The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,601–2,700 of 12,257
Heras, A., & Gupta, J. (2025) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2025.100251 · Cited by 9
Menstrual pain and epistemic injustice
Mickiewicz, A. J. (2025) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-025-10266-7 · Cited by 9
Objectivity, standardization, and epistemic injustice in psychiatry
Ballesteros, V. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05016-4 · Cited by 9
Conceptualising Lived Experience in Mental Health Research: Problems, Insights and Implications
Samra, R. (2025) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.70039 · Cited by 9
Neiders, I., Mežinska, S., & van Haren, N. E. M. (2025) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-06949-3 · Cited by 10
Iwanaga, J., Takeda, S., Walocha, J. A., Ribatti, D., del Sol, M., Ravi, K. S., Moryś, J., Paulsen, F. P., Singh, V., Apaydın, N., et al. (2025) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.24293 · Cited by 9
Contested illness, contested identity: How women with fibromyalgia construct legitimacy online
Kerr, J. M., & DeMichelis, C. (2025) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118251 · Cited by 9
Psychological Effect of Medical Gaslighting on Female Patients: A Systematic Review
Dhillon, J. K. (2025) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/25jun646 · Cited by 9
A Proposed Framework for Considering “Inclusive Science Communication” in Theory and Practice
Collective, C. I. S. C. (2025) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470251344471 · Cited by 9
Addey, C. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009158893 · Cited by 9
A Free Comment Forum to Mitigate Epistemic Injustice in Academic Publication
da Silva, J. A. T., & Daly, T. P. (2025) · World Affairs · doi:10.1002/waf2.70012 · Cited by 9
Baeyaert, J. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101126 · Cited by 9
Soysal, N., Wilder, R., Copsey, O., & Milligan, L. O. (2025) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2025.2545537 · Cited by 9
Cautious optimism: public voices on medical AI and sociotechnical harm
Townsend, B., Hodge, J., Richardson, H., Călinescu, R., & Arvind, T. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1625747 · Cited by 9
Veldmeijer, L., & van Os, J. (2025) · Psychosis · doi:10.1080/17522439.2025.2560852 · Cited by 9
Palmer, D. A. (2025) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/17470161251388131 · Cited by 9
Sustaining diamond open access in Africa towards knowledge equity and community-driven publishing
Kwanya, T., & Ateka, A. (2026) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669251411317 · Cited by 9
Reflection, reflective practice and reflective knowledge in nursing: where are we?
Schutz, S. (2026) · Journal of research in nursing · doi:10.1177/17449871251407833 · Cited by 9
Où sont passé·e·s les coauteurs·trices ?
Sarna‐Wojcicki, D., Perret, M., Eitzel, M. V., & Fortmann, L. P. (2018) · Revue d anthropologie des connaissances · doi:10.3917/rac.039.0323 · Cited by 10
Dübgen, F., & Skupien, S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01995-2_6 · Cited by 10
An ethical obligation to ignore the unreliable
Holman, B. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02483-4 · Cited by 9
Sacramental Shame in Black Churches
Tobin, T. W., & Moon, D. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198848844.003.0007 · Cited by 9
Political Conviction and Epistemic Injustice
Case, S. (2020) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-020-00263-w · Cited by 9
Problems of conceptual amelioration: The question of rape myths
Hänel, H. C. (2020) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12381 · Cited by 9
Translating Knowledge of Sexual Configurations Theory via Instructional Videos
Beischel, W. J., Schudson, Z. C., Hoskin, R. A., Mao, J., Zielinski, A., & van Anders, S. M. (2020) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01797-6 · Cited by 9
Social Work, a Spiritual Kind of Work: Exploring the Experiences of Māori Social Workers
Fox, L. (2021) · Australian Social Work · doi:10.1080/0312407x.2020.1857807 · Cited by 9
Intersections of Environmental Justice and Sustainable Development
Atapattu, S. A., González, C. G., & Seck, S. L. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108555791.002 · Cited by 9
Feminism and Epistemic Injustice
Medina, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628925.013.32 · Cited by 9
Epistemic justice for the dead
Turner, S. (2021) · Journal of Classical Sociology · doi:10.1177/1468795x211022051 · Cited by 9
Álvarez, A. G. (2021) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2021.1997395 · Cited by 9
Linking perspectives: A role for poetry in philosophical inquiry
Simecek, K. (2022) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12544 · Cited by 9
Against Knowing: The Rhetorical Structure of Epistemic Violence
Graves, C. G., & Spencer, L. G. (2022) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/1041794x.2022.2101683 · Cited by 11
