The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,101–1,200 of 12,257
Sedláková, J., Lucivero, F., Pavarini, G., & Kerasidou, A. (2025) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2025.2526734 · Cited by 27
Projection and Objectification
Langton, R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.003.0012 · Cited by 27
The Relevance of Causal Social Construction
Marques, T. (2016) · Journal of Social Ontology · doi:10.1515/jso-2016-0018 · Cited by 27
The Topology of Communities of Trust
Alfano, M. (2016) · Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review · doi:10.17323/1728-192x-2016-4-30-56 · Cited by 27
Patronizing Depression: Epistemic Injustice, Stigmatizing Attitudes, and the Need for Empathy
Jackson, J. (2017) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12194 · Cited by 27
Unnsteinsson, E. G. (2018) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12260 · Cited by 27
The dynamics of moral progress
Hermann, J. (2019) · Ratio · doi:10.1111/rati.12232 · Cited by 27
Anbleyth‐Evans, J., & Lacy, S. N. (2019) · MAST. Maritime studies/Maritime studies · doi:10.1007/s40152-019-00136-3 · Cited by 28
Isham, L., Bradbury‐Jones, C., & Hewison, A. (2019) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12986 · Cited by 27
Consultation, Consent, and the Silencing of Indigenous Communities
Townsend, L., & Lupin, D. (2020) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1111/japp.12438 · Cited by 27
The Three Harms of Gendered Technology
Wang, L. (2020) · AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems · doi:10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2799 · Cited by 29
Pereira, G. (2020) · Philosophy and poverty · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45795-2_4 · Cited by 27
Emotions and Distrust in Science
Furman, K. (2020) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2020.1846281 · Cited by 27
An Epistemological Conception of Safe Spaces
Anderson, D. E. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2020.1855485 · Cited by 29
Smith, K., McLeod, J., Blunden, N., Cooper, M., Gabriel, L., Kupfer, C., McLeod, J., Murphie, M.-C., Oddli, H. W., Thurston, M., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742676 · Cited by 27
Representing suicide: Giving voice to a desire to die?
Marsh, I., Winter, R., & Marzano, L. (2021) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/13634593211046843 · Cited by 27
Racism and the future of antiracism in education: A critical analysis of the Sewell Report
Tikly, L. P. (2022) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3776 · Cited by 27
Diving Deeper into the Concept of ‘Cultural Heritage’ and Its Relationship with Epistemic Diversity
Mazzocchi, F. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.2023682 · Cited by 27
Matheson, J. (2022) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2021.49 · Cited by 27
The Scholarly Knowledge Ecosystem: Challenges and Opportunities for the Field of Information
Altman, M., & Cohen, P. N. (2022) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2021.751553 · Cited by 27
Anbleyth‐Evans, J., Prieto, M., Barton, J. R., García‐Cegarra, A. M., Muslow, S., Ricci, E., Campus, L., & Vergara‐Pinto, F. (2022) · Environment and Planning C Politics and Space · doi:10.1177/23996544221084193 · Cited by 27
Yep, G. A., Alaoui, F. Z. C., & Lescure, R. M. (2022) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2022.2103875 · Cited by 27
Emotional Gaslighting and Affective Empathy
Sodoma, K. A. (2022) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2022.2121894 · Cited by 27
Epistemic injustice and the psychiatrist
Kious, B. M., Lewis, B. R., & Kim, S. Y. H. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291722003804 · Cited by 27
Bedera, N. (2023) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2023.2195771 · Cited by 27
Montgomery, C., & Trahar, S. (2023) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2023.2194054 · Cited by 27
Shifts to open access with high article processing charges hinder research equity and careers
Williams, J. W., Taylor, A., Tolley, K. A., Provete, D. B., Correia, R. A., Guedes, T., Farooq, H. M., Li, Q., Pinheiro, H. T., Liz, A. V., et al. (2023) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.14697 · Cited by 27
Other People’s Problems: Student Distancing, Epistemic Responsibility, and Injustice
Whitt, M. S. (2015) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-015-9484-1 · Cited by 30
Could Integrity Be An Epistemic Virtue?
Scherkoske, G. (2012) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2011.635676 · Cited by 27
Haynes, J., & Murris, K. (2013) · Early Child Development and Care · doi:10.1080/03004430.2013.792256 · Cited by 27
Dev, L. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76720-8_11 · Cited by 27
“Knower” as an Ethical Concept: From Epistemic Agency to Mutual Recognition
Congdon, M. (2018) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6228 · Cited by 27
Creed, W. E. D., Gray, B., Höllerer, M. A., Karam, C. M., & Reay, T. (2022) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/01708406221122237 · Cited by 30
AI’s Epistemic Harm: Reinforcement Learning, Collective Bias, and the New AI Culture War
Humphreys, D. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00928-y · Cited by 26
“As tools such as language models are being marketed as epistemic tools, without broader recognition of their biases, people might accept the ideas and opinions presented by LLMs at face value, giving these models what Fricker ( 2007 ) calls “credibility excess”.”
