The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,301–1,400 of 12,257
Speaker's Freedom and Maker's Knowledge
Langton, R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.003.0014 · Cited by 24
Creative Resentments: The Role of Emotions in Moral Change
Congdon, M. (2018) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqy011 · Cited by 24
Harms and Wrongs in Epistemic Practice
Barker, S., Crerar, C., & Goetze, T. S. (2018) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246118000528 · Cited by 24
A gift from experience: co-production and co-design in stroke and self-management
Kulnik, S. T., Pöstges, H., Townsend, R., Micklethwaite, P., & Jones, F. (2019) · Design for Health · doi:10.1080/24735132.2019.1577524 · Cited by 23
What is an Educational Good? Theorising Education as Degrowth
Jones, A. H. (2020) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12494 · Cited by 23
Hunt, M. R., Eckenwiler, L. A., Hyppolite, S.-R., Pringle, J. D., Pal, N. E., & Chung, R. (2020) · Journal of International Humanitarian Action · doi:10.1186/s41018-020-00082-4 · Cited by 23
Still the same dilemma for conceptual engineers: reply to Koch
Deutsch, M. (2021) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-021-01619-y · Cited by 23
Lockdown: a case study in how to lose trust and undermine compliance
Faulkner, P. (2021) · Global Discourse · doi:10.1332/204378921x16106635782045 · Cited by 23
Gross, O., & Gagnayre, R. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1077628ar · Cited by 23
Race talk and white normativity: classroom discourse and narratives in Norwegian higher education
Harlap, Y., & Riese, H. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1940925 · Cited by 28
Social sensitivity and the ethics of attention
Magrì, E. (2021) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12702 · Cited by 23
Environmental Ethics: The State of the Question
Hourdequin, M. (2021) · The Southern Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/sjp.12436 · Cited by 27
Autistic autobiography and hermeneutical injustice
Dinishak, J. (2021) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12514 · Cited by 23
Papadimitriou, C., Weaver, J., Guernon, A., Walsh, E., Mallinson, T., & Pape, T. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267194 · Cited by 24
The new knowledge production in the social sciences and in the arts and humanities in Latin America
Guzmán-Valenzuela, C., Ortega, L., Montero, M., & Mejías, P. P. (2022) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00853-5 · Cited by 23
Wardrope, A., & Reuber, M. (2022) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-022-10086-z · Cited by 27
Khalifa, K., & Millson, J. A. (2020) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2019.55 · Cited by 23
The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence
Sudmann, A. (2019) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783839447192 · Cited by 23
Weststrate, N. M., & McLean, K. C. (2022) · Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity · doi:10.1037/sgd0000582 · Cited by 26
Breaking the silence on femicide: How women challenge epistemic injustice and male violence
Messina, B. C. (2022) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12968 · Cited by 25
Status Distrust of Scientific Experts
Desmond, H. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2104758 · Cited by 23
Goodin, R. E. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192888204.001.0001 · Cited by 25
Groot, B. C., Hendrikx, A., Bendien, E., Woelders, S., de Kock, L., & Abma, T. (2023) · Journal of Aging Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101154 · Cited by 23
Epistemic repair in global health: a human rights approach towards epistemic justice
Bhakuni, H. (2023) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013544 · Cited by 23
River, J., Bellingham, B., Isobel, S., Gill, K. H., Boydell, K., Conlon, L., Goodhew, M., Cutler, N. A., & Kemp, H. (2023) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069231213268 · Cited by 23
Epistemic injustice in experiences of young people with parents with mental health challenges
Yates, S., Gladstone, B., Foster, K., Hagström, A. S., Reupert, A., O’Dea, L., Cuff, R., McGaw, V. E., & Hine, R. H. (2023) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13730 · Cited by 24
Epistemic inclusion: a key challenge for global RRI
Zwart, H. A. E., Mendes, A. B., & Blok, V. (2024) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2024.2326721 · Cited by 23
Intercultural Education as Dialogue Between Knowledge Systems: Elements of a Theoretical Framework
El-Hani, C. N., & Ludwig, D. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00525-z · Cited by 27
Caron, C. (2018) · Lien social et Politiques · doi:10.7202/1044109ar · Cited by 23
Why the ‘Politics’ against African Philosophy should be Discontinued
Chimakonam, J. O., & Nweke, V. C. A. (2018) · Dialogue · doi:10.1017/s0012217317000907 · Cited by 23
Are ME/CFS Patient Organizations “Militant”?
Blease, C., & Geraghty, K. (2018) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-018-9866-5 · Cited by 23
Force and Conversational States
Murray, S. E., & Starr, W. B. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0009 · Cited by 23
Can a Woman Rape a Man and Why Does It Matter?
