Cited by 386Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Death among Women: Psychosocial Predictors from a 20-Year Follow-up of Women in the Framingham Study

Eaker, Elaine D., Pinsky, Joan, Castelli, William P.·1992·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

This study investigates the relation of psychosocial variables to the 20-year incidence of myocardial infarction or coronary death among women in the Framingham Study. In 1965-1967, a psychosocial interview was given along with the collection of other coronary risk factor data. This study includes 749 women aged 45-64 years who were free of coronary disease at this baseline examination. Demographic variables, psychosocial scales (such as tension and reactions of anger), and individual interview items (such as attitudes toward children, money, and religion) were measured. When age, systolic blood pressure, the ratio of serum total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes, cigarette smoking, and body mass index were controlled for in multivariate proportional hazards models, the predictors of the 20-year incidence of myocardial infarction or coronary death were as follows: among employed women, perceived financial status only; among homemakers, symptoms of tension and anxiety, being lonely during the day, difficulty falling asleep, infrequent vacations, housework affecting health, and believing one is prone to heart disease (p less than 0.05 for all variables); and among both groups of women combined, low educational level, tension, and lack of vacations. These results are discussed in relation to previous findings from the Framingham Study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116381

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Eaker, E. D., Pinsky, J., & Castelli, W. P.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
  • Framingham Heart Study (US)
Corresponding author
Eaker, Elaine D.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1992-04-15
Volume
135
Issue
8
Pages
854-864
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2268721432
Cited by
386
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease mortality, women, psychosocial risk factors, tension, anxiety, loneliness, sleep disorders, holidays, housework, educational attainment, Framingham Heart Study, middle-aged women
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Death, Sudden, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review