The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,201–1,300 of 12,257
Bae, C. L. L., Matewos, A. M., & Fife, J. E. (2024) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2024.2370549 · Cited by 26
Re-imagining Procedural Justice in Policing Sexual Violence: Centring Survivors
Johnson, K., Walling-Wefelmeyer, R., Smith, O., Hohl, K., & Brooks, O. (2024) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azae060 · Cited by 30
ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN AI-ENHANCED EDUCATION: CULTURAL DIMENSIONS AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPACT
Fadil, H. O. C. A., & Nuredin, A. (2025) · Symposium Proceedings · doi:10.55843/isl2025symp163h · Cited by 25
Expanding Epistemology: A Responsibilist Approach
Axtell, G. S. (2008) · Philosophical Papers · doi:10.1080/05568640809485214 · Cited by 25
Scully, J. L. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139939829.013 · Cited by 25
Group Knowledge, Questions, and the Division of Epistemic Labour
Habgood‐Coote, J. (2019) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0006.033 · Cited by 27
#MeToo, Social Norms, and Sanctions
Rasmussen, K. B., & Yaouzis, N. O. (2019) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/jopp.12207 · Cited by 25
Intersectionality as a Regulative Ideal
Gasdaglis, K., & Madva, A. (2020) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0006.044 · Cited by 26
Byskov, M. F. (2020) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449626.2020.1858324 · Cited by 25
Epistemic Injustice in Brain Studies of (Trans)Gender Identity
Caselles, E. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2021.608328 · Cited by 28
Ricoeur’s hermeneutic arc and the “narrative turn” in the ethics of care
Russo, M. T. (2021) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-021-10020-9 · Cited by 25
Pang, B. (2021) · Sport Education and Society · doi:10.1080/13573322.2021.1953461 · Cited by 27
Ethical Challenges of Organ Transplantation
Hansen, S. L., & Schicktanz, S. (2021) · Bioethik - Medizinethik · doi:10.14361/9783839446430 · Cited by 25
Grounding co‐writing: An analysis of the theoretical basis of a new approach in mental health care
Faccio, E., Pocobello, R., Vitelli, R., & Stanghellini, G. (2022) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/jpm.12835 · Cited by 25
Technology as Driver for Morally Motivated Conceptual Engineering
Veluwenkamp, H., Capasso, M., Maas, J., & Marin, L. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00565-9 · Cited by 25
Furman, K. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2122756 · Cited by 25
Duijs, S. E., Abma, T., Plak, O., Jhingoeri, U., Abena‐Jaspers, Y., Senoussi, N., Mazurel, C., Bourik, Z., & Verdonk, P. (2022) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.15470 · Cited by 30
Epistemic Just and Dynamic AI Ethics in Africa
Ruttkamp, E. (2022) · Social and cultural studies of robots and AI · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3_2 · Cited by 29
Evidence, regulation and ‘rational’ prescribing: the case of gabapentin for neuropathic pain
Ghinea, N., Lipworth, W. L., & Kerridge, I. (2014) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12223 · Cited by 25
Capstick, A., Chatwin, J., & Ludwin, K. (2015) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.14361/9783839427101-011 · Cited by 25
Kelland, L. (2016) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12295 · Cited by 25
Horta, Ó. (2017) · Res Publica · doi:10.1007/s11158-017-9356-3 · Cited by 25
Culture in Mind – An Enactivist Account
Hutto, D. D., Gallagher, S., Ilundáin‐Agurruza, J., & Hipólito, I. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.009 · Cited by 29
Spagnolo, J., Gautier, L., Seppey, M., & D’souza, N. A. (2020) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100075 · Cited by 25
Coyne, T., Zurita, M. D. L. M., Reid, D., & Prodanović, V. (2020) · Blue-Green Systems · doi:10.2166/bgs.2020.017 · Cited by 25
Scott, K. A. (2021) · Feminist Anthropology · doi:10.1002/fea2.12045 · Cited by 25
Sociocultural Attunement in Systemic Family Therapy
Knudson‐Martin, C., McDowell, T., & Bermúdez, J. M. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119790181.ch27 · Cited by 25
Mollema, W. J. T. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00801-w · Cited by 24
“Instead of those experiences being recognized and valued as valid perspectives, they are excluded from public discourse, institutions and the like [11], pp. 156-159).”
InfluentialCaring Democracy: How Should Concepts Travel?
