The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,101–3,200 of 12,257
Lignou, S., Sheehan, M., & Singh, I. (2024) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/17470161231224060 · Cited by 7
Decolonizing leadership knowledge: Context, culture, and complexity
Owen, J. E., Pacheco, D. R., & Yamanaka, A. (2024) · New Directions for Student Leadership · doi:10.1002/yd.20620 · Cited by 8
Hazlett, A. (2012) · Midwest Studies in Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.2012.00231.x · Cited by 7
Sourcing Women's Ecological Knowledge: The Worry of Epistemic Objectification
Tuvel, R. (2015) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12141 · Cited by 7
Hidden in Plain Sight: Social Inequalities in the Context of Environmental Change
Ackerly, B. A. (2015) · Advances in global change research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25796-9_9 · Cited by 7
Knowledge and Social Roles: A Virtue Approach
Wright, S. J. (2011) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2011.0009 · Cited by 7
Transcendence and Feminist Philosophy
Anderson, P. S. (2009) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-12074-8_3 · Cited by 7
Making Peace Education Everyone’s Business
Thornton, S., & Burgh, G. (2017) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6351-065-3_5 · Cited by 7
Emoción, racionalidad y argumentación en la decisión judicial
Trelles, J. E. S. (2017) · Derecho PUCP · doi:10.18800/derechopucp.201702.008 · Cited by 8
Folk Filmmaking: A Participatory Method for Engaging Indigenous Ethics and Improving Understanding
Amir, A. (2019) · Conservation and Society · doi:10.4103/cs.cs_17_123 · Cited by 7
What Is the Harm in Gendered Citation Practices?
McCusker, D. (2019) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/705495 · Cited by 8
Epistemic Justice and Epistemic Participation
Schmidt, K. C. S. (2019) · Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) · doi:10.7936/s8g9-5w13 · Cited by 7
Schaap, A. (2019) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321719873865 · Cited by 7
Institutional ethnography for communication and media research
Sorce, G. (2019) · The Communication Review · doi:10.1080/10714421.2019.1659703 · Cited by 12
Elgin, C. Z. (2019) · Acta Analytica · doi:10.1007/s12136-019-00418-9 · Cited by 7
Displacement, exile and incarceration commuted into cinematic vision
Tofighian, O. (2019) · Alphaville Journal of Film and Screen Media · doi:10.33178/alpha.18.07 · Cited by 7
Breaking the silence: working with pupil voice in Iranian primary schools
Partovi, M., & WYNESS, M. G. (2020) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2020.1713051 · Cited by 7
Curriculating from the Black Archive – Marginality as novelty
Kumalo, S. H. (2020) · Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning · doi:10.14426/cristal.v8i1.252 · Cited by 7
Osinski, A. (2020) · Food Ethics · doi:10.1007/s41055-020-00077-2 · Cited by 7
Speak No Evil: Understanding Hermeneutical (In)justice
Beverley, J. (2020) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2020.40 · Cited by 7
Arqueologia colaborativa não é o fim
Colwell, C., & Lopes, R. D. A. (2020) · Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia · doi:10.11606/issn.2448-1750.revmae.2020.163597 · Cited by 7
Fillol, A., Kadio, K., & Gautier, L. (2020) · Revue française des affaires sociales · doi:10.3917/rfas.204.0103 · Cited by 7
Auvinen, P., Parviainen, J., Lahikainen, L., & Palukka, H. (2021) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci10020045 · Cited by 7
The Metaphysics of Intersectionality Revisited*
Lawford‐Smith, H., & Phelan, K. M. (2021) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/jopp.12251 · Cited by 7
Giri, A. K. (2021) · Sociological Bulletin · doi:10.1177/00380229211014666 · Cited by 7
Facilitating college teaching change: A model of inclusive deliberate teaching
Loya, K. I. (2021) · Journal of Pedagogical Research · doi:10.33902/jpr.2021370558 · Cited by 7
The Rationality of Fundamentalist Belief
Malcolm, F. (2021) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12440 · Cited by 7
Mosquera, A. F. V. (2021) · RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo · doi:10.23913/ride.v12i23.1063 · Cited by 7
A Decolonising Approach to Health Promotion
Ramugondo, E. L., & Emery-Whittington, I. G. (2021) · Community psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75201-9_10 · Cited by 7
Between Problematization and Evaluation
Santarelli, M. (2021) · European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy · doi:10.4000/ejpap.2450 · Cited by 7
Filling in the (gendered) gaps: How observers frame claims of sexual assault
Mulder, E., & Bosma, A. K. (2021) · International Review of Victimology · doi:10.1177/02697580211061893 · Cited by 7
The disabling nature of hope in discovering a biological explanation of stuttering
Prabhat, Rombouts, E., & Borry, P. (2022) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2022.105906 · Cited by 7
Brick, S. (2020) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2020.1737748 · Cited by 7
Daza, J. D. F. (2022) · Estudios de Filosofía · doi:10.17533/udea.ef.347697 · Cited by 7
Exemption, Self-Exemption, and Compassionate Self-Excuse
Jeppsson, S. M. I. (2022) · International Mad Studies Journal · doi:10.58544/imsj.v1i1.5243 · Cited by 7
Epistemic agency and the generalisation of fear
Puddifoot, K., & Trakas, M. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04222-2 · Cited by 7
Spewak, D. C. (2016) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2016.12 · Cited by 7
Explaining Injustice in Speech: Individualistic vs. Structural Explanation.
