The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 5,601–5,700 of 12,257
Joseph, J. A. (2026) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.70360 · Cited by 1
Okuhara, T., Okada, H., Yokota, R., & Kagawa, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2026.1819681 · Cited by 1
Schwarzer, N.-H., Behringer, N., Dees, P., Gingelmaier, S., Henter, M., Kirsch, H., Kreuzer, T., Langnickel, R., Link, P.-C., Müller, S., et al. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-04810-0 · Cited by 1
Gatekeeping potentially harmful research: The case of autism genetics
Gopakumar, M. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05597-8 · Cited by 1
Hindhede, A. L., & Sorensen, J. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2673387 · Cited by 1
Cape, S. (2026) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/13634593261455073 · Cited by 1
Rose, J., Amodt, S., Burke, Y., Canham, S. L., Clark, N., Clay, S., Elliott, H., Ferris, R., Gary, R., Horman, L., et al. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70708 · Cited by 1
Sibling Brokerage: Recasting Sibling Roles as Systemic Labour Across Disability Service Systems
Jeong, J. Y. (2026) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.70252 · Cited by 1
Bortolotti, L. (2026) · JME Practical Bioethics · doi:10.1136/jmepb-2026-000169 · Cited by 1
Who decides what is healthy? Algorithmic classification and medical normativity
Peng, W. (2026) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/13634593261458873 · Cited by 1
The Philanthropic Gaze: Western “Generosity” as Scientific Neocolonialism
Boretti, A. A. (2026) · Science & Society · doi:10.1177/00368237261456318 · Cited by 1
Parviainen, J., Teräsahde, S., Kuusipalo, P., Koski, A., & Rantala, J. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03157-9 · Cited by 1
The Theory of Ethically Resonant Listening: Listening as an Ethically Consequential Practice
Ala-Kortesmaa, S. (2026) · International Journal of Listening · doi:10.1080/10904018.2026.2689974 · Cited by 1
“We love our livestock”: relational care-based One Health in pastoral drylands
Griffith, E. F., Opondoh, A., Kaluwa, C., (20874083), E. L. N., Rotich, K., Kipkemoi, J. R., Levin, J., Mutua, J., & Amuguni, J. H. (2026) · Pastoralism Research Policy and Practice · doi:10.3389/past.2026.16200 · Cited by 1
The Harms of Self-Help Discourse
Latham, S., Isern‐Mas, C., & Almagro, M. (2026) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2026.10075 · Cited by 1
Creating community through Walking the Talk for dementia
Irving, K., Peres, F. A., Dawson, W. D., Zegarra-Valdivia, J. A., Mbakile‐Mahlanza, L., Leroi, I., & Gelmon, S. B. (2026) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2026.2678993 · Cited by 1
Khan, N., Stewart, N., Bhatti‐Sinclair, K., & Peckham, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1803057 · Cited by 1
Kellecioglu, D. (2026) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2026.2699171 · Cited by 1
Woke Attention and Controlling the Narrative
Kitsik, E. (2026) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2026.2688288 · Cited by 1
Story, transformation and global citizenship education: a narrative and hopeful approach to pedagogy
Dolan, A. M. (2026) · International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning · doi:10.14324/ijdegl.18.1.04 · Cited by 1
Almeida, P. A. (2026) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.70226 · Cited by 1
Reimagining Indigenous Knowledge Systems in the Age of AI
Haldar, P., & Mandal, D. K. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7976-0.ch001 · Cited by 1
The Personal is Epistemological: The Epistemic Force of Consciousness-Raising
Engelstad, A. (2026) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2026.10127 · Cited by 1
Markowska‐Manista, U. (2026) · Intercultural Education · doi:10.1080/14675986.2026.2703347 · Cited by 1
Feminist epistemic justice: reimagining knowledge and power in EU politics
KÜRÜM, R. S. (2026) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2026.2683855 · Cited by 1
Public Understandings of Microaggressions and the Harm They Do
Mulder, E., & Bosma, A. K. (2026) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605261463257 · Cited by 1
Epistemic power dynamics in participatory research with adolescents
Radu, S., & Zhu, X. (2026) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qmr-04-2025-0088 · Cited by 1
Subverting Poverty Stigma—Dub Theology and the Politics of Shame
Shannahan, C. (2026) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel17080889 · Cited by 1
Bisexual geographies: mapping bisexual experiences and imagining non-monosexual spaces in Catalonia
Rodó-Zárate, M., de Souza, J. I. L., & Pascual-Bordas, J. (2026) · Social & Cultural Geography · doi:10.1080/14649365.2026.2703803 · Cited by 1
Gendered exploitation in Halmahera’s nickel mining: A feminist perspective
Natalis, A., & Asy'arie, M. A. H. A. (2026) · Feminist Encounters A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics · doi:10.20897/femenc/19058 · Cited by 1
Arandjelović, O. (2026) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2026.10131 · Cited by 1
Health literacy reductionism: when individual deficits become the default explanation
Okuhara, T., Okada, H., & Furukawa, E. (2026) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daag118 · Cited by 1
Diaz, M. A., & Lopez, K. (2026) · Journal of Contemporary Ethnography · doi:10.1177/08912416261476440 · Cited by 1
Epistemic injustice in plain sight evidence from medical data