McKeever, N. (2018) · Criminal Law and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11572-018-9485-6 · Cited by 23
Allen, K., Needham, C. E., Hall, K., & Tanner, D. (2018) · Social Policy and Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.12468 · Cited by 23
Turley, B., & Caretta, M. A. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12010147 · Cited by 24
Dübgen, F. (2020) · Philosophy and poverty · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31711-9_5 · Cited by 23
Asexuality and epistemic injustice: a gendered perspective
Cuthbert, K. (2021) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2021.1966399 · Cited by 27
Neumann, T., De‐Arteaga, M., & Fazelpour, S. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533205 · Cited by 29
Goldman, A. I., & Blanchard, T. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0088 · Cited by 24
The governance of energy transitions in Africa: a sketch of plural perspectives
Späth, P., Broto, V. C., Bawakyillenuo, S., & Pregernig, M. (2022) · Energy Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-022-00380-2 · Cited by 23
The future of phenomenological psychopathology
Spencer, L. J., Broome, M. R., & Stanghellini, G. (2024) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2403881 · Cited by 23
Upholding Ethical Accountability in Ethnobotany and Ethnobiology Research
Vandebroek, I., Stepp, J. R., Kunwar, R. M., Hilgert, N. I., Silva, M. T. P., Ladio, A. H., Clement, C. R., Júnior, W. S. F., Towns, A., Borokini, I. T., et al. (2025) · Economic Botany · doi:10.1007/s12231-025-09634-4 · Cited by 23
Immigration, interpersonal trust and national culture
Radoilska, L. (2013) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2013.851486 · Cited by 22
Toward an Analytic Theology of Liberation
Yadav, S. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198848844.003.0003 · Cited by 22
Who's Afraid of Epistemic Dilemmas?
Hughes, N. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003134565-18 · Cited by 22
A Practice-based Account of The Truth Norm of Belief
Wei, X. (2022) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2022.26 · Cited by 22
He Knows, She Doesn’t? Epistemic Inequality in a Developmental Perspective
Filho, W. J. S., Dazzani, M. V. M., Tateo, L., Barreto, R. G. S., & Marsico, G. (2022) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/10892680221143079 · Cited by 22
Epistemic Inclusion as the Key to Benefiting from Cognitive Diversity in Science
Sikimić, V. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2258831 · Cited by 22
The Promises of Inclusive Research Methodologies: Relational Design and Praxis
Verhage, M., Lindenberg, J., Bussemaker, J., & Abma, T. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069241230407 · Cited by 22
Pearlman, S., & Williams, E. R. (2022) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2022.2.14386 · Cited by 23
Being Free, Feeling Free: Race, Gender, and Republican Domination
Laborde, C. (2024) · Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1093/arisup/akae005 · Cited by 22
Bioethics and the value of disagreement
Parker, M. J. (2024) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2024-110174 · Cited by 31
Don’t Put Words in My Mouth: Self-appointed Speaking-for Is Testimonial Injustice Without Prejudice
Steers-McCrum, A. (2019) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2019.1682710 · Cited by 22
Self-Control and Moral Security
Kennett, J., & Wolfendale, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198845539.003.0002 · Cited by 24
The ‘Epistemic Critique’ of Epistocracy and Its Inadequacy
Hédoin, C. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.1882609 · Cited by 22
Charity for moral reasons? – A defense of the principle of charity in argumentation
Stevens, K. (2021) · Argumentation and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/10511431.2021.1897327 · Cited by 22
“Pride” and “profit”: a sociolinguistic profile of the Chinese communities in Britain
Curdt‐Christiansen, X. L., & Huang, J. (2021) · International Journal of the Sociology of Language · doi:10.1515/ijsl-2020-0005 · Cited by 22
Hopwood, J. (2021) · Critical African Studies · doi:10.1080/21681392.2021.1931383 · Cited by 22
Goldstein, R. B. (2022) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-021-00465-w · Cited by 22
Academic excellence and community relevance: Can we have it all?
