The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,001–3,100 of 12,257
Brännmark, J. (2021) · Journal of Social Ontology · doi:10.1515/jso-2021-0033 · Cited by 7
“We want to do more, but…”: New Jersey public library approaches to misinformation
Paris, B. S., Carmien, K., & Marshall, M. B. (2022) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101157 · Cited by 7
NIHEI, M. (2022) · Interdisciplinary Information Sciences · doi:10.4036/iis.2022.a.01 · Cited by 10
Pro-Diversity Beliefs and the Diverse Person’s Burden
Steel, D. P., & Paier, K. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03785-w · Cited by 9
Introduction: Why ‘Chinese’ Stories of Interculturality?
Dervin, F. (2022) · Palgrave studies on Chinese education in a global perspective · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12770-0_1 · Cited by 7
Philosophy of Street Art: Identity, Value, and the Law
Baldini, A. (2022) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12862 · Cited by 7
Lepoutre, M. (2022) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-022-10323-7 · Cited by 7
Moberg, J. (2022) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcac220 · Cited by 7
Collective vice and collective self-knowledge
Schwengerer, L. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03969-4 · Cited by 7
Making life more interesting: Trust, trustworthiness, and testimonial injustice
McGlynn, A. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2133695 · Cited by 7
Lobo, C. (2022) · Nordic Wittgenstein Review · doi:10.15845/nwr.v11.3643 · Cited by 8
Restorative validity and healing through inquiry: A visual ethnographic case study in Guatemala
Dazzo, G. P., Cúmez, C., Henderson, E., & Peccerelli, F. (2023) · Conflict Resolution Quarterly · doi:10.1002/crq.21376 · Cited by 7
Why is absent/low sexual desire a mental disorder (except when patients identify as asexual)?
Margolin, L. (2023) · Psychology and Sexuality · doi:10.1080/19419899.2023.2193575 · Cited by 11
Alvarez-Lizotte, P., & Caron, C. (2023) · Enfances Familles Générations · doi:10.7202/1097368ar · Cited by 7
Mistrust of Experts by Populists and Politicians
Crease, R. P. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190848927.013.7 · Cited by 7
Set, B. (2023) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages8020131 · Cited by 7
Critical ethnography and its others: Entanglement of matter/meaning/madness
Adam, S., Gold, E., & Tsui, J. (2023) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.12576 · Cited by 7
Facts, Concepts and Patterns of Life—Or How to Change Things with Words
Trächtler, J. (2023) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies8040058 · Cited by 7
Knowing from conflict: interculturality as a space of interaction for the production of knowledges
Parra-Romero, A. (2023) · Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1080/25729861.2023.2207866 · Cited by 7
Ohlsson, J., & Przybylinski, S. (2023) · Bristol University Press eBooks · doi:10.47674/9781529232233 · Cited by 7
Immunitas and (un)desirable teacher knowledge in teacher education
Unsworth, R., Clarke, M., & Hansen, D. R. (2023) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12577 · Cited by 7
Ajmani, L., Houtti, M., Foriest, J. C., DeVito, M. A., Vincent, N., & Johnson, I. L. (2023) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3584931.3611280 · Cited by 10
Delinking the Capitalist Episteme: Empathy and the Decolonial Turn in Amitav Ghosh’s Jungle Nama
Karmakar, G., & Chetty, R. (2023) · Current Writing · doi:10.1080/1013929x.2023.2251291 · Cited by 7
An Epistemic Lens on Algorithmic Fairness
Edenberg, E., & Wood, A. (2023) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623248 · Cited by 8
The politics of past and future: synthetic media, showing, and telling
Hyska, M. (2023) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-023-02062-x · Cited by 12
Epistemic injustice: complicity and promise in education
Nikolaidis, A. C., & Thompson, W. C. (2023) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhad078 · Cited by 9
Wrenn, C. B. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192869500.001.0001 · Cited by 7
Intersectionality without Fragmentation
Martín, A. (2023) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/727271 · Cited by 9
Social Structure and Epistemic Privilege
Stahl, T. (2023) · Análisis Revista de investigación filosófica · doi:10.26754/ojs_arif/arif.202329937 · Cited by 7
Migration Research, Coloniality and Epistemic Injustice
Landström, K., & Crawley, H. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39814-8_5 · Cited by 8
Sangiovanni, A. (2023) · Manchester University Press eBooks · doi:10.7765/9781526172693.00007 · Cited by 9
