The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 5,401–5,500 of 12,257
Epistemic Injustice in Cases of Compulsory Psychiatric Treatment
Smyth, A. (2021) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) · Cited by 2
Giving In: Chronic Pain, BDSM, and Crip/Queer Utopia
Jobson, R. (2020) · doi:10.22215/etd/2020-14056 · Cited by 2
Exposing the Colonial Mind: Epistemologies of Ignorance and Education in Ontario, Canada
Schaefli, L. M. (2018) · QSpace (Queen's University Library) · Cited by 2
“Like having a perpetrator on your back”: Violence in the Welfare System
Speake, A. E. C. (2020) · Sheffield Hallam University · doi:10.7190/shu-thesis-00394 · Cited by 1
Breaking the silence : a phenomenological account of epistemic injustice and its role in psychiatry
Spencer, L. J. (2021) · Cited by 2
Kukla, Q. R. (2021) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.004 · Cited by 2
Sanyal, P., & Rao, V. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139095716.006 · Cited by 2
Stewart, S., Kennedy, H., Warner, T., Edan, V., Makuvachuma, D., Griffiths, S., Scholz, B., & Roper, C. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1394360/v1 · Cited by 2
Public Philosophy and Trans Activism
Ivy, V., & George, B. R. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119635253.ch19 · Cited by 2
Fricker, M. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0274 · Cited by 2
Self-citationHealth Literacy, Measurement of
Thompson, T. L. (2014) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483346427.n237 · Cited by 2
Chronic Pain, Bad-Differences, and Disability VariantismPreprint
Nadelhoffer, T. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/d7hmg · Cited by 2
Collective, P. K. E. (2016) · Practical Action Publishing eBooks · doi:10.3362/9781780449395.001 · Cited by 2
Keating, A. (2017) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-11982 · Cited by 2
Moseley, D. D. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee861 · Cited by 2
Agency Ascriptions in Ethics and Epistemology: Or, Navigating Intersections, Narrow and Broad
Axtell, G. S. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444391398.ch5 · Cited by 2
Argumentation and disagreement
Amenabar, D. C. (2022) · doi:10.33612/diss.219238903 · Cited by 2
Banks, S., Armstrong, A., Bonner, A., Hall, Y., Harman, P., Johnston, L., Levi, C., Smith, K., & Taylor, R. (2018) · Bristol University Press eBooks · doi:10.46692/9781447340775.004 · Cited by 2
Mulder, M. (2022) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.21076045 · Cited by 2
People's Councils for Ethical Machine LearningPreprint
McQuillan, D. (2018) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/sjpmc · Cited by 2
The Fallibility of Personal Experience
Kittay, E. F. (2023) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2146411 · Cited by 2
Lacerda-Vandenborn, E. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12852-4_41-1 · Cited by 2
Healing after Prayer, an interdisciplinary case study
Kruijthoff, D. J. (2023) · doi:10.5463/thesis.169 · Cited by 2
Transitions for People: Locating Inequality in Sustainable Urban Mobility Transitions
Lindberg, M. R. (2022) · VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) · doi:10.54337/aau521482687 · Cited by 3
Nzimande, N. P. (2022) · doi:10.14232/phd.11233 · Cited by 2
What is a just transition for environmental targets?
Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, Grub, H. M. J., & Wentworth, J. (2023) · doi:10.58248/pn706 · Cited by 2
Why we should all be reflexive: The case for reflexivity in quantitative sciencePreprint
Lammer, L. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/re6zq · Cited by 3
Rajan, R. (2024) · Journal of Dharma Studies · doi:10.1007/s42240-024-00165-0 · Cited by 2
African Metaphysics, Epistemology, and a New Logic: A Decolonial Approach to Philosophy
Nwosimiri, O. (2024) · South African Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/02580136.2024.2355005 · Cited by 2
An Introduction to Trauma-Informed Teaching in Anthropology
Tantam, W. (2024) · Teaching Anthropology · doi:10.22582/ta.v13i2.747 · Cited by 2
Acceding to MAiD Proponent’s Framing Excludes Abolition as Potential Solution
Peters, G. (2025) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2025.2489274 · Cited by 2
Killmister, S., & Ripley, D. (2023) · Australasian Philosophical Review · doi:10.1080/24740500.2023.2441498 · Cited by 2
Camlin, J. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5254622 · Cited by 2
Richards, K.-A. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5332125 · Cited by 2
Epistemic Justice and Indigenous Knowledge: Unpacking the Moral Imperatives of Outside EngagementPreprint
Duria, J. J. C. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5341678 · Cited by 2
Ramamoorthy, S., & Dinesh, A. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7452889/v1 · Cited by 2
Paradigms, positionality, and the responsibilities of inquiry
Piedra, L. M. (2025) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/14733250251384424 · Cited by 2
Gopalan, N. (2025) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2025.2554810 · Cited by 2
Multilingualism for Epistemological Diversity and Epistemic Inclusion
Zheng, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.70036 · Cited by 2
Social Theory of Disability and Experiential Knowledge
Boucher, N. (2025) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia5040182 · Cited by 2
Adi, F., & Oktavian, W. (2025) · Media Asia · doi:10.1080/01296612.2025.2589234 · Cited by 2
Doing Justice to the Patient’s Words: the Ethics of AI Scribes
Salloch, S. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2025.2608636 · Cited by 2
Epistemic Pluralism, Open Inquiry, and Constructive Disagreement: Strengthening the 2029 EPAS
Twis, M. K., Hodge, D. R., Farber, N. B., Horner, P. S., Rueda, H. A., Lens, V., Drake, B., & Alam, N. (2026) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/10497315261441544 · Cited by 2
Christou, A., Raby, R. L., & Lambert, S. (2026) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2026.2664329 · Cited by 2
Possible misplaced perception of moral shame in AI-use disclosure
Tang, B. L. (2026) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2026.2679554 · Cited by 2
Fernández, M. L., & García, X. L. (2026) · Cuadernos info · doi:10.7764/cdi.64.105364 · Cited by 2
Health workforce development in the Age of Intelligence: a tragedy of the cognitive commons?
