The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,501–3,600 of 12,257
A matter of life and death: physician gender and patient outcomes after surgery
Lorello, G. R., & Flexman, A. M. (2024) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.06.002 · Cited by 5
Inayat, S., Younas, A., & Ali, P. A. (2024) · World Medical & Health Policy · doi:10.1002/wmh3.631 · Cited by 5
Tracing the limits of epistemic agency in truth-telling about Australian settler colonialism
Kunjan, P. (2024) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/14407833241252193 · Cited by 5
Hatoss, A., & Allport, E. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12611 · Cited by 5
Blaming the victim, preserving the icon: the gendered moral work of celebrity sexual abuse scandals
Meyer, A. (2024) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2024.2392102 · Cited by 5
Science as a site of inequality
Koch, S., Ludwig, D., Boshoff, N., Boakye-Danquah, J., & Mbiah, A. F. T. (2024) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103917 · Cited by 5
The Credibility Deficit Experienced by Black Patients
Beach, M. C., & Saha, S. S. (2024) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38521 · Cited by 5
Everyday Solidarities and Epistemic Justice: Nourishing Ecologies of Wellbeing
Sonn, C. C., Keast, S., Agung-Igusti, R. P., Jayawardana, R. J., & Gabb, L. (2024) · Community psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67035-0_15 · Cited by 5
Haghiri‐Vijeh, R. (2024) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.70007 · Cited by 5
Sangiovanni, A. (2024) · Political Philosophy · doi:10.16995/pp.16976 · Cited by 5
Decolonising the curriculum: common sense, threshold concepts, and epistemic injustice
Stopford, R. J. (2024) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01354-3 · Cited by 7
Re-thinking vulnerability: Research fraud and bureaucratic harm in community-engaged online research
Majic, S. A., & Ditmore, M. H. (2024) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/14687941241297417 · Cited by 6
Johnsdotter, S., & Wendel, L. (2024) · International journal of law, crime and justice · doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100714 · Cited by 5
Childism and the Politics of Social Empowerment
Wall, J. (2024) · Sociedad e Infancias · doi:10.5209/soci.97639 · Cited by 5
Drolet, M.-J. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1114963ar · Cited by 5
Ukraine is Europe: lessons for Europe and for political science
Popova, M., & Shevel, O. (2024) · European Political Science · doi:10.1057/s41304-024-00506-4 · Cited by 5
Incredibly emotional: interpreting trustworthiness in Danish courtrooms
Johansen, L. V. (2024) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1457424 · Cited by 5
Saeed, R. (2024) · International Journal of Law in Context · doi:10.1017/s1744552324000326 · Cited by 5
Data, anecdotes, anecdotal data: Feminist data activism against gendered violence post #Metoo
Le, T. (2024) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517241306347 · Cited by 5
Urban food policy councils as politicized spaces: The case of Arusha, Tanzania
Steyaert, A., Kuyper, T. W., Dessein, J., & Prové, C. (2025) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102802 · Cited by 5
Lynch, A. (2025) · European Social Work Research · doi:10.1332/27551768y2025d000000031 · Cited by 5
Rethinking the Theoretical Foundation of Economics II: Core Themes of the Multilevel Paradigm
Snower, D. J., & Wilson, D. S. (2025) · Economics · doi:10.1515/econ-2025-0133 · Cited by 6
A “code-switching” model for healthcare communication
Chen, S. S. (2025) · Healthcare Management Forum · doi:10.1177/08404704251327095 · Cited by 5
Care for the soul of science: Equity and virtue in reform and reformation
Knibbe, M., de Rijcke, S., & Penders, B. (2025) · Cultures of Science · doi:10.1177/20966083251329632 · Cited by 5
Primig, F. (2025) · Publizistik · doi:10.1007/s11616-025-00887-6 · Cited by 9
Exploring dilemmas and depoliticization in inclusive lawmaking: the perspective of silent agents
Rantala, K., Esko, T., Hämäläinen, H., & Salminen, J. (2025) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2025.2493085 · Cited by 5
Writing in community: Relationship building and accountability in knowledge production
Prince, J. A. R., Blackwood, E. M., Landrum, M., Milton, E. B. P., Rodgers, E. L., Barnes, M., Chin, E. J., Craven, C., Douglass, K., Torres, M. J. F., et al. (2025) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.28070 · Cited by 5
White, S. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191904752.001.0001 · Cited by 6
Morley, G., & Field, R. B. (2025) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/734775 · Cited by 5
Hesni, S. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197769577.001.0001 · Cited by 5
Resisting epistemic exploitation: From institutional remedies to community-based research
Rolin, K. H. (2025) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.005 · Cited by 5
Automating Misrecognition: The Case of Disability
Scully, J. L., van Toorn, G., & Gendera, S. (2025) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-025-10462-3 · Cited by 6
Griffith, A. M. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198948469.001.0001 · Cited by 6
Critical Children's Rights Studies
Reynaert, D., Vandenhole, W., Imoh, A. T.-D., & Llobet, V. (2025) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003510284-1 · Cited by 5
‘Stay with the body’: facilitating integrative silence in community-based sexual trauma care
Morgan, L., Nadar, S., & Keygnaert, I. (2025) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008066.2025.2510020 · Cited by 8