Epistemic consequences of unfair tools
Lassen, I. M. S., Kristensen‐McLachlan, R. D., Almasi, M., Enevoldsen, K., & Nielbo, K. L. (2024) · Digital Scholarship in the Humanities · doi:10.1093/llc/fqad091 · Cited by 7
“There's a little bit of mistrust”: Red River Métis experiences of the H1N1 and COVID‐19 pandemics
Driedger, S. M., Maier, R., Capurro, G., Jardine, C., Tustin, J. L., Chartrand, F., Sanguins, J., & Kloss, O. (2024) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14274 · Cited by 7
Isola, A.-M. (2024) · Social Inclusion · doi:10.17645/si.7781 · Cited by 10
Barnes, L. G., Podpadec, T. J., Jones, V., Vafadari, J., Pawson, C., Whitehouse, S., & Richards, M. (2024) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3980 · Cited by 7
Contested representations of benefits of urban nature in a densifying marginalised neighbourhood
Stålhammar, S., & Raymond, C. M. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2024.2311822 · Cited by 7
Adamson, L., Milligan, L. O., & Desai, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2024.2315547 · Cited by 7
Fox, J. (2024) · Community Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10597-024-01230-5 · Cited by 7
Regenerative and restorative pedagogy: The foundation of a new contract for cognitive justice
Damus, O. (2024) · Prospects · doi:10.1007/s11125-024-09683-y · Cited by 7
Kumalo, S. H. (2024) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhae028 · Cited by 7
Guha, M. (2024) · Contemporary South Asia · doi:10.1080/09584935.2024.2340590 · Cited by 7
Empathy as a means to understand people
Schramme, T. (2024) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/13869795.2024.2344975 · Cited by 7
Buddhism Between Religion and Philosophy
Stepien, R. K. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197771303.001.0001 · Cited by 7
Clashing epistemologies and contrasting injustice: an Aotearoa/ New Zealand case
McEntee, M., Harvey, M., & Medvecky, F. (2024) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.23040401 · Cited by 7
Xu, C. L. (2024) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01272-4 · Cited by 7
A pedagogy of being: Humanising learning environments in the South African tertiary sector
Kelland, L., Lembethe, N., Maponya, M., & Tabensky, P. (2024) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2024.7.s1.7 · Cited by 7
Social stereotypes affect imprecision resolution across different tasks
Beltrama, A., & Schwarz, F. (2024) · Semantics and Pragmatics · doi:10.3765/sp.17.10 · Cited by 7
Herberg, J., Luh, V., & Renn, O. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103683 · Cited by 7
Holliman, R. E., Ludhra, G., Warren, C., Khatwa, A., Araya, Y., Smith, K., Ansine, J., & Badger, M. P. S. (2024) · Earth Science Systems and Society · doi:10.3389/esss.2024.10119 · Cited by 7
Castañeda, P. H. M. (2024) · childhood & philosophy · doi:10.12957/childphilo.2024.80549 · Cited by 8
Institutional Epistemic Isolation in Psychiatric Healthcare
Spencer, L. J. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2403620 · Cited by 7
Aveling, E., Caldas, B. D. N., Sabaine, B., Portela, M. C., Soares, L., & Cornish, F. (2024) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017017 · Cited by 7
Evans, C., Deljavan, S., Zimmermann, K., Allen, K., Moghimi, E., & Canning, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1509946 · Cited by 7
Transforming Transitions: The Energy Futures of Community-Driven Design
Trueworthy, A., Dupont, B., & Grear, M. E. (2024) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2025.122470 · Cited by 8
The Decolonial Turn in Forensic Anthropology
Go, M. C. (2025) · American Journal of Biological Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.70003 · Cited by 9
5E Mental Health? Notes on an emerging style of thought
Rose, N. (2025) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/13634615251327862 · Cited by 7
Sippel, C. S., & Jiménez, M. U. (2025) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2025.2527813 · Cited by 9
Ethical Issues and Recommendations in Psychedelic Research and Practice: A Scoping Review
Brittain, N., Higgins, N., Barber, M., Choi, W., Carter, A., & Gardner, J. (2025) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-025-10454-3 · Cited by 8
Kershner, R., & Hargreaves, L. M. (2012) · Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/02607476.2012.668332 · Cited by 7
The Ethics of Good Communication in a Complex Research Partnership
Sodeke, S. O., Turner, T., & Tarver, W. L. (2010) · Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved · doi:10.1353/hpu.0.0356 · Cited by 7
Nudging for health and the predicament of agency: The relational ecology of autonomy and care.