Macarthy, J. M., Koroma, B. M., Cociña, C., Butcher, S., & Frediani, A. A. (2022) · Environment and Urbanization · doi:10.1177/09562478221106611 · Cited by 9
Hermeneutical Injustice and Child Victims of Abuse
Lo, A. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2136506 · Cited by 9
Les usages de la recherche collaborative. Des défis et enjeux permanents
Artois, P., Moriau, J., & Wagener, M. (2022) · Les Politiques Sociales · doi:10.3917/lps.223.0004 · Cited by 9
WTF?! Covid-19, indignation, and the internet
Osler, L. (2023) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-023-09889-z · Cited by 9
Violações de direitos humanos nos procedimentos normalizadores em crianças intersexo
Leivas, P. G. C., Schiavon, A. D. A., Resadori, A. H., Vanin, A. A., Almeida, A. D. N., & Machado, P. S. (2023) · Cadernos de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/0102-311xpt066322 · Cited by 9
Social justice leadership: a tribute to Kadir Beycioglu
Abellán, C. M. A., & Murillo, F. J. (2023) · School Leadership and Management · doi:10.1080/13632434.2023.2187773 · Cited by 9
Lieu, J., Martínez-Reyes, A., Groome, P., Mangalagiu, D., Pearce, B. J., Witajewska-Baltvilka, B., & Møller, R.-E. D. (2023) · GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society · doi:10.14512/gaia.32.1.11 · Cited by 10
Mączka, K., Lis, A., & Iwińska, K. (2023) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103154 · Cited by 9
Epistemic rights violations and epistemic injustice
McGlynn, A. (2023) · Asian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s44204-023-00087-x · Cited by 9
Nonhuman Animals and Epistemic Injustice
Lopez, A. (2023) · Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy · doi:10.26556/jesp.v25i1.2201 · Cited by 12
Pillay, S. R. (2023) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593535231181759 · Cited by 11
Bublitz, C. (2023) · Criminal Law and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11572-023-09695-3 · Cited by 13
The provision of healthcare services to older LGBT adults in the Nordic countries: a scoping review
Jakobsen, M. D., Bromseth, J., Siverskog, A., & Krane, M. S. (2023) · Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care · doi:10.1080/02813432.2023.2242713 · Cited by 9
Prejuicios que silencian: Injusticia Testimonial y Muerte Hermenéutica
Manus, S. G. M. (2023) · Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios de Género de El Colegio de México · doi:10.24201/reg.v9i1.1026 · Cited by 9
Reconceptualising coproduction as activism together
McMellon, C., McCusker, P., Roesch‐Marsh, A., Hall, L., Bartlett, T., & McDermott, R. (2023) · Children & Society · doi:10.1111/chso.12788 · Cited by 9
Dekolonialisierung des Wissens
Abay, R. A. (2023) · Gesellschaft der Unterschiede · doi:10.1515/9783839470534 · Cited by 14
Inge, E., Pérez‐Aronsson, A., Ibrahim, K., Aljeshy, R., Sarkadi, A., & Warner, G. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13926 · Cited by 9
Epistemic (In)justice: Whose voices count? Listening to migrants and students
Carr, A., Alchazidu, A., BOOTH, W. A., Constanzo, P., Bonilla, G., Tineo, P., & Chudova, K. (2023) · Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education · doi:10.32674/jcihe.v15i5.5811 · Cited by 12
Learning to Listen: Cultivating Pre-Service Teachers’ Attunement to Student Thinking
Davidson, S. G., Jaber, L. Z., & Metcalf, A. (2024) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1046560x.2024.2302694 · Cited by 9
Expanding the quality of life paradigm: Contributions from the field of disability studies
Edwards, M., & Schippers, A. P. (2024) · Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jppi.12483 · Cited by 11
Community Energy and Sustainable Energy Transitions
Broto, V. C. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-57938-7 · Cited by 10
What Children Know: Children, Climate Change, and Epistemic Injustice
Mercer, J. A. (2024) · Pastoral Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11089-024-01146-7 · Cited by 14
Values in public health: an argument from trust
Popa, E. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04650-8 · Cited by 9
Wolfe, B. H., & Hintz, E. A. (2024) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108354 · Cited by 9
Yeoman, P. (2024) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-59691-9_8 · Cited by 9
Hengelaar, R., Verdonk, P., van Hartingsveldt, M. J., & Abma, T. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117169 · Cited by 9
Paré, D. (2024) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21929 · Cited by 10
Bhaumik, S. (2024) · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0012781 · Cited by 9
Epistemic oppression and the concept of coercion in psychiatry
Faissner, M., Braun, E., & Hempeler, C. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04853-z · Cited by 9
Woodrow, M., Ziauddeen, N., Smith, D. M., & Alwan, N. A. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70202 · Cited by 9
Categorizing experiences of misrecognition in energy contexts: A recognition justice typology
van Uffelen, N., & Ayllón, L. M. S. (2025) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125730 · Cited by 9
