Cited by 57Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

The human language system, including its inferior frontal component in “Broca’s area,” does not support music perception

Open access
Chen, Xuanyi, Affourtit, Josef, Ryskin, Rachel, Regev, Tamar I, Norman-Haignere, Samuel, Jouravlev, Olessia, Malik-Moraleda, Saima, Kean, Hope +2 more·2023·Cerebral Cortex

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Language and music are two human-unique capacities whose relationship remains debated. Some have argued for overlap in processing mechanisms, especially for structure processing. Such claims often concern the inferior frontal component of the language system located within “Broca’s area.” However, others have failed to find overlap. Using a robust individual-subject fMRI approach, we examined the responses of language brain regions to music stimuli, and probed the musical abilities of individuals with severe aphasia. Across 4 experiments, we obtained a clear answer: music perception does not engage the language system, and judgments about music structure are possible even in the presence of severe damage to the language network. In particular, the language regions’ responses to music are generally low, often below the fixation baseline, and never exceed responses elicited by nonmusic auditory conditions, like animal sounds. Furthermore, the language regions are not sensitive to music structure: they show low responses to both intact and structure-scrambled music, and to melodies with vs. without structural violations. Finally, in line with past patient investigations, individuals with aphasia, who cannot judge sentence grammaticality, perform well on melody well-formedness judgments. Thus, the mechanisms that process structure in language do not appear to process music, including music syntax.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhad087

Cites

256 of 256 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • fMRI reveals that the language network responds reliably when people listen to, read, or generate sentences, but not when they perform arithmetic tasks, engage in logical reasoning, understand computer programs, listen to music, categorize objects or events, reason about people's mental states, or process non-verbal communicative information like facial expressions or gestures.

    “it responds reliably when people listen to, read, or generate sentences, but not when they perform arithmetic tasks, engage in logical reasoning, understand computer programs, listen to music, categorize objects or events, reason about people’s mental states, or process non-verbal communicative information like facial expressions or gestures [37, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48].”

    From Dissociating language and thought in large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [43]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Brown DR. Human universals. Philadelphia (PA): Temple University Press; 1991.
  2. Chomsky N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1965.
  3. Chomsky N. The minimalist program. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1995.
  4. Cross I, Tolbert E. Music and meaning. The Oxford handbook of music psychology. 2009:24-34.
  5. Dale AM. Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999:8(2-3):109-114.
  6. Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston naming test. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
  7. Liu J, Hilton CB, Bergelson E, Mehr SA. Language experience shapes music processing across 40 tonal, pitch-accented, and non-tonal languages. bioRxiv. 2021.
  8. Peretz I, Belleville S, Fontaine S. Dissociations between music and language functions after cerebral resection: a new case of amusia without aphasia. Can J Exp Psychol. 1997:51(4):354-368.
  9. Roberts I. Comments and a conjecture inspired by Fabb and Halle. In: Rebuschat P, Rohrmeier M, Hawkins JA, Cross I, editors. Language and music as cognitive systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 51-66.
  10. Shain C, Kean H, Lipkin B, Affourtit J, Siegelman M, Mollica F, Fedorenko E. 'Constituent length'effects in fMRI do not provide evidence for abstract syntactic processing. bioRxiv. 2021.
  11. Slevc LR, Reitman J, Okada B. 2013. Syntax in music and language: the role of cognitive control. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society; 2013 Jul 31-Aug 3; Berlin, Germany; p. 3414-3419.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, X., Affourtit, J., Ryskin, R., Regev, T. I., Norman-Haignere, S., Jouravlev, O., Malik-Moraleda, S., Kean, H., Varley, R., & Fedorenko, E.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • University of Rochester Medical Center Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, , Rochester, NY , United States
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2023-04-01
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
7904-7929
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W4362507403
Cited by
57
References
256
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Simons Center for the Social Brai
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research
  • Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department
  • Paul and Lilah Newton Brain Science Award
  • Alzheimer’s Society and The Stroke Association
  • La Caixa Fellowship (LCF/BQ/AA17/11610043)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute/Life Sciences Research Foundation
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (R00HD057522, R01DC016607, R01DC016950, R01NS121471, K99DC018051, F32-DC-015163)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
music perception, language system, Broca's area, inferior frontal cortex, aphasia, musical syntax, individual differences, auditory cortex
MeSH terms
Aphasia, Brain Mapping, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Music, Perception, Broca Area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review