The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 11,701–11,800 of 12,257
Krisis Otoritas Pengetahuan dalam Pendidikan Digital: Sebuah Telaah Epistemologis
Mufiq (2026) · Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Pendidikan · doi:10.70292/jpcp.v4i1.675
Martínez-Rivera, Ó., Alonso-López, C., & Ribera, J. P. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14183089
Understanding the “Understanding of AI”:
Lekshmi, R. I. (2026) · Dia-noesis. · doi:10.12681/dia.46973
Haidar, J. (2026) · Lodz Papers in Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/lpp-2026-0071
Bastos, L. N. (2026) · RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber · doi:10.51473/rcmos.v1i2.2026.2909
Engineered approval: a critical discourse analysis of sycophancy in RLHF-trained language models
Ahmed, H., & Bhatia, S. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03350-w
Auliawan, F., Pambudi, K. S., & Thontowi, H. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7497939
Spiegel, T. J. (2026) · Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie · doi:10.1515/dzph-2026-0034
De Jure Hinges and Doxastic Wronging: The Harm of Rational BeliefsPreprint
Gregg, M. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10874100/v1
Widmer, D., Carreras, H. M., Ruof, J., Fernando, G. V. M. C., Ouvrard, P., Bonnamour, M.-C., McCarthy, M., & Atreya, S. Y. (2026) · Journal of Market Access & Health Policy · doi:10.3390/jmahp14030057
Global Citizenship Education and Claims of Ubuntu : A Philosophical Reappraisal
Waghid, Y., & Waghid, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197815823.003.0003
Mangiameli, A. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10535849/v1
Ethical Evaluation of Gendered Engineering Identity: A Relational Dual-Character Perspective
Bernhard, S. (2026) · Res Publica · doi:10.1007/s11158-026-09793-8
Gender norms for gender justice: power, transformation, and the politics of change
Legros, S., & Maubert, C. (2026) · Development in Practice · doi:10.1080/09614524.2026.2697249
Sırkıntı, H. G. (2026) · Babel Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation / Revista Internacional de Traducción · doi:10.1075/babel.26217.gul
Vergnas, O. L., Jouet, E., & Vinçon-Leite, A. (2026) · Savoirs · doi:10.3917/savo.071.0057
Shrestha, A., Shin, G. U., Shrestha, J., Dzombo, M. N., & Winter, S. C. (2026) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci15090646
Patrick, A. Y., LeDoux, J., & Schley, S. (2026) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.70079
Kwok, C. (2026) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-026-06464-9
Gómez, G. M., & Torres, A. G. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05807-3
Epistemic injustice and the Meitei revivalist movement in Manipur, India
Khundrakpam, P., & Meetei, N. B. (2026) · Asian Ethnicity · doi:10.1080/14631369.2026.2737962
Adewale, S., & Ndwandwe, N. D. (2026) · Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.17583/remie.20298
Reimagining grassroots youth skill development practice for sustainable livelihoods in rural India
Ncube, B., & Pandey, P. (2026) · Development in Practice · doi:10.1080/09614524.2026.2731102
Recognition and Entrepreneurial Control at the MarginsPreprint
Sahoo, S., & Thakur, M. K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7507003
Negotiating the validity of lived experience as a form of evidence
Wilder, E. P., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2026) · Proceedings. · doi:10.22318/icls2026.764888
Jacobsen, M. H., Taraporevala, P., Pande, R., Borde, R., & Oza, R. (2026) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2026.103677
Eastham, R., & McDermott, E. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1868755
Necula, L. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1964488
Critique without guarantees: justification and the social authorization of criticism
Mendoza, K. P. R., & Quilantang, R. F. (2026) · Journal of Multicultural Discourses · doi:10.1080/17447143.2026.2735970
Jia, S., Du, J. T., & Yan, H. (2026) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.70114
Digital Accessibility as a Service Design Challenge in Academic Libraries
Ateka, A., & Kwanya, T. (2026) · Libri · doi:10.1515/libri-2026-0023
Is philosophy of education Western? Considerations for doctoral supervision
Rumjahn, A., Kenklies, K., Waterman-Evans, L., Rappleye, J., Xing, S., Periodi, I., Taylor, R. M., Hansen, D. T., Almadlouh, A., Sharify-Funk, M., et al. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2733639