Process-Policy & Outcome-Policy: Rethinking How to Address Poverty & Inequality
Rao, V. (2019) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/daed_a_01756 · Cited by 26
“Do antidepressants work?” A humanistic perspective on a long-standing and contentious debate.
Cosgrove, L., Troeger, R., & Karter, J. M. (2019) · The Humanistic Psychologist · doi:10.1037/hum0000154 · Cited by 26
The Continuity of Ethics and Political Theory
Baderin, A. (2021) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/715068 · Cited by 26
Breheny, R. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.4 · Cited by 26
Herremans, B., & Destrooper, T. (2022) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639221134965 · Cited by 26
Episteme and Ecology: Amitav Ghosh’s The Living Mountain and the Decolonial Turn
Karmakar, G., & Chetty, R. (2023) · South Asian Review · doi:10.1080/02759527.2023.2206307 · Cited by 26
Farraj, W., & Yousafzai, S. (2023) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267231203531 · Cited by 28
Lee, J. Y., Clark, J. K., Schmiesing, R., Kaiser, M. L., Reece, J., & Park, S. (2024) · Journal of Urban Affairs · doi:10.1080/07352166.2024.2305132 · Cited by 26
Can theorising epistemic injustice help us decolonise?
Mitova, V. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2327489 · Cited by 29
Lam, J. T. H., Coret, M., Khalil, C., Butler, K. J. D., Giroux, R., & Martimianakis, M. A. (2024) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.15425 · Cited by 28
Schafer, R., & Phillippi, J. C. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251315395 · Cited by 26
Academic libraries as hubs of artificial intelligence competency
Sousa, N. M. T. (2025) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-025-00490-8 · Cited by 26
The taxonomy and ontology of sexual difference: implications for sport
Amy-Chinn, D. (2012) · Sport in Society · doi:10.1080/17430437.2012.723401 · Cited by 26
Conceptual Exclusion and Public Reason
Morgan-Olsen, B. (2009) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393109353186 · Cited by 26
The game you are in: Misleading through social norms and what’s wrong with it
Herzog, L. M. (2017) · Filozofija i drustvo · doi:10.2298/fid1702250h · Cited by 26
Social Constraints On Moral Address
Carbonell, V. (2017) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12450 · Cited by 26
Therapeutic Theodicy? Suffering, Struggle, and the Shift from the God’s-Eye View
Griffioen, A. L. (2018) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel9040099 · Cited by 26
Maitra, I. (2018) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2018.27 · Cited by 26
Schaefli, L. M., Godlewska, A. M. C., & Rose, J. (2018) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1080/03626784.2018.1518113 · Cited by 32
Epistemic injustice in a settler nation: Canada’s history of erasing, silencing, marginalizing
Koggel, C. M. (2018) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449626.2018.1506996 · Cited by 26
Buses and Breaking Point: Freedom of Expression and the ‘Brexit’ Campaign
Reid, A. P. (2019) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-019-09999-1 · Cited by 26
Wilson, J., & Chu, E. (2020) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1629170 · Cited by 26
The social fabric of understanding: equilibrium, authority, and epistemic empathy
Jäger, C., & Malfatti, F. I. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02776-z · Cited by 26
Being Fair about the Design of FAIR Data Standards
Bezuidenhout, L. M. (2020) · Digital Government Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3399632 · Cited by 26
Varieties of Hermeneutical Injustice: A Blueprint
Bratu, C., & Hänel, H. C. (2021) · Moral Philosophy and Politics · doi:10.1515/mopp-2020-0007 · Cited by 26
Post-truth Politics and Collective Gaslighting
Rietdijk, N. (2021) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2021.24 · Cited by 26
Wright, D. K., Chan, L. S., Fishman, J. R., & Macdonald, M. E. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114366 · Cited by 26
Dobrowolski, Z. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14175381 · Cited by 26
Motamedi, M., Carter, S. M., & Degeling, C. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00547-7 · Cited by 26
The Craft of Generalism clinical skills and attitudes for whole person care
Lynch, J. M., van Driel, M., Meredith, P. J., Stange, K. C., Getz, L., Reeve, J. L., Miller, W. L., & Dowrick, C. F. (2021) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13624 · Cited by 26
The harms of medicalisation: intersex, loneliness and abandonment
Jones, C. (2022) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/14647001211062740 · Cited by 29
Posthuman Child and the Diffractive Teacher: Decolonizing the Nature/Culture Binary
