The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,501–2,600 of 12,257
Lappé, M. D., Fahey, F. F., & Hein, R. J. (2022) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439221137028 · Cited by 11
Moberg, J., & Schön, U. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1054028 · Cited by 10
Toward Epistemically-Just Research: A Methodologies Framework
McIntosh, S., & Wilder, R. (2022) · Culture Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies · doi:10.1177/15327086221138981 · Cited by 10
Virtue Signalling to Signal Trustworthiness, Avoid Distrust, and Scaffold Self-Trust
Tuckwell, W. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2150989 · Cited by 10
For a political conception of multicultural citizenship
Gianni, M. (2023) · Ethnicities · doi:10.1177/14687968221149741 · Cited by 10
Experiences of Silence in Mood Disorders
Degerman, D. (2023) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00652-5 · Cited by 10
Atkin, K. M., Berghs, M. J., & Chattoo, S. (2023) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12515 · Cited by 10
Flowerree, A. K. (2023) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2022.2157032 · Cited by 10
Conceptualising the emancipatory potential of populism: A typology and analysis
Beresford, A., Beardsworth, N., Findlay, K., & Alger, S. (2023) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102808 · Cited by 8
Against Intellectual Autonomy: Social Animals Need Social Virtues
Levy, N. L. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2177521 · Cited by 10
Museus, S. D. (2023) · Higher education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06696-2_5 · Cited by 11
Epistemic Health, Epistemic Immunity and Epistemic Inoculation
Piovarchy, A., & Siskind, S. (2023) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-023-01993-9 · Cited by 10
Lopes, M., & Messas, G. P. (2023) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-023-09921-2 · Cited by 10
Cognitive (In)justice and Decoloniality in Amitav Ghosh’s The Nutmeg’s Curse
Karmakar, G., & Chetty, R. (2023) · Journal of Human Values · doi:10.1177/09716858231185614 · Cited by 10
Bonotti, M., & Willoughby, L. (2023) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12649 · Cited by 10
Yeon, J., Smith, M. J., Youngman, T., & Patin, B. J. H. (2023) · The International Journal of Information Diversity & Inclusion (IJIDI) · doi:10.33137/ijidi.v7i1/2.39251 · Cited by 10
The Cultural Evolution of Science
Wu, J., O’Connor, C., & Smaldino, P. E. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198869252.013.78 · Cited by 11
Wemrell, M., & Gunnarsson, L. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291966 · Cited by 10
Anti‐Black racism: Gaining insight into the experiences of Black nurses in Canada
Prendergast, N., Boakye, P. N., Bailey, A., Igwenagu, H., & Burnett‐Ffrench, T. (2023) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.12604 · Cited by 10
Why Political Philosophy Should Be Robust
Kirshner, A. S., & Spinner‐Halev, J. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055423000898 · Cited by 10
Falbo, A., & LaCroix, T. (2022) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2022.3/4.14264 · Cited by 13
The Epistemic Injustice of Genocide Denialism
Altanian, M. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003202158 · Cited by 10
Wand, T., Isobel, S., & Kemp, H. (2024) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.13318 · Cited by 10
Is Public Ignorance a Problem? An Epistemic Defense of Really Existing Democracies
Trantidis, A., & Cowen, N. (2024) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129241244715 · Cited by 11
Giving Voice through Reparative Storytelling: Correcting Racist Epistemic Injustices in LIS
Smith, M. A. B., & Patin, B. J. H. (2024) · The Library Quarterly · doi:10.1086/731841 · Cited by 10
(Epistemic) Injustice and Resistance in Canadian Research Ethics Governance
Clairmont, S., Doerksen, E., Gunay, A. E., & Friesen, P. (2025) · Ethics & Human Research · doi:10.1002/eahr.60004 · Cited by 10
Kizel, A. (2016) · Journal of Philosophy in Schools · doi:10.21913/jps.v3i1.1298 · Cited by 10
Intellectual Humility and Empathy by Analogy
Johnson, C. R. (2017) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-017-9453-0 · Cited by 10
Who is afraid of scientific imperialism?
