The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,301–3,400 of 12,257
Social criticism, dissonance, and progress: A socio-epistemic approach
Casuso, G. (2022) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537211040571 · Cited by 6
Lasida, E., Renault, M., de Laat, M., & Tardieu, B. (2022) · Participations · doi:10.3917/parti.032.0093 · Cited by 6
Lindberg, A., Lundberg, A., Rundqvist, E., & Häythiö, S. (2022) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-022-09495-5 · Cited by 6
Communities of Practice in Crop Diversity Management: From Data to Collaborative Governance
Louafi, S., Thomas, M., Jankowski, F., Leclerc, C., Barnaud, A., Baufume, S., Guichardaz, A., Joly, H. I., Labeyrie, V., Leclercq, M., et al. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13276-6_14 · Cited by 8
Stewart, E. (2022) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2144190 · Cited by 6
Hewer, R. (2022) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639221140796 · Cited by 7
Malm, C., Jönson, H., Andersson, S. K., & Hanson, E. J. (2022) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-022-00946-8 · Cited by 6
Briand, C., de Medeiros, J. M., Vallée, C., Luconi, F., Vachon, B., Monthuy‐Blanc, J., Drolet, M.-J., & Montminy, S. (2023) · Journal of Recovery in Mental Health · doi:10.33137/jrmh.v6i1.38706 · Cited by 6
Human rights violations in normalizing procedures on intersex children
Leivas, P. G. C., Schiavon, A. D. A., Resadori, A. H., Vanin, A. A., Almeida, A. D. N., & Machado, P. S. (2023) · Cadernos de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/0102-311xen066322 · Cited by 6
The Genesis of Iconographic Exegesis
Cardoso, S. K. (2023) · Currents in Biblical Research · doi:10.1177/1476993x221147925 · Cited by 6
Kreutz, A. (2023) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2023.2185907 · Cited by 6
Emotions in knowledge production
Candiotto, L. (2023) · Interdisciplinary Science Reviews · doi:10.1080/03080188.2023.2179722 · Cited by 10
¿Es útil el concepto de injusticia epistémica para los procedimientos penales?
Correa, R. C., & Rimoldi, F. (2023) · Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal · doi:10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.789 · Cited by 6
Justified Epistemic Exclusions in Mathematics
Rittberg, C. J. (2023) · Philosophia Mathematica · doi:10.1093/philmat/nkad008 · Cited by 6
Lund, R. (2023) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2023.2215067 · Cited by 6
Transforming Identities in Contemporary Europe
Engebretsen, E. L., & Liinason, M. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003245155 · Cited by 7
Socialising epistemic risk: On the risks of epistemic injustice
Mitova, V. (2023) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12640 · Cited by 6
Mercer, L. E., & Moses, T. (2023) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/15077.001.0001 · Cited by 6
Hultqvist, S., Hanson, E. J., Jönson, H., Slaug, B., & Iwarsson, S. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00493-8 · Cited by 6
How Does Stalking Wrong the Victim?
Brake, E. (2023) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/725815 · Cited by 6
The Arts and Individual and Collective Agency: A Brazilian Favela Case Study
Moayerian, N., Poets, D., Stephenson, M. O., Jr., & Cathy, G. (2023) · Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies · doi:10.29333/ejecs/1407 · Cited by 6
21. Critical data literacies for good
Kühn, C., Pete, J., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2023) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0363.21 · Cited by 6
Haker, H. (2023) · De Ethica A Journal of Philosophical Theological and Applied Ethics · doi:10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.23737 · Cited by 6
Putting “Epistemic Injustice” to Work in Bioethics: Beyond Nonmaleficence
Wallaert, S., & Segers, S. (2023) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-023-10314-y · Cited by 6
Sadowski, M. M., Rego, R. M., & Carmo, A. (2024) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-023-10088-x · Cited by 6
Berkhout, S., Hashmi, S. S., & Pikula, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Global Women s Health · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1350294 · Cited by 6
Cultural Awareness of Intersex in Malta: Invisibility, Stigma and Epistemic Injustice
Tabone, C. B., Garland, F., & Travis, M. (2024) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci13030150 · Cited by 6
Hauswald, R. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-68750-5 · Cited by 6
Viaña, J. N. M. (2024) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2024.2308144 · Cited by 6
Lantela, P. (2024) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877241257211 · Cited by 7
Sandré, T., Vanderlinden, J., Gherardi, J.-M., Zhu, Z., & Wickson, F. (2024) · NAMMCO Scientific Publications · doi:10.7557/3.7371 · Cited by 6
Political Epistemology without Apologies
Vogelmann, F. (2024) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.13028 · Cited by 10
Sundbäck, L. (2024) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2024.2404224 · Cited by 6
Habermas, Virtue Epistemology, and Religious Justifications in the Public Sphere
Epstein, J. (2013) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12035 · Cited by 6
PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND THE PROBLEM OF INTELLECTUAL DEFERENCE
Ahlstrom‐Vij, K. (2014) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2014.20 · Cited by 6
Bowell, T. (2015) · Women's Studies Journal · Cited by 6
Resistant Imaginations and Radical Solidarity
Medina, J. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.003.0006 · Cited by 6
Philosophy with Children: An Imaginative Democratic Practice
Haynes, J. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-41291-1_18 · Cited by 6
Besch, T. M. (2018) · Dialogue · doi:10.1017/s0012217318000495 · Cited by 6
Schaub, J. (2018) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12403 · Cited by 6
Reflecting on Heteronormativity and Family Diversity: Analysis of an After-School Club
Lo, R. S. (2018) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2018.1536920 · Cited by 6
What—If Anything—Sets Limits to the Clinical Ethics Consultant's "Expertise"?
