Visser, E., Oudsten, B. L. D., Traa, M. J., Gosens, T., & Vries, J. D. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245198 · Cited by 29
Externalizing your eating disorder: a qualitative interview study
Voswinkel, M. M., Rijkers, C., van Delden, J. J. M., & Elburg, A. A. V. (2021) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-021-00486-6 · Cited by 29
Leblanc-Omstead, S., & Kinsella, E. A. (2022) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-022-10157-z · Cited by 30
Pickles, C. (2023) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2023.73 · Cited by 29
People from ethnic minorities seeking help for long COVID: a qualitative study
Smyth, N., Ridge, D., Kingstone, T., Gopal, D. P., Alwan, N. A., Wright, A., Chaudhry, A., Clark, S., Band, R. J., & Chew-Graham, C. A. (2024) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp.2023.0631 · Cited by 29
Methodology and mental illness: resistance and restorying
Fisher, P. J. P., & Freshwater, D. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/jpm.12073 · Cited by 29
Toward Conceptual Competence in Psychiatric Diagnosis: An Ecological Model for Critiques of the DSM
Karter, J. M., & Kamens, S. R. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02732-2_2 · Cited by 31
Integrity and the virtues of reason: leading a convincing life
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-2013 · Cited by 29
A Third Conception of Epistemic Injustice
Nikolaidis, A. C. (2021) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-021-09760-1 · Cited by 28
Hermeneutical Injustice as Basing Failure
Simion, M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315145518-10 · Cited by 28
Lee, E., Tsang, A. K. T., Bogo, M., Johnstone, M., Herschman, J., & Ryan, M. (2018) · Social Work · doi:10.1093/sw/swy050 · Cited by 28
Happy Unhappiness (and Other Stratified Contradictions)
D’Agostini, F. (2022) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-022-00524-w · Cited by 28
Epistemic justice in public involvement and engagement: Creating conditions for impact
Liabo, K., Cockcroft, E., Boddy, K., Farmer, L., Bortoli, S. H. D., & Britten, N. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13553 · Cited by 28
Epistemic injustice: The silenced voices
Fisher, J. (2023) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.13163 · Cited by 28
Fiorito, T. R. (2023) · Migration Studies · doi:10.1093/migration/mnad027 · Cited by 28
Holdsworth, S., Turner, M., & Sandri, O. J. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12110627 · Cited by 28
“Don’t bring race into it”: white ignorance, UK counterterrorism and the impact agenda
Wright, H. (2024) · Critical Studies on Terrorism · doi:10.1080/17539153.2024.2340780 · Cited by 29
How the EU AI Act Seeks to Establish an Epistemic Environment of Trust
Ho, C. W.-L., & Caals, K. (2024) · Asian Bioethics Review · doi:10.1007/s41649-024-00304-6 · Cited by 28
Hempeler, C., Schneider-Reuter, L., Windel, A.-S., Carlet, J. S., Philipsen, L., Juckel, G., Gather, J., Yeboah, A., & Faissner, M. (2024) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.20230252 · Cited by 36
INDEFENSIBLE MIDDLE GROUND FOR LOCAL REDUCTIONISM ABOUT TESTIMONY
Gelfert, A. (2009) · Ratio · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9329.2009.00424.x · Cited by 28
Alfano, M., & Robinson, B. (2017) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-017-9809-y · Cited by 29
Pragmatic Competence Injustice
Cruz, M. P. (2018) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2018.1458351 · Cited by 28
“Microaggressions: A Kantian Account”
O’Dowd, O. (2018) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-018-9964-9 · Cited by 28
Duijs, S. E., Baur, V. E., & Abma, T. (2019) · Action Research · doi:10.1177/1476750319844577 · Cited by 39
Centering knowledge from the margins: our embodied practices of epistemic resistance and revolution
Causevic, A., Philip, K., Zwick-Maitreyi, M., Lewis, P., Bouterse, S., & Sengupta, A. (2020) · International Feminist Journal of Politics · doi:10.1080/14616742.2019.1701515 · Cited by 31
Epistemic injustice and deepened disagreement
Lagewaard, T. (2020) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01496-x · Cited by 28
Ko, D., Mawene, D., Roberts, K., & Hong, J. J. (2020) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932520983474 · Cited by 28
Re-thinking Information Ethics: Truth, Conspiracy Theories, and Librarians in the COVID-19 Era
Lor, P. J., Wiles, B., & Britz, J. (2021) · Libri · doi:10.1515/libri-2020-0158 · Cited by 32
The Internet and Epistemic Agency
Gunn, H. K., & Lynch, M. P. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198833659.003.0016 · Cited by 28
(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374 · Cited by 30
Temporality in epistemic justice
Valkenburg, G. (2022) · Time & Society · doi:10.1177/0961463x221094699 · Cited by 28
Holly, J., & Thomas-Quigley, L. (2022) · Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022036667 · Cited by 28
Lookism as Epistemic Injustice
Spiegel, T. J. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2076629 · Cited by 28
Exploring Partial Overlaps Between Knowledge Systems in a Brazilian Fishing Community
Renck, V., Ludwig, D., Bollettin, P., & El-Hani, C. N. (2022) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-022-00335-3 · Cited by 28
Co-production as praxis: Critique and engagement from within the university
Perry, B. (2022) · Methodological Innovations · doi:10.1177/20597991221129773 · Cited by 28
Frost‐Arnold, K. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190089184.001.0001 · Cited by 31
The Prospect of a Humanitarian Artificial Intelligence
Montemayor, C. (2023) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781350353275 · Cited by 29
van Grunsven, J., Stone, T., & Marin, L. (2023) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2023.2218275 · Cited by 28
Consolidating Progress: The Selection of Female Ministers in Autocracies and Democracies
Nyrup, J., Yamagishi, H., & Bramwell, S. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305542300062x · Cited by 28
What Makes a Good Theory, and How Do We Make a Theory Good?