Floris, M. (2026) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-026-10393-9 · Cited by 1
Rubens, M., Zerafa-Payne, E., Mullens, A. B., Brown, D. J., Debattista, J., Mulcahy, F., Clarke, J., & Brömdal, A. (2026) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2026.2732193 · Cited by 1
Promoting Personal and Public Health
Stokols, D. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803113-1.00005-3 · Cited by 2
18. The Needs of Low-Literate Migrants When Learning the English Language
Mascarenhas, M. (2020) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0203.18 · Cited by 1
Sylvan, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108666404.011 · Cited by 1
Goldberg, S. C. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856436.003.0002 · Cited by 1
The Neural Mechanisms Underlying Social Norms
Mu, Y., & Gelfand, M. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.015 · Cited by 2
Linguistic Diversity in Higher Education
Somlata, Z. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108671088.008 · Cited by 2
An Analysis of the Language Legislation Effects in the Banking Sector
Thango, M. Z., & Moyo, W. N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108671088.011 · Cited by 1
Reconsidering post-war narratives of involvement in Nazi violence
Rauch, S. (2021) · Holocaust Studies · doi:10.1080/17504902.2020.1863073 · Cited by 1
Flear, M. L. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108620024.020 · Cited by 1
Leani, L. (2021) · Resistances Journal of the Philosophy of History · doi:10.46652/resistances.v2i3.45 · Cited by 1
The Swedish Personal Ombudsman: Support in Decision-Making and Accessing Human Rights
Berggren, U. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108979016.018 · Cited by 1
Groll, D. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190063054.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Sherman, N. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197501832.003.0009 · Cited by 1
The Messy Realities of Inclusive Research
Armstrong, A., Collis, A., & Walmsley, J. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48277-0_15-1 · Cited by 1
Epistemic Hierarchies, Decolonisation and the Periphery
Muller, S. (2021) · Debating higher education: philosophical perspectives · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84447-9_13 · Cited by 1
Schemmel, C. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190084240.003.0009 · Cited by 1
Is There a Duty to Speak Your Mind?
Hannon, M. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2045382 · Cited by 1
(2019) · Verlag Barbara Budrich eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvqsf36t · Cited by 1
Kim, C. S. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.11 · Cited by 1
The Uses and Abuses of Narrative for Life
Meretoja, H. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190649364.003.0004 · Cited by 1
An Exploration of Multilinguals’ Voice-Hearing Experiences
Olive, R. R., & Dewaele, J. (2022) · Language and Psychoanalysis · doi:10.7565/landp.v11i1.6611 · Cited by 1
Rodéhn, C. (2020) · Tidskrift för genusvetenskap · doi:10.55870/tgv.v41i3.2584 · Cited by 1
Testimony, Violence, and Silence: An Examination of Agamben and His Critics
Independent Scholar, F., & Uygarkizi, Y. (2022) · Dignity A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence · doi:10.23860/dignity.2022.07.02.05 · Cited by 1
Specifying the Method of Reflective Equilibrium: A Methodological Framework
Rechnitzer, T. (2022) · Logic, argumentation & reasoning · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04333-8_3 · Cited by 1
Mind Invasion Through Cognitive Integration: Facebook and the Exploitation of Users’ Ignorance
Talamanca, G. F., & Hunting, E. (2022) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-01922-7_7 · Cited by 1
Deliberation and Discursive Injustice: A Collective Failure.
Barba, M. (2022) · Las Torres de Lucca International Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.5209/ltdl.77037 · Cited by 1
Die epistemische Ambiguität der Verwundbarkeit
Teixeira, M. O. D. N. (2022) · Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie · doi:10.22613/zfpp/9.1.6 · Cited by 1
La politique du Logement d'abord en pratique
Tissot, N. (2022) · Presses de Rhizome eBooks · doi:10.3917/chlv.chamb.2022.01.0076 · Cited by 1
Rozas, L. W., & Henry, A. (2022) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2022.2115997 · Cited by 2
Living the Dream of Martin Luther King, Jr.: A Philosophy of Education
Glass, R. D. (2022) · Philosophy of education · doi:10.47925/78.2.001 · Cited by 1
Blameless Moral Criticism – the Case of Moral Disappointment
Schönherr, J. (2022) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-022-10352-2 · Cited by 1
Paul Hirst, education and epistemic injustice
Marabini, A. (2023) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhac004 · Cited by 1
Counteracting Epistemic Oppression Through Social Myths: The Last Indigenous Peoples of Europe
Renteria-Uriarte, X. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2153350 · Cited by 1
Peels, R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197654514.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Multilingual philosophy glossaries: Steps towards socially just pedagogical praxis
Coetser, Y. M., Gray, C., Terblanché-Greeff, A. C., & Lembethe, N. (2022) · NWU self-directed learning series · doi:10.4102/aosis.2022.bk345.04 · Cited by 2
Patient‐centricity: Research's new shibboleth?