Tronto, J. C. (2020) · International political theory · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41437-5_9 · Cited by 24
The Problem with Disagreement on Social Media
Edenberg, E. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192893338.003.0015 · Cited by 24
ChatGPT and accounting in African contexts: Amplifying epistemic injustice
Muzanenhamo, P., & Power, S. B. (2024) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102735 · Cited by 28
Self-Narration in the Oppressive Niche
Fabry, R. E. (2024) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-024-10088-x · Cited by 24
Democratic innovation for change: A participatory corrective to deliberative hegemony
Escobar, O., & Bua, A. (2025) · Politics · doi:10.1177/02633957251349635 · Cited by 24
Slimi, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1769680 · Cited by 24
Neurocognitive Variety in Neurotypical Environments: The Source of “Deficit” in Autism
Legault, M., Bourdon, J.-N., & Poirier, P. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science · doi:10.4236/jbbs.2019.96019 · Cited by 26
Capacities, capabilities, and the societal impact of the humanities
Sigurðarson, E. S. (2019) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvz031 · Cited by 24
Closed-Mindedness As an Intellectual Vice
Battaly, H. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108666404.002 · Cited by 24
Resurrecting the Black Archive through the decolonisation of philosophy in South Africa
Kumalo, S. H. (2020) · Third World Thematics A TWQ Journal · doi:10.1080/23802014.2020.1798276 · Cited by 28
Introduction to Folk Psychology: Pluralistic Approaches
Andrews, K., Spaulding, S., & Westra, E. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02837-3 · Cited by 24
Carenzo, S. (2020) · Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1080/25729861.2020.1788775 · Cited by 24
Panchuk, M. (2020) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2020.32 · Cited by 24
Denial of Japan’s Military Sexual Slavery and Responsibility for Epistemic Amends
Song, S. (2020) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2020.1839811 · Cited by 24
Deliberation through Misrepresentation? Inchoate Speech and the Division of Interpretive Labor*
Prescott‐Couch, A. (2020) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/jopp.12242 · Cited by 24
Ko, D., Bal, A., Çakır, H. İ., & Kim, H. (2021) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146812112300201 · Cited by 24
de Boer, M. L. (2021) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13301 · Cited by 24
Retheorising distributed leadership through epistemic injustice
Tian, M., & Nutbrown, G. (2021) · Educational Management Administration & Leadership · doi:10.1177/17411432211022776 · Cited by 24
Indigenous parents and child welfare: Mistrust, epistemic injustice, and training
Leckey, R. C. G., Schmieder-Gropen, R., Nnebe, C., & Clouthier, M. (2021) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639211041476 · Cited by 30
Risse, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108680875 · Cited by 25
Heffer, C. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190923280.001.0001 · Cited by 24
Comments on Miranda Fricker's Epistemic Injustice
Goldberg, S. C. (2010) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2010.0004 · Cited by 24
Writing about Learning and Teaching in Higher Education
Healey, M., Matthews, K., & Cook‐Sather, A. (2020) · Elon University Center for Engaged Learning eBooks · doi:10.36284/celelon.oa3 · Cited by 27
Huang, Z. M. (2022) · Intercultural Education · doi:10.1080/14675986.2022.2069393 · Cited by 24
Fricas, J. (2022) · Journal of Participatory Research Methods · doi:10.35844/001c.37606 · Cited by 24
Medina, J. (2022) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12221 · Cited by 28
Kuchah, K., Adamson, L., Dorimana, A., Uwizeyemariya, A., Uworwabayeho, A., & Milligan, L. O. (2022) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2022.2159031 · Cited by 24
Ethical Issues in Near-Future Socially Supportive Smart Assistants for Older Adults
London, A., Razin, Y., Borenstein, J., Eslami, M., Perkins, R., & Robinette, P. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2023.3237124 · Cited by 18
van Toorn, G., & Scully, J. L. (2023) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2023.2233684 · Cited by 24
Ellins, J., Hocking, L., Al‐Haboubi, M., Newbould, J., Fenton, S., Daniel, K., Stockwell, S., Leach, B., Sidhu, M. S., Bousfield, J., et al. (2023) · Health and Social Care Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/xqwu4117 · Cited by 24
One Too Many: Hermeneutical Excess as Hermeneutical Injustice
Dular, N. (2023) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2023.20 · Cited by 24
Ameliorating Algorithmic Bias, or Why Explainable AI Needs Feminist Philosophy
Huang, L. T.-L., Chen, H., Lin, Y.-T., Huang, T.-R., & Hung, T.-W. (2022) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2022.3/4.14347 · Cited by 26
Abdul-Rahman, L., Grau, H. E., Klaus, L., & Singelnstein, T. (2023) · Campus Verlag eBooks · doi:10.12907/978-3-593-45438-2 · Cited by 24
Thurber, A., & Fraser, J. C. (2015) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.006 · Cited by 24
Responding to misrecognition from a (post)/colonial university
Luckett, K., & Naicker, V. (2016) · Critical Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1234495 · Cited by 24
Knowledge, Democracy, and the Internet
Mößner, N., & Kitcher, P. (2016) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-016-9310-0 · Cited by 24
Sweatshop Regulation and Workers’ Choices
Flanigan, J. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3395-0 · Cited by 24
Cycles of deportability: Threats, fears, and the agency of ‘irregular’ migrants in Canada
