The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,901–3,000 of 12,257
Offending White Men: Racial Vilification, Misrecognition, and Epistemic Injustice
Richardson-Self, L. V. (2018) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6234 · Cited by 8
Thorson, J. K., & Baker, C. (2019) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2018.1561762 · Cited by 8
Epistemic Injustice and Scientific Knowledge Distribution
Bai, H. (2020) · Filosofija Sociologija · doi:10.6001/fil-soc.v31i3.4269 · Cited by 8
On Locker Room Talk and Linguistic Oppression
McGowan, M. K. (2018) · Philosophical Topics · doi:10.5840/philtopics201846217 · Cited by 9
Mutual Constitution of Culture and the Mind
Kitayama, S., & Yu, Q. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.006 · Cited by 9
Town, S., Donovan, M. C. J., & Beach, E. (2020) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507620972238 · Cited by 8
von Peter, S., & Zinkler, M. (2021) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws10020022 · Cited by 9
The virtues of truth: On democracy’s epistemic value
Tong, Z. (2021) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537211017573 · Cited by 8
Living bioethics, clinical ethics committees and children's consent to heart surgery
Alderson, P., Bowman, D., Brierley, J., Elliott, M. J., Kazmi, R., Mendizabal‐Espinosa, R. M., Montgomery, J., Sutcliffe, K., & Wellesley, H. (2021) · Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1177/14777509211034145 · Cited by 8
Faissner, M., Juckel, G., & Gather, J. (2021) · Ethik in der Medizin · doi:10.1007/s00481-021-00666-7 · Cited by 8
DIGITAL CHANGE AND MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES: CHANGING ATTITUDES TOWARDS DIGITAL MEDIA IN THE MARGINS
Eickers, G., & Rath, M. O. (2021) · ICERI proceedings · doi:10.21125/iceri.2021.1197 · Cited by 8
Transforming Lives and Systems
Frawley, J., Nguyen, T., & Sarian, E. (2020) · Springer briefs in education · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5351-6 · Cited by 8
Democratising Ethical Regulation and Practice in Educational Research
Fox, A., & Busher, H. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12100674 · Cited by 10
Introduction to special issue: New dialogues between medical sociology and disability studies
McLaughlin, J., Scambler, S., & Thomas, G. M. (2023) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13652 · Cited by 8
A lasdair M acIntyre's Analysis of Tradition
Angier, T. (2011) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00505.x · Cited by 8
Silence, Silencing, and (In)Visibility: The Geopolitics of Tehran's Silent Protests
Ranjbar, A. M. (2017) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12343 · Cited by 8
Ten forms of recognition and misrecognition in long-term care for older people
Laitinen, A., & Pirhonen, J. (2018) · SATS · doi:10.1515/sats-2016-0017 · Cited by 8
Just Knowledge’: Can Social Work’s ‘Guilty Knowledge’ Help Build a More Inclusive Knowledge Society?
Heinsch, M., & Cribb, A. (2018) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcy118 · Cited by 8
Burt, J. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11205611 · Cited by 8
Giles, H. (2019) · Contemporary Justice Review · doi:10.1080/10282580.2019.1644626 · Cited by 8
A realist epistemic utopia? Epistemic practices in a climate camp
Zamora, J. S., & Herzog, L. M. (2021) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12438 · Cited by 8
The Compliment of Rational Opposition: Disagreement, Adversariality, and Disputation
Godden, D. (2021) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-021-09768-9 · Cited by 8
‘It feels special when you're Māori’—voices of mokopuna Māori aged 6 to 13 years
King, P. T., & Cormack, D. M. (2022) · Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · doi:10.1080/03036758.2022.2064520 · Cited by 8
Scorekeeping in a Pornographic Language Game
Langton, R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.003.0009 · Cited by 8
Reynolds, J. M. (2016) · AJOB Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/21507740.2016.1150911 · Cited by 8
The Nature of Applied Philosophy
Lippert‐Rasmussen, K. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118869109.ch1 · Cited by 8
Authority and Attribution: the Case of Epistemic Injustice in Self-Knowledge
Borgoni, C. (2018) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-018-0002-x · Cited by 8
Ideology and Social Cognition: The Challenge of Theorizing ‘Speciesism’
Mills, C. W. (2019) · Australasian Philosophical Review · doi:10.1080/24740500.2019.1705233 · Cited by 8
Urban Analytics: History, Trajectory, and CritiquePreprint
Boeing, G., Batty, M., Jiang, S., & Schweitzer, L. (2021) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/bwhx2 · Cited by 8
Epistemic Injustice and Religious Education
Mercer, J. A. (2022) · Religious Education · doi:10.1080/00344087.2022.2030095 · Cited by 8
Medina, J. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.003.0000 · Cited by 8
Keates, N., Waldock, K. E., & Dewar, E. F. A. (2022) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00331 · Cited by 8
Editorial of dossier “Epistemic Injustice in Criminal Procedure”
Páez, A., & Matida, J. (2023) · Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal · doi:10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.821 · Cited by 15
The fragility of truth: Social epistemology in a time of polarization and pandemic
Kirmayer, L. J. (2024) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/13634615241299556 · Cited by 8
MisgenderingPreprint
McNamarah, C. T. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3683490 · Cited by 8
Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings
Mbah, M. F., & Jarvis, L. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2626631 · Cited by 7
When Bioethics Fails: Intersex, Epistemic Injustice and Advocacy
Carpenter, M., & Jordens, C. F. C. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91475-2_7 · Cited by 7
Looking Through the Eyes of General Practitioners: The Role of Social Work in Primary Health Care
Feryn, N., Boeckxstaens, P., Ashcroft, R., Corte, J. D., & Roose, R. (2023) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcad183 · Cited by 7
Murano, M. C. (2024) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/17470161241242135 · Cited by 7
Enhancing equity in South Korean EMI higher education through translanguaging
Williams, D. G. (2024) · Journal of English as a Lingua Franca · doi:10.1515/jelf-2024-2012 · Cited by 7
Mental integrity, autonomy, and fundamental interests
Zuk, P. D. (2024) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2023-109732 · Cited by 7
Adekola, J., & Chia, R. (2024) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Science · doi:10.1007/s13753-024-00572-8 · Cited by 7
Physical education in alternative provision schools: A case of spatial (in)justice?