Sadki, R. (2026) · doi:10.59350/t0630-9wt12 · Cited by 4
Horsthemke, K. (2012) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9509-x · Cited by 2
Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power
Herissone-Kelly, R. (2025) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaf044 · Cited by 1
Think tasks, not tools: why AI policy in higher education needs constructive alignment
Santschi, S. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2671391 · Cited by 1
Aydeniz, M. (2026) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.70230 · Cited by 1
Towards a Theory of the Social Determination of Behavior
Hoff, K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2015) · The World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank) · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-7537 · Cited by 1
Duxbury, T., Paphitis, S. A., Bezerra, J., & Tandlich, R. (2020) · New Trends in Qualitative Research · doi:10.36367/ntqr.1.2020.81-103 · Cited by 1
Neither pardon nor blame: Reacting in the wrong way
Coren, D. (2020) · Analytic Philosophy · doi:10.1111/phib.12196 · Cited by 1
Epistemology of the unspeakable: articulating and thinking beyond shock and non/presence
Anonymous (2021) · Culture, theory and critique/Culture, theory & critique · doi:10.1080/14735784.2022.2100133 · Cited by 1
Mhlongo, M. (2021) · Alternation Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of the Arts and Humanities in Southern Africa · doi:10.29086/2519-5476/2021/sp38c06 · Cited by 1
Alves, A. P. M., Andrade, D. R. D. S., & da Silva, F. C. G. (2023) · Ciência da Informação · doi:10.18225/ci.inf.v52i1.6095 · Cited by 1
Access to collective epistemic reasons: reply to Mitova
Boult, C. (2023) · Asian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s44204-023-00114-x · Cited by 1
Paterson, G. (2023) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2023.2267089 · Cited by 1
An Epistemic Injustice Critique of Austin's Ordinary Language Epistemology
Pearlman, S. (2024) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2023.111 · Cited by 1
Classroom communities for everyone
Stroupe, D., Berk, L., & Kramer, A. (2024) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/00317217241238105 · Cited by 1
Accountability as praxis: a dialectical conversation on decolonising teaching methods
Affolter, E., & Yost, A. (2024) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2024.2328606 · Cited by 1
Chabanel, P. (2024) · The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-59659-9_5 · Cited by 1
‘The Ethics of Attention to Language’ Introducing Conceptual Injustice
Braune, C. (2024) · Wittgenstein-Studien · doi:10.1515/witt-2024-0010 · Cited by 1
Thurston, M. (2024) · British Journal of Visual Impairment · doi:10.1177/02646196241267959 · Cited by 1
Theorien des Globalen Südens und Interkulturelle Theologie: Epistemologische Herausforderungen
Estermann, J. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-66324-0_20-1 · Cited by 1
Pollock, R., & Ko, D. (2024) · Outlines Critical Practice Studies · doi:10.7146/ocps.v26i.148606 · Cited by 1
A Bourdieusian theory on communicating an opinion about AI governance
Binst, B., Bircan, T., & Smets, A. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02060-5 · Cited by 3
The Inbetweeny Collective: Reflexive Dialogues on the Liminality of Researchers' Lived Experiences
Quesnel, D. T., Losev, T., Stepanova, E. R., Carpendale, S., & Riecke, B. E. (2024) · Halfway to the Future Symposium · doi:10.1145/3686169.3686204 · Cited by 1
Decolonial Community Psychology from Abya Yala
Velázquez, T., Ortiz‐Torres, B., León, T. C., & Ciófalo, N. (2024) · Community psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67035-0_25 · Cited by 1
The Role of Trust in LGBTQ + Refugee Status Determination ( RSD ) System
Vitikainen, A., & Lenard, P. T. (2024) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12596 · Cited by 1
The Politics of Exclusion and Inclusive Recognition: Unveiling Social and Epistemic Injustice
Nwosimiri, O. (2024) · Philosophia Africana · doi:10.5325/philafri.23.1.0029 · Cited by 1
Epistemic health, epistemic self-trust, and bipolar disorder: a case study
Barker, S. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04867-7 · Cited by 1