Scofield, G. R. (2018) · Perspectives in biology and medicine · doi:10.1353/pbm.2018.0068 · Cited by 6
Representation of low and middle income countries in traumatic stress journals from 2006 to 2015
Robson, B., Chang, L., & Kaminer, D. (2019) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0081246319831605 · Cited by 8
Changing Family Identity Through the Quinceañera Ritual
Verdín, A., & Camacho, J. (2019) · Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1177/0739986319837266 · Cited by 6
Heinz Kimmerle’s intercultural philosophy and the quest for epistemic justice
Schepen, R., & Graneß, A. (2019) · The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa · doi:10.4102/td.v15i1.554 · Cited by 6
Paternalism and the Justification of Education
Giesinger, J. (2020) · Philosophical Inquiry in Education · doi:10.7202/1071420ar · Cited by 6
Rubio‐Fernández, P. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.23 · Cited by 6
The Inevitability of Aiming for Virtue
Madva, A. (2019) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 6
Group assertion and group silencing
Townsend, L. (2019) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2019.08.003 · Cited by 6
Recognition and social freedom
McQueen, P. (2019) · European Journal of Political Theory · doi:10.1177/1474885119871856 · Cited by 6
Art beyond Morality and Metaphysics: Late Joseon Korean Aesthetics
Kim, H. H. (2019) · Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.1111/jaac.12682 · Cited by 6
Shallish, L., Rao, S., & Pancsofar, N. (2019) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131725.2020.1674437 · Cited by 9
The Burden of Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence, Experience, and Persuasion
Gribaldo, A. M. M. (2019) · PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review · doi:10.1111/plar.12309 · Cited by 6
Of Kids and Unicorns: How Rational Is Children's Trust in Testimonial Knowledge?
Lascaux, A. (2020) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12819 · Cited by 6
Testing pragmatic genealogy in political theory: The curious case of John Rawls
Testini, F. (2020) · European Journal of Political Theory · doi:10.1177/1474885120909777 · Cited by 6
The Chinese School, Global Production of Knowledge, and Contentious Politics in the Disciplinary IR
Zhang, Y. (2020) · All Azimuth A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace · doi:10.20991/allazimuth.725252 · Cited by 6
Using Art to Resist Epistemic Injustice
Dalaqua, G. H. (2020) · Contention · doi:10.3167/cont.2020.080107 · Cited by 6
Arias-Cepeda, C. (2020) · GiST Education and Learning Research Journal · doi:10.26817/16925777.713 · Cited by 6
Gaudet, S. (2021) · SociologieS · doi:10.4000/sociologies.15416 · Cited by 6
Why Ethics Matter in Psychotherapy
Trachsel, M., Gaab, J., Tekin, Ş., Biller‐Andorno, N., & Sadler, J. Z. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198817338.013.2 · Cited by 6
A philosophy of birth: if you want to change the world, change the conversation
Villarmea, S. (2021) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.13333.1 · Cited by 6
Ethical considerations of urban ecological design and planning experiments
Pataki, D. E., Santana, C. G., Hinners, S. J., Felson, A. J., & Engebretson, J. M. (2021) · Plants People Planet · doi:10.1002/ppp3.10204 · Cited by 6
THE (VIRTUE) EPISTEMOLOGY OF POLITICAL IGNORANCE
Boult, C. (2021) · American Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/48616057 · Cited by 7
Practical Identity and Duties of Love
Brogaard, B. “. (2021) · Disputatio · doi:10.2478/disp-2021-0002 · Cited by 6
Galvaan, R., & van der Merwe, T. R. (2021) · South African Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.17159/2310-3833/2021/vol51n2a13 · Cited by 6
Eitzel, M. V. (2021) · Research Ideas and Outcomes · doi:10.3897/rio.7.e71553 · Cited by 8
Saldaña, L. P. (2021) · Association of Mexican American Educators Journal · doi:10.24974/amae.15.2.421 · Cited by 6
Luongo, N. M. (2021) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103450 · Cited by 7
Rereading Rape in the Critical Canon
Spampinato, E. A. (2021) · State University of New York Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/10407391-9309373 · Cited by 7
Investigating gender in a world of gender consciousness
Jaunait, A. (2022) · Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique · doi:10.1177/07591063211061759 · Cited by 10
The use of blind-portrait: an opportunity to de-essentialise intercultural, educational research
Huang, Z. M. (2022) · Language and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/14708477.2022.2041653 · Cited by 6
The Supremacy of Whiteness in Social Work Ethics
Weinberg, M. (2022) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2022.2058579 · Cited by 6
Allen, A., Cociña, C., & Wesely, J. (2020) · Radical Housing Journal · doi:10.54825/zkpz4893 · Cited by 6
De quoi le zombie est-il le signe, et pourquoi ?