Ayala, S., & Vasilyeva, N. Y. (2015) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 7
À qui appartient-il de déterminer les modes d’intervention auprès des personnes intersexuées ?
Charlebois, J. B. (2017) · Nouvelles pratiques sociales · doi:10.7202/1039174ar · Cited by 7
People's Knowledge and Participatory Action Research
(2016) · Practical Action Publishing eBooks · doi:10.3362/9781780449395 · Cited by 7
Karfakis, N. (2018) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2018.05.009 · Cited by 7
Roldán, C., Brauer, D., Rohbeck, J., & The (2018) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110492415 · Cited by 7
Evaluation of Research(ers) and its Threat to Epistemic Pluralisms
Viola, M. (2018) · European journal of analytic philosophy · doi:10.31820/ejap.13.2.4 · Cited by 7
Warren, M. R., & Glass, R. D. (2019) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.27.4445 · Cited by 7
Supporting autistic flourishing
Jaswal, V. K., & Akhtar, N. (2019) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x19000025 · Cited by 7
Bontemps-Hommen, M. C. M. M. L., Baart, A., & Vosman, F. J. H. (2019) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10728-019-00385-7 · Cited by 7
Schidel, R. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie · doi:10.22613/zfpp/7.1.8 · Cited by 7
Neurodiversity as a Conceptual Lens and Topic of Cross-Cultural Study
Cascio, M. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.027 · Cited by 7
Besley, T. A. C., Jackson, L., Peters, M. A., Devine, N., Mayo, C., Stewart, G. T., White, E. J., STENGEL, B. S., Opiniano, G. A., Sturm, S., et al. (2022) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2021.2015322 · Cited by 7
Wood, L. A., & Pillay, M. (2016) · South African Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.20853/30-4-679 · Cited by 7
Niemi, L., & Young, L. (2016) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2016.1111122 · Cited by 7
The Epistemic Value of Diversity
Robertson, E. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118721254.ch9 · Cited by 7
Disrespect in health care: An epistemic injustice
Beach, M. C. (2023) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/13558196231212851 · Cited by 7
Theorizing the processes and practices of entrepreneuring at work
Champenois, C., Dimov, D. P., Gherardi, S., Hjorth, D., & Thompson, N. (2025) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267251328865 · Cited by 7
Hidden Risks: Artificial Intelligence and Hermeneutic Harm
Rebera, A. P., Lauwaert, L., & Oimann, A.-K. (2025) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-025-09733-0 · Cited by 6
The Import of Critical Phenomenology for Theorizing Disability
Wieseler, C. (2023) · The Journal of Philosophy of Disability · doi:10.5840/jpd2023102324 · Cited by 6
Monteleone, R. (2023) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2023.85 · Cited by 6
Boult, C. (2023) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.6 · Cited by 6
Kieslinger, K., & Nierobisch, K. (2024) · Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung · doi:10.1007/s40955-024-00272-2 · Cited by 6
Santo, R., Hu, A. D., Phelps, D., Caskurlu, S., Dunbar, K. M., & Yadav, A. K. (2024) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2024.2380163 · Cited by 6
Sedawi, W., & Barton, A. C. (2024) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2024.2381205 · Cited by 6
Models of Disability as Research Frameworks in Biology Education Research
Tedeschi, M. N., & Limeri, L. B. (2024) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.24-01-0026 · Cited by 8
Participatie, het verschil tussen een methode en een kritisch paradigma
Dedding, C. W. M., & Aussems, K. (2024) · TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen · doi:10.1007/s12508-024-00439-9 · Cited by 6
Towards a Capabilities-Based Conception of Distributive Epistemic Justice
Mudd, S., & Bobadilla, H. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2392130 · Cited by 6
Harniess, P., McGlinchey, C., McDonald, A., Boyle, F., Garrood, A., Logan, S., Morris, C., & Borek, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1445879 · Cited by 6
Iturriaga, C. (2024) · Language Culture and Curriculum · doi:10.1080/07908318.2024.2418847 · Cited by 6
Revell, L., Bowie, R. A., Woolley, M., & Riordan, J. (2024) · Journal of Religious Education · doi:10.1007/s40839-024-00245-0 · Cited by 6
Belief beyond reason: a radical relativist hinge epistemology
Johnson, D. (2025) · Asian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s44204-025-00244-4 · Cited by 6
Moral certainty, deep disagreement, and disruption
Hermann, J. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-04948-1 · Cited by 6
Baze, C. L., González‐Howard, M., Sampson, V. D., Crawford, R., & Hamilton, X. D. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15040402 · Cited by 6
Transforming Justice Responses to Non-Recent Institutional Abuses