Fumagalli, R. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1411-2 · Cited by 10
The Logic of Deferral: Educational Aims and Intellectual Disability
Taylor, A. (2017) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-017-9595-y · Cited by 10
Kertomusten eettinen potentiaali ja vaarat: kuusi mittapuuta
Meretoja, H. (2018) · AVAIN - Kirjallisuudentutkimuksen aikakauslehti · doi:10.30665/av.70005 · Cited by 17
Gendering Islamophobia to better understand immigration laws
Dauvergne, C. (2019) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2018.1561066 · Cited by 10
Disentangling Evidence and Preference in Patient-Clinician Concordance Discussions
Rand, L. Z., & Berger, Z. D. (2019) · The AMA Journal of Ethic · doi:10.1001/amajethics.2019.505 · Cited by 10
Cultural Pluralism and Epistemic Injustice
Collste, G. (2019) · Journal of Nationalism Memory & Language Politics · doi:10.2478/jnmlp-2019-0008 · Cited by 10
Kennelly, J. (2019) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2019.1650724 · Cited by 10
Promoting Perspective Transformation in Post-Totalitarian Societies
Kloubert, T. (2019) · Journal of Transformative Education · doi:10.1177/1541344619876274 · Cited by 10
Climate Science Denial as Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance
Mason, S. E. (2020) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2020.1739167 · Cited by 12
Interventions Against Child Abuse and Violence Against Women
Hagemann‐White, C., Kelly, L., & Meysen, T. (2019) · Verlag Barbara Budrich eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvr7fcsw · Cited by 11
The Ethics of Belief and Beyond
(2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429284977 · Cited by 11
The Epistemic Significance of #MeToo
Freedman, K. L. (2020) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2020.2.8030 · Cited by 10
Organizing the Caring Society: Toward a Care Ethical Perspective on Institutions
Urban, P. (2020) · International political theory · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41437-5_14 · Cited by 10
The value of doing philosophy in mental health contexts
Stammers, S., & Pulvermacher, R. (2020) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-020-09961-4 · Cited by 10
Neuroanthropological Perspectives on Culture, Mind, and Brain
Lende, D. H., & Downey, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.014 · Cited by 10
Who’s to Blame? Hermeneutical Misfire, Forward-Looking Responsibility, and Collective Accountability
Hänel, H. C. (2020) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2020.1839591 · Cited by 10
Marovah, T., & Mkwananzi, F. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56197-0_9 · Cited by 10
Walwyn, D. R., & Combrinck, C. (2021) · Industry and Higher Education · doi:10.1177/0950422220987088 · Cited by 10
Bad Faith, Bad Politics, and Bad Consequences: The Epistemic Harms of Online Deceit
MacKenzie, A., & Bhatt, I. (2021) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72154-1_1 · Cited by 10
Community Readiness for Local COVID-19 Management
Pozzo, R., & Virgili, V. (2021) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2020.602200 · Cited by 10
Virtues for agents in directed social networks
Alfano, M. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03169-6 · Cited by 10
Weaponized testimonial injustice
Almagro, M., Osorio, J., & Fernández, N. V. (2021) · Las Torres de Lucca International Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.5209/ltdl.76461 · Cited by 10
Remaking Communities and Adult Learning
Evans, R., Kurantowicz, E., & Lucio-Villegas, E. (2022) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004518032 · Cited by 10
Doolan‐Noble, F., Noller, G., Jaye, C., & Bryan, M. A. (2023) · New Zealand Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1080/00480169.2023.2174202 · Cited by 10
A Socio‐epistemological Framework for Scientific Publishing
Simon, J. (2010) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2010.498930 · Cited by 10
Explanatory Genealogies and Historical Testimony
Jardine, N. (2008) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/e1742360008000300 · Cited by 10
Argumentum ad Verecundiam: New Gender-based Criteria for Appeals to Authority
Ciurria, M., & Tamimi, K. A. (2014) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-014-9328-0 · Cited by 10
Nana, G. (2013) · Research in Comparative and International Education · doi:10.2304/rcie.2013.8.4.468 · Cited by 12
THE ROLE OF EPISTEMIC VIRTUE IN THE REALIZATION OF BASIC GOODS
Baril, A. (2016) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2016.19 · Cited by 10
Goldberg, S. C. (2015) · American Philosophical Quarterly · Cited by 10
‘Life is Not Simply Fact’: Aesthetics, Atmosphere and the Neoliberal University
van Marle, K. (2018) · Law and Critique · doi:10.1007/s10978-018-9232-0 · Cited by 10
Powerful objects, difficult dialogues: mobilizing archaeological exhibits for civic engagement
Clark, B. J., & Amati, A. (2018) · International Journal of Heritage Studies · doi:10.1080/13527258.2018.1530290 · Cited by 10
Beyond Plausibility Checks: A Case for Moral Doubt in Review Processes of Animal Experimentation
Cojocaru, M., & von Gall, P. (2019) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004391192_013 · Cited by 10
An Ecological Model for Conceptual Competence in Psychiatric Diagnosis
Karter, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022167819852488 · Cited by 17
Engaging Vulnerabilities: An Outline for a Responsive and Responsible Theory
Mihai, M. (2019) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12316 · Cited by 11
Creating Space for Feminist Ethics in Medical School
Campelia, G. D., & Feinsinger, A. (2020) · HEC Forum · doi:10.1007/s10730-020-09403-x · Cited by 10