Coquelin, L., & Saemmer, A. (2022) · Communication & langages · doi:10.3917/comla1.212.0033 · Cited by 6
Examining the psychology of practitioners, institutions and structures:
Hunt, J. (2022) · Outlines Critical Practice Studies · doi:10.7146/ocps.v23i1.129191 · Cited by 6
How a Humbler Science Becomes a Better Science
Lumbreras, S., Tierno, L. G., & Oviedo, L. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14010064 · Cited by 7
Kumalo, S. H. (2022) · Theoria · doi:10.3167/th.2022.6917301 · Cited by 6
Hearing the quiet voices: Listening as democratic action in a Norwegian neighborhood
Connor, J. (2023) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404522000677 · Cited by 6
Apprendre en inter-professionnalité à partir de l’expérience de patients-mentors
Gross, O., Azogui‐Lévy, S., Bourdon, O., Foucaut, A.-M., Margat, A., Lartigue, C., Lassalle, S., Ruelle, Y., Wagner, A., & Gagnayre, R. (2023) · Pédagogie médicale · doi:10.1051/pmed/2022034 · Cited by 6
Palimetaki, F., Woutersen, K., & Pot, A. M. (2023) · BMJ Open Quality · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001897 · Cited by 6
Cassam, Q. (2023) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12624 · Cited by 6
Liberatory Knowledge and Just Social Practices
Haslanger, S. (2013) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 6
Museums, Ethics and Truth: Why Museums' Collecting Policies Must Face up to the Problem of Testimony
Tonner, P. (2016) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246116000126 · Cited by 6
Epistemic Injustice and Resistance in the Chiapas Highlands: The Zapatista Case
Gallegos, S. A., & Quinn, C. (2017) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12315 · Cited by 6
“They brought you back to the fact you’re not the same”: Sense of self after traumatic brain injury
Mäkelä, P. (2017) · Subjectivity · doi:10.1057/s41286-017-0036-8 · Cited by 6
Liminality in practice: A case study in life sciences research
Clinch, M., Shaw, S. E., Ashcroft, R. E., & Swinglehurst, D. (2018) · BioSocieties · doi:10.1057/s41292-018-0128-x · Cited by 6
Disability and Citizenship in the Global South in a Post-truth Era
Swartz, L. M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74675-3_5 · Cited by 6
Centralizing queer in Finnish art education
Suominen, A., Pusa, T., Raudaskoski, A., & Haggrén, L. (2019) · Policy Futures in Education · doi:10.1177/1478210319837836 · Cited by 6
Who Knows What About Gorillas? Indigenous Knowledge, Global Justice, and Human-Gorilla Relations
Amir, A. (2019) · doi:10.26209/ik560158 · Cited by 6
Vulnerability and the Consenting Subject: Reimagining Informed Consent in Embryo Donation
Hewer, R. (2019) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-019-09414-1 · Cited by 6
Understanding child labor in Myanmar
Kennedy, A. G. (2019) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449626.2019.1690551 · Cited by 6
Ávila, F. E. C. (2019) · Ideas y Valores · doi:10.15446/ideasyvalores.v68n5supl.80664 · Cited by 6
Alterity, Analectics, and the Challenges of Epistemic Decolonization
Kim, D. H. (2019) · The Southern Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/sjp.12346 · Cited by 6
Shame, Vulnerability and Philosophical Thinking
Þorgeirsdóttir, S. (2020) · Sophia · doi:10.1007/s11841-020-00773-w · Cited by 8
Making effective participatory environmental health science through collaborative data analysis
Allen, B. L. (2020) · Manchester University Press eBooks · doi:10.7765/9781526137005.00012 · Cited by 6
Baril, A. (2020) · Frontières · doi:10.7202/1070339ar · Cited by 8
Gender in Audio-visual Advertisements in Ghana: A Semiotics Analysis
Adzovie, D. E., Adzovie, R. H., & Boateng, E. (2019) · Proceedings of The World Conference on Social Sciences · doi:10.33422/worldcss.2019.09.542 · Cited by 6
Willful Ignorance as Formative Epistemic Injustice
Nikolaidis, A. C. (2021) · doi:10.47925/76.4.083 · Cited by 6
Radical epistemology, structural explanations, and epistemic weaponry
Pettigrew, R. (2021) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-021-01660-x · Cited by 7
Testimony and Engagement: On the Four Elements of Witnessing
van der Heiden, G. J., & Romanian Society for Phenomenology (2021) · Studia Phaenomenologica · doi:10.5840/studphaen2021212 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