Shavit, A., & Silver, Y. (2022) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625221087321 · Cited by 22
Trust, distrust, and testimonial injustice
Carter, J. A., & Meehan, D. (2022) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2022.2037418 · Cited by 22
Anderson, D. E. (2020) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2020.3.8162 · Cited by 24
Communication in youth mental health clinical encounters: Introducing the agential stance
Bergen, C., Bortolotti, L., Tallent, K., Broome, M. R., Larkin, M., Temple, R., Fadashe, C., Lee, C., Lim, M. C., & McCabe, R. (2022) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593543221095079 · Cited by 22
Strengthening the Epistemic Case against Epistocracy and for Democracy
BOUWEL, J. V. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2081823 · Cited by 22
Epistemic exploitation in education
Dunne, G., & Kotsonis, A. (2022) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2022.2094249 · Cited by 22
Uccelli, P. (2023) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12558 · Cited by 22
Perfect Storm for Epistemic Injustice
Stewart, H., Cichocki, E., & McLeod, C. (2022) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2022.3/4.14291 · Cited by 26
Taking Action on Racism and Structural Violence in Psychiatric Training and Clinical Practice
Jarvis, G. E., Andermann, L., Ayonrinde, O., Beder, M., Cénat, J. M., Ben-Cheikh, I., Fung, K. P.-L., Gajaria, A., Gómez-Carrillo, A., Guzder, J., et al. (2023) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/07067437231166985 · Cited by 23
Trustworthy AI and the Logics of Intersectional Resistance
Knowles, B., Fledderjohann, J., Richards, J. T., & Varshney, K. R. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3593986 · Cited by 24
Oldac, Y. İ., Nkansah, J. O., & Yang, L. (2023) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-023-01127-4 · Cited by 22
PPI in psychiatry and the problem of knowledge
Rose, D. S., & Beresford, P. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-05398-0 · Cited by 24
Ramessur, R., Dand, N., Langan, S., Saklatvala, J. R., Fritzsche, M.-C., Holland, S., Arents, B. W. M., McAteer, H., Proctor, A., McMahon, D., et al. (2024) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljae080 · Cited by 22
A rapid realist review of literature examining Co‐production in mental health services for youth
Jones, V. R., Waring, J. J., Wright, N., & Fenton, S. (2024) · JCPP Advances · doi:10.1002/jcv2.12272 · Cited by 22
Conducting research within the acronym: Problematizing LGBTIQ+ research in psychology
Klysing, A., Prandelli, M., Roselló‐Peñaloza, M., Alonso, D. J., Gray, M., Glazier, J. J., Swanson, S., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12634 · Cited by 22
Murris, K. (2014) · European Early Childhood Education Research Journal · doi:10.1080/1350293x.2014.970856 · Cited by 22
Mabon, L., Shackley, S. J., Vercelli, S., Anderlucci, J., & Boot, K. (2014) · Environment and Planning C Government and Policy · doi:10.1068/c12133 · Cited by 22
Hutchison, K., & Rogers, W. (2012) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01905.x · Cited by 22
Conceptual competence injustice
Anderson, D. E. (2017) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2016.1241320 · Cited by 24
How genealogies can affect the space of reasons
Queloz, M. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1777-9 · Cited by 22
Differential Voting Weights and Relational Egalitarianism
Bengtson, A. (2020) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321719889870 · Cited by 22
Are Epistemic Norms Fundamentally Social Norms?
Henderson, D. K. (2020) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2019.49 · Cited by 22
Drolet, M.-J., Lalancette, M., & Caty, M. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1070230ar · Cited by 22
Morley, L., & Lund, R. (2020) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2020.1855567 · Cited by 22
‘It's not fair’: Custodial grandparents' access to services and supports in Australia
Fernandes, C., Blundell, B., Moran, R. J., Gilbert, J. M., & Liddiard, M. (2021) · Child & Family Social Work · doi:10.1111/cfs.12839 · Cited by 22
The Theory and Philosophy of History
Ohara, J. R. M. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009036313 · Cited by 22
Spreading the Credit: Virtue Reliabilism and Weak Epistemic Anti-Individualism
Palermos, S. O. (2015) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-015-9741-2 · Cited by 23
Doing epistemic (in)justice to Semenya
Amy-Chinn, D. (2011) · International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics · doi:10.1386/mcp.6.3.311_1 · Cited by 22
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0: Four Reasons Why AICP Needs an Open Data Ethic
Schweitzer, L., & Afzalan, N. (2017) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1290495 · Cited by 22
The many faces of hedonic adaptation
Klausen, S. H., Emiliussen, J., Christiansen, R., Hasandedic-Dapo, L., & Engelsen, S. (2022) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2021.1967308 · Cited by 21
DOXASTICISM: BELIEF AND THE INFORMATION-RESPONSIVENESS OF MIND
Audi, R. (2019) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2018.53 · Cited by 21
The Virtue of Epistemic Trustworthiness and Re-Posting on Social Media
Wright, S. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863977.003.0012 · Cited by 21
Huq, E., & Shafique, T. (2023) · Environment and Urbanization · doi:10.1177/09562478221149863 · Cited by 23
Cruelty, Injustice, and the Liberalism of Fear
Douglass, R. (2023) · Political Theory · doi:10.1177/00905917231169979 · Cited by 21
Rethinking the Large Ensemble Paradigm: Moving Toward Epistemic Justice
Hess, J. (2023) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-023-09882-8 · Cited by 26
The Dworkin–Williams debate: Liberty, conceptual integrity, and tragic conflict in politics
Queloz, M. (2023) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.13002 · Cited by 21
Deepfakes and trust in technology
Laas, O. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04363-4 · Cited by 21
Williams, H., & Jobe, A. (2024) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2024.2323455 · Cited by 23
Knowing Better: Motivated Ignorance and Willful Ignorance
Freedman, K. L. (2024) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2024.3 · Cited by 21
Conducting sustainability research in the anthropocene: toward a relational approach
Böhme, J., Spreitzer, E.-M., & Christine Wamsler, B. (2024) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-024-01510-9 · Cited by 29
Tarisayi, K. S. (2024) · E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences · doi:10.38159/ehass.20245711 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