Bennett, A. K., Schulte, A., Arcara, J., Bardwell, J., Cadena, D., Chaudhri, A., Davis, L., Frederiksen, B. N., Labiran, C. B., McDonald‐Mosley, R., et al. (2025) · Women s Health Issues · doi:10.1016/j.whi.2025.04.003 · Cited by 5
Distinguishing Situated Knowledge and Standpoint Theory: Defending the Achievement Thesis
Milanovich, K. (2025) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2025.10021 · Cited by 5
de Melo, A. T., Renault, L., Caves, L. S. D., Garnett, P., Lopes, P. D., Ribeiro, R., & Santos, F. (2025) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-025-00817-6 · Cited by 5
Virtue environmentalism: towards a robustly social virtue epistemology
Jarczewski, D. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05168-3 · Cited by 5
Menafsir Ulang Keadilan: Epistemologi Emansipatif, Rekognisi Kontekstual, dan Kapabilitas Relasional
Mukmin, M. A. (2025) · Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia · doi:10.23887/jfi.v8i2.96157 · Cited by 5
The Rumpelstiltskin effect: therapeutic repercussions of clinical diagnosis
Levinovitz, A., & Aftab, A. (2025) · BJPsych Bulletin · doi:10.1192/bjb.2025.10137 · Cited by 7
Counter Self-Narration: A Creative-Imaginative Practice of Resistance
Fabry, R. E. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10260-x · Cited by 5
Pesliak, L. D., & Killin, A. (2025) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104222 · Cited by 5
Moral Perception and Uncertainty Expression in LLM-Augmented Judicial Practice
Delacroix, S. (2025) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-025-09744-x · Cited by 5
Araújo, S. (2025) · Oñati Socio-legal Series · doi:10.35295/osls.iisl.2210 · Cited by 5
Parsons, S., & Kovshoff, H. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251355986 · Cited by 5
Making Disability (Matter) in Philosophy of Education
Taylor, A. (2015) · Philosophy of education · doi:10.47925/2015.224 · Cited by 5
Pedagogies of indignation and The Lives of Others
Suissa, J. (2017) · Policy Futures in Education · doi:10.1177/1478210317721279 · Cited by 5
On the Possibility of Testimonial Justice
Stewart, R. T., & Nielsen, M. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2019.1706183 · Cited by 5
Roaux, C. (2021) · SociologieS · doi:10.4000/sociologies.14771 · Cited by 5
Kizel, A. (2021) · childhood & philosophy · doi:10.12957/childphilo.2021.53450 · Cited by 5
Fahie, D., & Dunne, G. (2021) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc11020028 · Cited by 9
THE AUTHORITY OF THE SACRED VICTIM
McGrath, M. B. (2020) · Social Philosophy and Policy · doi:10.1017/s026505252100008x · Cited by 5
Cappelletto, M., Giuffredi, R., Kastanidi, E., Vassilopoulou, V., & L’Astorina, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.717789 · Cited by 5
To be is to be perceived, not to be is not to be perceived
Blanc, G. L. (2021) · Études britanniques contemporaines · doi:10.4000/ebc.10944 · Cited by 5
Schiller, H. I. (2020) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01504-0 · Cited by 5
Blame for me and Not for Thee: Status Sensitivity and Moral Responsibility
Argetsinger, H. (2022) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-022-10274-z · Cited by 5
National Attachment—Cohesive, Divisive, or Both?
Gustavsson, G. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0004 · Cited by 6
Begby, E. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852834.003.0007 · Cited by 5
Fillol, A., Sween-Cadieux, E. M., Ventelou, B., Larose, M., Nguemdjo, U., Kadio, K., Dagenais, C., & Ridde, V. (2022) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-022-00854-x · Cited by 5
Svensson, S., Donoso, A., & Svensson, G. (2022) · HumaNetten · doi:10.15626/hn.20224805 · Cited by 5
da Silva, F. C. G., & da Silva, R. A. (2022) · InCID Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentação · doi:10.11606/issn.2178-2075.v13i1p47-72 · Cited by 8
An Epistemology for Listening Across Religious, Cultural, and Political Divides
Vishanoff, D. R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05785-4_10 · Cited by 5
Two Wikipedias in Bhutan: problems and solutions for knowledge equity in the digital age
Avieson, B. (2022) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292986.2021.1937248 · Cited by 5
Díaz‐Lázaro, C. M., & Verdinelli, S. (2022) · Revista de Psicología · doi:10.24215/2422572xe150 · Cited by 5
Picazo, C. (2022) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-022-09847-5 · Cited by 5
Epistemic Dependence, Cognitive Irrationality, and Epistemic Conflicts of Interests
Müller, B. (2022) · Logos & Episteme · doi:10.5840/logos-episteme202213324 · Cited by 6
Human Rights at the Intersections
Chase, A. T., Mahdavi, P., Banai, H., & Gruskin, S. (2022) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781350268692 · Cited by 5
On the Harms of Agnotological Practices and How to Address Them
de Melo‐Martín, I. (2023) · International Studies in the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1080/02698595.2023.2178838 · Cited by 6
Transvaginal mesh in Australia: An analysis of news media reporting from 1996 to 2021
Motamedi, M., Carter, S. M., & Degeling, C. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13734 · Cited by 5
QTPOC Survivors of Sexual Violence in College: Methods at the Intersections
Woods, C. (2023) · Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/26379112.2023.2171422 · Cited by 5
Why Following the Rules Will Not Stop Them:
Martinsson, L., & Mulinari, D. (2023) · lambda nordica · doi:10.34041/ln.v27.832 · Cited by 5
When Does Resilience Become Epistemic Injustice?