Guest, O. (2024) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-023-00193-2 · Cited by 35
Sense‐making and hermeneutical injustice following a psychiatric diagnosis
Hassall, R. (2024) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13971 · Cited by 28
Fraser, R. (2024) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/729708 · Cited by 30
Samsonsen, V., & Turney, D. (2016) · European Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/13691457.2016.1185701 · Cited by 31
From ‘Intersex’ to ‘DSD’: a case of epistemic injustice
Merrick, T. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1327-x · Cited by 28
What Can Philosophy Teach Us About the Post-truth Condition
Fuller, S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8013-5_2 · Cited by 28
Engebretsen, K. M., & Bjorbækmo, W. S. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13244 · Cited by 28
Is it ever morally permissible to select for deafness in one’s child?
Wallis, J. M. (2019) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-019-09922-6 · Cited by 28
Nurses’ professional dignity in private health care: a descriptive phenomenological study
Combrinck, Y., van Wyk, N. C., & Mogale, R. S. (2020) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.12602 · Cited by 28
Feminism in Epistemology: Exclusion and Objectification
Langton, R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.003.0013 · Cited by 29
Critical perspectives on teaching in the multilingual university
Bhatt, I., Badwan, K., & Madiba, M. (2022) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2058295 · Cited by 28
Critical perspectives on agency and social justice in transitions and career development
Thomsen, R., Hooley, T., & Mariager-Anderson, K. (2022) · British Journal of Guidance and Counselling · doi:10.1080/03069885.2022.2106551 · Cited by 35
Martino, W., & Kuhl, D. (2024) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2024.2426295 · Cited by 28
“I'm Human After All”: Autism, Trauma, and Affective Empathy
Hume, R., & Burgess, H. (2021) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2020.0013 · Cited by 27
Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice
Milano, S., & Prunkl, C. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-023-02095-2 · Cited by 38
“For example, it has been argued that women have a different expressive style when it comes to ethical judgments, which is sometimes marginalised as morally immature (Fricker, 2007, p.160), thereby excluding them from contributing to the hermeneutical system.”
InfluentialClimate Change Science and Responsible Trust: A Situated Approach
Grasswick, H. (2014) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12090 · Cited by 27
Saint-Croix, C. (2020) · Res Philosophica · doi:10.11612/resphil.1953 · Cited by 27
Epistemic Trust and Liberal Justification*
Fuerstein, M. (2012) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2012.00415.x · Cited by 28
Do Metaphors Matter? Fibromyalgia and Women's Embodiment
McKiernan, A. L. (2018) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.3138/ijfab.2018.01.15 · Cited by 27
Character education for students with disabilities
Cureton, A. (2021) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2021.1903407 · Cited by 31
Professionals harnessing experiential knowledge in Dutch mental health settings
Karbouniaris, S., Weerman, A., Dunnewind, B., Wilken, J. P., & Abma, T. (2021) · Mental Health and Social Inclusion · doi:10.1108/mhsi-08-2021-0054 · Cited by 27
Coliva, A. (2019) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12140 · Cited by 27
Carter, J. A. (2022) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12214 · Cited by 27
Hultman, L., & Hultman, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1058422 · Cited by 27
McTernan, E. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197613092.001.0001 · Cited by 27
Intergenerational Storytelling as a Developmental Resource in LGBTQ+ Communities
Weststrate, N. M., Turner, K., & McLean, K. C. (2023) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2023.2202295 · Cited by 27
Sexual Refusal: The Fragility of Women's Authority
Mason, E. (2023) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2023.7 · Cited by 27
Understanding Digital Inequality: A Theoretical Kaleidoscope
Kühn, C., Khoo, S.-M., Czerniewicz, L., Lilley, W., Bute, S. J. R., Crean, A., Abegglen, S., Burns, T., Sinfield, S. F., Jandrić, P., et al. (2023) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35411-3_17 · Cited by 27
Canzutti, L., & Tazzioli, M. (2023) · International Political Sociology · doi:10.1093/ips/olad014 · Cited by 27
Anka, A. (2024) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2023.2299245 · Cited by 27
Johnson, S. B., Konopasky, A., & Wyatt, T. R. (2024) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2024.2329680 · Cited by 22
‘We have so much to offer’: Community members’ perspectives on autism research
Haar, T., Brownlow, C., Hall, G., Heyworth, M., Lawson, W. B., Poulsen, R. E., Reinisch, T., & Pellicano, E. (2024) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613241248713 · Cited by 34
The journal and the quest for epistemic justice
Dadze-Arthur, A. F., & Mangai, M. S. (2024) · Public Administration and Development · doi:10.1002/pad.2064 · Cited by 27
Epistemic injustice and the “Nature of Science”
Stroupe, D., Suárez, E., & Scipio, D. (2024) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21988 · Cited by 31
Jonas, L., Bacharach, S., Nightingale, S., & Filoche, S. K. (2025) · Ethics Medicine and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jemep.2024.101039 · Cited by 29
Illuminating Gaslighting: A Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Review of Gaslighting Literature
Darke, L., Paterson, H. M., & van Golde, C. (2025) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-025-00805-4 · Cited by 34
Incidents in the Life of Kirsten T. Edwards: A Personal Examination of the Academic In-between Space
Edwards, K. T. (2010) · Journal of Curriculum Theorizing · doi:10.63997/jct.v26i1.152 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
