The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 5,701–5,800 of 12,257
A crisis of recognition: gender, race, and the struggle to be seen in pre-modernity
Dawson, H. (2024) · British Journal for the History of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/09608788.2024.2310571 · Cited by 1
Quesnay, P., & Margat, A. (2024) · Éducation et socialisation · doi:10.4000/edso.27320 · Cited by 1
Group Ownership, Group Interests, and the Ethics of Cultural Exchange
Ferracioli, L., & Shpall, S. (2024) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-024-09478-5 · Cited by 1
Wharne, S., Arnold‐Baker, C., & Dowek, N. H. (2024) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.12763 · Cited by 1
Towards Decolonising Post Graduate Supervision
Pillay, S. K. (2024) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1289-6.ch015 · Cited by 1
Las formas de la violencia sobre el tejido cuerpo-territorio
Volonterio, M. P., & Pena, D. (2023) · Bajo el volcán. Revista del posgrado de sociología. BUAP. · doi:10.32399/icsyh.bvbuap.2954-4300.2023.4.8.537 · Cited by 2
McClimans, L. M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197572078.003.0004 · Cited by 1
Ringer, N., & Schön, U. (2024) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-024-02875-2 · Cited by 1
Mångfaldens möten: Interkulturalitet, utbildning och lärande
Bergnéhr, D., Nilsson, H., Silander, C., & Trulsson, Å. (2024) · doi:10.15626/9789180821476 · Cited by 1
Schwengerer, L. (2024) · Acta Analytica · doi:10.1007/s12136-024-00598-z · Cited by 1
Are there boundaries for epistemic injustice in medical education?
Percival, C. S., & Wyatt, T. R. (2024) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.15467 · Cited by 1
Roen, K., Lundberg, T., & Joy, E. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117099 · Cited by 1
Wieczorek, M. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02013-y · Cited by 1
Book Symposium: Alfred Archer and Jake Wojtowicz’s Why it’s OK to be a Sports Fan
Archer, A., Wojtowicz, J., Kadlac, A., Slater, J., Baron‐Schmitt, N., & Windgätter, N. (2024) · Sport Ethics and Philosophy · doi:10.1080/17511321.2024.2367073 · Cited by 1
Solutions to the medical practice of silencing
Sowemimo, A. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01652-0 · Cited by 1
"Ingen kender 'det rigtige sprog', vi taler allesammen konstant om det"
Anbert, L. C. (2024) · Tidsskriftet Antropologi · doi:10.7146/ta.vi89.147999 · Cited by 1
Nielsen, G. B. (2024) · Tidsskriftet Antropologi · doi:10.7146/ta.vi89.148002 · Cited by 1
Behdadi, D. (2024) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2391430 · Cited by 1
Ethical Guidance and Epidemiological Studies
van Delden, J. J. M., van der Graaf, R., & Janssens, A. I. W. A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6625-3_40-1 · Cited by 1
Adams, M., Sanford, N., Bevan, C., Booker, M., Hartley, J., Heazell, A. E. P., Montgomery, E., Treadwell, M., & Sandall, J. (2024) · Health and Social Care Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/ytdf8015 · Cited by 2
The Insider’s Journey: Two Investments for Epistemic Justice in Educational Research
Hill-Jackson, V. (2024) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10778004241269947 · Cited by 1
Ramaswamy, S., Seshadri, S. P., & Bunders, J. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60974-9_10 · Cited by 1
Collaborative Writing as a Process of Inquiry within Knowledge Ecologies
McDermott, M., Lenart, B. A., Rimpu, S., Ruddock, K., Reid, L., & Williams, A. (2024) · Journal of Electronic Publishing · doi:10.3998/jep.6033 · Cited by 1
Epistemic Shortcuts and Unjust Diagnostic Practices
