Cited by 114Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

The left ventral occipito-temporal response to words depends on language lateralization but not on visual familiarity

Open access
Cai, Q., Paulignan, Y., Brysbaert, M., Ibarrola, D., Nazir, T. A.·2010·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

The sensitivity of the left ventral occipito-temporal (vOT) cortex to visual word processing has triggered a considerable debate about the role of this region in reading. One popular view is that the left vOT underlies the perceptual expertise needed for rapid skilled reading. Because skilled reading breaks down when words are presented in a visually unfamiliar format, we tested this hypothesis by analyzing vOT responses to horizontally presented words (familiar format) and vertically presented words (unfamiliar format). In addition, we compared the activity in participants with left and right cerebral dominance for language generation. Our results revealed 1) that the vOT activity during reading is lateralized to the same side as the inferior frontal activity during word generation, 2) that vertically and horizontally presented words triggered the same amount of activity in the vOT of the dominant hemisphere, but 3) that there was significantly more activity for vertically presented words in the vOT of the nondominant hemisphere. We suggest that the reading-related activity in vOT reflects the integration of general perceptual processes with language processing in the anterior brain regions and is not limited to skilled reading in the familiar horizontal format.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhp175

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The left ventral occipitotemporal cortex contributes to written word recognition by integrating bottom-up generic visual processing with top-down influences from phonological and semantic areas.

    “A complementary perspective is that the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex contributes to written word recognition by integrating bottom up (feed forward) generic visual processing with top-down influences from phonological, and semantic areas (Cai et al., 2010; Hellyer et al., 2011; Price and Devlin, 2011; Wang et al., 2011; Woodhead et al., 2011a).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, Q., Paulignan, Y., Brysbaert, M., Ibarrola, D., & Nazir, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Université de Lyon (FR)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2009-08-14
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
1153-1163
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2116019115
Cited by
114
References
65
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
visual word processing, language lateralization, reading, language dominance, inferior frontal cortex, word production, perceptual expertise, hemispheric lateralization
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Language, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Occipital Lobe, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Reading, Temporal Lobe, Vocabulary, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review