Maher, A. J., Quarmby, T., Hooper, O., Wells, V., & Slavin, L. (2024) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.4064 · Cited by 7
Ryan, S., & O’Brien, R. (2024) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.13299 · Cited by 7
Riande, G. D. R., & Vilchis, I. L. (2024) · Journal of Electronic Publishing · doi:10.3998/jep.6448 · Cited by 7
Learning About Mental Health Lived Experience in Social Work Education
Ridley, S., Hodgson, D., Netto, J., Martin, R., & Mahboub, L. (2024) · Australian Social Work · doi:10.1080/0312407x.2024.2389944 · Cited by 7
McKenna, M. S. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780197679999.001.0001 · Cited by 7
Joshi, H., & McKenna, R. (2024) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.13119 · Cited by 7
Lost in translation: key lessons from conducting dissemination and implementation science in Zambia
Maritim, P., Munakampe, M. N., Nglazi, M. D., Mweemba, C., Sikombe, K., Mbewe, W., Silumbwe, A., Jacobs, C. N., Zulu, J. M., Herce, M. E., et al. (2024) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-024-00663-z · Cited by 7
The role of Mapuche communities as guardians of basin headwaters in Northern Patagonia
Aigo, J. D. C., & Ladio, A. H. (2024) · Inland Waters · doi:10.1080/20442041.2024.2433880 · Cited by 7
Harper, I., Broom, A. F., & Kenny, K. (2024) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323241304571 · Cited by 7
Taggart, D., Wright, K., Griffin, H., Duckworth, L., Baxter-Thornton, M., Coates, S., Lewis, E., Maxted, F., Shellam, K., Tuck, C., et al. (2024) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107147 · Cited by 7
Upholding Hierarchies of Knowledge Production: Mundane Obstacles to Global International Relations
Vogel, B., Džuverović, N., Tripathi, S., Kušić, K., Zapata, M. L., Ramachandran, S., Dhungana, N., & Taithe, B. O. (2024) · International Studies Perspectives · doi:10.1093/isp/ekae025 · Cited by 7
Mezza, M. (2025) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581596.2024.2446763 · Cited by 7
Bennett, S., Catanzariti, B., & Tollon, F. (2025) · Ai & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02162-0 · Cited by 6
Hyma, R., Jones, B., Kry, S., Sen, L., Loek, S., Tath, N., & Kuy, T. (2025) · Development in Practice · doi:10.1080/09614524.2025.2463913 · Cited by 7
Unravelling distractions in the discourse of African decolonisation: a critical examination
Balogun, B. J., & Woldegiorgis, E. T. (2025) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2025.2462786 · Cited by 7
Wettermark, A., & Berglund, K. (2025) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267251318960 · Cited by 7
Attention sanctuaries: Social practice guidelines and emergent strategies in attention activism
Burnett, D. G., & Mitchell, E. (2025) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.15313 · Cited by 7
Carroll, T. (2025) · The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics · doi:10.1017/rep.2025.3 · Cited by 7
Identity-protective reasoning: an epistemic and political defense
Flores, C. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2025.17 · Cited by 7
Sarma, N., Gage, S., Hough, C. L., & Hope, A. A. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70266 · Cited by 9
Phurisamban, R., Pérez, E. L., Eyster, H. N., Chignell, S. M., & Koppes, M. N. (2025) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.70168 · Cited by 7
DeCuir, A. (2025) · Journal of Educational Administration & History · doi:10.1080/00220620.2025.2502163 · Cited by 7
Safe Enough: Subjective Determinations in Hospital Discharge for Patients With Medical Complexity
Vo, H. H., Seltzer, R. R., Scott, M., Feudtner, C., & Foster, C. C. (2025) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2024-067585 · Cited by 7
Billington, J., Knott, F. J., & Craythorne, S. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251346839 · Cited by 8
Hwami, M., & Bedeker, M. (2025) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-56275-4_104-1 · Cited by 7
Misunderstanding Epistemic Injustice: The Case of Chronic Pain Reports
Campos, V., & Luca‐Noronha, D. D. (2025) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1111/japp.70032 · Cited by 7
Diaspora theoretical contributors: bridging transnational knowledge and transforming global academia
Mogaji, E. (2025) · Globalisation Societies and Education · doi:10.1080/14767724.2025.2531977 · Cited by 7
Gabathuler, F., Würth, K., Hodel, M., Gläßel, A., Biller‐Andorno, N., & Schwind, B. (2025) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-025-10457-0 · Cited by 7
Tosas, M. R. (2025) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-025-10285-4 · Cited by 7
Dynamics of Using Digital Technologies in Agroecological Settings: A Case Study Approach