Ellis, B. D., & Stam, H. J. (2017) · Migration Studies · doi:10.1093/migration/mnx049 · Cited by 24
Bergman, S. B., & Barker, M. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-51053-2_3 · Cited by 24
Posthuman Child and the Diffractive Teacher: Decolonizing the Nature/Culture Binary
Murris, K. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_7-1 · Cited by 24
Talking the Talk: Enhancing Clinical Ethics with Health Literacy Best Practices
Watson, J. C. (2019) · HEC Forum · doi:10.1007/s10730-019-09369-5 · Cited by 24
García, E. B. (2019) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2019.1621403 · Cited by 24
McKeown, M., Scholes, A., Jones, F. A., & Aindow, W. (2019) · University of Toronto Press eBooks · doi:10.3138/9781442629981-023 · Cited by 24
Transformative practice: social work practice with vulnerable young people
Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2020) · European Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/13691457.2020.1819205 · Cited by 24
Transdisciplinary Generalism: Naming the epistemology and philosophy of the generalist
Lynch, J. M., Dowrick, C. F., Meredith, P. J., McGregor, S. L. T., & van Driel, M. (2020) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13446 · Cited by 24
Meretoja, H. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190649364.003.0002 · Cited by 26
Mind the civic empowerment gap: Economically elite students and critical civic education
Swalwell, K. M. (2015) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1080/03626784.2015.1095624 · Cited by 24
Swartz, A. K. (2018) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2018.1498948 · Cited by 24
Abma, T., Groot, B. C., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2019) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1619869 · Cited by 24
‘Isn’t Everyone a Little OCD?’ The Epistemic Harms of Wrongful Depathologization
Spencer, L., & Carel, H. (2021) · Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.5195/philmed.2021.19 · Cited by 23
II—Arrogance, Silence, and Silencing
Goldberg, S. C. (2016) · Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1093/arisup/akw012 · Cited by 23
A cross-cultural assessment of the semantic dimensions of intellectual humility
Christen, M., Alfano, M., & Robinson, B. (2017) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0791-7 · Cited by 24
Hermeneutical Injustice and Animal Ethics: Can Nonhuman Animals Suffer from Hermeneutical Injustice?
Podosky, P. C. (2018) · Journal of Animal Ethics · doi:10.5406/janimalethics.8.2.0216 · Cited by 23
Thinking about Justice in the Unjust Meantime
Jaggar, A. M. (2019) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7283 · Cited by 24
Generics and Epistemic Injustice
Rosola, M., & Cella, F. (2020) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-020-10095-y · Cited by 23
Epistemic Dependence and Oppression: A Telling Relationship
Sertler, E. (2020) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2020.34 · Cited by 23
Culpability, Blame, and the Moral Dynamics of Social Power
Mackenzie, C. (2021) · Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1093/arisup/akab002 · Cited by 23
Glasscock, J. S. P. (2020) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-020-00313-5 · Cited by 23
Hanna, A. (2022) · The International Journal of Children s Rights · doi:10.1163/15718182-30040003 · Cited by 23
Instrumental dialogue and the ethics of expressing solicitude for each other’s existence
Bencherki, N., & Sénac, C. (2023) · Language and Dialogue · doi:10.1075/ld.00138.ben · Cited by 23
Kaur, K., Grama, B., Chaudhuri, N. R., & Recalde-Vela, M. J. (2023) · Journal of Human Rights Practice · doi:10.1093/jhuman/huad008 · Cited by 23
‘It was just a joke!’ Comedy and freedom of speech
Goldstraw, S. (2023) · European Journal of Political Theory · doi:10.1177/14748851231205375 · Cited by 23
Understanding gender and sexuality: The hidden curriculum in English schools
Donovan, C., Gangoli, G., King, H., & Dutt, A. (2023) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3440 · Cited by 23
Epistemic Exhaustion and the Retention of Power
Satta, M. (2024) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2024.1 · Cited by 23
The epistemic injustice of borderline personality disorder
Watts, J. (2024) · BJPsych International · doi:10.1192/bji.2024.16 · Cited by 23
Policy mixes for just transitions: A holistic evaluation framework
Kaljonen, M., Paloviita, A., Huttunen, S., & Kortetmäki, T. (2024) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2024.100885 · Cited by 23
Do Reasons Matter? Navigating Parents’ Reasons in Healthcare Decisions for Children
Moore, B., & Brown, A. C. (2024) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2024.2388730 · Cited by 23
Who is (not) in the room? An epistemic justice perspective on low-carbon transport transitions
Kläver, A., & Verlinghieri, E. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2024.2422842 · Cited by 23
Rushton, E. A. C., Walshe, N., & Johnston, B. J. (2025) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1002/curj.322 · Cited by 23
Booker, D., Petrou, G., Chatzidiakou, L., Das, D., Farooq, F., Ferguson, L., Jutila, O. I., Milczewska, K., Modlich, M., Moreno-Rangel, A., et al. (2025) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112957 · Cited by 24
The epistemic revolution of AI: reconfiguring the foundations of scientific knowledge
Cruz‐Aguilar, M. A. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02658-3 · Cited by 23
Cosmopolitanism and Policy: A Pedagogical Framework for Global Issues in Music Education
Schmidt, P. (2013) · Arts Education Policy Review · doi:10.1080/10632913.2013.803410 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