Murris, K. (2020) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_7 · Cited by 26
Spencer, D. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197510766.001.0001 · Cited by 26
Daya, I. (2022) · Incarceration · doi:10.1177/26326663221103445 · Cited by 29
MacKenzie, A., Chiang, T., & Thurston, A. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102032 · Cited by 26
Hungwe, J. P., & Ndofirepi, A. P. (2022) · South African Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.20853/36-3-4587 · Cited by 26
Epistemic solidarity in medicine and healthcare
Pot, M. (2022) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-022-10112-0 · Cited by 26
From critical thinking to criticality and back again
Pettersson, H. (2023) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhad021 · Cited by 26
Marconi, D. R., Lapierre, M., Serra, M., Fontaine, L. Z., Sanabria, C.-M., & Almuna, H. Q. (2023) · Educación Médica · doi:10.1016/j.edumed.2023.100835 · Cited by 26
Patient-centered or population-centered? How epistemic discrepancies cause harm and sow mistrust
Donnelly, K. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116552 · Cited by 27
Scheel, S. (2024) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2024.2307782 · Cited by 26
Battaly, H. D. (2013) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12024 · Cited by 26
Knowledge Justice: An Opportunity for Counter-expertise in Security vs. Science Debates
Egert, P. R., & Allen, B. L. (2017) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505431.2017.1339683 · Cited by 26
Taking Age Out of Play: Children's Animistic Philosophising Through a Picturebook
Haynes, J., & Murris, K. (2019) · Oxford Literary Review · doi:10.3366/olr.2019.0284 · Cited by 26
Shieber, J. (2012) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2011.560953 · Cited by 23
The Nonbinary Fraction: Looking Towards the Future of Gender Equity in AstronomyPreprint
Rasmussen, K. C., Maier, E., Strauss, B. E., Durbin, M., Riesbeck, L., Wallach, A., Zamloot, V., & Erena, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.04893 · Cited by 30
Addressing Racism in Medicine Requires Tackling the Broader Problem of Epistemic Injustice
del Pozo, B., & Rich, J. D. (2021) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1861367 · Cited by 26
Spiekermann, K. (2020) · Politics, Philosophy & Economics · doi:10.1177/1470594x19872505 · Cited by 25
Simoniti, V. (2021) · British Journal of Aesthetics · doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayab018 · Cited by 25
Kidd, I. J. (2012) · Journal of Medical Humanities · doi:10.1007/s10912-012-9179-3 · Cited by 25
Flikschuh, K. A. (2018) · Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1093/arisup/aky003 · Cited by 25
Multilingual Parties and the Ethics of Partisanship
Bonotti, M., & Stojanović, N. (2021) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/715167 · Cited by 25
Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel
Clarke, J., & Gottlieb, G. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108647441 · Cited by 25
Psychedelic injustice: should bioethics tune in to the voices of psychedelic-using communities?
McMillan, R. M. (2022) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2021-012299 · Cited by 25
Hull, G. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03613-1 · Cited by 25
Goldberg, S. C. (2013) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2013.14 · Cited by 25
Non-Ideal Philosophy as Methodology
Hänel, H. C., & Müller, J. M. (2022) · Theoria · doi:10.3167/th.2022.6917202 · Cited by 25
Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Bowell, T. (2023) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v43i1.7304 · Cited by 25
The Epistemic vs. the Practical
Kauppinen, A. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198884699.003.0007 · Cited by 25
Jecker, N. S., Ravitsky, V., Ghaly, M. M., Bélisle‐Pipon, J., & Atuire, C. (2023) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2232748 · Cited by 25
Karmakar, G. (2023) · International Social Science Journal · doi:10.1111/issj.12480 · Cited by 25
Intersectional climate action: the role of community-based organisations in urban climate justice
Strange, K. F., Satorras, M., & March, H. (2024) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2024.2315992 · Cited by 29
Language as a Source of Epistemic Injustice in Organisations
Wilmot, N. V. (2024) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-024-05644-9 · Cited by 25
Allan, S., Ward, T., Eisner, E., Bell, I., Cella, M., Chaudhry, I. B., Torous, J. B., Kiran, T., Kabir, T., Priyam, A., et al. (2024) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbae031 · Cited by 26
Kraft, A., & Soulier, E. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658981 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