Meesala, H., & Brunori, G. (2025) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture15151636 · Cited by 7
Racial bias in clinician assessment of patient credibility: Evidence from electronic health records
Beach, M. C., Harrigian, K., Chee, B. W., Ahmad, A., Links, A. R., Zirikly, A., Han, D., Boss, E. F., Lawson, S. M., Saheed, M. O., et al. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0328134 · Cited by 8
Relational & culture-sensitive AI innovation
Herzog, C. (2025) · Journal of Responsible Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100135 · Cited by 5
Baehr, J. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191947469.001.0001 · Cited by 8
Ramsoomair, N. (2025) · Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice · doi:10.7202/1119494ar · Cited by 7
(Not) just policy success: Incorporating justice in policy evaluation
van Uffelen, N., Goyal, N., & Martínez-Reyes, A. (2025) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-025-09588-3 · Cited by 8
Zembylas, M. (2025) · Ethics and Education · doi:10.1080/17449642.2025.2565034 · Cited by 7
The University, Epistemic Power, and Institutional Epistemic Responsibilities
Lechner, I. M., de Ridder, J., van Woudenberg, R., & Anttila, S. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2553111 · Cited by 9
Resisting epistemic injustice: The potential of vulnerability in research ethics
Nicole-Berva, O., & Ušča, A. (2025) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/14687941251390765 · Cited by 7
Ethical crossroads in agricultural data: Perspectives on trust, equity and sustainability
Garwe, E. C., Arpaci, S., Moss, A. J., Bailey, K., Suchith, A., Oyewole, O. B., & Thondhlana, J. (2025) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.1177/00307270251391436 · Cited by 7
Alberda, A. P., Chipangura, N., Choksey, L., de Groot, J., & Sharma, M. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009635363 · Cited by 7
Breaking digital silence: AI, structural bias, and the uneven landscape of whistleblowing
Walle, Y. M. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02758-0 · Cited by 7
Kurniati, E., Emaliana, I., & Sahar, R. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2590919 · Cited by 8
Tirivangasi, H. M., & Kontinen, T. (2025) · International Journal of Heritage Studies · doi:10.1080/13527258.2025.2595080 · Cited by 7
Allen, L. K., DeLiema, D., & Kendeou, P. (2025) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2025.2588213 · Cited by 7
Anand, P., Attri, P. S., & Sahasranamam, S. (2025) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503251407016 · Cited by 7
Roberts, S., Reddan, M. D. R., Thomas-Parr, G., & Wescott, S. (2026) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2026.2617572 · Cited by 7
Generative AI and linguistic diversity in academic writing and publishing
Ugwuanyi, K. O., Mair, C., Dovchin, S., Erdocia, I., Kuteeva, M., & Airemionkhale, E. O. (2025) · Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes · doi:10.1075/jerpp.00035.ugw · Cited by 9
Johnson, J., Lewis, A., Mankoff, J. C., & Banner, O. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790652 · Cited by 8
Mambu! Breathing Protest: Atmospheric Trauma and Maternal Activism in Central Java
Candraningrum, D. (2026) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593535261442929 · Cited by 7
Dialogic teaching and multilingual counterpublics
Ghiso, M. P., Campano, G., Player, G. D., & Rusoja, A. (2016) · L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature · doi:10.17239/l1esll-2016.16.02.05 · Cited by 7
Meizel, K. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190621469.003.0002 · Cited by 7
Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue
Phillips, K. L. (2021) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v41i1.6689 · Cited by 7
Democratic Inclusion Through Caring Together with Others
Heier, J. (2020) · International political theory · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41437-5_3 · Cited by 7
Futures of the Study of Culture
Bachmann-Medick, D., Kugele, J., & Nünning, A. (2020) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110669398 · Cited by 9
van den Brink, B., Zala, M., & Theuns, T. (2020) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781839108488.00019 · Cited by 7
Satherley, R., Wolfe, I., & Lingam, R. (2021) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102661 · Cited by 9
Developing epistemic impartiality to deliver on justice in higher education South Africa
Kumalo, S. H. (2021) · Education Citizenship and Social Justice · doi:10.1177/17461979211048665 · Cited by 7
Ohlhorst, J. (2021) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-021-01761-7 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