Arnold, M. H., & Kerridge, I. (2023) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13830 · Cited by 1
Zašto je tako malo žena u filozofiji?
Boršić, L. (2022) · Filozofska istraživanja · doi:10.21464/fi42306 · Cited by 1
Ho, A. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780197556269.003.0005 · Cited by 1
Molina, G. E. C. (2023) · Revista de Antropología Social · doi:10.5209/raso.87298 · Cited by 1
Daher, M., Rosati, A., & Cifuentes, S. (2023) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/10892680231170018 · Cited by 1
Speaking of Elves, Dragons, and Werewolves
Baldwin, C., Ripley, L., & Arsenault, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197571026.003.0008 · Cited by 1
Historiography of Science and Gender
Reichenberger, A. (2023) · Historiographies of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99498-3_30-1 · Cited by 1
2. Jacques Derrida: Das Zeugnis als Geheimnis
Käser, M. (2023) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.14361/9783839468333-009 · Cited by 1
Teacher talk in an early educator blog: building culture circles for exploring ethics
Furman, C. E., & Karno, D. (2023) · Ethics and Education · doi:10.1080/17449642.2023.2224221 · Cited by 1
Neo-Liberalism and the Ethics of Pan-African Development Governance in Sub-Saharan Africa
George, K. M. (2023) · Philosophy and politics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32898-5_3 · Cited by 1
Hänel, H. C. (2023) · Constellations · doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12703 · Cited by 1
Herzog, L. M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197681718.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Schoonheim, L., & Vintges, K. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003366089 · Cited by 1
McBride, S.-L. (2023) · ISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment · doi:10.1093/isle/isad067 · Cited by 1
Bibliografia sobre Justiça Social: fontes sobre o tema em Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
da Silva, F. C. G., Garcez, D. C., Vieira, G. D. M., Fevrier, P. R., & Alves, A. P. M. (2023) · Ciência da Informação · doi:10.18225/ci.inf.v52i1.6094 · Cited by 1
Exploring Ignorance and Injustice in African Epistemology
Abudu, K. U. (2023) · Handbooks in philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25149-8_14 · Cited by 1
Talamanca, G. F. (2023) · Információs Társadalom · doi:10.22503/inftars.xxiii.2023.2.8 · Cited by 1
Social work with young women in security emergencies: An autoethnography of epistemic resistance
Shimei, N. (2023) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593535231207190 · Cited by 1
Epistemic injustice in educational policy: an account of structural contributory injustice
Bogia, M. L. (2023) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhad070 · Cited by 1
Jensen, R. E., Thayssen, A. E. M., & Uldbjerg, S. (2023) · Conjunctions Transdisciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation · doi:10.2478/tjcp-2023-0005 · Cited by 1
Expertise, trading zones and the planning system: A case study of an energy-from-biomass plant
Hacking, N., Evans, R., & Lewis, J. (2023) · Environment and Planning E Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486231212083 · Cited by 1
Treating black patients as “knowers”
Thomas, J. J., Johnson, S. M., Holden, K. B., & Hutchins, S. S. (2023) · Journal of the National Medical Association · doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2023.09.012 · Cited by 1
La invisibilización del trabajo doméstico a partir de la división sexual del trabajo
Estermann, V., & Muro, M. (2023) · REVISTA CONTROVERSIA · doi:10.54118/controver.vi221.1299 · Cited by 1
Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Prospective View
Maringe, F., & Chiramba, O. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42402-1_10 · Cited by 1
The Epistemological Asymmetry of Framing “Woman” via US Women's Rights Pioneers
Bickell, L. (2023) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2023.84 · Cited by 1
El trauma o en busca de la agencia perdida
Ruiz, R. (2023) · Ideas y Valores · doi:10.15446/ideasyvalores.v72n181.107694 · Cited by 1
Murgatroyd, A., & Feront, C. (2023) · Evaluation: African perspectives. · doi:10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.02 · Cited by 1
Programme evaluation as a reflection and perpetuator of inequality in the global political economy
Dlakavu, A. (2023) · Evaluation: African perspectives. · doi:10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.03 · Cited by 1
McLean, K. C. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197764640.003.0003 · Cited by 1
Neologisms in contemporary feminisms: For a redefinition of feminist linguistic activism
Foubert, O. (2023) · GLAD! · doi:10.4000/glad.7722 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