Nealon, N. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2400067 · Cited by 1
Ideology as modes of being-with: An existential-phenomenological contribution to ideology critique
Burch, M. I., & Rautenberg, N. (2024) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537241284540 · Cited by 1
Rippon, S. (2024) · Acta Analytica · doi:10.1007/s12136-024-00608-0 · Cited by 1
Narratives about epistemic trespassing
Bristol, R., Alhaqab, S., & Rossano, F. (2024) · Text and Talk · doi:10.1515/text-2023-0174 · Cited by 1
Experiments in Living Together
Fuerstein, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197784280.003.0004 · Cited by 1
Macalantong-Casan, F. (2024) · Journal of interdisciplinary perspectives · doi:10.69569/jip.2024.0401 · Cited by 1
Patient engagement in drug development: dialogically problematizing participation
Egher, C., Bereczky, T., Snede, L., & Zvonareva, O. (2024) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505431.2024.2410719 · Cited by 1
Challenging Stereotypes About Young People Who Hear Voices
Bortolotti, L., Malpass, F., Murphy‐Hollies, K., Somerville-Large, T., Kapoor, G., & Braid, O. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-68881-2_2 · Cited by 4
Victimhood and Heroes and Hierarchies
Lawther, C. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191938634.003.0003 · Cited by 1
Moon, I. (2024) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2024.2426297 · Cited by 1
Derrick, G., Hauseux, M., Sheridan, M., Chen, P., Larivière, V., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2026) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.70228 · Cited by 1
Post‐Christendom Ignorance in Secular Society
Beauchamp, G. (2024) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1111/japp.12776 · Cited by 1
A Performative Feminist Hinge Epistemology: Making Room for Feminist Hinges
Carmona, C., & Gómez-Ledo, I. (2024) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2024.88 · Cited by 1
An Enquiry Into Modes of Non-Existence
Valkenburg, G. (2024) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439241300744 · Cited by 1
Explain Yourself: The Ethics of Soliciting Advice
Desmond, J. (2024) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12601 · Cited by 1
Saberes sobre o autismo e saberes autistas
Désormeaux-Moreau, M. (2024) · Cahiers franco-latino-américains d études sur le handicap · doi:10.56078/cfla_discapacidad.373 · Cited by 1
The Communicative Space: Painting the Evidence and Plausibility in Asylum Court Hearings
Tužinská, H. (2024) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639241307604 · Cited by 1
“Since you live in two worlds, it is not always easy to tell them apart”
Koskinen, K. P. (2024) · Speki Nordic Philosophy and Education Review · doi:10.5617/speki.11463 · Cited by 1
Ideology and Values in Healthcare: A Commentary on Baker's (2025) Medical Lysenkoism
Mercuri, M., & Calzavara, A. (2024) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.14292 · Cited by 1
Görünüş ve Gerçeklik Arasında Hakikat Sonrası: Post-Truth Söyleme Eleştirel Bir Bakış
Akyasan, D., & Sungur, E. (2024) · Muhakeme Dergisi · doi:10.33817/muhakeme.1572759 · Cited by 1
Lachapelle, S., Gelbard, S. B., & Kilty, J. M. (2025) · Current Issues in Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/10345329.2024.2437207 · Cited by 1
Zawadzka, K., & Ciarcińska, K. (2024) · Studia Administracji i Bezpieczeństwa · doi:10.5604/01.3001.0054.9408 · Cited by 1
Self-Prediction in Practical Reasoning
White, S. J. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191997273.003.0010 · Cited by 1