Baril, A., Silverman, M., Gauthier, M.-C., & Lévesque, M. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société · doi:10.1017/cls.2020.13 · Cited by 10
Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement
Castro, D. (2021) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v41i2.5580 · Cited by 10
Valences of Interdisciplinarity: Theory, Practice, Pedagogy
Foshay, E. B. R. (2012) · Athabasca University Press eBooks · doi:10.15215/aupress/9781926836461.01 · Cited by 10
Spinoza, Feminism and Privacy: Exploring an Immanent Ethics of Privacy
Richardson, J. (2014) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-014-9271-3 · Cited by 11
Solidarity as environmental justice in brownfields remediation
Kolers, A. (2017) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2017.1398857 · Cited by 10
Mathematical cognition and enculturation: introduction to the Synthese special issue
Pantsar, M. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02478-1 · Cited by 10
Joy, M. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118499528.ch9 · Cited by 10
Postdigital Epistemology of Ignorance
MacKenzie, A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_8-1 · Cited by 10
Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction
Räisä, T., & Stocchetti, M. (2024) · Journal of Digital Social Research · doi:10.33621/jdsr.v6i3.33235 · Cited by 12
A Network Approach to Public Trust in Generative AI
McIntyre, A., Conover, L., & Russo, F. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00974-6 · Cited by 9
Narrating and Remembrance in the Face of Abuse in the Church
Heyder, R. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13040348 · Cited by 9
Please Keep Your Charity out of My Agency
McGrath, S. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192868886.003.0012 · Cited by 9
Bergen, J. P., & Robaey, Z. (2022) · Philosophy of engineering and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08424-9_9 · Cited by 9
* ‘Det her skal alle da opleve’
Danbolt, M., & Myong, L. (2018) · Peripeti · doi:10.7146/peri.v15i29/30.109631 · Cited by 9
When God Hurts: The Rhetoric of Religious Trauma as Epistemic Pain
Ramler, M. E. (2023) · Rhetoric Society Quarterly · doi:10.1080/02773945.2022.2129755 · Cited by 9
Speaking with Us, Not for Us: Neurodiversity, Theology and Justice
Jacobs, N. L. (2023) · Journal of Disability & Religion · doi:10.1080/23312521.2023.2249448 · Cited by 9
Kierkegaard, “the Public”, and the Vices of Virtue-Signaling: The Dangers of Social Comparison
Lippitt, J. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14111370 · Cited by 9
The #metoo Movement in India: Emotions and (in)justice in feminist responses
Gangoli, G. (2023) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-023-09540-x · Cited by 9
Why Language Matters in Chronic Pain: The Example of Pain Catastrophizing
Connoy, L., & Webster, F. (2023) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2023.12.012 · Cited by 9
“That's a Third Rail Issue” Using LGBTQ + Children's Literature as Backup to Counter Pushback
Wargo, J. M., Giunco, K., & Smith, K. (2024) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1002/trtr.2278 · Cited by 9
Rocelli, M., Aquili, L., Giovanazzi, P., Puecher, A., Goglio, M. M., & Faccio, E. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13999 · Cited by 9
How can Africa’s urban majority reframe sustainability agendas?
Ali, N. A., Royo, M. G., Cupers, K., Ndege, G. A., Clause, J. C., & Bennett, J. (2024) · Environment and Urbanization · doi:10.1177/09562478241230498 · Cited by 9
Responsive and responsible methodologies. Emplacing care with collaborative filmmaking
Jacobs, J., & Salimbeni, A. (2024) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.12684 · Cited by 9
Michael, K., & Ahlborg, H. (2024) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-024-01539-1 · Cited by 9
Owens, R., Walker, J., & Bradbury-Leather, V. (2024) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2024.2348727 · Cited by 9
The Role of Representation in Visual Perception: An Introduction
Brogaard, B. “., & French, R. (2024) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-57353-8_1 · Cited by 9
Epistemic Injustices in Disaster Theory and Management
Álvarez, A. G. (2024) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies9040095 · Cited by 10
Xu, W. J. (2024) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2383950 · Cited by 9
An Introduction to Research Methods and Ethics in Neurodiversity Studies
Jackson‐Perry, D., & Rosqvist, H. B. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66127-3_1 · Cited by 10
Community-Driven Research with People Who Use Drugs: A Virtual Project During Multiple Epidemics
Brothers, S., Simon, C., & Vincent, L. (2024) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.1177/00811750241281063 · Cited by 13
O’Doherty, L., Carter, G., sleath, E., Brown, K., Brown, S., Lutman, E., Jackson, L., Heron, J., Kalsi, P., Ladeinde, O. C., et al. (2023) · Health and Social Care Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/ctgf3870 · Cited by 11
Goyanes, M., Herrero, E., & de‐Marcos, L. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0312731 · Cited by 11
Decolonizing the integration discourse through embedded narratives
Ghorashi, H. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1080/01419870.2024.2438292 · Cited by 12
Disorder or distress? The hermeneutical injustices of overdiagnosis within psychiatry
Nielsen, T. H. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04902-7 · Cited by 9
Lord, E. J., & Sareen, S. (2025) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104245 · Cited by 9
Uddin, K. A. (2025) · Development in Practice · doi:10.1080/09614524.2025.2474045 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
