Cited by 169Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Hippocampal Radial Glial Subtypes and Their Neurogenic Potential in Human Fetuses and Healthy and Alzheimer’s Disease Adults

Open access
Cipriani, Sara, Ferrer, Isidre, Aronica, Eleonora, Kovacs, Gabor G, Verney, Catherine, Nardelli, Jeannette, Khung, Suonavy, Delezoide, Anne-Lise +7 more·2018·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Neuropathological conditions might affect adult granulogenesis in the adult human dentate gyrus. However, radial glial cells (RGCs) have not been well characterized during human development and aging. We have previously described progenitor and neuronal layer establishment in the hippocampal pyramidal layer and dentate gyrus from embryonic life until mid-gestation. Here, we describe RGC subtypes in the hippocampus from 13 gestational weeks (GW) to mid-gestation and characterize their evolution and the dynamics of neurogenesis from mid-gestation to adulthood in normal and Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects. In the pyramidal ventricular zone (VZ), RGC density declined with neurogenesis from mid-gestation until the perinatal period. In the dentate area, morphologic and antigenic differences among RGCs were observed from early ages of development to adulthood. Density and proliferative capacity of dentate RGCs as well as neurogenesis were strongly reduced during childhood until 5 years, few DCX+ cells are seen in adults. The dentate gyrus of both control and AD individuals showed Nestin+ and/or GFAPδ+ cells displaying different morphologies. In conclusion, pools of morphologically, antigenically, and topographically diverse neural progenitor cells are present in the human hippocampus from early developmental stages until adulthood, including in AD patients, while their neurogenic potential seems negligible in the adult.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhy096

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The brain has limited regenerative capacity compared to tissues such as skeletal muscle and skin, which rely on stem cells to repair damage.

    “This is due to the brain’s limited regenerative capacity compared to tissues, such as skeletal muscle and skin, which rely on stem cells to repair damage [57,58].”

    From The Impact of Neurotoxin Proteins Trafficked by Primary Cilia and Extracellular Vesicles in Neurodegenerative Diseases (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    The section “Neurogenic potential in the dentate gyrus during normal adulthood” (page not supplied) describes very few proliferating cells in the adult human hippocampus, supporting a narrower point about limited neurogenesis. It does not compare the brain’s repair capacity with skeletal muscle or skin, or discuss those tissues’ stem-cell-based repair. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some groups report absent or minimal hippocampal neurogenesis in the mature brain using double immunofluorescence and single nucleus transcriptomics.

    “Some groups have reported absent or minimal hippocampal neurogenesis in the mature brain using double immunofluorescence targeting markers expressed by neuronal cells at different maturational stages95, 96 and single nucleus transcriptomics97.”
  • Ageing significantly reduces adult hippocampal neurogenesis.

    “Ageing has been shown to significantly reduce adult hippocampal neurogenesis [109].”

    From Ageing, Cellular Senescence and Neurodegenerative Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [109]

  • The majority of reports provide positive evidence for adult neurogenesis in the human hippocampus, suggesting that studying this process in rodents is likely relevant to understanding human brain plasticity.

    “A few studies contradict these findings (Cipriani et al., 2018; Sorrells et al., 2018), but the majority of reports provide positive evidence for adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus of humans, suggesting that studying this process in rodents is likely relevant to understanding human brain plasticity.”

    From Adult neurogenesis, glia, and the extracellular matrix (2019) · cites this paper as Cipriani et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cipriani, S., Ferrer, I., Aronica, E., Kovacs, G. G., Verney, C., Nardelli, J., Khung, S., Delezoide, A.-L., Milenkovic, I., Rasika, S., Manivet, P., Benifla, J.-L., Deriot, N., Gressens, P., & Adle-Biassette, H.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Networked Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Institute of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • APHP, Service de Biologie du Développement, Hôpital Robert-Debré, APHP, Paris, France
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
  • APHP, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Lariboisère, Paris, France
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2018-05-02
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
2458-2478
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2802269477
Cited by
169
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
European Commission (HEALTH-2011-2.2.2-2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
radial glia, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, adult neurogenesis, Alzheimer's disease, neural progenitor cells, human fetal development, ventricular zone, doublecortin, nestin, aging
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Fetus, Gestational Age, Hippocampus, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Ki-67 Antigen, Neurogenesis, Young Adult, Neural Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review