Mazumder, J. (2026) · Feminist Anthropology · doi:10.1002/fea2.70076
Townsend, S., Dodge, B., & Bostwick, W. B. (2026) · Culture Health & Sexuality · doi:10.1080/13691058.2026.2730472
Sanctioned by Others: Remediating Knowledge Exclusion on Wikipedia Through Design
Ajmani, L., Zhou, M., Andic, T., Berson, A., Johnson, I. L., Hill, B. M., Maung, R., Narayan, S., Severson, S., Terveen, L., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3816994
Gossip as Communicative Mediation: Rumor and Social Knowledge in Everyday Life
Llanos, N. F. D. L. (2026) · Signo y Pensamiento · doi:10.11144/javeriana.syp45.gcmr
Hertiman, M. R. (2026) · Nouvelles Questions Féministes · doi:10.3917/nqf.452.0096
Shen, G. J. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2026.2736694
Pelekidou, L., Koutra, K., Ratsika, N., Kokaliari, E. D., & Arnault, D. S. (2026) · Journal of Human Rights and Social Work · doi:10.1007/s41134-026-00490-3
0000-0002-2787-4088 (2026) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2026.2736740
Anjum, G., & Aziz, M. (2026) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916261468309
Radičuks, R., Bula-Biteniece, I., Boobani, B., & Jakovičs, M. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16101596
Developing educational research through a Penal-Lectical assemblage
Glazzard, J., & Thomas, S. (2026) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.1108/qrj-06-2026-0293
Moral‐Epistemic Dilemmas: The Case of Gender in Medical Diagnosis
Barnes, E. (2026) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.1111/phpe.70005
Navigating AI-Accelerated Science: An Intellectual Virtue Approach to Responsible Inquiry
Sikimić, V. (2026) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2026.10140
Direito ao Cuidado como Direito Informacionalmente Constituído
Brandão, J. L. A. (2026) · Suprema - Revista de Estudos Constitucionais · doi:10.53798/suprema.2026.v6.n2.a766
Andoniou, C. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9190-8.ch019
Review of Catala’s The Dynamics of Epistemic Injustice
McWilliams, E. C. (2026) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2026.10105
THE ETHICS OF RESPONSIBILITY AFTER CHORNOBYL: STIGMATIZATION, TRAUMA AND THE SEARCH FOR JUSTICE
Boichenko, N. M. (2026) · Filosofska dumka (Philosophical Thought) · doi:10.15407/fd2026.03.062
Epistemic Leadership in Higher Education and the Challenge of Disinformation
Hatami, R. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0353-4.ch004
Mitova, V. (2026) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.70070
Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Paternalism in Non-Professional Interpreting
Yıldız, M. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2719583
Bu, F., Zhang, Y., Wang, F., Jin, Q., & Rong, S. (2026) · Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40489-026-00600-x
Institutional Speech: Social Norms and Social Roles
Seglow, J. (2026) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-026-09582-8
Grant, C., Ripoll, S., & Waldman, L. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119879
Neuropanopticon and the Self-as-Platform: Neurotechnologies as Power Tools in the Workplace
Mateus, J. (2026) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-026-09920-2
ÖZDEMİR, H. (2026) · SÖYLEM Filoloji Dergisi · doi:10.29110/soylemdergi.1920531
Normative Bias in Quality of Life
Mareverwa, A., Abude-Aribo, J. O., Chemhaka, G. B., & Apeadu-Baah, G. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-1629-1_53-1
ChatGPT-5's Epistemological Grounds: Dialogues in the Platonic Cloud
Marone, E., & Marone, L. (2026) · Cultural Science Journal · doi:10.2478/csj-2026-0003
Knowing Pain Without Certainty: Recognition When Self‐Report is Unavailable
Blenis, R. C. (2026) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.70125
What are teachers taught? An analysis of child development curricula
Ansari, A. N., & Ahmad, S. (2026) · Early Years Journal of International Research and Development · doi:10.1080/09575146.2026.2733155
de Kok, B. C., Gyan, S. E., Yevoo, L. L., Koi-Larbi, K., & Arhinful, D. K. (2026) · Culture Health & Sexuality · doi:10.1080/13691058.2026.2737187
The Jury Chooses What It Hears: Ballot-Conditioned Disclosure in a Staged Medea Trial
Uhl, J. C., Frantzmann, L., Huber, M., Maier, L. C., Loeffler, J., Bröker, I. R., Effertz, M. J., & Regal, G. (2026) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3829807.3829880
