The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 5,501–5,600 of 12,257
Piola, M. E., & García, A. M. (2025) · Nouvelles pratiques sociales · doi:10.7202/1119071ar · Cited by 1
Gajdusek, M. F., & Szüdi, G. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17177979 · Cited by 1
Older women as crone: A radical imaginary for the common good
Southam, T. (2025) · Journal of Women & Aging · doi:10.1080/08952841.2025.2552512 · Cited by 1
Indigenous Gnoseology as a Theory of Knowledge Beyond Epistemology
Chowdhury, J. S. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3927-6.ch001 · Cited by 1
Collective Amnesia as an Epistemic Injustice
Chevalier, F. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2025.10068 · Cited by 2
Jiménez, L. G. (2025) · Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico · doi:10.5209/emp.103036 · Cited by 1
Puente, S. N. (2025) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/14647001251371967 · Cited by 1
Delahaye, S. G., & Dubath, C. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14090553 · Cited by 1
Coleman, S. R. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009440301.017 · Cited by 1
The Mad Movement in Catalonia. Epistemic resistance and counter-hegemony in mental health
Urquiza, M. C., García, A. M., & Alegre-Agís, E. (2025) · SSM - Mental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100533 · Cited by 1
Schulmann, K., Timonen, V., & Conlon, C. (2025) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100640 · Cited by 1
O’Hanlon, R. (2025) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x251386553 · Cited by 1
Morton, L. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197804995.003.0003 · Cited by 1
Choudhary, R., & Singh, M. M. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1707-6.ch008 · Cited by 1
Hutchinson, P. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-2252-8_93 · Cited by 1
A pluralist account of epistemic repair
Catala, A. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02407-8 · Cited by 1
Genomic Data Are Not Commodities: Advocating for Collective Responsibility in Open Science
Amaral, D. T., Fentanes‐Machado, J. R., & Bonatelli, I. A. S. (2025) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.70062 · Cited by 1
Museums as the catalysts for a democratic revolution in cultural policy
Anderson, D., Guennec, A. C. L., Castilla, A., & Scarff, L. (2025) · Cultural Trends · doi:10.1080/09548963.2025.2564946 · Cited by 1
McKernan, R., & O’Toole, C. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1293-3.ch008 · Cited by 1
Blunting concepts: The double-edged effect of popularizing psychotherapy language
Almagro, M., & Isern‐Mas, C. (2025) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2573763 · Cited by 1
Croce, M., & Pritchard, D. (2025) · The Journal of Value Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s10790-025-10066-5 · Cited by 1
McInally, J. D., Hitchcott, N., & Karekezi, A. U. U. (2025) · Archives and Records · doi:10.1080/23257962.2025.2565770 · Cited by 1
Hunklinger, M. (2025) · European Politics and Society · doi:10.1080/23745118.2025.2576703 · Cited by 1
Tracking the Epistemic Harms of Marital Rape: The Case for Experiential Injustice
Ravish, S., & Sharma, R. (2025) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1111/japp.70058 · Cited by 1
Who Is the System? On the Externalisation and Depersonalisation of Responsibility for Abuse
Kron, T. (2025) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.3206 · Cited by 1
Jesus, N. S. D., Croguennec, D., & Morgiève, M. (2025) · Perspectives In Psychiatric Care · doi:10.1155/ppc/9002919 · Cited by 1
The specifics of theological education in the system of modern scientific knowledge
Romanov, M. P. (2025) · Professional education in the modern world · doi:10.20913/2224-1841-2025-3-16 · Cited by 1
Bam, A., & Lulema, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1644068 · Cited by 1
Diagnostic Vulnerabilities in Indian Psychiatry: A Martha Mitchell Effect Perspective
Seervi, A., & Sharma, I. L. (2025) · Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1177/02537176251393499 · Cited by 1
Leadership, Personhood, and Race
Buckley, B. J. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/979-8-88730-132-720251007 · Cited by 1
Epistemic reparations as social epistemic achievement
Flowerree, A. K. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02452-3 · Cited by 1
Does social concordance matter?