Hoarse with no name: chronic voice problems, policy and music teacher marginalisation
Schmidt, P., & Morrow, S. L. (2015) · Music Education Research · doi:10.1080/14613808.2015.1014329 · Cited by 9
The need for an effective development ethics
Malavisi, A. (2014) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449626.2014.974110 · Cited by 9
Situationism, Moral Responsibility and Blame
Ciurria, M. (2012) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-012-9382-5 · Cited by 9
Knowledge for a Common World? On the Place of Feminist Epistemology in Philosophy of Education
Schumann, C. (2016) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci6010010 · Cited by 12
II—Michael Brady: Disappointment
Brady, M. S. (2010) · Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8349.2010.00191.x · Cited by 9
Testimony, Holocaust Education and Making the Unthinkable Thinkable
Suissa, J. (2016) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12207 · Cited by 9
Klingemann, J. I. (2017) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.01.015 · Cited by 9
Decolonizing Family Photographs: Ecological Imaginaries and Nonrepresentational Ethnographies
Doucet, A. (2018) · Journal of Contemporary Ethnography · doi:10.1177/0891241617744859 · Cited by 10
Fox, F. (2018) · Porn Studies · doi:10.1080/23268743.2018.1434111 · Cited by 9
Basu, R. (2018) · Cited by 9
Procedural justice and the individual participant in priority setting: Doctors' experiences
Gallagher, S., & Little, M. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.012 · Cited by 9
Nonideal Justice as Nonideal Fairness
Arvan, M. (2019) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2018.50 · Cited by 9
Onea, E. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.17 · Cited by 9
Banting, K. G., Harell, A., Kymlicka, W., & Wallace, R. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0012 · Cited by 9
Ramírez, G. A. (2020) · The CRISPR Journal · doi:10.1089/crispr.2019.0045 · Cited by 10
Understanding Power Dynamics in Bisexual Intimate Partner Violence: Looking in the Gap
Head, S. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44762-5_7 · Cited by 10
Turnaround Learner Discipline Practices through Epistemic Social Justice in Schools
Lumadi, R. I. (2020) · Education as Change · doi:10.25159/1947-9417/4892 · Cited by 9
Stanier, J., & Miglio, N. (2021) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65613-3_8 · Cited by 9
Epistemic Collaborativeness as an Intellectual Virtue
Kotsonis, A. (2021) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-021-00384-y · Cited by 11
Inwood, J. F. J., & Alderman, D. H. (2021) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-021-10459-6 · Cited by 10
Kelp, C., & Greco, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108666404 · Cited by 9
Lazaridou‐Chatzigoga, D. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12 · Cited by 9
Mueller, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108992985 · Cited by 9
Do nepotism and cronyism have payoff boundaries? A cross-country investigation
Dobrowolski, Z., Sułkowski, Ł., Przytuła, S., & Rašticová, M. (2022) · Problems and Perspectives in Management · doi:10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.19 · Cited by 9
Barnoy, A. (2022) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2022.2077347 · Cited by 9
Gander‐Zaucker, S., Unwin, G., & Larkin, M. (2022) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc12030093 · Cited by 9
Locock, L., O’Donnell, D., Donnelly, S., Ellis, L., Kroll, T., Shé, É. N., & Ryan, S. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13576 · Cited by 9
Beyond COVID: Reframing the Global Problematique with STiP (Systems Thinking in Practice)
Ison, R. L. (2023) · Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11518-023-5549-9 · Cited by 11
Let Geography Die: The Rise, Fall, and “Unfinished Business” of Geography at Harvard
Mountz, A., & Williams, K. (2023) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2023.2208645 · Cited by 9
Degerman, D. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04210-6 · Cited by 9
Abay, R. A. (2023) · Gesellschaft der Unterschiede · doi:10.14361/9783839470534-002 · Cited by 9
Playing dirty: the shady governance and reproduction of migrant illegality
Scheel, S. (2024) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2024.2371207 · Cited by 9
Was Sir William Crookes epistemically virtuous?
Kidd, I. J. (2014) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.06.004 · Cited by 9
A Discourse Ethics Defense of Nussbaum's Capabilities Theory
Kleist, C. (2013) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2013.764852 · Cited by 9
Climate Change Through the Lens of Feminist Philosophy
Tuana, N. (2015) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26348-9_3 · Cited by 9
Participation in and beyond liminalities : action research with unaccompanied asylum-seeking girls
Kaukko, M. (2015) · Cited by 9
Dikke kinderen, uitgebluste werknemers en vreemde virussen
Horstman (2010) · doi:10.26481/spe.20100625kh · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
