Cited by 152Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Effects of protein supplementation on lean body mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in nonfrail community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
ten Haaf, Dominique S M, Nuijten, Malou A H, Maessen, Martijn F H, Horstman, Astrid M H, Eijsvogels, Thijs M H, Hopman, Maria TE·2018·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Increasing protein intake has been suggested as an effective strategy to ameliorate age-related loss of muscle mass and strength. Current reviews assessing the effect of protein supplementation are strongly influenced by the inclusion of studies with frail older adults.Objectives We assessed the effect of protein supplementation on lean body mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in exclusively nonfrail community-dwelling older adults. Moreover, we assessed the superior effects of protein supplementation during concomitant resistance exercise training on muscle characteristics.Design A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to 15 May 2018. We included randomized controlled trials that assessed the effect of protein supplementation on lean body mass, muscle thigh cross-sectional area, muscle strength, gait speed, and chair-rise ability and performed random-effects meta-analyses.Results Data from 36 studies with 1682 participants showed no significant effects of protein supplementation on changes in lean body mass [standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.11; 95% CI: -0.06, 0.28], handgrip strength (SMD: 0.58; 95% CI: -0.08, 1.24), lower extremity muscle strength (SMD: 0.03; 95% CI: -0.20, 0.27), gait speed (SMD: 0.41; 95% CI: -0.04, 0.85), or chair-rise ability (SMD: 0.10; 95%: CI -0.08, 0.28) compared with a control condition in nonfrail community-dwelling older adults. Moreover, no superior effects of protein supplementation were found during concomitant resistance exercise training on muscle characteristics.Conclusions Protein supplementation in nonfrail community-dwelling older adults does not lead to increases in lean body mass, muscle cross-sectional area, muscle strength, or physical performance compared with control conditions; nor does it exert superior effects when added to resistance exercise training. Habitual protein intakes of most study participants were already sufficient, and protein interventions differed in terms of type of protein, amount, and timing. Future research should clarify what specific protein supplementation protocol is beneficial for nonfrail community-dwelling older adults with low habitual protein intake.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/nqy192

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of protein ingestion independent of resistance exercise are not commonly explored.

    “However, the effects of protein ingestion independent of RE are not commonly explored.”

    From Systematic review and meta-analysis of protein intake to support muscle mass and function in healthy adults (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Selection of studies for the meta-analysis section (page unavailable) reports 11 studies assessing protein supplementation without concomitant resistance exercise, versus 18 assessing its additional effect during resistance exercise. This supports the narrower point that independent effects were studied less often in nonfrail community-dwelling older adults, but not the unqualified claim that they are uncommonly explored generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Protein supplementation rarely substantially affects strength outcomes, which highlights that the extra LBM gain stimulated by protein supplementation may not be muscle, or at least not sufficient muscle that is contributing to increases in strength.

    “This question is relevant as protein supplementation rarely substantially affects strength outcomes, 14 , 21 , 22 , 23 which highlights that the extra LBM gain stimulated by protein supplementation may not be muscle, 111 or at least not sufficient muscle that is contributing to increases in strength.”

    From Systematic review and meta-analysis of protein intake to support muscle mass and function in healthy adults (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The insertion of clinical trials testing multi-ingredient supplements, including energy-restricted weight-loss diets, or using different cut-off points for age sub-groups likely explains differences in main effects and conclusions when comparing studies.

    “The insertion of clinical trials testing multi‐ingredient supplements, 106 including energy‐restricted weight‐loss diets, 13 or using different cut‐off points for age sub‐groups likely explain the differences in main effects and conclusions when comparing studies. 14 , 21 , 22 , 23”

    From Systematic review and meta-analysis of protein intake to support muscle mass and function in healthy adults (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Study selection section defines older adults using an average age of at least 50 years, and the Limitations section says the review included protein-based multi-ingredient supplements and that varied supplementation strategies introduced heterogeneity. But Study selection explicitly excludes interventions with energy-intake restriction, and the cited passages do not establish that differing age cutoffs explain differences in conclusions between reviews. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some particularities in the inclusion criteria in these two meta-analyses (i.e. aerobic exercise training or the cut-off point during age subgroup analysis) might cause such contrast compared with our findings.

    “However, some particularities in the inclusion criteria in these two meta‐analyses (i.e. aerobic exercise training or the cut‐off point during age subgroup analysis) might cause such contrast compared with our findings.”

    From Systematic review and meta-analysis of protein intake to support muscle mass and function in healthy adults (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Study selection section defines older adults as participants with an average age of at least 50 years, supporting the point about an age cutoff. It also includes studies with resistance training, but the passages do not establish that aerobic exercise training was an inclusion criterion. The proposed explanation for the contrast is the citing authors’ own inference, not a finding attributed to this review. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • According to previous meta-analyses, the effects of increasing daily protein ingestion on muscle strength are highly variable.

    “According to previous meta‐analyses from our group and others, the effects of increasing daily protein ingestion on muscle strength are highly variable. 14 , 21 , 22 , 23”

    From Systematic review and meta-analysis of protein intake to support muscle mass and function in healthy adults (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Muscle strength results (page unavailable) report significant heterogeneity in handgrip-strength effects, supporting variability for that outcome. But they report no heterogeneity for lower-extremity strength or for strength outcomes during resistance training; the Limitations section likewise says significant heterogeneity occurred in only two forest plots, just one of which concerned strength. Thus this source does not support describing muscle-strength effects generally as highly variable. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ten Haaf, D. S. M., Nuijten, M. A. H., Maessen, M. F. H., Horstman, A. M. H., Eijsvogels, T. M. H., & Hopman, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • FrieslandCampina (Netherlands) (NL)
Corresponding author
Hopman, Maria TE
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
108
Issue
5
Pages
1043-1059
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901144022
Cited by
152
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 7
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
protein supplementation, lean body mass, muscle strength, physical performance, community-dwelling older adults, resistance training, grip strength, walking speed, muscle cross-sectional area, sarcopenia
MeSH terms
Physical Functional Performance, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Fluid Compartments, Dietary Proteins, Female, Gait, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Exercise, Geriatric Assessment, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review