Anderson, J. N. (2025) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-025-03080-w · Cited by 1
Children's Agency in Contact Disputes: Navigating Protection, Participation and Alienation
McCormack, M. (2025) · Child & Family Social Work · doi:10.1111/cfs.70092 · Cited by 1
Rejection of Expert Testimony: A Patterned Testimonial Injustice
Klijnman, C. J. F. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2572096 · Cited by 1
Hammersen, L., Maes, J., Clemens, T., & Beuken, J. A. (2025) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581596.2025.2596302 · Cited by 1
Epistemic LARPing: How to Be a Responsible Pseudo-Intellectual
Porter, T. (2025) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/fzaf060 · Cited by 1
Palmer, D. A., & Haylett, D. (2025) · Mental Health and Social Inclusion · doi:10.1108/mhsi-10-2025-0290 · Cited by 1
Jacobs, N. L. (2025) · International Journal of Disability and Social Justice · doi:10.13169/intljofdissocjus.5.2.0004 · Cited by 1
Hushing-up: a social epistemic practice for overcoming partisan ignorance
Gray, A. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05333-8 · Cited by 1
Moral Progress Through Conceptual Improvements: A Typology and Its Philosophical Lessons
ZHOU, J., & YANG, Y. (2025) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2025.10018 · Cited by 1
Navigating global–local epistemic tensions: how a Big Four shapes its IASB comment letters
Kohler, H., Brivot, M., & Manh, A. L. (2025) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-02-2024-6896 · Cited by 1
Abbas, M. (2025) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2025.2600674 · Cited by 1
Te Waka Houora o te Ngahere: Mobilising for Action for Forest Health in Aotearoa, New Zealand
Harvey, M., McEntee, M., & Mullen, M. (2025) · Australian Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1017/aee.2025.10107 · Cited by 1
Getting Serious about Useful Chemistry Learning: A Case for Attending to Epistemological Messaging
Stowe, R. L. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00829 · Cited by 1
Disability-Related Accommodations in Fieldwork: A Survey of Health Professional Educators
Dhillon, S. K., Jarus, T., Farley, C., & Wojkowski, S. (2025) · Disabilities · doi:10.3390/disabilities6010004 · Cited by 2
Invisible States, Invisible Knowledge: Abkhazia and the Silence of International Relations
BAŞOL, E. (2025) · Diplomasi ve Strateji Dergisi · doi:10.58685/dsd.1820618 · Cited by 1
Mollema, W. J. T. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-01019-8 · Cited by 1
Epistemic reparations and disability
Darling, F. (2026) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02433-6 · Cited by 1
Blocking meaning creation: impostor concepts and hermeneutical injustice
Delgado, L., & Picazo, C. M. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05420-w · Cited by 1
Kashyap, S. (2026) · Journal of Constructivist Psychology · doi:10.1080/10720537.2025.2612512 · Cited by 1
Water justice: evolving perspectives and dilemmas
Bosch, H., Gupta, J., van Vliet, L., & Müller, A. B. (2026) · International Journal of Water Resources Development · doi:10.1080/07900627.2025.2597823 · Cited by 2
False confessions, epistemic agency, and repairing self-trust
Wright, S. J. (2026) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02473-y · Cited by 1
Holding and practising Yolŋu concepts of märr and ŋayaŋu in Northern Australia
Muthamuluwuy, B., Waṉambi, G., Armstrong, E., & Hayashi, Y. (2026) · Australian Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/aral.25049.hay · Cited by 1
Nguyen, T. (2026) · Public Library Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01616846.2026.2614911 · Cited by 1
Brosnan, C., Buykx, P., Cummins, A. M., Tickner, C., Gillett, K., Hill, L., & Newnham, E. C. (2026) · Health Sociology Review · doi:10.1080/14461242.2025.2599806 · Cited by 1
Victims as Agents of State Accountability
Manikis, M. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191993947.001.0001 · Cited by 1
Epistemic Care, Self-Care, and Subservience
Battaly, H. D. (2026) · Palgrave studies in comparative East-West philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09411-7_7 · Cited by 1
The Words to Say It: Co-Constructing Knowledge on Child Maltreatment with Care-Leavers
Bertotti, T., Mauri, D., Marra, S., Moretto, G., Pergher, D., & Sabetta, M. (2026) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/10497315251413531 · Cited by 1
Azam, R. M. U. (2026) · Journal of Human Rights · doi:10.1080/14754835.2026.2615699 · Cited by 1
Epistemic Injustice and Indigenous Epistemology
Narayanan, V. H. (2026) · Anthropology of Consciousness · doi:10.1111/anoc.70033 · Cited by 1
Muchecheti, A. (2026) · International Journal of Disability Development and Education · doi:10.1080/1034912x.2026.2622983 · Cited by 1
Deconstructing inequalities in higher education institutions within the SADC region
Chibambo, M. I., Divala, J. J., & Fick, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1745790 · Cited by 1
Datafied Selves at Work: Ethical Boundaries of Surveillance in People Analytics
Pawirosumarto, S., & Kurniawan, B. (2026) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-026-06272-1 · Cited by 1
Caring in qualitative interviews: A working model for interviews in the transformative paradigm
Marcucci, O., & Elmesky, R. M. (2026) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/14687941261420115 · Cited by 1
Cohen‐Rimer, Y. (2026) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1017/lsi.2026.10135 · Cited by 1
Olalde-Mathieu, V. E., & Licea-Haquet, G. (2026) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1715212 · Cited by 1
Kustatscher, M., Hancock, J., Taylor, A., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2026) · Global Studies of Childhood · doi:10.1177/20436106261421709 · Cited by 1
Translanguaging space, decoloniality, and epistemic justice in educational spaces
Phyak, P. B., Zhang, Y., & Du, J. (2026) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2026.2627558 · Cited by 1
Gonzalez-Mañas, D., & Urquiza, M. C. (2026) · Salud Colectiva · doi:10.18294/sc.2026.6041 · Cited by 1
Eiroá‐Orosa, F. J., & Gonzalez-Mañas, D. (2026) · Journal of Constructivist Psychology · doi:10.1080/10720537.2026.2639444 · Cited by 1
Epistemic disadvantage and looping breaks: a reply to Gauld et al.