Awakening ‘the Indian genius’: The epistemic aims of Indian liberatory education
Agrawal, D. (2025) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2025.2459094 · Cited by 1
Reworking relations of epistemological authority in teaching collaborations
Hilbrandt, H., & Ren, J. (2025) · City · doi:10.1080/13604813.2024.2447684 · Cited by 1
Newey, C. A., & Rennick, S. (2025) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2024.96 · Cited by 1
Huchet, É. (2024) · Terrains/Théories · doi:10.4000/13c52 · Cited by 1
Sitting with invisible difference: Psychoanalytics and autism
Saayman, N., Harvey, C., & Fletcher, T. D. (2025) · British Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1111/bjp.12956 · Cited by 1
A-Z of Ethics of User Involvement in Mental Health Care and Research
Demke, E., Amering, M., Krämer, U. M., Schulz, G., Schulze, M., Stastny, P., von Peter, S., & Werning, A. (2025) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-2274-0_6 · Cited by 1
10. Patient participation in regulation of healthcare quality: Countering epistemic injustices
Husabø, G., & Hovlid, E. (2025) · Universitetsforlaget eBooks · doi:10.18261/9788215069906-25-10 · Cited by 1
What are Hermeneutical Resources? Nondiscursive Self-Interpretation and Gendered Embodiment
Ferguson, M. (2025) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2025.2 · Cited by 1
Trans* Women’s Experiences of Epistemic Misrecognition in Swedish Law and Society
Saeidzadeh, Z. (2025) · Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society · doi:10.1093/sp/jxaf019 · Cited by 1
The Danger of Precision Medicine Hesitancy
Demichelis, A. (2025) · Global Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10516-025-09747-4 · Cited by 2
Simone, S. D., & Pileri, J. (2025) · Diversity and inclusion research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81938-4_32 · Cited by 1
McCann, C. (2025) · History of Education · doi:10.1080/0046760x.2025.2486094 · Cited by 1
Yamaguchi, S., Huaman, J. A. V., Flores, C. Y., Flores, J., & Gamboa, D. C. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1117874ar · Cited by 1
Ireland‐Blake, N., Cram, F., Dew, K. P., Bacharach, S., STONE, P. R., Snelling, J., Buchanan, C. M., & Filoche, S. K. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70292 · Cited by 1
Webber, V. (2025) · Sexuality Research and Social Policy · doi:10.1007/s13178-025-01136-1 · Cited by 1
Epistemic standards and minimally responsive beliefs
Bongiorno, F. (2025) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.70024 · Cited by 1
Digital personomics: precision and digital psychiatry beyond reductionism
Constant, A. (2025) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2521436 · Cited by 1
Hutchinson, P. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_93-1 · Cited by 1
Overcoming epistemic injustice in Africa: a Global South perspective
Masaka, D. (2025) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2025.2521663 · Cited by 1
Knowing what to know? Health social workers and the values of epistemic resources
Sernbo, E., Törnbom, K., & Ståhl, D. (2025) · European Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/13691457.2025.2521742 · Cited by 1
Making sense of community-led place-based research
Wills, J. (2025) · Environment and Planning F · doi:10.1177/26349825251350714 · Cited by 1
The Epistemic Harms of National Humiliation
Majeed, R. (2025) · Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1093/arisup/akaf003 · Cited by 1
Ho, C. W.-L., & Caals, K. (2025) · Asian Bioethics Review · doi:10.1007/s41649-025-00387-9 · Cited by 1
THE IMPACT OF USING AI WITHOUT ADEQUATE ENGLISH PROFICIENCY AMONG USERS IN MATARAM
Seventilofa, I. G. N. O. (2025) · Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora · doi:10.59896/pesolah.v1i1.346 · Cited by 1
Consolandi, M., Floris, M., Ganz, C., & Paciscopi, N. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0328072 · Cited by 1
Justice signified: Naming injustice in the therapeutic space
Williams, M. L. (2025) · British Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1111/bjp.12985 · Cited by 1
Avery, S., Schaubroeck, K., & Sterckx, S. (2025) · European Journal of Women s Studies · doi:10.1177/13505068251369333 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