Autonomy and Vulnerability: Elements of a Phenomenology of Reflection and Reason
Melichar, H. G. (2025) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/s10746-024-09775-w · Cited by 1
The Role of Intercultural Science Education: Reorienting a Socio-political Agenda for Latin-America
Robles-Piñeros, J., & Abella, S. (2024) · Contemporary trends and issues in science education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-78586-3_11 · Cited by 1
Colonial Memory, Epistemic Affordances, and Political Equality
Catala, A. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197776353.003.0005 · Cited by 1
Catala, A. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197776353.003.0001 · Cited by 1
The development of pervasive social dysphoria in autistic people with gender dysphoria in Japan
Shimoyama, S., & Endo, T. (2025) · The Japanese journal of psychology · doi:10.4992/jjpsy.96.23035 · Cited by 1
Understanding, knowledge, injustice and the right to know
García, E. B. (2025) · Asian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s44204-024-00237-9 · Cited by 1
Ser mujer negra en la academia chilena. Tensiones y reflexiones
Rebolledo-Rebolledo, R., & Valoyes-Chávez, L. (2025) · REVISTA CUHSO · doi:10.7770/cuhso-v34n2-art797 · Cited by 1
Godoy, D. (2024) · Debate Feminista · doi:10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.2025.69.2520 · Cited by 1
Rønneberg, M., Mjølstad, B. P., Hvas, L., & Getz, L. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1080/17482631.2025.2454043 · Cited by 1
Southern Lights: Framing Horizontality in Scientific Networks
Chaudhary, N., Sá, A. L. D. F., Marsico, G., & Pickren, W. E. (2025) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/10892680251314495 · Cited by 1
Guité, A. (2024) · Éducation relative à l environnement · doi:10.4000/136n8 · Cited by 1
The development process of a type 2 diabetes health-promoting CBPR intervention
Lindsjö, C., Forss, K. S., Kumlien, C., Kottorp, A., & Rämgård, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1486996 · Cited by 1
Low, K. E., Petretti, S., Lowry, C. B., & Shaharuddin, M. (2025) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2024-013110 · Cited by 1
Palacio-Hernández, R., & Bolaños, K. (2024) · Magis Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación · doi:10.11144/javeriana.m17.emcm · Cited by 1
Hänel, H. C. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie · doi:10.1007/s42048-025-00206-8 · Cited by 1
From participants to partners: Indigenous community engagement practices in neuroscience research
Bassil, K. C., & Muller, S. H. A. (2025) · Developments in neuroethics and bioethics · doi:10.1016/bs.dnb.2025.01.001 · Cited by 1
Living Your Animal: Listening to Wild Gender and Sexuality
Taxidis, G. (2024) · Psychological Perspectives · doi:10.1080/00332925.2024.2442280 · Cited by 1
Poole, M., Carthens, S. R., Cochran, E. N., & Koenig, A. (2024) · Rhetoric of Health & Medicine · doi:10.5744/rhm.2024.2084 · Cited by 1
Scarcity in the Credibility Economy: A Bayesian Analysis of Testimonial Injustice
Merdes, C. J. (2025) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-025-00942-8 · Cited by 1
Antipsychotic Deprescribing Analyzed as a Wicked Problem
Ustrup, M., Roe, D., & Speyer, H. (2025) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/00221678251328088 · Cited by 2
For whom is the human geography discipline?
Roux, L. L. (2025) · South African Geographical Journal · doi:10.1080/03736245.2025.2472664 · Cited by 1
Sénac, C. (2024) · Communiquer Revue de communication sociale et publique · doi:10.4000/13lfb · Cited by 1
Quels visages de l’éthique au prisme d’une école hospitalière ?