Goldstein, R. B. (2026) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-026-10341-7 · Cited by 1
No more single stories: The case of global adolescent pregnancy care
Sabet, F., Patton, G. C., Béhague, D. P., Sawyer, S. M., Oyetunde, O., & Prost, A. (2026) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0006088 · Cited by 1
Watts, K. J., Flowers‐Jones, A., Craigwell, A. B., & Ojelade, I. I. (2026) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.70245 · Cited by 1
Naqvi, A. (2026) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-026-09741-w · Cited by 1
Dislocated belongings: a duoethnography of practising social work across St Helena and the UK
Harris, D., & Phippard, S. (2026) · Practice · doi:10.1080/09503153.2026.2643231 · Cited by 1
Lane, J., Ala-Kortesmaa, S., Peterson‐Salahuddin, C., Lindstadt, C., & Dutta, M. J. (2026) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1093/anncom/wlag006 · Cited by 1
Wu, T., & Liu, N. (2026) · Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education · doi:10.1080/03057925.2026.2643257 · Cited by 1
Brunner, A.-M. (2026) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-026-10863-z · Cited by 1
The slow labor of contestation. Environmental injustice in Băicoi, Romania
Cosma, V. S., Şerbănuţă, C., CODREANU, I., & Rusu, O. (2026) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2026.2648024 · Cited by 1
Nendauni, L. (2026) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2026.2650625 · Cited by 1
Ekologiczna i epistemiczna transformacja w pracy socjalnej
Sałustowicz, P. (2026) · Praca Socjalna · doi:10.71358/ps.2853 · Cited by 1
Höll, D. (2026) · Public humanities. · doi:10.1017/pub.2026.10146 · Cited by 1
The transnational diffusion of anti-trans discourse: a comparative analysis of Denmark and Italy
Lavizzari, A., & Gregersen, A. B. (2026) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2026.2651823 · Cited by 1
Ikedionwu, I., Sullivan, M., Villena, C. M., Rubin, R. S., & Malik, R. D. (2026) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdag114 · Cited by 1
Warner, R., & Avery, J. (2026) · Women s Reproductive Health · doi:10.1080/23293691.2026.2636611 · Cited by 1
The source code of social theorising: engaging with binary distinctions, concepts and typologies
Mladenov, T. (2026) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-12-2025-1932 · Cited by 1
Learner Data in Context: Students Would Share Grades and Text but Less So Logs and Video Data
Salta, S., Briceno, D., Longin, L., Viberg, O., & Poquet, O. (2026) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3785022.3785066 · Cited by 1
Transformative justice approaches to domestic, family, and sexual violence: a scoping review
Lane, J., Kirwan, A., Storey, N., Sutherland, G. A., & Stoove, P. M. (2026) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-026-01447-5 · Cited by 1
Nothing about us without us: the politics of outing in academia
Dean, L. A. (2026) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qrom-06-2025-3065 · Cited by 1
Distributed Truth-Telling: A Model for Moral Revolution and Epistemic Justice in Australia
Bullot, N. J., & Enciso, S. W. (2026) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2026.2652964 · Cited by 1
Daré, W. (2026) · Journal of Agrarian Change · doi:10.1111/joac.70089 · Cited by 1
Enacting Epistemic Justice to Promote Safer Care for People Living with Chronic Pain
Côté, C. (2026) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-025-10543-3 · Cited by 1
The Architecture of Impunity: Systemic Evasion and Institutional Design in Elite Sex Trafficking
Shehab, E., & Hamamra, B. T. (2026) · Journal of Human Trafficking · doi:10.1080/23322705.2026.2671960 · Cited by 1
University students’ perspectives on stigma in Swiss higher education
Etxebarria, N., Thomas, C., Mondragón, N. I., Gorrotxategi, M. P., Fernández, I. L., & Tsybuliak, N. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1773246 · Cited by 1
Alcántara-Ayala, I. (2026) · Environmental Hazards · doi:10.1080/17477891.2026.2669508 · Cited by 1
Beyond inclusion: feminist AI for transformative justice in STEM
Kubes, T. A. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01161-9 · Cited by 2
Academic Boldness: A Critical Resource for Decolonizing Knowledge
Adjei, S. B., & Moss, S. M. (2026) · Human Arenas · doi:10.1007/s42087-026-00630-1 · Cited by 1
Qualitative research: a needed but neglected form of inquiry in nutrition
Vaz, M. (2026) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-026-01762-x · Cited by 1
Reimagining oral health professionalism in Africa: a narrative from the margins
Foláyan, M. O., Ekundayo, O. O., & Gqaleni, N. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1834418 · Cited by 1
Migration, genre et santé mentale
Heine, A. (2026) · La Revue Nouvelle · doi:10.3917/rn.264.0005 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