Jennings, B., Wertz, F. J., & Morrissey, M. B. Q. (2016) · Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1037/teo0000041 · Cited by 7
Boddington, P. (2016) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33525-4_13 · Cited by 7
Proceduralism and the epistemic dilemma of Supreme Courts
Liveriero, F., & Santoro, D. (2017) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1317872 · Cited by 7
Bioethics and Biopolitics: Presents and Futures of Reproduction
Camporesi, S. (2017) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-017-9787-8 · Cited by 7
The word of a reluctant convert
DiPaolo, J. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-02042-3 · Cited by 7
Curriculum Decolonisation and Revisionist Pedagogy of African Customary Law
Diala, A. (2019) · Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad · doi:10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4976 · Cited by 7
Racism and Epistemologies of Ignorance: Framing the French Case
Bessone, M. (2020) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-020-10112-0 · Cited by 7
History of Philosophy and the Reflective Society
Pozzo, R. (2021) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110709292 · Cited by 7
The Lived Experience and Legacy of Pragmatics for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children
Young, A. M., Szarkowski, A., Ferguson‐Coleman, E., Freeman, D., Lindow-Davies, C., Davies, R., Hopkins, K., Noon, I., Rogers, K., Russell, J. M., et al. (2020) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2020-0242k · Cited by 7
Harnessing Indigenous Knowledge through Community Involvement in Public Libraries in South Africa
Mhlongo, M. (2020) · Libri · doi:10.1515/libri-2019-0194 · Cited by 7
Deception-Based Hermeneutical Injustice
Luzzi, F. (2021) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2021.7 · Cited by 7
Alethic Rights: Preliminaries of an Inquiry into the Power of Truth
D’Agostini, F. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.1919236 · Cited by 7
A systematic review of policy and clinical guidelines on positive risk management
Just, D., Tai, S., & Palmier‐Claus, J. E. (2021) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638237.2021.1922643 · Cited by 7
Fuentes, C. A., Goñi, J., & Miranda, C. (2021) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625211020474 · Cited by 8
Archives, Epistemic Injustice and Knowing the Past
Landström, K. (2021) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2021.1961004 · Cited by 7
Shame, Vulnerability, and Change
Hu, J. I. (2021) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2021.21 · Cited by 7
Remembrance and Denial of Genocide: On the Interrelations of Testimonial and Hermeneutical Injustice
Altanian, M. (2021) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2021.1997397 · Cited by 7
Our Epistemic Duties in Scenarios of Vaccine Mistrust
Terzian, G., & Corbalán, M. I. (2021) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2021.1997399 · Cited by 7
Epistemic Blame and the New Evil Demon Problem
Ballarini, C. (2022) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-021-01774-2 · Cited by 7
Rose, S. (2022) · UCL Press eBooks · doi:10.14324/111.9781800081772 · Cited by 7
Schumacher, P. B. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.25 · Cited by 7
Kizel, A. (2020) · Academia – ein Verlag in der Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783896658647-143 · Cited by 7
Making it precise—Imprecision and underdetermination in linguistic communication
Drożdżowicz, A. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03544-x · Cited by 7
Demystifying the Deep Self View
Gorman, A. (2022) · Journal of Moral Philosophy · doi:10.1163/17455243-20223564 · Cited by 8
Ramachandran, A., Mouat, I. C., & Öberg, G. (2022) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21768 · Cited by 8
Social critique and transformation: Revising Habermas’s colonisation thesis
Kreide, R. (2022) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/13684310221133029 · Cited by 7
Wrongful Discrimination Without Equal, Basic Moral Status
Lippert‐Rasmussen, K. (2022) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-022-10343-3 · Cited by 7
Defining Disability: Creating a Monster?
Espinoza, M., & Tenorio, A. S. (2022) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhac019 · Cited by 7
Access denied: epistemic obstruction and the distribution of knowledge
Battaly, H. D. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-04007-z · Cited by 7
On the Use of YouTube, Digital Games, Argument Maps, and Digital Feedback in Teaching Philosophy
Bohlmann, M., Lanius, D., Maisenhölder, P., Moser, T., Noller, J. U., & Schwartz, M. (2023) · Journal of Didactics of Philosophy · doi:10.46586/jdph.2023.9863 · Cited by 7
Zavros-Orr, A. (2021) · Psychology of Sexualities Review · doi:10.53841/bpssex.2021.12.1.34 · Cited by 7
The self-work of planetary justice
Bendik‐Keymer, J. D. (2023) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2023.2180907 · Cited by 7
Pirhonen, J., Vähäkangas, A. M., & Saarelainen, S.-M. K. (2023) · Journal of Ageing and Longevity · doi:10.3390/jal3010008 · Cited by 7
Holly, J., & Lee, W. C. (2023) · Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2023044514 · Cited by 7
From gender segregation to epistemic segregation: a case study of the school system in Iran
Heidarifar, S. (2023) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhad068 · Cited by 7
Spiritual Intelligence: A Vision for Formation in Religious Education
Nguyen, T. A. H. (2023) · Religious Education · doi:10.1080/00344087.2023.2264554 · Cited by 7
The Ethics of Surveillance in Times of Emergency
Macnish, K., & Henschke, A. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192864918.001.0001 · Cited by 7
Stahl, T. (2023) · Global Discourse · doi:10.1332/20437897y2023d000000025 · Cited by 7
Epistemic Arguments for a Democratic Right to Silence
Degerman, D., & Bellazzi, F. (2024) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqad128 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
