CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 320Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisSmoking Behavior and Cessation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Beaver Dam Eye Study: The Relation of Age-related Maculopathy to Smoking

Klein, Ronald, Klein, Barbara E. K., Linton, Kathryn L. P., DeMets, David L.·1993·American Journal of Epidemiology
DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116659
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There are conflicting reports regarding the relation of cigarette smoking to age-related maculopathy, a major cause of blindness in the United States. In this report, the authors examined this association in people aged 43-86 years (n = 4,771) who participated in the Beaver Dam Eye Study, Beaver Dam, Wisconsin (1988-1990). Exposure data on cigarette smoking were derived from questions about present and past smoking, duration of smoking, and the number of cigarettes smoked per day. Age-related maculopathy status was determined by grading stereoscopic color fundus photographs using the Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy Grading System. Smoking status, pack-years smoked, and current exposure to passive smoking were not associated with drusen characteristics (type, area, and confluence) or signs of early age-related maculopathy in any age-sex group studied, except for a higher frequency of increased retinal pigment in males who had ever smoked compared with those who had never smoked. The relative odds for exudative macular degeneration, one form of late age-related maculopathy, in females who were current smokers was 2.50 (95% confidence interval 1.01-6.20) compared with those who were ex-smokers or never smokers; for males, it was 3.29 (95% confidence interval 1.03-10.50). There was no significant relation between smoking status and pure geographic atrophy, another form of late age-related maculopathy. These results suggest that exudative macular degeneration is associated with cigarette smoking and that different forms of macular degeneration may have different etiologies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116659

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Linton, K. L. P., & DeMets, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
ORCID
DeMets, David L.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1993-01-15
Volume
137
Issue
2
Pages
190-200
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
DOI
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116659
OpenAlex
W2141960190
Cited by
320
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (U10 EYO6594, U10EY006594)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
age-related maculopathy, cigarette smoking, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, drusen, retinal pigment, passive smoking, geographic atrophy, Beaver Dam Eye Study, pack-years, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Smoking, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Wisconsin, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review