Laine, J. P. (2026) · Ethics & Global Politics · doi:10.1080/16544951.2026.2740264
Madalambana, O. (2026) · Journal of Education and Learning Technology · doi:10.38159/jelt.20267712
Educational Leading Practices and Epistemic Justice
Macdonald, K., & Keddie, A. (2026) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-21359-4_157
Nicholls, C., Sydor, A., Evans, S., Pickles, J., Snooks, H., Sivarajasingam, V., & Moore, S. (2026) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380261476695
Propuestas comunitarias para transformar la respuesta estatal frente a la violencia basada en género
Martínez, A. C., & Vásquez, L. T. C. (2026) · Voces y Silencios Revista Latinoamericana de Educación · doi:10.18175/vys17.3.2026.7
Araújo, C. A. Á. (2026) · Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología · doi:10.17533/udea.rib.v49n3e365008
Hidalgo, M., & Seijo, F. (2026) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/00113921261477422
Hwami, M., & Bedeker, M. (2026) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-21359-4_104
Exploring practitioner values in Inclusive Science Communication: An Australian perspective
Gill, E., & Grand, A. (2026) · Cultures of Science · doi:10.1177/20966083261487013
Belonging, Self-Trust, and Epistemic Repair
Catala, A. (2026) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2026.10142
Identifying, disentangling and reflecting on traditions in science communication: An introduction
Holliman, R. E., & Doran, H. (2026) · Cultures of Science · doi:10.1177/20966083261486238
Fujio, T., & Fujio, H. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01407-6
Smith, R., Gutiérrez, M. C., Nemouchi, L., Bird, T., & Fernández, A. T. T. (2026) · Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education · doi:10.1080/03057925.2026.2737936
Human Autonomy and Machine Authority
Yadav-Ranjan, R. (2026) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-34604-9_8
The Double Novel: Irony, Bildung , and #MeToo in Elif Batuman's Either/Or
Prout, M. (2026) · NOVEL A Forum on Fiction · doi:10.1215/00295132-12660200
Yamamoto, E., & Kallio, A. A. (2026) · British Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1017/s0265051726101065
Toward a Framework of Social Marginalization: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda
Preston, M. C., & Kim, Y. L. (2026) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2025.0093
Mobilizing lived experience in the fight against racism: the case of the Amsterdam municipality
Maussen, M., & van den Breemer, R. (2026) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2026.2732208
Zhang, X., Li, H., & Bao, S. (2026) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-026-10032-1
العلوم الإنسانية وصناعة الأمل من إنتاج المعرفة إلى تعزيز الصحة النفسية المجتمعية
عمري, م. ع. (2026) · مجلة الآداب للعلوم الانسانية - جامعة تعز · doi:10.67951/q7r05829
Health, N. P. R. U. I. R., Proffitt, E., Dhar, D., Harvey-Pescott, L., Brown, E., McNiven, A., Felix, A., Lima, E. D., Rahman, Y., Bailey, J., et al. (2026) · BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health · doi:10.1136/bmjsrh-2026-203239
What Is Wrong with Gossip? An Exclusion‐Based Account
Jatoi, A. R. (2026) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1002/japp.70134
Üretken Yapay Zekâda Dil ve Konum Farklarının Görsel Söyleme Etkisi: DALL-E 3 Örneği
Taşkıran, M. S., & KULLUK, R. (2026) · Kültür ve İletişim · doi:10.18691/kulturveiletisim.1951815
Añez, D. F. M., & Pastor, I. (2026) · Gender Issues · doi:10.1007/s12147-026-09435-6
Misinterpretive Frames and Epistemic Contamination
Wilson, E. L. (2026) · Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy · doi:10.26556/jesp.v31i5.6243
Rokvity, A. (2026) · Humanities · doi:10.3390/h15100142
Contact zones, safe houses and the family language politics of Chedungun maintenance
Alvarado, M. E. (2026) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2026.2735983
Wong, S., Almeamari, F., Nathan, S., Perry, K. N., & Lokot, M. (2026) · Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health · doi:10.1017/gmh.2026.10297
Ecosocial Work in the Polycrisis Era: Vulnerability, Transformative Learning and Epistemic Change
Conficoni, A. (2026) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci15100668
Takhar, J. (2026) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1177/01417789261492163
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