Lacôte-Coquereau, C. (2024) · Éthique en éducation et en formation Les Dossiers du GREE · doi:10.7202/1116967ar · Cited by 1
Ancient Greek Philosophy and Feminism: A Field Guide
Pellò, C. (2025) · Ancient Philosophy Today · doi:10.3366/anph.2025.0123 · Cited by 1
Peripherien, Konflikte, Transformationen – Perspektiven einer kritischen Energiegeographie
Naumann, M., Becker, S., & Bruns, A. (2025) · Geographica Helvetica · doi:10.5194/gh-80-99-2025 · Cited by 1
Vice, Skill, and the Non-Ideal
Matthews, T. (2025) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2025.2482919 · Cited by 1
Thakore-Dunlap, U., & Feng, B. L.-H. (2025) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/jmft.70020 · Cited by 1
Epistemic injustice: women poppy cultivators in the opium production discourse of Afghanistan
Nazari, N. (2025) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2025.2488499 · Cited by 1
Co-producing Histories of Australian Community Mental Health, 1970–1990
The Re;Minding Histories Research Group (2025) · The politics of mental health and illness · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82861-4_5 · Cited by 1
Psy-knowledges in the Academy: Making Space for Critique
Tseris, E. J. (2025) · The politics of mental health and illness · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82861-4_3 · Cited by 1
Molecular and Hematological Characterization of α-Thalassemia in Denizli Province
Karaer, D., Er, T. U., Aslan, N. A., & Durak, T. (2025) · Acta haematologica oncologica Turcica. · doi:10.4274/ahot.galenos.2025.2025-3-3 · Cited by 1
Özel Gereksinimli Bireylere Yönelik Cinsel Eğitim Konulu Lisansüstü Tezlerin Sistematik Derlemesi
Alp, Z. A., Sezik, A., & Aksoy, F. (2025) · Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.19171/uefad.1540602 · Cited by 1
Resistance to epistemic silencing in social services: user tactics for enhancing responsiveness
Osinski, A., & Rurka, A. (2025) · Critical and Radical Social Work · doi:10.1332/20498608y2025d000000081 · Cited by 1
Giorgi, A. L. D. (2025) · Tempo · doi:10.1590/tem-1980-542x2024v310111 · Cited by 1
Keller, L. (2025) · Integrated science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87023-1_5 · Cited by 1
Challenging Antifat Bias and Fatphobia in the Philosophy Classroom
Wieseler, C. (2025) · American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy · doi:10.5840/aaptstudies202557105 · Cited by 1
On Knowing I Am Not Alone in the Universe
Eilan, N. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191954856.003.0017 · Cited by 1
Campbell, L. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191954856.001.0001 · Cited by 1
White, S. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191904752.003.0007 · Cited by 1
Mackintosh, N. J., Chew, S., Armstrong, N., Duncan, P., Hill, M., Kelly, T., Sutton, L., Willars, J., & Tarrant, C. (2025) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2025.104461 · Cited by 1
Library time: in pursuit of liberatory leisure
Abbott, J. K. (2025) · Information Research · doi:10.47989/ir30colis52345 · Cited by 1
Connaissance sociologique, « savoirs expérientiels » et « injustices épistémiques »
Mauger, G. (2025) · Sciences & Actions Sociales · doi:10.3917/sas.023.0006 · Cited by 1
Self-inflicted epistemic injustice
Kotsonis, A. (2025) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2025.2505497 · Cited by 1
The effects of epistemic violence on women philosophers’ career
Zirbel, I., & Sattler, J. (2025) · Revista de Filosofia Aurora · doi:10.1590/2965-1557.037.e202531454 · Cited by 1
Boonabaana, B., Musiimenta, P., Muhanguzi, F. K., & Faria, C. (2025) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2025.2513076 · Cited by 1
Konishi, Y. (2025) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.70059 · Cited by 1
Exploring Electoral Discrimination Through an Ethics of Office Accountability
Ceva, E., & Stojanović, N. (2025) · Representation · doi:10.1080/00344893.2025.2515587 · Cited by 1
The ambivalent wisdom of moral disgust
Yip, B. (2025) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2521437 · Cited by 1
Authenticity and Constitutively Relational Emotions
Johnston, R. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197795767.003.0005 · Cited by 1
Perception, Recognition, and the Aesthetics of Exclusion. A Paradox in Axel Honneth’s Social Theory
Chmielewski, A. (2025) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-025-00836-7 · Cited by 1
Oredsson, A. F., & Lippert‐Rasmussen, K. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009445955.019 · Cited by 1
Who Needs a Theory of Justice? Judith Shklar and the Politics of Injustice
Douglass, R. (2025) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055425100816 · Cited by 1
Embodied Voices: An Introduction
Simecek, K., & Young, T. (2025) · The British Journal of Aesthetics · doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayaf009 · Cited by 1
Rawat, V. K., & Nagaraju, P. M. T. V. (2024) · doi:10.53555/kuey.v30i6.10377 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review