Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RCSB Protein Data Bank: biological macromolecular structures enabling research and education in fundamental biology, biomedicine, biotechnology and energy

Open access
Burley, Stephen K, Berman, Helen M, Bhikadiya, Charmi, Bi, Chunxiao, Chen, Li, Di Costanzo, Luigi, Christie, Cole, Dalenberg, Ken, Duarte, Jose M, Dutta, Shuchismita, Feng, Zukang, Ghosh, Sutapa, Goodsell, David S, Green, Rachel K, Guranović, Vladimir, Guzenko, Dmytro, Hudson, Brian P, Kalro, Tara, Liang, Yuhe, Lowe, Robert, Namkoong, Harry, Peisach, Ezra, Periskova, Irina, Prlić, Andreas, Randle, Chris, Rose, Alexander, Rose, Peter, Sala, Raul, Sekharan, Monica, Shao, Chenghua, Tan, Lihua, Tao, Yi-Ping, Valasatava, Yana, Voigt, Maria, Westbrook, John, Woo, Jesse, Yang, Huanwang, Young, Jasmine, Zhuravleva, Marina, Zardecki, Christine·2019·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB, rcsb.org), the US data center for the global PDB archive, serves thousands of Data Depositors in the Americas and Oceania and makes 3D macromolecular structure data available at no charge and without usage restrictions to more than 1 million rcsb.org Users worldwide and 600 000 pdb101.rcsb.org education-focused Users around the globe. PDB Data Depositors include structural biologists using macromolecular crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and 3D electron microscopy. PDB Data Consumers include researchers, educators and students studying Fundamental Biology, Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Energy. Recent reorganization of RCSB PDB activities into four integrated, interdependent services is described in detail, together with tools and resources added over the past 2 years to RCSB PDB web portals in support of a 'Structural View of Biology.'

