Cited by 9Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyFree Will and Agency

Performance monitoring during a minimal group manipulation

Open access
Pfabigan, Daniela M., Holzner, Marie-Theres, Lamm, Claus·2016·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

The on-going (self-)monitoring of our behaviour is inextricably intertwined with the surrounding social context. In this study, we investigated whether a minimal group paradigm assigning individuals to arbitrary group categories is powerful enough to induce changes in behavioural, psychophysiological and event-related potential correlates of performance monitoring. Following arbitrary group assignment based on ostensible task performance and a group identification task, 22 volunteers performed a flanker-task during both in-group and out-group contexts, while electroencephalography was performed. More errors were committed in the out-group compared with the in-group context. Error-related negativity amplitudes were larger for in-group compared with out-group errors. However, subsequent processing reflected in late Pe amplitudes and stimulus-driven conflict reflected in N2 amplitudes were not affected by the group context. Heart rate deceleration (during both correct and incorrect trials) tended to be more pronounced during the out-group compared with the in-group context. This surprising observation was corroborated by subjective ratings of performance satisfaction, in which participants reported higher satisfaction with their out-group performance. This study identified specific stimulus evaluation processes to be affected by a minimal group manipulation and demonstrated thereby transient top-down effects of a social context manipulation on performance monitoring.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsw071

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hautzinger, M., Keller, F., Ku ¨hner, C. (2006) BDI-II Beck-Depressions- Inventar, Frankfurt: Pearson Assessment.
  2. Robinson, M.D. (Ed.), et al. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, Guilford Press, 272-90.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfabigan, D. M., Holzner, M.-T., & Lamm, C.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2016-05-20
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
1560-1568
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2407484641
Cited by
9
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universität Wien
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
performance monitoring, minimal group paradigm, group identification, error-related negativity, flanker task, heart rate deceleration, performance satisfaction, event-related potentials
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Social Identification, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review