Cited by 371Muscle metabolism and nutritionRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Oral leucine administration stimulates protein synthesis in rat skeletal muscle

Open access
Crozier, Stephen J., Kimball, Scot R., Emmert, Sans W., Anthony, Joshua C., Jefferson, Leonard S.·2005·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Oral administration of a single bolus of leucine in an amount equivalent to the daily intake (1.35 g/kg body wt) enhances skeletal muscle protein synthesis in food-deprived rats. To elucidate whether smaller amounts of leucine can also stimulate protein synthesis, rats were administered the amino acid at concentrations ranging from 0.068 to 1.35 g/kg body wt by oral gavage. Thirty minutes following the administration of doses of leucine as low as 0.135 g/kg body wt, skeletal muscle protein synthesis was significantly greater than control values. The increase in protein synthesis was associated with changes in the regulation of biomarkers of mRNA translation initiation as evidenced by upregulated phosphorylation of the translational repressor, eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), the association of eIF4G with the mRNA cap binding protein eIF4E, and the phosphorylation of the 70-kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase. Alterations in the phosphorylation of eIF4G, as well as the association of 4E-BP1 with eIF4E, were observed following leucine administration; however, these changes appeared to be biphasic with maximal changes occurring when circulating insulin concentrations were elevated. Thus it appears that leucine administration affects mRNA translation and skeletal muscle protein synthesis through modulation of multiple biomarkers of mRNA translation. The ability of small doses of leucine to stimulate skeletal muscle protein synthesis suggests that future research on the regulation of skeletal muscle protein synthesis by orally administered leucine will be feasible in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/135.3.376

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As leucine enters the muscle it triggers protein synthesis largely through its ability to activate mTORC1.

    “As leucine enters the muscle it acts to trigger protein synthesis largely through its ability to activate mTORC1 [19].”

    From Using Molecular Biology to Maximize Concurrent Training (2014) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that oral leucine stimulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis in food-deprived rats and describes an mTOR-dependent effect on a translation-initiation regulator. It also says another leucine-induced change involves both mTOR-dependent and mTOR-independent pathways, and that the study cannot determine which pathways mediate the increase in protein synthesis. It therefore does not establish that activation of mTORC1 accounts for most of that increase. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only a fraction of maximal mTORC1 activity (~30%) is required to fully saturate muscle protein synthesis.

    “Furthermore, only a fraction of maximal mTORC1 activity (~30%) is required to fully saturate muscle protein synthesis [98,99].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crozier, S. J., Kimball, S. R., Emmert, S. W., Anthony, J. C., & Jefferson, L. S.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Jefferson, Leonard S.
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
135
Issue
3
Pages
376-382
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165232899
Cited by
371
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 29
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-15658, R01DK015658)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
leucine, skeletal muscle protein synthesis, mRNA translation, eIF4E, 4E-BP1, eIF4G, S6K, insulin, food deprivation, translational regulation
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Food Deprivation, Insulin, Kinetics, Leucine, Phenylalanine, Proteins, Muscle, Skeletal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review