Goldberg, R. M. (2023) · Social Work · doi:10.1093/sw/swad016 · Cited by 7
Narrative as an Interpretation of Self-Pattern
Gallagher, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197571026.003.0007 · Cited by 5
Pal, P., & Karmakar, G. (2023) · Visual Anthropology · doi:10.1080/08949468.2023.2203296 · Cited by 5
“He told me my pain was in my head”: mitigating testimonial injustice through peer support
Vigouroux, M., Newman, G., Amja, K., & Hovey, R. B. (2023) · Frontiers in Pain Research · doi:10.3389/fpain.2023.1125963 · Cited by 5
Belief, blame, and inquiry: a defense of doxastic wronging
Quanbeck, Z. (2023) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-023-02012-7 · Cited by 5
Kempster, J. R. (2023) · TESOL in context · doi:10.21153/tesol2023vol31no2art1727 · Cited by 8
Healthy Eating Policy and Public Reason in a Complex World: Normative and Empirical Issues
Barnhill, A., & Bonotti, M. (2023) · Food Ethics · doi:10.1007/s41055-023-00131-9 · Cited by 5
Victimhood, Memory, and Consumerism
Franko, K., & Goyes, D. R. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192874115.001.0001 · Cited by 5
Birk, R. H., & Manning, N. (2023) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-023-02570-5 · Cited by 5
Sato, K. (2023) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/14778785231207976 · Cited by 5
Introduction: Caring for Equitable Relations in Interdisciplinary Collaborations
Carrigan, C. M., & Wylie, C. D. (2023) · Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v9i2.41070 · Cited by 6
Gender and ethnicity intersect to reduce participation at a large European hybrid HIV conference
Howe, A., Wan, Y. I., Gilleece, Y. C., Aebi-Popp, K., Dhairyawan, R., Bhagani, S., Paparini, S., & Orkin, C. M. (2023) · BMJ Leader · doi:10.1136/leader-2023-000848 · Cited by 5
Rozzi, R. (2023) · Ecology and ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40040-7_25 · Cited by 5
Exploring Epistemic Injustice: A Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Production and Its Evolution
Báez-Vizcaíno, K. (2023) · Publishing Research Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s12109-023-09972-y · Cited by 5
Wieczorek, M. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00695-2 · Cited by 5
Kleefstra, S. M., Frederiks, B. J. M., Tingen, A., & Reulings, P. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-10692-y · Cited by 5
Gillespie, J. N., Wright, H., Pinkney, J. H., & Lloyd, H. M. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12070747 · Cited by 5
Levin, L., & Nevo, M. (2024) · Journal of Gerontological Social Work · doi:10.1080/01634372.2024.2339973 · Cited by 6
Bastian, L. (2024) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-024-09479-4 · Cited by 5
Concepts and Contexts: Towards a Theory of “Hermeneutical Bastardization”
Drury, M. R. F. (2024) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2024.32 · Cited by 5
Loets, A. J. (2024) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2024.2329972 · Cited by 5
Bioethanol sacrifice zones and environmental/ epistemic injustice. A case study in Argentina.
Berger, M. (2024) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103782 · Cited by 5
Shields, R., Muratkyzy, A., Paudel, M. K., Singh, A., Nuwategeka, E., Rodríguez, M. F., & Paulson, J. (2024) · Global Social Challenges Journal · doi:10.1332/27523349y2024d000000011 · Cited by 5
Duffy, M., & Mhuirthile, T. N. (2024) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci13090442 · Cited by 5
More and Happier Women: On the Political Significance of Wittgenstein and Hinge Epistemology
Coliva, A. (2024) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2024.58 · Cited by 5
Harris, K. R. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04763-0 · Cited by 7
Martino, W., Kassen, J., & Omercajic, K. (2024) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2024.2426300 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