McAlinden, A., Keenan, M., & Gallen, J. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191967399.001.0001 · Cited by 7
Mashhood, A., Saeed, G., & Sami, F. (2025) · SSM - Mental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100433 · Cited by 7
Fehlberg, Z., Klaic, M., Croy, S., & Best, S. (2025) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/s00103-025-04057-x · Cited by 6
Burkhardt, A. (2025) · RaumFragen: Stadt - Region - Landschaft · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74846-2_6 · Cited by 6
Centeno, D., Lopez, A. G., Palomino, A., Taboada, J., Sinclair, R., Montgomery, Q., Marquez, C., Sanchez, M. N., Arzeno‐Soltero, I. B., & Freilich, M. (2025) · GeoHealth · doi:10.1029/2024gh001327 · Cited by 6
Epistemic injustice and psychotherapy
Drożdżowicz, A., & Grodniewicz, J. P. (2025) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2519320 · Cited by 6
Mir, G., Mullard, J., Parkin, A., Lee, C., Clarke, J., Kock, J. H. D., Prociuk, D., Darbyshire, J. L., Evans, S. E., & Sivan, M. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70336 · Cited by 6
Côté, C. I. (2025) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/s41285-025-00218-9 · Cited by 7
Madrid, N. S. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009446457 · Cited by 6
Voice to validation: An epistemic-legitimation cycle for pluriversal mathematics education
Yamaguchi, J. A. R. (2025) · Policy Futures in Education · doi:10.1177/14782103251367219 · Cited by 6
Synthetic voice and the philosophy of agency, authenticity, and ethics in AI-mediated speech
Muskaan, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00820-7 · Cited by 6
From translanguaging to transknowledging: decolonizing knowledge production in applied linguistics
Song, Y., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2025) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2025-0157 · Cited by 6
Ayodele, A. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05718-7 · Cited by 6
Paulo Freire and the epistemic disobedience of the south in internationalization of higher education
Du, T. (2025) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2025.2552766 · Cited by 6
Matas, J. D. (2025) · Emerging Media · doi:10.1177/27523543251371839 · Cited by 6
Epistemic justice in urban living labs: a framework for analysis applied to transport planning
Mukhtar‐Landgren, D., Hantson, M., Vitrano, C., Sträuli, L., Uteng, T. P., & Ryan, J. (2025) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2025.2551836 · Cited by 7
Jacobsen, K. (2025) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2025.2566190 · Cited by 6
Clinical Ceiling: Barriers to Lived Experience‐Led Approaches in the Mental Health Sector
Larsen, K., Roennfeldt, H., Carlon, D., Hodges, E., & Byrne, L. (2025) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.70159 · Cited by 6
Epistemic Freedom: Itineraries of a Concept
Ndlovu‐Gatsheni, S. J. (2025) · The Thinker · doi:10.36615/vfc2ns66 · Cited by 6
The Politics of Space in South African Writing Centres: Whose Knowledge is Centred?
Nendauni, L. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Development in Africa · doi:10.25159/2312-3540/19826 · Cited by 6
Kita, S. M. (2025) · Disasters. The Journal of Disaster Studies, Policy and Management · doi:10.1111/disa.70028 · Cited by 6
Artificial General Intelligence and Planetary Justice: A Framework for Safe and Just Transitions
Stiefenhofer, P., & Deniz, C. (2025) · Challenges · doi:10.3390/challe16040059 · Cited by 6
Between a rock and a hard place: exploring the lived experience of disability and climate injustice
Eriksen, S., Bell, S., Mfitumukiza, D., Raanaas, R. K., Dani, R. P., Delic-Klevstad, N., Gilani, S. F. F., Grøndahl, R., Kuteesa, V., Marty, E., et al. (2025) · Climate and Development · doi:10.1080/17565529.2025.2592263 · Cited by 6
Orjuela, J. P., Schwanen, T., Giraldo, D., Morales, N., & Ruda, N. (2024) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104511 · Cited by 9
Arumuhathas, S. S. (2026) · Journal of International Students · doi:10.32674/pzt79b15 · Cited by 6
Ijaz, N. (2026) · Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1177/27683605251398692 · Cited by 6
Purnama, D. H. (2026) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2026.2629632 · Cited by 6
The Apt Curation Model: An Epistemic Virtue Theory of AI-Assisted Authorship
Rodrigues, T. V. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01038-z · Cited by 11
Revisiting the Inclusion Illusion: The 35th Delphine Hanna Lecture
Haegele, J. A. (2026) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.2026.2632031 · Cited by 6
Epistemic injustice in physical education and sport: a critical disability studies perspective
Coates, J. K., Haegele, J. A., Maher, A. J., Alves, M. L. T., Giese, M., Ruin, S., & Sharpe, L. (2026) · Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2026.2654024 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
