Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of Resveratrol, Green Tea Extract, Curcumin, Oxaloacetic Acid, and Medium-Chain Triglyceride Oil on Life Span of Genetically Heterogeneous Mice

Strong, R., Miller, R. A., Astle, C. M., Baur, J. A., de Cabo, R., Fernandez, E., Guo, W., Javors, M., Kirkland, J. L., Nelson, J. F., Sinclair, D. A., Teter, B., Williams, D., Zaveri, N., Nadon, N. L., Harrison, D. E.·2013·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/gls070

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resveratrol does not extend mouse lifespan under normal dietary conditions.

    “although resveratrol does not extend mouse lifespan under normal dietary conditions”

    From The Hallmarks of Aging (2013) · cites this paper as Strong et al., 2012

  • University of Michigan site was found to have longer lifespan for male mice than the other sites.

    “For male mice we used ITP data from the Jackson Laboratory and the University of Texas and excluded data from University of Michigan as this site was found to have longer lifespan for male mice then the other sites71.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Miller, 2002, The Milbank quarterly, 80, 155, 10.1111/1468-0009.00006 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2006, International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 22, 10.1093/ije/dyi283 · DOI
  3. 1996, The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 51, B448
  4. Schneider, 1985, New England Journal of Medicine, 312, 1159, 10.1056/NEJM198505023121805 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cotzias, 1977, Science, 196, 549, 10.1126/science.850799 · DOI
  6. Miller, 2007, Aging cell, 6, 565, 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00311.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2008, AGE DORDR, 30, 187, 10.1007/s11357-008-9048-1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2011, The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 66, 191
  9. Valenzano, 2006, Current biology : CB, 16, 296, 10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.038 · DOI
  10. Pearson, 2008, 8, 157, 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
  11. KITANI, 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1019, 424, 10.1196/annals.1297.075 · DOI
  12. Kitani, 2007, Biogerontology, 8, 567, 10.1007/s10522-007-9100-z · DOI
  13. Salah, 1995, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 322, 339, 10.1006/abbi.1995.1473 · DOI
  14. Pietta, 2000, Journal of Natural Products (Print), 63, 1035, 10.1021/np9904509 · DOI
  15. Han, 2003, Obesity, 11, 734, 10.1038/oby.2003.103 · DOI
  16. Bluher, 2003, Science, 299, 572, 10.1126/science.1078223 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Williams, 2009, Aging cell, 8, 765, 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00527.x · DOI
  18. Nicholls, 2006, Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 5, 493, 10.1038/nrd2060 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Bass, 2007, Mechanisms of ageing and development, 128, 546, 10.1016/j.mad.2007.07.007 · DOI
  20. Maheshwari, 2006, Life sciences, 78, 2081, 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2003, Mutation Research, 523 524, 127, 10.1016/S0027-5107(02)00328-7 · DOI
  22. Sharma, 2004, Clinical Cancer Research, 10, 6847, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0744 · DOI
  23. Frautschy, 2001, Neurobiology of aging, 22, 993, 10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00300-1 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lim, 2001, Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 8370, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-21-08370.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kumar, 2005, Molecular vision [electronic resource], 11, 561
  26. Suryanarayana, 2005, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 46, 2092, 10.1167/iovs.04-1304 · DOI
  27. Soni, 1992, Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology, 36, 273
  28. Soudamini, 1992, Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology, 36, 239
  29. Zaveri, 2006, Life sciences, 78, 2073, 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.12.006 · DOI
  30. Sagar, 2006, 13, 14, 10.3747/co.v13i1.77 · DOI
  31. Yang, 1999, Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology, 45, 337, 10.3177/jnsv.45.337 · DOI
  32. Khan, 1992, Cancer Research, 52, 4050
  33. Kimura, 2002, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 56, 1186, 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601471 · DOI
  34. uczaj, 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A, 67, 595, 10.1080/15287390490425579 · DOI
  35. Crozier, 1987, Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 36, 807, 10.1016/0026-0495(87)90122-3 · DOI
  36. Kono, 2003, Annals of surgery, 237, 246, 10.1097/00000658-200302000-00014 · DOI
  37. Reger, 2004, Neurobiology of aging, 25, 311, 10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00087-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Strong, R., Miller, R. A., Astle, C. M., Baur, J. A., de Cabo, R., Fernandez, E., Guo, W., Javors, M., Kirkland, J. L., Nelson, J. F., Sinclair, D. A., Teter, B., Williams, D., Zaveri, N., Nadon, N. L., & Harrison, D. E.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2012-03-26
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
6-16
ISSN
  • 1079-5006
  • 1758-535X
Cited by
212
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review