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gky1004

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Bank, 1971, Crystallography: Protein Data Bank, Nat. New Biol., 233, 223, 10.1038/newbio233223b0 · DOI
  2. Berman, 2000, The Protein Data Bank, Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235, 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Berman, 2008, The Protein Data Bank: a historical perspective, Acta Crystallogr. A, 64, 88, 10.1107/S0108767307035623 · DOI
  4. Burley, 2017, Protein Data Bank (PDB): The single global macromolecular structure archive, 627, 10.1007/978-1-4939-7000-1_26 · DOI · Paper page
  5. wwPDB consortium, 2019, Protein Data Bank: The single global archive for 3D macromolecular structure data jointly managed by the Worldwide Protein Data Bank, Nucleic Acid Res., 10.1093/nar/gky949 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Burley, 2018, RCSB Protein Data Bank: sustaining a living digital data resource that enables breakthroughs in scientific research and biomedical education, Protein Sci., 27, 316, 10.1002/pro.3331 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Rose, 2017, The RCSB protein data bank: integrative view of protein, gene and 3D structural information, Nucleic Acids Res., 45, D271
  8. Basner, 2017, Berman HM et al., (2000), The Protein Data Bank
  9. Markosian, 2018, Analysis of impact metrics for the Protein Data Bank, Sci. Data, 5, 180212, 10.1038/sdata.2018.212 · DOI
  10. Mir, 2018, PDBe: towards reusable data delivery infrastructure at protein data bank in Europe, Nucleic Acids Res., 46, D486, 10.1093/nar/gkx1070 · DOI
  11. Kinjo, 2017, Protein Data Bank Japan (PDBj): updated user interfaces, resource description framework, analysis tools for large structures, Nucleic Acids Res., 45, D282, 10.1093/nar/gkw962 · DOI
  12. Young, 2017, OneDep: Unified wwPDB system for deposition, biocuration, and validation of macromolecular structures in the PDB archive, Structure, 25, 536, 10.1016/j.str.2017.01.004 · DOI
  13. Gore, 2017, Validation of the structures in the Protein Data Bank, Structure, 25, 1916, 10.1016/j.str.2017.10.009 · DOI
  14. Young, 2018, Worldwide Protein Data Bank biocuration supporting open access to high-quality 3D structural biology data, Database, 2018, bay002, 10.1093/database/bay002 · DOI
  15. Yang, 2004, Automated and accurate deposition of structures solved by X-ray diffraction to the Protein Data Bank, Acta Crystallogr. D, 60, 1833, 10.1107/S0907444904019419 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Yang, 2016, DCC: a Swiss army knife for structure factor analysis and validation, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 49, 1081, 10.1107/S1600576716004428 · DOI
  17. Fitzgerald, 2005, 4.5 Macromolecular dictionary (mmCIF), 295
  18. Westbrook, 2005, The Use of mmCIF Architecture for PDB Data Management, 539
  19. Westbrook, 2009, Chapter 10 The PDB format, mmCIF formats, and other data formats, 271
  20. Fitzgerald, 2005, 3.6 Classification and use of macromolecular data, 144
  21. Westbrook, 2005, Ontologies for three-dimensional molecular structure, 3474, 10.1002/047001153X.g408315 · DOI
  22. Bourne, 1997, Macromolecular crystallographic information file, Methods Enzymol., 277, 571, 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)77032-0 · DOI
  23. Westbrook, 2015, The chemical component dictionary: complete descriptions of constituent molecules in experimentally determined 3D macromolecules in the Protein Data Bank, Bioinformatics, 31, 1274, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu789 · DOI
  24. Dutta, 2014, Improving the representation of peptide-like inhibitor and antibiotic molecules in the Protein Data Bank, Biopolymers, 101, 659, 10.1002/bip.22434 · DOI
  25. Henrick, 2008, Remediation of the protein data bank archive, Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D426, 10.1093/nar/gkm937 · DOI
  26. Lawson, 2008, Representation of viruses in the remediated PDB archive, Acta Crystallogr. D, D64, 874, 10.1107/S0907444908017393 · DOI
  27. Sen, 2014, Small molecule annotation for the Protein Data Bank, Database (Oxford), 2014, bau116, 10.1093/database/bau116 · DOI
  28. Velankar, 2013, SIFTS: Structure integration with function, taxonomy and sequences resource, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D483, 10.1093/nar/gks1258 · DOI
  29. Tafreshi, 2017, Proximity-Based Adaptation of Web Content on Public Displays, 282
  30. Ormo, 1996, Crystal structure of the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein, Science, 273, 1392, 10.1126/science.273.5280.1392 · DOI
  31. Kvansakul, 2001, Structural basis for the high-affinity interaction of nidogen-1 with immunoglobulin-like domain 3 of perlecan, EMBO J., 20, 5342, 10.1093/emboj/20.19.5342 · DOI
  32. Brunk, 2018, Recon3D: a resource enabling a three-dimensional view of gene variation in human metabolism, Nat. Biotechnol., 36, 272, 10.1038/nbt.4072 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Wassermann, 2011, BindingDB and ChEMBL: online compound databases for drug discovery, Exp. Opin. Drug Discov., 6, 683, 10.1517/17460441.2011.579100 · DOI
  34. Gao, 2017, BioJava-ModFinder: identification of protein modifications in 3D structures from the Protein Data Bank, Bioinformatics, 33, 2047, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx101 · DOI
  35. 2017, Best of the Web, Genet. Engin. Biotechnol. News, 37, 30
  36. Hrabe, 2016, PDBFlex: exploring flexibility in protein structures, Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D423, 10.1093/nar/gkv1316 · DOI
  37. Bradley, 2017, MMTF-An efficient file format for the transmission, visualization, and analysis of macromolecular structures, PLoS Comput. Biol., 13, e1005575, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005575 · DOI
  38. Bliven, 2018, Automated evaluation of quaternary structures from protein crystals, PLoS Comput. Biol., 14, e1006104, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006104 · DOI
  39. Van Noorden, 2014, The top 100 papers, Nature, 514, 550, 10.1038/514550a · DOI
  40. Rose, 2015, The RCSB Protein Data Bank: views of structural biology for basic and applied research and education, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D345, 10.1093/nar/gku1214 · DOI
  41. Rose, 2013, The RCSB Protein Data Bank: new resources for research and education, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D475, 10.1093/nar/gks1200 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Rose, 2011, The RCSB Protein Data Bank: redesigned web site and web services, Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D392, 10.1093/nar/gkq1021 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Kouranov, 2006, The RCSB PDB information portal for structural genomics, Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D302, 10.1093/nar/gkj120 · DOI
  44. Deshpande, 2005, The RCSB Protein Data Bank: a redesigned query system and relational database based on the mmCIF schema, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D233, 10.1093/nar/gki057 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Bourne, 2004, The distribution and query systems of the RCSB Protein Data Bank, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D223, 10.1093/nar/gkh096 · DOI
  46. Westbrook, 2003, The Protein Data Bank and structural genomics, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 489, 10.1093/nar/gkg068 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Bhat, 2001, The PDB data uniformity project, Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 214, 10.1093/nar/29.1.214 · DOI
  48. Deneka, 2018, Structure of a volume-regulated anion channel of the LRRC8 family, Nature, 558, 254, 10.1038/s41586-018-0134-y · DOI
  49. Bollag, 2010, Clinical efficacy of a RAF inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF-mutant melanoma, Nature, 467, 596, 10.1038/nature09454 · DOI
  50. Cai, 2013, The structure of CcmP, a tandem bacterial microcompartment domain protein from the beta-carboxysome, forms a subcompartment within a microcompartment, J. Biol. Chem., 288, 16055, 10.1074/jbc.M113.456897 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Burley, S. K., Berman, H. M., Bhikadiya, C., Bi, C., Chen, L., Di Costanzo, L., Christie, C., Dalenberg, K., Duarte, J. M., Dutta, S., Feng, Z., Ghosh, S., Goodsell, D. S., Green, R. K., Guranović, V., Guzenko, D., Hudson, B. P., Kalro, T., Liang, Y., Lowe, R., Namkoong, H., Peisach, E., Periskova, I., Prlić, A., Randle, C., Rose, A., Rose, P., Sala, R., Sekharan, M., Shao, C., Tan, L., Tao, Y.-P., Valasatava, Y., Voigt, M., Westbrook, J., Woo, J., Yang, H., Young, J., Zhuravleva, M., & Zardecki, C.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2018-10-24
Volume
47
Issue
D1
Pages
D464-D474
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2898364362
Cited by
1,243
References
6
FWCI
56.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF-DBI 1338415)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.